You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Phil Yang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/07/21 09:28:00 UTC

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-18334) Remove sync client implementation and wrap async client under sync client interface

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16096016#comment-16096016 ] 

Phil Yang edited comment on HBASE-18334 at 7/21/17 9:27 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------

In [HBaseCon 2017 (in page 39) |https://www.slideshare.net/HBaseCon/hbase-at-xiaomi?qid=96198dc1-bac8-4d13-a7df-64dbad476c34&v=&b=&from_search=18] we showed some basic PE results.


was (Author: yangzhe1991):
In [HBaseCon 2017 |https://www.slideshare.net/HBaseCon/hbase-at-xiaomi?qid=96198dc1-bac8-4d13-a7df-64dbad476c34&v=&b=&from_search=18] we showed some basic PE results.

> Remove sync client implementation and wrap async client under sync client interface
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-18334
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18334
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Phil Yang
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>
> Since 2.0 we have async client, now we have two client implementations. We can implement an sync client (Table interface) by using async client, getting a CompletableFuture and then waiting it done directly. This can reduce the maintenance work at client side in the future.
> Async client is almost done, we tested the performance and it showed it has same performance with sync client. In branch-2 we can keep old sync client implementations and remove it in master branch (since 3.0).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)