You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to batik-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Elliotte Rusty Harold <el...@metalab.unc.edu> on 2003/06/18 13:55:37 UTC

TCK license fees are prohibitive

The only work in SVG APIs for Java that I'm aware of to date have 
taken place as part of the open source Apache XML Project, 
particularly Batik <http://xml.apache.org/batik/>

I am concerned that the licensing fees proposed for the TCK with JSR 
226,  Scalable 2D Vector Graphics API for J2ME ($50,000 initial 
payment + $20,000 per year) will prevent open source implementations. 
At these levels Sun's $1,000,000 per year scholarship program that 
must cover all open source implementations of all payware TCKs is not 
an adequate replacement for a free-beer TCK. If this price cannot be 
substantially reduced or ideally eliminated, then this JSR should be 
rejected.
-- 

   Elliotte Rusty Harold
   elharo@metalab.unc.edu
   Processing XML with Java (Addison-Wesley, 2002)
   http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xmljava
   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0201771861/cafeaulaitA

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Re: TCK license fees are prohibitive

Posted by Onno Kluyt <On...@Sun.COM>.
There is still plenty room in that budget.

Onno Kluyt
Director, JCP Program Office.

On Wednesday, Jun 18, 2003, at 08:55 US/Pacific, Dirk-Willem van Gulik 
wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
>
>> The only work in SVG APIs for Java that I'm aware of to date have
>> taken place as part of the open source Apache XML Project,
>> particularly Batik <http://xml.apache.org/batik/>
>>
>> I am concerned that the licensing fees proposed for the TCK with JSR
>> 226,  Scalable 2D Vector Graphics API for J2ME ($50,000 initial
>> payment + $20,000 per year) will prevent open source implementations.
>> At these levels Sun's $1,000,000 per year scholarship program that
>> must cover all open source implementations of all payware TCKs is not
>> an adequate replacement for a free-beer TCK. If this price cannot be
>> substantially reduced or ideally eliminated, then this JSR should be
>> rejected.
>
> It may be worthwhile to check as to how much of that 1m$ is actually
> allocated for this year. I suspect that there enough of such left not 
> to
> worry too much right now. And what better tribute would there be to 
> java,
> SUN and its commitment to openness if that amounth got a) depleted each
> year and b) subsequentely increased (or these arbitrary fees
> questioned and decreased).
>
> Dw
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Re: TCK license fees are prohibitive

Posted by Dirk-Willem van Gulik <di...@webweaving.org>.

On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:

> The only work in SVG APIs for Java that I'm aware of to date have
> taken place as part of the open source Apache XML Project,
> particularly Batik <http://xml.apache.org/batik/>
>
> I am concerned that the licensing fees proposed for the TCK with JSR
> 226,  Scalable 2D Vector Graphics API for J2ME ($50,000 initial
> payment + $20,000 per year) will prevent open source implementations.
> At these levels Sun's $1,000,000 per year scholarship program that
> must cover all open source implementations of all payware TCKs is not
> an adequate replacement for a free-beer TCK. If this price cannot be
> substantially reduced or ideally eliminated, then this JSR should be
> rejected.

It may be worthwhile to check as to how much of that 1m$ is actually
allocated for this year. I suspect that there enough of such left not to
worry too much right now. And what better tribute would there be to java,
SUN and its commitment to openness if that amounth got a) depleted each
year and b) subsequentely increased (or these arbitrary fees
questioned and decreased).

Dw


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-help@xml.apache.org