You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Rene Moser <ma...@renemoser.net> on 2015/11/05 09:34:52 UTC
git tags on cloudstack repo
Hi
I have kind of a question about the tagging policy in cloudstack git repo:
We now have tag 4.6.0 but we call it an RC. This raises 2 problems:
1st: from the public perspective, this is a released version. Or how can
anyone not related to the project see, if this is an RC or not?
2nd: tags seems not to be persistent. If we decide to do another RC, the
tag would be moved to another commit. If we test "4.6.0" we can not say
which version has been tested.
Proposal: We adopt the well known versioning model "semantic versioning"
http://semver.org/.
This means the RC would have been named 4.6.0-RC20151104T1522 or 4.6.0-rc.1
Do I miss anything? Any thoughts?
Regards
René
Re: git tags on cloudstack repo
Posted by Boris Schrijver <bo...@pcextreme.nl>.
Good point! Hadn't looked there. I don't think we should tag an RC as it's still
under active development.
--
Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards,
Boris Schrijver
PCextreme B.V.
http://www.pcextreme.nl/contact
Tel direct: +31 6 33784542
> On November 5, 2015 at 9:47 AM Rene Moser <ma...@renemoser.net> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/05/2015 09:45 AM, Erik Weber wrote:
>
> > Unless I'm seeing wrong, we have a branch, and it's called
>
> I am not seeing it on github yet, but on here
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tags
>
Re: git tags on cloudstack repo
Posted by Rene Moser <ma...@renemoser.net>.
On 11/05/2015 09:45 AM, Erik Weber wrote:
> Unless I'm seeing wrong, we have a branch, and it's called
I am not seeing it on github yet, but on here
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tags
Re: git tags on cloudstack repo
Posted by Boris Schrijver <bo...@pcextreme.nl>.
I don't see a tag either. When the RC passes its vote, then a tag and
corresponding release will be created. Until then, we just have the rc branch.
--
Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards,
Boris Schrijver
PCextreme B.V.
http://www.pcextreme.nl/contact
Tel direct: +31 6 33784542
> On November 5, 2015 at 9:45 AM Erik Weber <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Rene Moser <ma...@renemoser.net> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I have kind of a question about the tagging policy in cloudstack git repo:
> >
> > We now have tag 4.6.0 but we call it an RC. This raises 2 problems:
> >
> >
> Unless I'm seeing wrong, we have a branch, and it's called
> '4.6.0-RC20151104T1522'
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.6.0-RC20151104T1522
>
> Where are you seeing the 4.6.0 tag?
>
> --
> Erik
Re: git tags on cloudstack repo
Posted by Erik Weber <te...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Rene Moser <ma...@renemoser.net> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have kind of a question about the tagging policy in cloudstack git repo:
>
> We now have tag 4.6.0 but we call it an RC. This raises 2 problems:
>
>
Unless I'm seeing wrong, we have a branch, and it's called
'4.6.0-RC20151104T1522'
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.6.0-RC20151104T1522
Where are you seeing the 4.6.0 tag?
--
Erik
Re: git tags on cloudstack repo
Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Remi Bergsma <RB...@schubergphilis.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I accidentally pushed the 4.6.0 tag and I shouldn't have done that before
>> it is final. Sorry!
>>
>> Let's see if we can get rid of it until the vote passes.
>>
>> Regards, Remi
>>
>> git push apache :4.6.0
--
Daan
Re: git tags on cloudstack repo
Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
I don't like the rc1 tag. The date tag is more descriptive. and easier to
automate. As for the tag being or not in git doesn't really matter. I used
to rename the released branch to GA-4.4.x after the vote and leave the tag
on there as well. In the end it is the commit-id that is significnant.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Remi Bergsma <RB...@schubergphilis.com>
wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I accidentally pushed the 4.6.0 tag and I shouldn't have done that before
> it is final. Sorry!
>
> Let's see if we can get rid of it until the vote passes.
>
> Regards, Remi
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 05 Nov 2015, at 09:35, Rene Moser <ma...@renemoser.net> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I have kind of a question about the tagging policy in cloudstack git
> repo:
> >
> > We now have tag 4.6.0 but we call it an RC. This raises 2 problems:
> >
> > 1st: from the public perspective, this is a released version. Or how can
> > anyone not related to the project see, if this is an RC or not?
> >
> > 2nd: tags seems not to be persistent. If we decide to do another RC, the
> > tag would be moved to another commit. If we test "4.6.0" we can not say
> > which version has been tested.
> >
> > Proposal: We adopt the well known versioning model "semantic versioning"
> > http://semver.org/.
> >
> > This means the RC would have been named 4.6.0-RC20151104T1522 or
> 4.6.0-rc.1
> >
> > Do I miss anything? Any thoughts?
> >
> > Regards
> > René
>
--
Daan
Re: git tags on cloudstack repo
Posted by Remi Bergsma <RB...@schubergphilis.com>.
The 4.6.0 tag is now removed.
To https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git
- [deleted] 4.6.0
Didn’t take it like that, René, you had a valid point. No problem.
Regards, Remi
On 05/11/15 09:55, "Rene Moser" <ma...@renemoser.net> wrote:
>Hi
>
>On 11/05/2015 09:52 AM, Remi Bergsma wrote:
>> Guys,
>>
>> I accidentally pushed the 4.6.0 tag and I shouldn't have done that before it is final. Sorry!
>
>Ok then! Was not meant to be a criticism at all, Remi, Don't get me
>wrong. Would be good to me to remove it.
>
>Yours
>René
>
>
Re: git tags on cloudstack repo
Posted by Rene Moser <ma...@renemoser.net>.
Hi
On 11/05/2015 09:52 AM, Remi Bergsma wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I accidentally pushed the 4.6.0 tag and I shouldn't have done that before it is final. Sorry!
Ok then! Was not meant to be a criticism at all, Remi, Don't get me
wrong. Would be good to me to remove it.
Yours
René
Re: git tags on cloudstack repo
Posted by Remi Bergsma <RB...@schubergphilis.com>.
Guys,
I accidentally pushed the 4.6.0 tag and I shouldn't have done that before it is final. Sorry!
Let's see if we can get rid of it until the vote passes.
Regards, Remi
Sent from my iPhone
> On 05 Nov 2015, at 09:35, Rene Moser <ma...@renemoser.net> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I have kind of a question about the tagging policy in cloudstack git repo:
>
> We now have tag 4.6.0 but we call it an RC. This raises 2 problems:
>
> 1st: from the public perspective, this is a released version. Or how can
> anyone not related to the project see, if this is an RC or not?
>
> 2nd: tags seems not to be persistent. If we decide to do another RC, the
> tag would be moved to another commit. If we test "4.6.0" we can not say
> which version has been tested.
>
> Proposal: We adopt the well known versioning model "semantic versioning"
> http://semver.org/.
>
> This means the RC would have been named 4.6.0-RC20151104T1522 or 4.6.0-rc.1
>
> Do I miss anything? Any thoughts?
>
> Regards
> René
Re: git tags on cloudstack repo
Posted by Wei ZHOU <us...@gmail.com>.
+1 with 4.6.0-rc1
2015-11-05 9:34 GMT+01:00 Rene Moser <ma...@renemoser.net>:
> Hi
>
> I have kind of a question about the tagging policy in cloudstack git repo:
>
> We now have tag 4.6.0 but we call it an RC. This raises 2 problems:
>
> 1st: from the public perspective, this is a released version. Or how can
> anyone not related to the project see, if this is an RC or not?
>
> 2nd: tags seems not to be persistent. If we decide to do another RC, the
> tag would be moved to another commit. If we test "4.6.0" we can not say
> which version has been tested.
>
> Proposal: We adopt the well known versioning model "semantic versioning"
> http://semver.org/.
>
> This means the RC would have been named 4.6.0-RC20151104T1522 or 4.6.0-rc.1
>
> Do I miss anything? Any thoughts?
>
> Regards
> René
>