You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@olingo.apache.org by "Bolz, Michael" <mi...@sap.com> on 2014/09/05 15:17:39 UTC
Prepare Release "Olingo OData Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”?
Hi All,
with the coming release of the "Olingo OData Client for Java Script 4.0.0-beta-01” we should also prepare the according Java release.
A JIRA Issue was already created by Stephan and currently there are 9 open issues related to version "4.0.0-beta-01”, but no bug and 5 issues just related to release preparations and 2 related to Javascript (see: http://s.apache.org/olingo-4).
So we should check the remaining two issues (OLINGO-347 and OLINGO-213) and either fix/close or postpone them to the next release.
Additionally we should think about a "code freeze" on the master till the release is done.
Further we should think about renaming the Java library according to the last discussion in Javascript context to "Olingo OData Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”.
WDYT, should we do a) a rename and b) already with the next release? IMHO we should do both ;o)
Nevertheless I hope we can start till mid of next week with the release preparation to get a RC01 at the end of next week.
Again, WDYT about creation of a release?
Kind regards,
Michael
Re: Prepare Release "Olingo OData Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”?
Posted by Carl Mosca <ca...@gmail.com>.
I am OK without adding "Library" to the names.
Carl
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Yi Ding <yi...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Thank you for organizing this. One proposal is to not having "-Library" in
> the artifact names. Thus, they will be "Olingo OData Client for Java
> 4.0.0-beta-01" and "Olingo OData Server for Java 4.0.0-beta-01". Some
> thoughts with this proposal:
> 1. It has name consistency with the Olingo JavaScript client
> 2. Some existing OData libraries don't have "library" in their names (e.g.
> OData Client for .NET:
> https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.OData.Client/)
>
> Best,
> Yi
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bolz, Michael [mailto:michael.bolz@sap.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2014 2:09 PM
> To: dev@olingo.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Prepare Release "Olingo OData Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”?
>
> Hi Challen,
>
> thanks for offer of support.
>
> I will wait till tomorrow for other opinions and then start with the
> release preparations.
> Another thought during the weekend was to split the naming into "Olingo
> OData Client-Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01” and "Olingo OData
> Server-Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”.
> So it is probably more clear which distribution someone want to use.
> On the other side it is a very long name for an artifact ;o)
>
> @All: Some opinions about this?
>
> Kind regards,
> Michael
>
>
> On 09.09.2014, at 05:55, Challen He <ch...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 for java client naming & release.
> > I will be happy to work with you on the logistics as needed.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,-Challen
> >
> > From: Bolz, Michael [mailto:michael.bolz@sap.com]
> > Sent: 2014年9月5日 21:18
> > To: dev@olingo.apache.org
> > Subject: Prepare Release "Olingo OData Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”?
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > with the coming release of the "Olingo OData Client for Java Script
> 4.0.0-beta-01” we should also prepare the according Java release.
> >
> > A JIRA Issue was already created by Stephan and currently there are 9
> open issues related to version "4.0.0-beta-01”, but no bug and 5 issues
> just related to release preparations and 2 related to Javascript (see:
> http://s.apache.org/olingo-4).
> > So we should check the remaining two issues (OLINGO-347 and OLINGO-213)
> and either fix/close or postpone them to the next release.
> > Additionally we should think about a "code freeze" on the master till
> the release is done.
> > Further we should think about renaming the Java library according to the
> last discussion in Javascript context to "Olingo OData Library for Java
> 4.0.0-beta-01”.
> > WDYT, should we do a) a rename and b) already with the next release?
> IMHO we should do both ;o)
> >
> > Nevertheless I hope we can start till mid of next week with the release
> preparation to get a RC01 at the end of next week.
> >
> > Again, WDYT about creation of a release?
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Michael
>
>
--
Carl J. Mosca
Re: Prepare Release "Olingo OData Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”?
Posted by "Bolz, Michael" <mi...@sap.com>.
Hi together,
based on the feedback and discussion I have changed the "olingo" part in the artifact ids to "odata" and renamed the distributions to:
- "Olingo OData Client for Android 4.0.0-beta-01”
- "Olingo OData Client for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”
- "Olingo OData Server for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”
All those preparations are currently in the "OLINGO-342_Release_OData_4.0.0-beta-01" branch [1].
If there are no objections against I will use this as base for the "4.0.0-beta-01-RC01".
Hence, please do not commit code modification into current master.
Which I would then create tomorrow and trigger the vote for a release of version "4.0.0-beta-01".
Kind regards,
Michael
[1]: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=olingo-odata4.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/OLINGO-342_Release_OData_4.0.0-beta-01
On 10.09.2014, at 05:36, Bolz, Michael <mi...@sap.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks a lot for feedback.
>
> I agree with the names without the library part. So as example we then get:
> "Olingo OData Client for Java 4.0.0-beta-01” and "Olingo OData Server for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”.
>
> Based on this I will start with the preparation for the RC01 which then results in:
> "Olingo OData Client for Java 4.0.0-beta-01-RC01” and "Olingo OData Server for Java 4.0.0-beta-01-RC01”.
>
> I think till the end of the week the RC01 could be available (on the homepage and in the maven repo) for a release vote.
>
> Kind regards,
> Michael
>
>
> On 09.09.2014, at 18:22, Ramesh Reddy <ra...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 for not having "Library" in the name, that seems verbose otherwise. Also, are you guys planning on having them in maven repo?
>> +1 for separate client and server distributions, as I suspect there is going to be lot of client users compare to server api consumers.
>>
>> Ramesh..
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> Hi Michael,
>>>
>>> Thank you for organizing this. One proposal is to not having "-Library" in
>>> the artifact names. Thus, they will be "Olingo OData Client for Java
>>> 4.0.0-beta-01" and "Olingo OData Server for Java 4.0.0-beta-01". Some
>>> thoughts with this proposal:
>>> 1. It has name consistency with the Olingo JavaScript client
>>> 2. Some existing OData libraries don't have "library" in their names (e.g.
>>> OData Client for .NET:
>>> https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.OData.Client/)
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Yi
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Bolz, Michael [mailto:michael.bolz@sap.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2014 2:09 PM
>>> To: dev@olingo.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Prepare Release "Olingo OData Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”?
>>>
>>> Hi Challen,
>>>
>>> thanks for offer of support.
>>>
>>> I will wait till tomorrow for other opinions and then start with the release
>>> preparations.
>>> Another thought during the weekend was to split the naming into "Olingo OData
>>> Client-Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01” and "Olingo OData Server-Library for
>>> Java 4.0.0-beta-01”.
>>> So it is probably more clear which distribution someone want to use.
>>> On the other side it is a very long name for an artifact ;o)
>>>
>>> @All: Some opinions about this?
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Michael
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09.09.2014, at 05:55, Challen He <ch...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 for java client naming & release.
>>>> I will be happy to work with you on the logistics as needed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,-Challen
>>>>
>>>> From: Bolz, Michael [mailto:michael.bolz@sap.com]
>>>> Sent: 2014年9月5日 21:18
>>>> To: dev@olingo.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Prepare Release "Olingo OData Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”?
>>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> with the coming release of the "Olingo OData Client for Java Script
>>>> 4.0.0-beta-01” we should also prepare the according Java release.
>>>>
>>>> A JIRA Issue was already created by Stephan and currently there are 9 open
>>>> issues related to version "4.0.0-beta-01”, but no bug and 5 issues just
>>>> related to release preparations and 2 related to Javascript (see:
>>>> http://s.apache.org/olingo-4).
>>>> So we should check the remaining two issues (OLINGO-347 and OLINGO-213) and
>>>> either fix/close or postpone them to the next release.
>>>> Additionally we should think about a "code freeze" on the master till the
>>>> release is done.
>>>> Further we should think about renaming the Java library according to the
>>>> last discussion in Javascript context to "Olingo OData Library for Java
>>>> 4.0.0-beta-01”.
>>>> WDYT, should we do a) a rename and b) already with the next release? IMHO
>>>> we should do both ;o)
>>>>
>>>> Nevertheless I hope we can start till mid of next week with the release
>>>> preparation to get a RC01 at the end of next week.
>>>>
>>>> Again, WDYT about creation of a release?
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>> Michael
>>>
>>>
>
Re: Prepare Release "Olingo OData Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”?
Posted by "Bolz, Michael" <mi...@sap.com>.
Hi,
thanks a lot for feedback.
I agree with the names without the library part. So as example we then get:
"Olingo OData Client for Java 4.0.0-beta-01” and "Olingo OData Server for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”.
Based on this I will start with the preparation for the RC01 which then results in:
"Olingo OData Client for Java 4.0.0-beta-01-RC01” and "Olingo OData Server for Java 4.0.0-beta-01-RC01”.
I think till the end of the week the RC01 could be available (on the homepage and in the maven repo) for a release vote.
Kind regards,
Michael
On 09.09.2014, at 18:22, Ramesh Reddy <ra...@redhat.com> wrote:
> +1 for not having "Library" in the name, that seems verbose otherwise. Also, are you guys planning on having them in maven repo?
> +1 for separate client and server distributions, as I suspect there is going to be lot of client users compare to server api consumers.
>
> Ramesh..
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> Thank you for organizing this. One proposal is to not having "-Library" in
>> the artifact names. Thus, they will be "Olingo OData Client for Java
>> 4.0.0-beta-01" and "Olingo OData Server for Java 4.0.0-beta-01". Some
>> thoughts with this proposal:
>> 1. It has name consistency with the Olingo JavaScript client
>> 2. Some existing OData libraries don't have "library" in their names (e.g.
>> OData Client for .NET:
>> https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.OData.Client/)
>>
>> Best,
>> Yi
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bolz, Michael [mailto:michael.bolz@sap.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2014 2:09 PM
>> To: dev@olingo.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Prepare Release "Olingo OData Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”?
>>
>> Hi Challen,
>>
>> thanks for offer of support.
>>
>> I will wait till tomorrow for other opinions and then start with the release
>> preparations.
>> Another thought during the weekend was to split the naming into "Olingo OData
>> Client-Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01” and "Olingo OData Server-Library for
>> Java 4.0.0-beta-01”.
>> So it is probably more clear which distribution someone want to use.
>> On the other side it is a very long name for an artifact ;o)
>>
>> @All: Some opinions about this?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Michael
>>
>>
>> On 09.09.2014, at 05:55, Challen He <ch...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for java client naming & release.
>>> I will be happy to work with you on the logistics as needed.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,-Challen
>>>
>>> From: Bolz, Michael [mailto:michael.bolz@sap.com]
>>> Sent: 2014年9月5日 21:18
>>> To: dev@olingo.apache.org
>>> Subject: Prepare Release "Olingo OData Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”?
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> with the coming release of the "Olingo OData Client for Java Script
>>> 4.0.0-beta-01” we should also prepare the according Java release.
>>>
>>> A JIRA Issue was already created by Stephan and currently there are 9 open
>>> issues related to version "4.0.0-beta-01”, but no bug and 5 issues just
>>> related to release preparations and 2 related to Javascript (see:
>>> http://s.apache.org/olingo-4).
>>> So we should check the remaining two issues (OLINGO-347 and OLINGO-213) and
>>> either fix/close or postpone them to the next release.
>>> Additionally we should think about a "code freeze" on the master till the
>>> release is done.
>>> Further we should think about renaming the Java library according to the
>>> last discussion in Javascript context to "Olingo OData Library for Java
>>> 4.0.0-beta-01”.
>>> WDYT, should we do a) a rename and b) already with the next release? IMHO
>>> we should do both ;o)
>>>
>>> Nevertheless I hope we can start till mid of next week with the release
>>> preparation to get a RC01 at the end of next week.
>>>
>>> Again, WDYT about creation of a release?
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Michael
>>
>>
Re: Prepare Release "Olingo OData Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”?
Posted by Ramesh Reddy <ra...@redhat.com>.
+1 for not having "Library" in the name, that seems verbose otherwise. Also, are you guys planning on having them in maven repo?
+1 for separate client and server distributions, as I suspect there is going to be lot of client users compare to server api consumers.
Ramesh..
----- Original Message -----
> Hi Michael,
>
> Thank you for organizing this. One proposal is to not having "-Library" in
> the artifact names. Thus, they will be "Olingo OData Client for Java
> 4.0.0-beta-01" and "Olingo OData Server for Java 4.0.0-beta-01". Some
> thoughts with this proposal:
> 1. It has name consistency with the Olingo JavaScript client
> 2. Some existing OData libraries don't have "library" in their names (e.g.
> OData Client for .NET:
> https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.OData.Client/)
>
> Best,
> Yi
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bolz, Michael [mailto:michael.bolz@sap.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2014 2:09 PM
> To: dev@olingo.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Prepare Release "Olingo OData Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”?
>
> Hi Challen,
>
> thanks for offer of support.
>
> I will wait till tomorrow for other opinions and then start with the release
> preparations.
> Another thought during the weekend was to split the naming into "Olingo OData
> Client-Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01” and "Olingo OData Server-Library for
> Java 4.0.0-beta-01”.
> So it is probably more clear which distribution someone want to use.
> On the other side it is a very long name for an artifact ;o)
>
> @All: Some opinions about this?
>
> Kind regards,
> Michael
>
>
> On 09.09.2014, at 05:55, Challen He <ch...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 for java client naming & release.
> > I will be happy to work with you on the logistics as needed.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,-Challen
> >
> > From: Bolz, Michael [mailto:michael.bolz@sap.com]
> > Sent: 2014年9月5日 21:18
> > To: dev@olingo.apache.org
> > Subject: Prepare Release "Olingo OData Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”?
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > with the coming release of the "Olingo OData Client for Java Script
> > 4.0.0-beta-01” we should also prepare the according Java release.
> >
> > A JIRA Issue was already created by Stephan and currently there are 9 open
> > issues related to version "4.0.0-beta-01”, but no bug and 5 issues just
> > related to release preparations and 2 related to Javascript (see:
> > http://s.apache.org/olingo-4).
> > So we should check the remaining two issues (OLINGO-347 and OLINGO-213) and
> > either fix/close or postpone them to the next release.
> > Additionally we should think about a "code freeze" on the master till the
> > release is done.
> > Further we should think about renaming the Java library according to the
> > last discussion in Javascript context to "Olingo OData Library for Java
> > 4.0.0-beta-01”.
> > WDYT, should we do a) a rename and b) already with the next release? IMHO
> > we should do both ;o)
> >
> > Nevertheless I hope we can start till mid of next week with the release
> > preparation to get a RC01 at the end of next week.
> >
> > Again, WDYT about creation of a release?
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Michael
>
>
RE: Prepare Release "Olingo OData Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”?
Posted by Yi Ding <yi...@microsoft.com>.
Hi Michael,
Thank you for organizing this. One proposal is to not having "-Library" in the artifact names. Thus, they will be "Olingo OData Client for Java 4.0.0-beta-01" and "Olingo OData Server for Java 4.0.0-beta-01". Some thoughts with this proposal:
1. It has name consistency with the Olingo JavaScript client
2. Some existing OData libraries don't have "library" in their names (e.g. OData Client for .NET: https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.OData.Client/)
Best,
Yi
-----Original Message-----
From: Bolz, Michael [mailto:michael.bolz@sap.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2014 2:09 PM
To: dev@olingo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Prepare Release "Olingo OData Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”?
Hi Challen,
thanks for offer of support.
I will wait till tomorrow for other opinions and then start with the release preparations.
Another thought during the weekend was to split the naming into "Olingo OData Client-Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01” and "Olingo OData Server-Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”.
So it is probably more clear which distribution someone want to use.
On the other side it is a very long name for an artifact ;o)
@All: Some opinions about this?
Kind regards,
Michael
On 09.09.2014, at 05:55, Challen He <ch...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> +1 for java client naming & release.
> I will be happy to work with you on the logistics as needed.
>
>
> Thanks,-Challen
>
> From: Bolz, Michael [mailto:michael.bolz@sap.com]
> Sent: 2014年9月5日 21:18
> To: dev@olingo.apache.org
> Subject: Prepare Release "Olingo OData Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”?
>
> Hi All,
>
> with the coming release of the "Olingo OData Client for Java Script 4.0.0-beta-01” we should also prepare the according Java release.
>
> A JIRA Issue was already created by Stephan and currently there are 9 open issues related to version "4.0.0-beta-01”, but no bug and 5 issues just related to release preparations and 2 related to Javascript (see: http://s.apache.org/olingo-4).
> So we should check the remaining two issues (OLINGO-347 and OLINGO-213) and either fix/close or postpone them to the next release.
> Additionally we should think about a "code freeze" on the master till the release is done.
> Further we should think about renaming the Java library according to the last discussion in Javascript context to "Olingo OData Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”.
> WDYT, should we do a) a rename and b) already with the next release? IMHO we should do both ;o)
>
> Nevertheless I hope we can start till mid of next week with the release preparation to get a RC01 at the end of next week.
>
> Again, WDYT about creation of a release?
>
> Kind regards,
> Michael
Re: Prepare Release "Olingo OData Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”?
Posted by "Bolz, Michael" <mi...@sap.com>.
Hi Challen,
thanks for offer of support.
I will wait till tomorrow for other opinions and then start with the release preparations.
Another thought during the weekend was to split the naming into "Olingo OData Client-Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01” and "Olingo OData Server-Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”.
So it is probably more clear which distribution someone want to use.
On the other side it is a very long name for an artifact ;o)
@All: Some opinions about this?
Kind regards,
Michael
On 09.09.2014, at 05:55, Challen He <ch...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> +1 for java client naming & release.
> I will be happy to work with you on the logistics as needed.
>
>
> Thanks,-Challen
>
> From: Bolz, Michael [mailto:michael.bolz@sap.com]
> Sent: 2014年9月5日 21:18
> To: dev@olingo.apache.org
> Subject: Prepare Release "Olingo OData Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”?
>
> Hi All,
>
> with the coming release of the "Olingo OData Client for Java Script 4.0.0-beta-01” we should also prepare the according Java release.
>
> A JIRA Issue was already created by Stephan and currently there are 9 open issues related to version "4.0.0-beta-01”, but no bug and 5 issues just related to release preparations and 2 related to Javascript (see: http://s.apache.org/olingo-4).
> So we should check the remaining two issues (OLINGO-347 and OLINGO-213) and either fix/close or postpone them to the next release.
> Additionally we should think about a "code freeze" on the master till the release is done.
> Further we should think about renaming the Java library according to the last discussion in Javascript context to "Olingo OData Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”.
> WDYT, should we do a) a rename and b) already with the next release? IMHO we should do both ;o)
>
> Nevertheless I hope we can start till mid of next week with the release preparation to get a RC01 at the end of next week.
>
> Again, WDYT about creation of a release?
>
> Kind regards,
> Michael
RE: Prepare Release "Olingo OData Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”?
Posted by Challen He <ch...@microsoft.com>.
+1 for java client naming & release.
I will be happy to work with you on the logistics as needed.
Thanks,-Challen
From: Bolz, Michael [mailto:michael.bolz@sap.com]
Sent: 2014年9月5日 21:18
To: dev@olingo.apache.org
Subject: Prepare Release "Olingo OData Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”?
Hi All,
with the coming release of the "Olingo OData Client for Java Script 4.0.0-beta-01” we should also prepare the according Java release.
A JIRA Issue was already created by Stephan and currently there are 9 open issues related to version "4.0.0-beta-01”, but no bug and 5 issues just related to release preparations and 2 related to Javascript (see: http://s.apache.org/olingo-4).
So we should check the remaining two issues (OLINGO-347 and OLINGO-213) and either fix/close or postpone them to the next release.
Additionally we should think about a "code freeze" on the master till the release is done.
Further we should think about renaming the Java library according to the last discussion in Javascript context to "Olingo OData Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”.
WDYT, should we do a) a rename and b) already with the next release? IMHO we should do both ;o)
Nevertheless I hope we can start till mid of next week with the release preparation to get a RC01 at the end of next week.
Again, WDYT about creation of a release?
Kind regards,
Michael