You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@kylin.apache.org by "jiatao.tao (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/09/25 06:49:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (KYLIN-3588) Potentially duplicate put to
RemoveBlackoutRealizationsRule#filters map
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KYLIN-3588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16626866#comment-16626866 ]
jiatao.tao commented on KYLIN-3588:
-----------------------------------
seems a synchronized can deal with this.
> Potentially duplicate put to RemoveBlackoutRealizationsRule#filters map
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KYLIN-3588
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KYLIN-3588
> Project: Kylin
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Ted Yu
> Assignee: jiatao.tao
> Priority: Minor
>
> Here is related code:
> {code}
> IRealizationFilter filter = filters.get(conf);
> if (filter == null) {
> try {
> Class<? extends IRealizationFilter> clz = ClassUtil.forName(conf.getQueryRealizationFilter(), IRealizationFilter.class);
> filter = clz.getConstructor(KylinConfig.class).newInstance(conf);
> } catch (Exception e) {
> throw new RuntimeException(e);
> }
> filters.put(conf, filter);
> {code}
> Two threads may find out there is no filter for conf, they would proceed with creation of IRealizationFilter instances and try to put into the map.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)