You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Sander Striker <st...@apache.org> on 2004/01/08 12:00:12 UTC
Backporting www?, WAS: Re: svn commit: r8170 -
branches/1.0-stabilization
On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 20:52, David Summers wrote:
> Does this mean the dist process should take out the www directory and
> sub-directories before the tarball is rolled?
>
> Not a big deal. It's just nice to include accurate information if you
> are going to include the information. :-)
IMHO, we have a very simple solution:
svn mv http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/www \
http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn
That way it is in it's own space, is not included in any distribution,
and is not subject to the question if there should be back/forward
ports between branches.
Sander
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Backporting www?, WAS: Re: svn commit: r8170 - branches/1.0-stabilization
Posted by kf...@collab.net.
kfogel@collab.net writes:
> > The discussion on IRC was something about SourceCast compatability was
> > the reason it was in there.
>
> Right now, it's not an issue (we can easily adjust the live website
> for such a change). If it becomes an issue later, we can deal with it
> then -- it would be trivial to move www/ back if there were no other
> solution, and leave a placeholder explanation in the old location.
Heh. Sometimes I get enthused about an idea, and then realize the
negative ramifications only later :-).
Can we not do this change? It's just a distraction. We'd have to
tweak dist.sh, tweak the live web site, and then when tigris.org gets
upgraded, we'll have to either revert it all, or tweak the site again.
We've got more important things to worry about. I'm sorry I ever +1'd
it.
The cost of inaction is merely that we have a (slightly) outdated www/
area in branches. Not a huge problem.
Oops, I hear the alarm on my bikeshed going off, gotta run,
-Karl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Backporting www?, WAS: Re: svn commit: r8170 - branches/1.0-stabilization
Posted by kf...@collab.net.
Ben Reser <be...@reser.org> writes:
> > This may have repercussions in dist.sh and elsewhere. Probably
> > trivial ones, though.
>
> The discussion on IRC was something about SourceCast compatability was
> the reason it was in there.
Right now, it's not an issue (we can easily adjust the live website
for such a change). If it becomes an issue later, we can deal with it
then -- it would be trivial to move www/ back if there were no other
solution, and leave a placeholder explanation in the old location.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Backporting www?, WAS: Re: svn commit: r8170 - branches/1.0-stabilization
Posted by Ben Reser <be...@reser.org>.
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 12:16:39PM -0600, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> +1 from me too. Let's wait a couple of days for others' thoughts
> before doing it.
>
> This may have repercussions in dist.sh and elsewhere. Probably
> trivial ones, though.
The discussion on IRC was something about SourceCast compatability was
the reason it was in there.
--
Ben Reser <be...@reser.org>
http://ben.reser.org
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Backporting www?, WAS: Re: svn commit: r8170 - branches/1.0-stabilization
Posted by kf...@collab.net.
Eric Gillespie <ep...@pretzelnet.org> writes:
> Sander Striker <st...@apache.org> writes:
> > IMHO, we have a very simple solution:
> >
> > svn mv http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/www \
> > http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn
>
> +1
>
> I first suggested this around two years ago, and no one saw the
> point. I've suggested it a few times since then, including
> yesterday, never to much interest. Having this stuff in
> subversion WCs and tar files is just plain silly.
+1 from me too. Let's wait a couple of days for others' thoughts
before doing it.
This may have repercussions in dist.sh and elsewhere. Probably
trivial ones, though.
-Karl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Backporting www?, WAS: Re: svn commit: r8170 - branches/1.0-stabilization
Posted by Eric Gillespie <ep...@pretzelnet.org>.
Sander Striker <st...@apache.org> writes:
> IMHO, we have a very simple solution:
>
> svn mv http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/www \
> http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn
+1
I first suggested this around two years ago, and no one saw the
point. I've suggested it a few times since then, including
yesterday, never to much interest. Having this stuff in
subversion WCs and tar files is just plain silly.
--
Eric Gillespie <*> epg@pretzelnet.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Backporting www?, WAS: Re: svn commit: r8170 - branches/1.0-stabilization
Posted by John Szakmeister <jo...@szakmeister.net>.
On Thursday 08 January 2004 07:00, Sander Striker wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 20:52, David Summers wrote:
> > Does this mean the dist process should take out the www directory and
> > sub-directories before the tarball is rolled?
> >
> > Not a big deal. It's just nice to include accurate information if you
> > are going to include the information. :-)
>
> IMHO, we have a very simple solution:
>
> svn mv http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/www \
> http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn
>
> That way it is in it's own space, is not included in any distribution,
> and is not subject to the question if there should be back/forward
> ports between branches.
I like it! +1 from me.
-John
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org