You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pagespeed.apache.org by Otto van der Schaaf <os...@we-amp.com> on 2017/12/04 21:13:09 UTC
Draft for the December podling report
Hi all,
I have a draft ready for the December podling report over at:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10kz6tIvLoZiuD9SQtYKBVB3TaUawIXc2N6-fSX5Q9eY/edit?usp=sharing
Any thoughts? Anything that should be added / changed?
Please let me know!
Otto
Re: Draft for the December podling report
Posted by Otto van der Schaaf <os...@we-amp.com>.
Nick, Leif, thanks for the feedback.
I've iterated on the draft and saved changes, hope it looks better now!
Otto
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 6:47 PM Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> > On Dec 5, 2017, at 3:48 AM, Nick Kew <ni...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 21:13 +0000, Otto van der Schaaf wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I have a draft ready for the December podling report over at:
> >>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/10kz6tIvLoZiuD9SQtYKBVB3TaUawIXc2N6-fSX5Q9eY/edit?usp=sharing
> >>
> >> Any thoughts? Anything that should be added / changed?
> >> Please let me know!
> >
> > - Overall looks good, thanks.
> > - Couple of places I'd add an explicit "No" or "N/A" where
> > there's nothing to say under a template heading.
> > - Possibly a bit much technical detail in the project progress
> > section, most notably "Progress was made on [something you have
> > to be pretty close to the project to understand]".
> > And is Debian inclusion really an apache matter?
>
>
> I’m somewhat torn on having all this release information on a release
> that’s not ASF related in any way. If it was me, I’d just focus on the work
> that is being done under the ASF umbrella, saying that we are working on
> getting the source code into the ASF repository. What google does and
> releases is semi-irrelevant to us as an ASF podling, no?
>
> — Leif
>
>
Re: Draft for the December podling report
Posted by Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org>.
> On Dec 5, 2017, at 3:48 AM, Nick Kew <ni...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 21:13 +0000, Otto van der Schaaf wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have a draft ready for the December podling report over at:
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/10kz6tIvLoZiuD9SQtYKBVB3TaUawIXc2N6-fSX5Q9eY/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>> Any thoughts? Anything that should be added / changed?
>> Please let me know!
>
> - Overall looks good, thanks.
> - Couple of places I'd add an explicit "No" or "N/A" where
> there's nothing to say under a template heading.
> - Possibly a bit much technical detail in the project progress
> section, most notably "Progress was made on [something you have
> to be pretty close to the project to understand]".
> And is Debian inclusion really an apache matter?
I’m somewhat torn on having all this release information on a release that’s not ASF related in any way. If it was me, I’d just focus on the work that is being done under the ASF umbrella, saying that we are working on getting the source code into the ASF repository. What google does and releases is semi-irrelevant to us as an ASF podling, no?
— Leif
Re: Draft for the December podling report
Posted by Nick Kew <ni...@apache.org>.
On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 21:13 +0000, Otto van der Schaaf wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a draft ready for the December podling report over at:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/10kz6tIvLoZiuD9SQtYKBVB3TaUawIXc2N6-fSX5Q9eY/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Any thoughts? Anything that should be added / changed?
> Please let me know!
- Overall looks good, thanks.
- Couple of places I'd add an explicit "No" or "N/A" where
there's nothing to say under a template heading.
- Possibly a bit much technical detail in the project progress
section, most notably "Progress was made on [something you have
to be pretty close to the project to understand]".
And is Debian inclusion really an apache matter?
I'm not saying you should change any of the technical detail,
but perhaps think more "executive summary" in future?
"Work continues on matters of protocol compliance".
"We're talking with Debian about packaging pagespeed".
Bear in mind the board has a lot of reports to read!
Or maybe that's just me?
--
Nick Kew
Re: Draft for the December podling report
Posted by Otto van der Schaaf <os...@we-amp.com>.
I started out on Docs out of sheer habit. Moved this over to the Wiki!
Otto
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:31 AM Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> > On Dec 4, 2017, at 2:13 PM, Otto van der Schaaf <os...@we-amp.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a draft ready for the December podling report over at:
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/10kz6tIvLoZiuD9SQtYKBVB3TaUawIXc2N6-fSX5Q9eY/edit?usp=sharing
> >
> > Any thoughts? Anything that should be added / changed?
> > Please let me know!
> >
>
>
> Why google docs? Just edit it on the Wiki directly?
>
> — Leif
>
>
>
Re: Draft for the December podling report
Posted by Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org>.
> On Dec 4, 2017, at 2:13 PM, Otto van der Schaaf <os...@we-amp.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have a draft ready for the December podling report over at:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/10kz6tIvLoZiuD9SQtYKBVB3TaUawIXc2N6-fSX5Q9eY/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Any thoughts? Anything that should be added / changed?
> Please let me know!
>
Why google docs? Just edit it on the Wiki directly?
— Leif