You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pdfbox.apache.org by "Tilman Hausherr (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/11/09 18:08:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-4374) Switch from log4j to slf4j

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-4374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16681780#comment-16681780 ] 

Tilman Hausherr commented on PDFBOX-4374:
-----------------------------------------

We're using Apache commons log, except for preflight tests. Where did you find log4j?

> Switch from log4j to slf4j
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: PDFBOX-4374
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-4374
>             Project: PDFBox
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Utilities
>            Reporter: Mihai Nita
>            Priority: Critical
>
> Hello,
> I would be nice to use slf4j instead of relying explicitly on log4j. ([slf4j.org|http://slf4j.org])
> There are adapters from slf4j to many logger implementations, one of them is log4j.
> The decision of which log engine does not belong in a library, it belongs to the user of that library.
> This was apparently done already by several Apache projects. Searching for slf4j in Jira shows Zookeeper, HBase, HDFS, Parquet, Cloudstack, Nemo, EmpireDB, Oozie, Hadoop, and many others.
>  
> I can offer a patch, I have done such migration before.
> Thank you very much,
> Mihai
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@pdfbox.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@pdfbox.apache.org