You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de> on 2023/09/05 10:40:01 UTC

Syntax mod_jk changelog

I saw we use for older versions

   <subsection name="Native">

in the changelog, but since the last version this is missing. Is this an 
oversight, or did we change the style sheet? Should we have the 
"subsection" everywhere or remove everywhere? Any ideas?

Thanks and regards,

Rainer

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org


Re: Syntax mod_jk changelog

Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
Am 05.09.23 um 13:18 schrieb Rainer Jung:
> Am 05.09.23 um 12:50 schrieb Mark Thomas:
>> On 05/09/2023 11:40, Rainer Jung wrote:
>>> I saw we use for older versions
>>>
>>>    <subsection name="Native">
>>>
>>> in the changelog, but since the last version this is missing. Is this 
>>> an oversight, or did we change the style sheet? Should we have the 
>>> "subsection" everywhere or remove everywhere? Any ideas?
>>
>> Probably an oversight but I'm not seeing the point of the Native 
>> sub-section. I'm leaning towards removing it everywhere.
>>
>> If we wanted to add Common, IIS, httpd sections that could be useful 
>> but it is also a LOT of work. Nice to have but certainly not essential.
> 
> Thanks for the quick feedback. Since the subsection use is not 
> consistent anyways, we could also switch over to using the more 
> meaningful subsections you mentioned. I would like that, especially 
> since we already do something similar but not as useful by prefixing the 
> entry texts.
> 
> I read between the lines, that the style sheet should be agnotic on what 
> subsection names we actually use. I'll have a try with adjusting the 
> subsections for the last and the forthcoming release and see how well it 
> works.

Done for a few versions back to show it is feasible for the future.

I can revert, if people don't like it.

Thanks!

Rainer

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org


Re: Syntax mod_jk changelog

Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
Am 05.09.23 um 12:50 schrieb Mark Thomas:
> On 05/09/2023 11:40, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> I saw we use for older versions
>>
>>    <subsection name="Native">
>>
>> in the changelog, but since the last version this is missing. Is this 
>> an oversight, or did we change the style sheet? Should we have the 
>> "subsection" everywhere or remove everywhere? Any ideas?
> 
> Probably an oversight but I'm not seeing the point of the Native 
> sub-section. I'm leaning towards removing it everywhere.
> 
> If we wanted to add Common, IIS, httpd sections that could be useful but 
> it is also a LOT of work. Nice to have but certainly not essential.

Thanks for the quick feedback. Since the subsection use is not 
consistent anyways, we could also switch over to using the more 
meaningful subsections you mentioned. I would like that, especially 
since we already do something similar but not as useful by prefixing the 
entry texts.

I read between the lines, that the style sheet should be agnotic on what 
subsection names we actually use. I'll have a try with adjusting the 
subsections for the last and the forthcoming release and see how well it 
works.

Thanks!

Rainer

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org


Re: Syntax mod_jk changelog

Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
On 05/09/2023 11:40, Rainer Jung wrote:
> I saw we use for older versions
> 
>    <subsection name="Native">
> 
> in the changelog, but since the last version this is missing. Is this an 
> oversight, or did we change the style sheet? Should we have the 
> "subsection" everywhere or remove everywhere? Any ideas?

Probably an oversight but I'm not seeing the point of the Native 
sub-section. I'm leaning towards removing it everywhere.

If we wanted to add Common, IIS, httpd sections that could be useful but 
it is also a LOT of work. Nice to have but certainly not essential.

Mark

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org