You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@trafficserver.apache.org by "Marcus Clyne (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/11/10 20:06:15 UTC
[jira] Created: (TS-524) Have a single directive for HTTP ports
Have a single directive for HTTP ports
--------------------------------------
Key: TS-524
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-524
Project: Traffic Server
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Configuration
Affects Versions: 2.1.3
Environment: Any
Reporter: Marcus Clyne
Priority: Trivial
Why have both
proxy.config.http.server_port
and
proxy.config.http.server_other_ports
as config options? Unless there is a good reason to have to options, it would probably be better to have a single config option.
See also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-523
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] [Updated] (TS-524) Have a single directive for HTTP ports
Posted by "Leif Hedstrom (Updated) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Leif Hedstrom updated TS-524:
-----------------------------
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1.2)
3.1.3
I'm moving all 3.1.2 bugs out to 3.1.3, and we can move some 3.1.1 bugs out to 3.1.2, to get some release action going.
> Have a single directive for HTTP ports
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: TS-524
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-524
> Project: Traffic Server
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Configuration
> Affects Versions: 2.1.3
> Environment: Any
> Reporter: Marcus Clyne
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 3.1.3
>
>
> Why have both
> proxy.config.http.server_port
> and
> proxy.config.http.server_other_ports
> as config options? Unless there is a good reason to have to options, it would probably be better to have a single config option.
> See also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-523
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Commented: (TS-524) Have a single directive for HTTP ports
Posted by "Leif Hedstrom (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12992226#comment-12992226 ]
Leif Hedstrom commented on TS-524:
----------------------------------
The main difference is, I think, that other_ports takes some descriptive information telling TS what it means. We'd have to merge that logic into the server_port as well if we merged this. I'm gonna move this to to v3.1, unless someone wants to work on this right now.
> Have a single directive for HTTP ports
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: TS-524
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-524
> Project: Traffic Server
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Configuration
> Affects Versions: 2.1.3
> Environment: Any
> Reporter: Marcus Clyne
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 3.1
>
>
> Why have both
> proxy.config.http.server_port
> and
> proxy.config.http.server_other_ports
> as config options? Unless there is a good reason to have to options, it would probably be better to have a single config option.
> See also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-523
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Resolved] (TS-524) Have a single directive for HTTP ports
Posted by "Leif Hedstrom (Resolved) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Leif Hedstrom resolved TS-524.
------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Duplicate of TS-1077.
> Have a single directive for HTTP ports
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: TS-524
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-524
> Project: Traffic Server
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Configuration
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0
> Environment: Any
> Reporter: Marcus Clyne
> Priority: Trivial
>
> Why have both
> proxy.config.http.server_port
> and
> proxy.config.http.server_other_ports
> as config options? Unless there is a good reason to have to options, it would probably be better to have a single config option.
> See also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-523
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (TS-524) Have a single directive for HTTP ports
Posted by "Leif Hedstrom (Updated) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Leif Hedstrom updated TS-524:
-----------------------------
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1.4)
> Have a single directive for HTTP ports
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: TS-524
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-524
> Project: Traffic Server
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Configuration
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0
> Environment: Any
> Reporter: Marcus Clyne
> Priority: Trivial
>
> Why have both
> proxy.config.http.server_port
> and
> proxy.config.http.server_other_ports
> as config options? Unless there is a good reason to have to options, it would probably be better to have a single config option.
> See also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-523
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Updated: (TS-524) Have a single directive for HTTP ports
Posted by "Leif Hedstrom (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Leif Hedstrom updated TS-524:
-----------------------------
Fix Version/s: 3.1
> Have a single directive for HTTP ports
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: TS-524
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-524
> Project: Traffic Server
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Configuration
> Affects Versions: 2.1.3
> Environment: Any
> Reporter: Marcus Clyne
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 3.1
>
>
> Why have both
> proxy.config.http.server_port
> and
> proxy.config.http.server_other_ports
> as config options? Unless there is a good reason to have to options, it would probably be better to have a single config option.
> See also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-523
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira