You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@archiva.apache.org by "Menattamai, Rajasekaran" <Ra...@finra.org> on 2009/11/20 20:06:39 UTC
Archiva repository scan issue
Iam not sure if the operation I am doing is incorrect or the repository
scanning feature in archiva 1.2.2 does not work as expected.
I created a repository. Added some files directly to the repository's
directory location ( in exactly like the maven2 format ) . Ran the
"repository scan" for this repository. After the scan the result
reported that it found 6 new files. These files appear in the "total
file count" ,but other columns were not updated at all. There are some
jars and poms in the set of the files I added. When I search for the
file I added, "search" did not return any results, which means the
database was not updated. If the operation I am doing is correct, then I
will open a defect ticket for this.
Statistics for Repository 'approved_3p'
Date of Scan Total File Count Total Size Artifact Count
Group Count Project Count Plugins Archetypes Jars
Wars Deployments Downloads
Fri Nov 20 13:12:43 EST 2009 6 1035114 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fri Nov 20 13:10:59 EST 2009 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
-- Thanks
Raj
Raj Menattamai
Software Factory CM
240 386 6238 ( O )
804 852 4001 ( Cell )
Confidentiality Notice: This email, including attachments, may include non-public, proprietary, confidential or legally privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient or an authorized agent of an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of the information contained in or transmitted with this e-mail is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and permanently delete this e-mail, its attachments, and any copies of it immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. Thank you
Re: ETA for Archiva 1.2.3? (Was: Archiva repository scan
issue)
Posted by Julian Dunn <Ju...@CBC.CA>.
Awesome - thanks guys!
- Julian
>>> Deng Ching <oc...@apache.org> 19/01/2010 8:13 pm >>>
Hi Julian,
We switched the version from 1.2.3 to 1.3 instead due to some new
features
implemented :) The voting was just finalized earlier today so the
binaries
should be available in a couple of hours in the Archiva site.
Thanks,
Deng
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Julian Dunn <Ju...@cbc.ca>
wrote:
> Is there a revised ETA for 1.2.3?
>
> - Julian
>
> >>> Deng Ching <oc...@apache.org> 24/11/2009 5:28 AM >>>
> Hopefully, we'll be able to cut a release candidate in the next
week.
> Only 5
> more issues to go for 1.2.3 \o/
>
> Thanks,
> Deng
>
Re: ETA for Archiva 1.2.3? (Was: Archiva repository scan issue)
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
Actually they appear to be up now, I'll work on the announcement.
On 20/01/2010, at 12:13 PM, Deng Ching wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> We switched the version from 1.2.3 to 1.3 instead due to some new features
> implemented :) The voting was just finalized earlier today so the binaries
> should be available in a couple of hours in the Archiva site.
>
> Thanks,
> Deng
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Julian Dunn <Ju...@cbc.ca> wrote:
>
>> Is there a revised ETA for 1.2.3?
>>
>> - Julian
>>
>>>>> Deng Ching <oc...@apache.org> 24/11/2009 5:28 AM >>>
>> Hopefully, we'll be able to cut a release candidate in the next week.
>> Only 5
>> more issues to go for 1.2.3 \o/
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Deng
>>
--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
Re: ETA for Archiva 1.2.3? (Was: Archiva repository scan issue)
Posted by Deng Ching <oc...@apache.org>.
Hi Julian,
We switched the version from 1.2.3 to 1.3 instead due to some new features
implemented :) The voting was just finalized earlier today so the binaries
should be available in a couple of hours in the Archiva site.
Thanks,
Deng
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Julian Dunn <Ju...@cbc.ca> wrote:
> Is there a revised ETA for 1.2.3?
>
> - Julian
>
> >>> Deng Ching <oc...@apache.org> 24/11/2009 5:28 AM >>>
> Hopefully, we'll be able to cut a release candidate in the next week.
> Only 5
> more issues to go for 1.2.3 \o/
>
> Thanks,
> Deng
>
Re: ETA for Archiva 1.2.3? (Was: Archiva repository scan
issue)
Posted by Julian Dunn <Ju...@CBC.CA>.
Is there a revised ETA for 1.2.3?
- Julian
>>> Deng Ching <oc...@apache.org> 24/11/2009 5:28 AM >>>
Hopefully, we'll be able to cut a release candidate in the next week.
Only 5
more issues to go for 1.2.3 \o/
Thanks,
Deng
Re: ETA for Archiva 1.2.3? (Was: Archiva repository scan issue)
Posted by Deng Ching <oc...@apache.org>.
Hopefully, we'll be able to cut a release candidate in the next week. Only 5
more issues to go for 1.2.3 \o/
Thanks,
Deng
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Fredrik Jonson <fr...@jonson.org> wrote:
> Deng Ching wrote:
>
> > In the next Archiva release, there will be an option from the web UI to
> scan
> > the entire repository so all artifacts get processed regardless of its
> last
> > modified date (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-1056)
>
> I'm very happy to see this issue resolved in 1.2.3. It is one of the
> reasons
> that I've not yet upgraded from 1.1 to 1.2.x everywhere yet. Do you have a
> rough target release date for 1.2.3 at this time?
>
> While I'm at it, thanks to all archiva hackers for your work on a great
> repository manager.
>
> --
> Fredrik Jonson
>
>
ETA for Archiva 1.2.3? (Was: Archiva repository scan issue)
Posted by Fredrik Jonson <fr...@jonson.org>.
Deng Ching wrote:
> In the next Archiva release, there will be an option from the web UI to scan
> the entire repository so all artifacts get processed regardless of its last
> modified date (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-1056)
I'm very happy to see this issue resolved in 1.2.3. It is one of the reasons
that I've not yet upgraded from 1.1 to 1.2.x everywhere yet. Do you have a
rough target release date for 1.2.3 at this time?
While I'm at it, thanks to all archiva hackers for your work on a great
repository manager.
--
Fredrik Jonson
Re: Archiva repository scan issue
Posted by Deng Ching <oc...@apache.org>.
The repository scanner only processes artifacts whose last modified date
newer than the last run of the repo scan. I think in your case, since the
artifacts were added directly in the file system, they weren't processed
because of this. To work around this, you need to update the last
modification date of the artifacts that you added by executing the following
command for each artifact directory you added:
*find [DIRECTORY_NAME] | xargs touch*
In the next Archiva release, there will be an option from the web UI to scan
the entire repository so all artifacts get processed regardless of its last
modified date (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-1056) :)
Thanks,
Deng
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Menattamai, Rajasekaran <
Rajasekaran.Menattamai@finra.org> wrote:
>
> Iam not sure if the operation I am doing is incorrect or the repository
> scanning feature in archiva 1.2.2 does not work as expected.
>
> I created a repository. Added some files directly to the repository's
> directory location ( in exactly like the maven2 format ) . Ran the
> "repository scan" for this repository. After the scan the result
> reported that it found 6 new files. These files appear in the "total
> file count" ,but other columns were not updated at all. There are some
> jars and poms in the set of the files I added. When I search for the
> file I added, "search" did not return any results, which means the
> database was not updated. If the operation I am doing is correct, then I
> will open a defect ticket for this.
>
>
>
> Statistics for Repository 'approved_3p'
>
>
> Date of Scan Total File Count Total Size Artifact Count
> Group Count Project Count Plugins Archetypes Jars
> Wars Deployments Downloads
> Fri Nov 20 13:12:43 EST 2009 6 1035114 0 0
> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
> Fri Nov 20 13:10:59 EST 2009 0 0 0 0 0
> 0 0 0 0 0 0
>
>
>
>
> -- Thanks
>
> Raj
>
> Raj Menattamai
> Software Factory CM
> 240 386 6238 ( O )
> 804 852 4001 ( Cell )
>
>
>
>
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This email, including attachments, may include
> non-public, proprietary, confidential or legally privileged information. If
> you are not an intended recipient or an authorized agent of an intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of the information contained in or transmitted with this e-mail is
> unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in
> error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and permanently
> delete this e-mail, its attachments, and any copies of it immediately. You
> should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any
> purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person.
> Thank you
>
>