You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@commons.apache.org by se...@apache.org on 2016/06/23 22:01:23 UTC
svn commit: r1750028 - in /commons/proper/bcel/trunk: RELEASE-NOTES.txt
src/changes/changes.xml
Author: sebb
Date: Thu Jun 23 22:01:23 2016
New Revision: 1750028
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1750028&view=rev
Log:
Generic Visitor was also updated
Modified:
commons/proper/bcel/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
commons/proper/bcel/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml
Modified: commons/proper/bcel/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/bcel/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES.txt?rev=1750028&r1=1750027&r2=1750028&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- commons/proper/bcel/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES.txt (original)
+++ commons/proper/bcel/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES.txt Thu Jun 23 22:01:23 2016
@@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ Source compatible - Yes, sort of;
- The org.apache.bcel.classfile.Visitor interface has been enhanced with
additional methods. If you implemented it directly instead of extending
the EmptyVisitor class you'll have to implement the new methods.
+ - The org.apache.bcel.generic.Visitor interface has been enhanced with an
+ additional method. If you implemented it directly instead of extending
+ the EmptyVisitor class you'll have to implement the new methods.
Semantic compatible - Yes, except:
- BCEL 6.0 handles new attributes such as code annotations that could only
Modified: commons/proper/bcel/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/bcel/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml?rev=1750028&r1=1750027&r2=1750028&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- commons/proper/bcel/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml (original)
+++ commons/proper/bcel/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml Thu Jun 23 22:01:23 2016
@@ -92,6 +92,9 @@ Source compatible - Yes, sort of;
- The org.apache.bcel.classfile.Visitor interface has been enhanced with
additional methods. If you implemented it directly instead of extending
the EmptyVisitor class you'll have to implement the new methods.
+ - The org.apache.bcel.generic.Visitor interface has been enhanced with an
+ additional method. If you implemented it directly instead of extending
+ the EmptyVisitor class you'll have to implement the new methods.
Semantic compatible - Yes, except: