You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@myfaces.apache.org by Rogerio Pereira <ro...@gmail.com> on 2006/07/19 21:23:33 UTC
about a new contribution
I would like know if a commiter can take a look on this jira issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-549
and tell me if can be included on sandbox.
--
Yours truly (Atenciosamente),
Rogério
Re: about a new contribution
Posted by Rogerio Pereira <ro...@gmail.com>.
I would like help on this effort.
2006/7/19, Rogerio Pereira <ro...@gmail.com>:
>
> Ok, i'll close this issue.
>
> 2006/7/19, Cagatay Civici <ca...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Although the component looks very useful, it leads to an overlap.
> >
> > As Mario mentioned the generic approach we are going to add for client
> > side validation-conversion already covers these kinds of requirements.
> >
> > Instead of new components and new tags, the mechanism will be enabled on
> > the current components.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Cagatay
> >
> >
> > On 7/19/06, Mario Ivankovits <ma...@ops.co.at> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > > > I would like know if a commiter can take a look on this jira issue:
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-549
> > > >
> > > > and tell me if can be included on sandbox.
> > > Unhappily I think the upcoming client side validation and converter
> > > stuff we plan to add to tomahawk will supersede your approach.
> > > This is a general approach how to deal with input - also with
> > > onkeypress
> > > stuff.
> > >
> > > Correct me if I am wrong, else, sorry for the work :-(
> > >
> > > Ciao,
> > > Mario
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Yours truly (Atenciosamente),
>
> Rogério
>
--
Yours truly (Atenciosamente),
Rogério
Re: about a new contribution
Posted by Rogerio Pereira <ro...@gmail.com>.
Ok, i'll close this issue.
2006/7/19, Cagatay Civici <ca...@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi,
>
> Although the component looks very useful, it leads to an overlap.
>
> As Mario mentioned the generic approach we are going to add for client
> side validation-conversion already covers these kinds of requirements.
>
> Instead of new components and new tags, the mechanism will be enabled on
> the current components.
>
> Regards,
>
> Cagatay
>
>
> On 7/19/06, Mario Ivankovits <ma...@ops.co.at> wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> > > I would like know if a commiter can take a look on this jira issue:
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-549
> > >
> > > and tell me if can be included on sandbox.
> > Unhappily I think the upcoming client side validation and converter
> > stuff we plan to add to tomahawk will supersede your approach.
> > This is a general approach how to deal with input - also with onkeypress
> > stuff.
> >
> > Correct me if I am wrong, else, sorry for the work :-(
> >
> > Ciao,
> > Mario
> >
> >
>
--
Yours truly (Atenciosamente),
Rogério
Re: about a new contribution
Posted by Cagatay Civici <ca...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Although the component looks very useful, it leads to an overlap.
As Mario mentioned the generic approach we are going to add for client side
validation-conversion already covers these kinds of requirements.
Instead of new components and new tags, the mechanism will be enabled on the
current components.
Regards,
Cagatay
On 7/19/06, Mario Ivankovits <ma...@ops.co.at> wrote:
>
> Hi!
> > I would like know if a commiter can take a look on this jira issue:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-549
> >
> > and tell me if can be included on sandbox.
> Unhappily I think the upcoming client side validation and converter
> stuff we plan to add to tomahawk will supersede your approach.
> This is a general approach how to deal with input - also with onkeypress
> stuff.
>
> Correct me if I am wrong, else, sorry for the work :-(
>
> Ciao,
> Mario
>
>
Re: about a new contribution
Posted by Mario Ivankovits <ma...@ops.co.at>.
Hi!
> I would like know if a commiter can take a look on this jira issue:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-549
>
> and tell me if can be included on sandbox.
Unhappily I think the upcoming client side validation and converter
stuff we plan to add to tomahawk will supersede your approach.
This is a general approach how to deal with input - also with onkeypress
stuff.
Correct me if I am wrong, else, sorry for the work :-(
Ciao,
Mario