Level 3 XPath interfaces

[Gareth Reakes <ga...@decisionsoft.com>]

Hi all,

	I am currently writing the XPath Level 3 interfaces. This is on 
the road map for eventual inclusion of Pathan into xerces. 

	I am looking for opinions on the naming of these classes. In the 
past we have prefixed DOM interfaces with "DOM" (eg DOMDocument). We have 
primarily done this due to the possibility of name clashes. This 
is no longer a problem because of namespace support. So, does anyone 
have a preference for DOMXPath... (eg DOMXPathNSResolver) which will at 
be consistent, or XPath... (XPathNSResolver) which prevents that 
irritating lack of ability to tab complete and prettier filenames? 

	My preference is for XPath... and Neils is for DOMXPath... but 
neither of us have particularly strong opinions. 


Gareth


-- 
Gareth Reakes, Head of Product Development  +44-1865-203192
DecisionSoft Limited                        http://www.decisionsoft.com
XML Development and Services




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-help@xml.apache.org