You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl> on 2014/12/04 11:53:27 UTC
[LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation
Hi,
I want to make sure that the SDK documentation (README, RELEASE_NOTES,
NOTICE, LICENSE and CONTRIBUTORS) is in order BEFORE we enter the
release cycle. This will avoid discussion and delay, so please
contribute if you can!
There were considerable changes to each of these documents, so please
check them all carefully. If you are a committer, please fix any
issues you find directly in the repo, 'commit then review' will be by
far the most effective approach. For others, or if you are unsure if
what you found is actually an issue, please use this thread to make
your case. If we can't reach consensus after a short discussion I will
start a vote. That way we can keep the process moving forward and
running smoothly.
Please, pretty please, if you plan to join this process at all, do it
now. Don't wait until the first RC is cut!
Thanks and have fun,
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
> BTW, the wiki page
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/AS3+Promises+-+a+guide+and+example
> looks a incomplete. You might want to clean it up a bit.
Yeah, I'll try to get to that next week...
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:52 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I have added a link to the wiki page for Promises.
>
BTW, the wiki page
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/AS3+Promises+-+a+guide+and+example
looks a incomplete. You might want to clean it up a bit.
Thanks,
Om
>
> I found this link [1] for FlatSpark usage. Can we add this to the
> RELEASE_NOTES? Or is Mahmoud planning on a new wiki page?
>
> It would be nice to have a wiki page for the TLF Tables as well. Harbs,
> any chance you can get something like that up?
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/akamud/FlatSpark/wiki/How-to-use-FlatSpark-in-your-project
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>
>> The README needs a bit about Java (1.)8 and the RELEASE_NOTES will be
>> updated with any fixed JIRA tickets, but that's about it. I'd
>> appreciate it if you could take a look at them.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> EdB
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> > I’m ok with LICENSE and NOTICE. I haven’t reviewed README/RELEASE_NOTES
>> > since they are still being worked on. I don’t know how to review
>> > CONTRIBUTORS, but I would imagine some of our new testers need to go in
>> it.
>> >
>> > -Alex
>> >
>> > On 12/19/14, 1:04 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>> >
>> >>So, the nice quiet on this thread means everyone is OK with the
>> >>current state of the legal docs?
>> >>
>> >>EdB
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On 12/10/14, 11:25 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>Alex, did BlazeDS integration fully land, as far as the docs are
>> >>>>concerned?
>> >>>
>> >>> It seems to be working for me. It could use more testing. It would
>> be
>> >>> great if someone took the nightly and tried to follow the README to
>> >>>build
>> >>> the source package.
>> >>>
>> >>> Should we mention that we removed the need to download the one BlazeDS
>> >>>jar
>> >>> in the RELEASE_NOTES?
>> >>>
>> >>> I think I found a error in LICENSE. I think the MPL shouldn’t be in
>> >>> LICENSE. I could not find any MPL files in the source package (and
>> >>>there
>> >>> shouldn’t be because it is category B and only binaries can be MPL).
>> >>>So,
>> >>> I am about to pull that out unless someone can explain why it should
>> >>>still
>> >>> be in there. I kept thinking it had to do with OSMF, but OSMF isn’t
>> in
>> >>> the source package either, and there is a sentence at the beginning
>> >>>saying
>> >>> it applies to most of the directories. In looking at Git/SVN history,
>> my
>> >>> current thinking is that we added it for 4.8 when we had some
>> >>> to-be-donated Adobe source in the package, but now I think everything
>> >>>has
>> >>> been donated.
>> >>>
>> >>> Meanwhile, I’m working on putting the OFL license acceptance into the
>> >>> install scripts, but I have to stop for now.
>> >>>
>> >>> -Alex
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>--
>> >>Ix Multimedia Software
>> >>
>> >>Jan Luykenstraat 27
>> >>3521 VB Utrecht
>> >>
>> >>T. 06-51952295
>> >>I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>
>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>
>> T. 06-51952295
>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>
>
>
Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
> RELEASE_NOTES? Or is Mahmoud planning on a new wiki page?
He stated he is working on an updated version for the Flex Wiki.
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation
Posted by Mahmoud Ali <mu...@gmail.com>.
>
> I found this link [1] for FlatSpark usage. Can we add this to the
> RELEASE_NOTES? Or is Mahmoud planning on a new wiki page?
>
> It would be nice to have a wiki page for the TLF Tables as well. Harbs,
> any chance you can get something like that up?
This version is outdated so it can cause some confusion, I am working on an
updated version.
Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
I have added a link to the wiki page for Promises.
I found this link [1] for FlatSpark usage. Can we add this to the
RELEASE_NOTES? Or is Mahmoud planning on a new wiki page?
It would be nice to have a wiki page for the TLF Tables as well. Harbs,
any chance you can get something like that up?
Thanks,
Om
[1]
https://github.com/akamud/FlatSpark/wiki/How-to-use-FlatSpark-in-your-project
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
> The README needs a bit about Java (1.)8 and the RELEASE_NOTES will be
> updated with any fixed JIRA tickets, but that's about it. I'd
> appreciate it if you could take a look at them.
>
> Thanks,
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > I’m ok with LICENSE and NOTICE. I haven’t reviewed README/RELEASE_NOTES
> > since they are still being worked on. I don’t know how to review
> > CONTRIBUTORS, but I would imagine some of our new testers need to go in
> it.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 12/19/14, 1:04 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
> >
> >>So, the nice quiet on this thread means everyone is OK with the
> >>current state of the legal docs?
> >>
> >>EdB
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 12/10/14, 11:25 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Alex, did BlazeDS integration fully land, as far as the docs are
> >>>>concerned?
> >>>
> >>> It seems to be working for me. It could use more testing. It would be
> >>> great if someone took the nightly and tried to follow the README to
> >>>build
> >>> the source package.
> >>>
> >>> Should we mention that we removed the need to download the one BlazeDS
> >>>jar
> >>> in the RELEASE_NOTES?
> >>>
> >>> I think I found a error in LICENSE. I think the MPL shouldn’t be in
> >>> LICENSE. I could not find any MPL files in the source package (and
> >>>there
> >>> shouldn’t be because it is category B and only binaries can be MPL).
> >>>So,
> >>> I am about to pull that out unless someone can explain why it should
> >>>still
> >>> be in there. I kept thinking it had to do with OSMF, but OSMF isn’t in
> >>> the source package either, and there is a sentence at the beginning
> >>>saying
> >>> it applies to most of the directories. In looking at Git/SVN history,
> my
> >>> current thinking is that we added it for 4.8 when we had some
> >>> to-be-donated Adobe source in the package, but now I think everything
> >>>has
> >>> been donated.
> >>>
> >>> Meanwhile, I’m working on putting the OFL license acceptance into the
> >>> install scripts, but I have to stop for now.
> >>>
> >>> -Alex
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>Ix Multimedia Software
> >>
> >>Jan Luykenstraat 27
> >>3521 VB Utrecht
> >>
> >>T. 06-51952295
> >>I. www.ixsoftware.nl
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ix Multimedia Software
>
> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> 3521 VB Utrecht
>
> T. 06-51952295
> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>
Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> I'd even consider taking the 'changing
> the version' paragraph out entirely, as it seems that is an
> exceedingly rare action.
I'd leave it in.given that new versions of FP/AIR come out more frequently than we're currently releasing the SDK. I notice for instance that the build files are still using the FP 16 beta when FP 16 has been released.
It's far easier running the script than rerunning the installer where bandwidth is limited and it has a much greater chance of working. It also useful for getting updated version of the FP when there have been security patches.
Justin
Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
> * Also, it's not clear whether "On Mac/Linux the AIR and Flash Player
> version can be changed by running:" is optional or required. Should we
> clarify that?
I'd say that 'can be changed' should be enough indication that there
is an original state/default... I'd even consider taking the 'changing
the version' paragraph out entirely, as it seems that is an
exceedingly rare action.
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation
Posted by Mihai Chira <mi...@gmail.com>.
I just made a few changes to README, mostly cosmetic (see commit
email). Some questions, while reading it:
* "The Adobe Flash Player and Adobe AIR have excluded licenses so they
can not be bundled with the Apache Flex SDK" - is that meant to be
"exclusive"?
* Also, it's not clear whether "On Mac/Linux the AIR and Flash Player
version can be changed by running:" is optional or required. Should we
clarify that?
On 19 December 2014 at 21:16, Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
> The README needs a bit about Java (1.)8 and the RELEASE_NOTES will be
> updated with any fixed JIRA tickets, but that's about it. I'd
> appreciate it if you could take a look at them.
>
> Thanks,
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> I’m ok with LICENSE and NOTICE. I haven’t reviewed README/RELEASE_NOTES
>> since they are still being worked on. I don’t know how to review
>> CONTRIBUTORS, but I would imagine some of our new testers need to go in it.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 12/19/14, 1:04 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>>
>>>So, the nice quiet on this thread means everyone is OK with the
>>>current state of the legal docs?
>>>
>>>EdB
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/10/14, 11:25 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Alex, did BlazeDS integration fully land, as far as the docs are
>>>>>concerned?
>>>>
>>>> It seems to be working for me. It could use more testing. It would be
>>>> great if someone took the nightly and tried to follow the README to
>>>>build
>>>> the source package.
>>>>
>>>> Should we mention that we removed the need to download the one BlazeDS
>>>>jar
>>>> in the RELEASE_NOTES?
>>>>
>>>> I think I found a error in LICENSE. I think the MPL shouldn’t be in
>>>> LICENSE. I could not find any MPL files in the source package (and
>>>>there
>>>> shouldn’t be because it is category B and only binaries can be MPL).
>>>>So,
>>>> I am about to pull that out unless someone can explain why it should
>>>>still
>>>> be in there. I kept thinking it had to do with OSMF, but OSMF isn’t in
>>>> the source package either, and there is a sentence at the beginning
>>>>saying
>>>> it applies to most of the directories. In looking at Git/SVN history, my
>>>> current thinking is that we added it for 4.8 when we had some
>>>> to-be-donated Adobe source in the package, but now I think everything
>>>>has
>>>> been donated.
>>>>
>>>> Meanwhile, I’m working on putting the OFL license acceptance into the
>>>> install scripts, but I have to stop for now.
>>>>
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>Ix Multimedia Software
>>>
>>>Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>>3521 VB Utrecht
>>>
>>>T. 06-51952295
>>>I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ix Multimedia Software
>
> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> 3521 VB Utrecht
>
> T. 06-51952295
> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
The README needs a bit about Java (1.)8 and the RELEASE_NOTES will be
updated with any fixed JIRA tickets, but that's about it. I'd
appreciate it if you could take a look at them.
Thanks,
EdB
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> I’m ok with LICENSE and NOTICE. I haven’t reviewed README/RELEASE_NOTES
> since they are still being worked on. I don’t know how to review
> CONTRIBUTORS, but I would imagine some of our new testers need to go in it.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 12/19/14, 1:04 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>
>>So, the nice quiet on this thread means everyone is OK with the
>>current state of the legal docs?
>>
>>EdB
>>
>>
>>
>>On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/10/14, 11:25 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Alex, did BlazeDS integration fully land, as far as the docs are
>>>>concerned?
>>>
>>> It seems to be working for me. It could use more testing. It would be
>>> great if someone took the nightly and tried to follow the README to
>>>build
>>> the source package.
>>>
>>> Should we mention that we removed the need to download the one BlazeDS
>>>jar
>>> in the RELEASE_NOTES?
>>>
>>> I think I found a error in LICENSE. I think the MPL shouldn’t be in
>>> LICENSE. I could not find any MPL files in the source package (and
>>>there
>>> shouldn’t be because it is category B and only binaries can be MPL).
>>>So,
>>> I am about to pull that out unless someone can explain why it should
>>>still
>>> be in there. I kept thinking it had to do with OSMF, but OSMF isn’t in
>>> the source package either, and there is a sentence at the beginning
>>>saying
>>> it applies to most of the directories. In looking at Git/SVN history, my
>>> current thinking is that we added it for 4.8 when we had some
>>> to-be-donated Adobe source in the package, but now I think everything
>>>has
>>> been donated.
>>>
>>> Meanwhile, I’m working on putting the OFL license acceptance into the
>>> install scripts, but I have to stop for now.
>>>
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Ix Multimedia Software
>>
>>Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>3521 VB Utrecht
>>
>>T. 06-51952295
>>I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
I’m ok with LICENSE and NOTICE. I haven’t reviewed README/RELEASE_NOTES
since they are still being worked on. I don’t know how to review
CONTRIBUTORS, but I would imagine some of our new testers need to go in it.
-Alex
On 12/19/14, 1:04 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>So, the nice quiet on this thread means everyone is OK with the
>current state of the legal docs?
>
>EdB
>
>
>
>On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/10/14, 11:25 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>>
>>>Alex, did BlazeDS integration fully land, as far as the docs are
>>>concerned?
>>
>> It seems to be working for me. It could use more testing. It would be
>> great if someone took the nightly and tried to follow the README to
>>build
>> the source package.
>>
>> Should we mention that we removed the need to download the one BlazeDS
>>jar
>> in the RELEASE_NOTES?
>>
>> I think I found a error in LICENSE. I think the MPL shouldn’t be in
>> LICENSE. I could not find any MPL files in the source package (and
>>there
>> shouldn’t be because it is category B and only binaries can be MPL).
>>So,
>> I am about to pull that out unless someone can explain why it should
>>still
>> be in there. I kept thinking it had to do with OSMF, but OSMF isn’t in
>> the source package either, and there is a sentence at the beginning
>>saying
>> it applies to most of the directories. In looking at Git/SVN history, my
>> current thinking is that we added it for 4.8 when we had some
>> to-be-donated Adobe source in the package, but now I think everything
>>has
>> been donated.
>>
>> Meanwhile, I’m working on putting the OFL license acceptance into the
>> install scripts, but I have to stop for now.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Ix Multimedia Software
>
>Jan Luykenstraat 27
>3521 VB Utrecht
>
>T. 06-51952295
>I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
So, the nice quiet on this thread means everyone is OK with the
current state of the legal docs?
EdB
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 12/10/14, 11:25 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>
>>Alex, did BlazeDS integration fully land, as far as the docs are
>>concerned?
>
> It seems to be working for me. It could use more testing. It would be
> great if someone took the nightly and tried to follow the README to build
> the source package.
>
> Should we mention that we removed the need to download the one BlazeDS jar
> in the RELEASE_NOTES?
>
> I think I found a error in LICENSE. I think the MPL shouldn’t be in
> LICENSE. I could not find any MPL files in the source package (and there
> shouldn’t be because it is category B and only binaries can be MPL). So,
> I am about to pull that out unless someone can explain why it should still
> be in there. I kept thinking it had to do with OSMF, but OSMF isn’t in
> the source package either, and there is a sentence at the beginning saying
> it applies to most of the directories. In looking at Git/SVN history, my
> current thinking is that we added it for 4.8 when we had some
> to-be-donated Adobe source in the package, but now I think everything has
> been donated.
>
> Meanwhile, I’m working on putting the OFL license acceptance into the
> install scripts, but I have to stop for now.
>
> -Alex
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 12/10/14, 11:25 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>Alex, did BlazeDS integration fully land, as far as the docs are
>concerned?
It seems to be working for me. It could use more testing. It would be
great if someone took the nightly and tried to follow the README to build
the source package.
Should we mention that we removed the need to download the one BlazeDS jar
in the RELEASE_NOTES?
I think I found a error in LICENSE. I think the MPL shouldn’t be in
LICENSE. I could not find any MPL files in the source package (and there
shouldn’t be because it is category B and only binaries can be MPL). So,
I am about to pull that out unless someone can explain why it should still
be in there. I kept thinking it had to do with OSMF, but OSMF isn’t in
the source package either, and there is a sentence at the beginning saying
it applies to most of the directories. In looking at Git/SVN history, my
current thinking is that we added it for 4.8 when we had some
to-be-donated Adobe source in the package, but now I think everything has
been donated.
Meanwhile, I’m working on putting the OFL license acceptance into the
install scripts, but I have to stop for now.
-Alex
Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
Alex, did BlazeDS integration fully land, as far as the docs are concerned?
EdB
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> The BlazeDS integration will affect all of these documents, so folks
> should wait until it lands.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 12/10/14, 1:17 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Thanks for reminding. I will take a look tomorrow.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Om
>>On Dec 10, 2014 1:14 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>>
>>> Bump...
>>>
>>> EdB
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>
>>>wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > I want to make sure that the SDK documentation (README, RELEASE_NOTES,
>>> > NOTICE, LICENSE and CONTRIBUTORS) is in order BEFORE we enter the
>>> > release cycle. This will avoid discussion and delay, so please
>>> > contribute if you can!
>>> >
>>> > There were considerable changes to each of these documents, so please
>>> > check them all carefully. If you are a committer, please fix any
>>> > issues you find directly in the repo, 'commit then review' will be by
>>> > far the most effective approach. For others, or if you are unsure if
>>> > what you found is actually an issue, please use this thread to make
>>> > your case. If we can't reach consensus after a short discussion I will
>>> > start a vote. That way we can keep the process moving forward and
>>> > running smoothly.
>>> >
>>> > Please, pretty please, if you plan to join this process at all, do it
>>> > now. Don't wait until the first RC is cut!
>>> >
>>> > Thanks and have fun,
>>> >
>>> > EdB
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Ix Multimedia Software
>>> >
>>> > Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>> > 3521 VB Utrecht
>>> >
>>> > T. 06-51952295
>>> > I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>>
>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>>
>>> T. 06-51952295
>>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>>
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
The BlazeDS integration will affect all of these documents, so folks
should wait until it lands.
-Alex
On 12/10/14, 1:17 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Thanks for reminding. I will take a look tomorrow.
>
>Thanks,
>Om
>On Dec 10, 2014 1:14 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>
>> Bump...
>>
>> EdB
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>
>>wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I want to make sure that the SDK documentation (README, RELEASE_NOTES,
>> > NOTICE, LICENSE and CONTRIBUTORS) is in order BEFORE we enter the
>> > release cycle. This will avoid discussion and delay, so please
>> > contribute if you can!
>> >
>> > There were considerable changes to each of these documents, so please
>> > check them all carefully. If you are a committer, please fix any
>> > issues you find directly in the repo, 'commit then review' will be by
>> > far the most effective approach. For others, or if you are unsure if
>> > what you found is actually an issue, please use this thread to make
>> > your case. If we can't reach consensus after a short discussion I will
>> > start a vote. That way we can keep the process moving forward and
>> > running smoothly.
>> >
>> > Please, pretty please, if you plan to join this process at all, do it
>> > now. Don't wait until the first RC is cut!
>> >
>> > Thanks and have fun,
>> >
>> > EdB
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Ix Multimedia Software
>> >
>> > Jan Luykenstraat 27
>> > 3521 VB Utrecht
>> >
>> > T. 06-51952295
>> > I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>
>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>
>> T. 06-51952295
>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>
Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for reminding. I will take a look tomorrow.
Thanks,
Om
On Dec 10, 2014 1:14 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
> Bump...
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to make sure that the SDK documentation (README, RELEASE_NOTES,
> > NOTICE, LICENSE and CONTRIBUTORS) is in order BEFORE we enter the
> > release cycle. This will avoid discussion and delay, so please
> > contribute if you can!
> >
> > There were considerable changes to each of these documents, so please
> > check them all carefully. If you are a committer, please fix any
> > issues you find directly in the repo, 'commit then review' will be by
> > far the most effective approach. For others, or if you are unsure if
> > what you found is actually an issue, please use this thread to make
> > your case. If we can't reach consensus after a short discussion I will
> > start a vote. That way we can keep the process moving forward and
> > running smoothly.
> >
> > Please, pretty please, if you plan to join this process at all, do it
> > now. Don't wait until the first RC is cut!
> >
> > Thanks and have fun,
> >
> > EdB
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ix Multimedia Software
> >
> > Jan Luykenstraat 27
> > 3521 VB Utrecht
> >
> > T. 06-51952295
> > I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>
>
>
> --
> Ix Multimedia Software
>
> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> 3521 VB Utrecht
>
> T. 06-51952295
> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>
Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
I'm trying to avoid 'last-minute' finds, and long discussions at a
late stage that might block the release. Basically I'm starting early
on calling on people to help out with the various tasks that have
proved 'contentious' during previous releases :-)
EdB
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
> Oh, sorry, you just seemed really keen :-)
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 10/12/14 12:53, Erik de Bruin wrote:
>>
>> This is about the documentation. Especially these files: README,
>> RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE, LICENSE and CONTRIBUTORS.
>>
>> These are in their 'final' state, not likely to substantially change,
>> whether we include the TLF 'tables' contribution or not.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> EdB
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Given the flex-tlf unit tests are all failing on apacheflexbuild and have
>>> been for two weeks, I don't imagine there is much rush as I understand
>>> there
>>> is a bunch of TLF changes in the release ?
>>>
>>> Tom
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/12/14 09:12, Erik de Bruin wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Bump...
>>>>
>>>> EdB
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I want to make sure that the SDK documentation (README, RELEASE_NOTES,
>>>>> NOTICE, LICENSE and CONTRIBUTORS) is in order BEFORE we enter the
>>>>> release cycle. This will avoid discussion and delay, so please
>>>>> contribute if you can!
>>>>>
>>>>> There were considerable changes to each of these documents, so please
>>>>> check them all carefully. If you are a committer, please fix any
>>>>> issues you find directly in the repo, 'commit then review' will be by
>>>>> far the most effective approach. For others, or if you are unsure if
>>>>> what you found is actually an issue, please use this thread to make
>>>>> your case. If we can't reach consensus after a short discussion I will
>>>>> start a vote. That way we can keep the process moving forward and
>>>>> running smoothly.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please, pretty please, if you plan to join this process at all, do it
>>>>> now. Don't wait until the first RC is cut!
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks and have fun,
>>>>>
>>>>> EdB
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>>>>
>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>>>>
>>>>> T. 06-51952295
>>>>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation
Posted by Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com>.
Oh, sorry, you just seemed really keen :-)
Tom
On 10/12/14 12:53, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> This is about the documentation. Especially these files: README,
> RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE, LICENSE and CONTRIBUTORS.
>
> These are in their 'final' state, not likely to substantially change,
> whether we include the TLF 'tables' contribution or not.
>
> Thanks,
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>> Given the flex-tlf unit tests are all failing on apacheflexbuild and have
>> been for two weeks, I don't imagine there is much rush as I understand there
>> is a bunch of TLF changes in the release ?
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>> On 10/12/14 09:12, Erik de Bruin wrote:
>>> Bump...
>>>
>>> EdB
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I want to make sure that the SDK documentation (README, RELEASE_NOTES,
>>>> NOTICE, LICENSE and CONTRIBUTORS) is in order BEFORE we enter the
>>>> release cycle. This will avoid discussion and delay, so please
>>>> contribute if you can!
>>>>
>>>> There were considerable changes to each of these documents, so please
>>>> check them all carefully. If you are a committer, please fix any
>>>> issues you find directly in the repo, 'commit then review' will be by
>>>> far the most effective approach. For others, or if you are unsure if
>>>> what you found is actually an issue, please use this thread to make
>>>> your case. If we can't reach consensus after a short discussion I will
>>>> start a vote. That way we can keep the process moving forward and
>>>> running smoothly.
>>>>
>>>> Please, pretty please, if you plan to join this process at all, do it
>>>> now. Don't wait until the first RC is cut!
>>>>
>>>> Thanks and have fun,
>>>>
>>>> EdB
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>>>
>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>>>
>>>> T. 06-51952295
>>>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>>
>>>
>
>
Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
This is about the documentation. Especially these files: README,
RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE, LICENSE and CONTRIBUTORS.
These are in their 'final' state, not likely to substantially change,
whether we include the TLF 'tables' contribution or not.
Thanks,
EdB
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
> Given the flex-tlf unit tests are all failing on apacheflexbuild and have
> been for two weeks, I don't imagine there is much rush as I understand there
> is a bunch of TLF changes in the release ?
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 10/12/14 09:12, Erik de Bruin wrote:
>>
>> Bump...
>>
>> EdB
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I want to make sure that the SDK documentation (README, RELEASE_NOTES,
>>> NOTICE, LICENSE and CONTRIBUTORS) is in order BEFORE we enter the
>>> release cycle. This will avoid discussion and delay, so please
>>> contribute if you can!
>>>
>>> There were considerable changes to each of these documents, so please
>>> check them all carefully. If you are a committer, please fix any
>>> issues you find directly in the repo, 'commit then review' will be by
>>> far the most effective approach. For others, or if you are unsure if
>>> what you found is actually an issue, please use this thread to make
>>> your case. If we can't reach consensus after a short discussion I will
>>> start a vote. That way we can keep the process moving forward and
>>> running smoothly.
>>>
>>> Please, pretty please, if you plan to join this process at all, do it
>>> now. Don't wait until the first RC is cut!
>>>
>>> Thanks and have fun,
>>>
>>> EdB
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>>
>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>>
>>> T. 06-51952295
>>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>
>>
>>
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation
Posted by Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com>.
Given the flex-tlf unit tests are all failing on apacheflexbuild and
have been for two weeks, I don't imagine there is much rush as I
understand there is a bunch of TLF changes in the release ?
Tom
On 10/12/14 09:12, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Bump...
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to make sure that the SDK documentation (README, RELEASE_NOTES,
>> NOTICE, LICENSE and CONTRIBUTORS) is in order BEFORE we enter the
>> release cycle. This will avoid discussion and delay, so please
>> contribute if you can!
>>
>> There were considerable changes to each of these documents, so please
>> check them all carefully. If you are a committer, please fix any
>> issues you find directly in the repo, 'commit then review' will be by
>> far the most effective approach. For others, or if you are unsure if
>> what you found is actually an issue, please use this thread to make
>> your case. If we can't reach consensus after a short discussion I will
>> start a vote. That way we can keep the process moving forward and
>> running smoothly.
>>
>> Please, pretty please, if you plan to join this process at all, do it
>> now. Don't wait until the first RC is cut!
>>
>> Thanks and have fun,
>>
>> EdB
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>
>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>
>> T. 06-51952295
>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>
>
Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
Bump...
EdB
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to make sure that the SDK documentation (README, RELEASE_NOTES,
> NOTICE, LICENSE and CONTRIBUTORS) is in order BEFORE we enter the
> release cycle. This will avoid discussion and delay, so please
> contribute if you can!
>
> There were considerable changes to each of these documents, so please
> check them all carefully. If you are a committer, please fix any
> issues you find directly in the repo, 'commit then review' will be by
> far the most effective approach. For others, or if you are unsure if
> what you found is actually an issue, please use this thread to make
> your case. If we can't reach consensus after a short discussion I will
> start a vote. That way we can keep the process moving forward and
> running smoothly.
>
> Please, pretty please, if you plan to join this process at all, do it
> now. Don't wait until the first RC is cut!
>
> Thanks and have fun,
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> --
> Ix Multimedia Software
>
> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> 3521 VB Utrecht
>
> T. 06-51952295
> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl