You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Sowmya Krishnan <so...@citrix.com> on 2013/05/07 12:03:36 UTC
[ACS42][QA] Test Plan for Support of Netscaler as external LB in VPC
I am planning to take up test execution for the feature : "Support for Netscaler as External Load Balancer in VPC"
I've written some test cases for the same. Please review and let me know if any comments.
Here are Test cases: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Support+for+Netscaler+as+External+Load+Balancer+in+VPC+Tests
Ref FS for the feature is here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Support+of+Netscaler+as+External+LoadBalancing+Provider+in+VPC
There are few questions on the FS as I was writing the tests. Rajesh, could you please let me know your response for these. I'll update the Test plan accordingly.
1. I am assuming upgrade of VPC offering from Default offering to "Default Offering with NS" is allowed. If not, need to update this in the FS if there are any limitations on this front.
2. On the same lines, upgrade of network offering of the network tier is also possible I assume . (For example, from LB provided by VpcVirtualRouter to LB provided by Netscaler)
3. Also on the UI front, currently while creating network offering for the tier, if we choose VPC, Netscaler as service provider for LB is disabled. We need to enable this.
Thanks,
Sowmya
RE: [ACS42][QA] Test Plan for Support of Netscaler as external LB
in VPC
Posted by Rajesh Battala <ra...@citrix.com>.
Regarding upgrade path I had updated in the FS.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sowmya Krishnan
> Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2013 4:38 PM
> To: Rajesh Battala; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [ACS42][QA] Test Plan for Support of Netscaler as external LB in
> VPC
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rajesh Battala
> > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 3:15 PM
> > To: Sowmya Krishnan; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [ACS42][QA] Test Plan for Support of Netscaler as
> > external LB in VPC
> >
> > There are two things, upgrading VPC, and upgrading VPC network offering.
> > Upgrading VPC is not supported.
> >
> Ok. I am talking about updateVPCOffering. Correct me if I am wrong here: we
> couldn't change VPC offering till now since we had only one offering for VPC:
> Default Offering. Now that we have a new offering (Default Offering with NS),
> shouldn't we allow updating the VPC offering? Otherwise, I don't see how we
> can upgrade the network tier offering to use External device without
> updating the VPC to use NS?
>
> > Upgrading VPC networking offering (only valid scenario is LB vpc to NS Lb).
> > upgrading the network where External device is involved changing the cidr.
>
> This is the network tier offering: updateNetwork. Are you saying this valid
> scenario is supported? Example: updateNetwork from offering which
> supports VPCVR as LB to offering which support NS as LB
>
> > Will update in FS.
>
> Thanks.
>
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Sowmya Krishnan
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2013 2:38 PM
> > > To: Rajesh Battala; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: [ACS42][QA] Test Plan for Support of Netscaler as
> > > external LB in VPC
> > >
> > > Thanks Rajesh. Could you please let me know the technical reason why
> > > we are not supporting Upgrade of VPC network offering or network tier
> LB?
> > > This limitation needs to be documented. Also, could you please
> > > update the same in FS too.
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Rajesh Battala
> > > > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 1:54 PM
> > > > To: Sowmya Krishnan; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > Subject: RE: [ACS42][QA] Test Plan for Support of Netscaler as
> > > > external LB in VPC
> > > >
> > > > Please see my comments in-line. Please let me know your comments.
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Sowmya Krishnan
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2013 3:34 PM
> > > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > > Cc: Rajesh Battala
> > > > > Subject: [ACS42][QA] Test Plan for Support of Netscaler as
> > > > > external LB in VPC
> > > > >
> > > > > I am planning to take up test execution for the feature :
> > > > > "Support for Netscaler as External Load Balancer in VPC"
> > > > > I've written some test cases for the same. Please review and let
> > > > > me know if any comments.
> > > > > Here are Test cases:
> > > > >
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Support+for+N
> > > > > et
> > > > > s
> > > > > caler+as+External+Load+Balancer+in+VPC+Tests
> > > > >
> > > > > Ref FS for the feature is here:
> > > > >
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Support+of+Ne
> > > > > ts
> > > > > c
> > > > > aler+as+External+LoadBalancing+Provider+in+VPC
> > > > >
> > > > [Rajesh Battala]
> > > > 48. Create VPC with shared NS : It should fail only when tier is
> > > > created and implemented with NS as LB ( when NS of type only
> > > > shared is available it should
> > > > fail) not while creating VPC.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Tests cases that should/can be include :
> > > > 1. As External Devices (Netscaler) is involved while tier
> > > > creation, cidr should be subset from the super cidr ( new cidr out
> > > > of super cidr should not be generated) 2. When tier is created
> > > > with LB as Netscaler ( and network is implemented) the VpcVR
> > > > should have a new nic attached and the ip of the nic should be the
> > > > gateway ip specified while creating the
> > > tier.
> > > > 3. when tier is created with LB as NS, when a dedicated NS is
> > > > available after tier got implemented NS state should be in allocated.
> > > > 4. when the tier is delete where NS is dedicate, NS allocation
> > > > state should be moved to free pool.
> > > > 5. Deletion of NS device should fail if the device is in
> > > > active/used in the
> > > tier.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > There are few questions on the FS as I was writing the tests.
> > > > > Rajesh, could you please let me know your response for these.
> > > > > I'll update the Test plan accordingly.
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. I am assuming upgrade of VPC offering from Default offering
> > > > > to "Default Offering with NS" is allowed. If not, need to update
> > > > > this in the FS if there are any limitations on this front.
> > > > [Rajesh Battala] Upgrading not supported currently. We can create
> > > > an enhancement to track it.
> > > > > 2. On the same lines, upgrade of network offering of the network
> > > > > tier is also possible I assume . (For example, from LB provided
> > > > > by VpcVirtualRouter to LB provided by Netscaler)
> > > > [Rajesh Battala] Upgrading of LB is possible but not supported
> currently.
> > > > 3. Also on the UI front, currently while creating
> > > > > network offering for the tier, if we choose VPC, Netscaler as
> > > > > service provider for LB is disabled. We need to enable this.
> > > > [Rajesh Battala] yes we need to enable this otherwise VPC n/w
> > > > offering cannot be created. I will add it in FS.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Sowmya
RE: [ACS42][QA] Test Plan for Support of Netscaler as external LB
in VPC
Posted by Sowmya Krishnan <so...@citrix.com>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rajesh Battala
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 3:15 PM
> To: Sowmya Krishnan; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [ACS42][QA] Test Plan for Support of Netscaler as external LB in
> VPC
>
> There are two things, upgrading VPC, and upgrading VPC network offering.
> Upgrading VPC is not supported.
>
Ok. I am talking about updateVPCOffering. Correct me if I am wrong here: we couldn't change VPC offering till now since we had only one offering for VPC: Default Offering. Now that we have a new offering (Default Offering with NS), shouldn't we allow updating the VPC offering? Otherwise, I don't see how we can upgrade the network tier offering to use External device without updating the VPC to use NS?
> Upgrading VPC networking offering (only valid scenario is LB vpc to NS Lb).
> upgrading the network where External device is involved changing the cidr.
This is the network tier offering: updateNetwork. Are you saying this valid scenario is supported? Example: updateNetwork from offering which supports VPCVR as LB to offering which support NS as LB
> Will update in FS.
Thanks.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sowmya Krishnan
> > Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2013 2:38 PM
> > To: Rajesh Battala; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [ACS42][QA] Test Plan for Support of Netscaler as
> > external LB in VPC
> >
> > Thanks Rajesh. Could you please let me know the technical reason why
> > we are not supporting Upgrade of VPC network offering or network tier LB?
> > This limitation needs to be documented. Also, could you please update
> > the same in FS too.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Rajesh Battala
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 1:54 PM
> > > To: Sowmya Krishnan; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: [ACS42][QA] Test Plan for Support of Netscaler as
> > > external LB in VPC
> > >
> > > Please see my comments in-line. Please let me know your comments.
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Sowmya Krishnan
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2013 3:34 PM
> > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > Cc: Rajesh Battala
> > > > Subject: [ACS42][QA] Test Plan for Support of Netscaler as
> > > > external LB in VPC
> > > >
> > > > I am planning to take up test execution for the feature : "Support
> > > > for Netscaler as External Load Balancer in VPC"
> > > > I've written some test cases for the same. Please review and let
> > > > me know if any comments.
> > > > Here are Test cases:
> > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Support+for+N
> > > > et
> > > > s
> > > > caler+as+External+Load+Balancer+in+VPC+Tests
> > > >
> > > > Ref FS for the feature is here:
> > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Support+of+Ne
> > > > ts
> > > > c
> > > > aler+as+External+LoadBalancing+Provider+in+VPC
> > > >
> > > [Rajesh Battala]
> > > 48. Create VPC with shared NS : It should fail only when tier is
> > > created and implemented with NS as LB ( when NS of type only shared
> > > is available it should
> > > fail) not while creating VPC.
> > >
> > >
> > > Tests cases that should/can be include :
> > > 1. As External Devices (Netscaler) is involved while tier creation,
> > > cidr should be subset from the super cidr ( new cidr out of super
> > > cidr should not be generated) 2. When tier is created with LB as
> > > Netscaler ( and network is implemented) the VpcVR should have a new
> > > nic attached and the ip of the nic should be the gateway ip
> > > specified while creating the
> > tier.
> > > 3. when tier is created with LB as NS, when a dedicated NS is
> > > available after tier got implemented NS state should be in allocated.
> > > 4. when the tier is delete where NS is dedicate, NS allocation state
> > > should be moved to free pool.
> > > 5. Deletion of NS device should fail if the device is in active/used
> > > in the
> > tier.
> > >
> > >
> > > > There are few questions on the FS as I was writing the tests.
> > > > Rajesh, could you please let me know your response for these. I'll
> > > > update the Test plan accordingly.
> > > >
> > > > 1. I am assuming upgrade of VPC offering from Default offering to
> > > > "Default Offering with NS" is allowed. If not, need to update this
> > > > in the FS if there are any limitations on this front.
> > > [Rajesh Battala] Upgrading not supported currently. We can create
> > > an enhancement to track it.
> > > > 2. On the same lines, upgrade of network offering of the network
> > > > tier is also possible I assume . (For example, from LB provided by
> > > > VpcVirtualRouter to LB provided by Netscaler)
> > > [Rajesh Battala] Upgrading of LB is possible but not supported currently.
> > > 3. Also on the UI front, currently while creating
> > > > network offering for the tier, if we choose VPC, Netscaler as
> > > > service provider for LB is disabled. We need to enable this.
> > > [Rajesh Battala] yes we need to enable this otherwise VPC n/w
> > > offering cannot be created. I will add it in FS.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Sowmya
RE: [ACS42][QA] Test Plan for Support of Netscaler as external LB
in VPC
Posted by Rajesh Battala <ra...@citrix.com>.
There are two things, upgrading VPC, and upgrading VPC network offering.
Upgrading VPC is not supported.
Upgrading VPC networking offering (only valid scenario is LB vpc to NS Lb). upgrading the network where External device is involved changing the cidr.
Will update in FS.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sowmya Krishnan
> Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2013 2:38 PM
> To: Rajesh Battala; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [ACS42][QA] Test Plan for Support of Netscaler as external LB in
> VPC
>
> Thanks Rajesh. Could you please let me know the technical reason why we
> are not supporting Upgrade of VPC network offering or network tier LB?
> This limitation needs to be documented. Also, could you please update the
> same in FS too.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rajesh Battala
> > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 1:54 PM
> > To: Sowmya Krishnan; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [ACS42][QA] Test Plan for Support of Netscaler as
> > external LB in VPC
> >
> > Please see my comments in-line. Please let me know your comments.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Sowmya Krishnan
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2013 3:34 PM
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Cc: Rajesh Battala
> > > Subject: [ACS42][QA] Test Plan for Support of Netscaler as external
> > > LB in VPC
> > >
> > > I am planning to take up test execution for the feature : "Support
> > > for Netscaler as External Load Balancer in VPC"
> > > I've written some test cases for the same. Please review and let me
> > > know if any comments.
> > > Here are Test cases:
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Support+for+N
> > > et
> > > s
> > > caler+as+External+Load+Balancer+in+VPC+Tests
> > >
> > > Ref FS for the feature is here:
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Support+of+Ne
> > > ts
> > > c
> > > aler+as+External+LoadBalancing+Provider+in+VPC
> > >
> > [Rajesh Battala]
> > 48. Create VPC with shared NS : It should fail only when tier is
> > created and implemented with NS as LB ( when NS of type only shared is
> > available it should
> > fail) not while creating VPC.
> >
> >
> > Tests cases that should/can be include :
> > 1. As External Devices (Netscaler) is involved while tier creation,
> > cidr should be subset from the super cidr ( new cidr out of super cidr
> > should not be generated) 2. When tier is created with LB as Netscaler
> > ( and network is implemented) the VpcVR should have a new nic attached
> > and the ip of the nic should be the gateway ip specified while creating the
> tier.
> > 3. when tier is created with LB as NS, when a dedicated NS is
> > available after tier got implemented NS state should be in allocated.
> > 4. when the tier is delete where NS is dedicate, NS allocation state
> > should be moved to free pool.
> > 5. Deletion of NS device should fail if the device is in active/used in the
> tier.
> >
> >
> > > There are few questions on the FS as I was writing the tests.
> > > Rajesh, could you please let me know your response for these. I'll
> > > update the Test plan accordingly.
> > >
> > > 1. I am assuming upgrade of VPC offering from Default offering to
> > > "Default Offering with NS" is allowed. If not, need to update this
> > > in the FS if there are any limitations on this front.
> > [Rajesh Battala] Upgrading not supported currently. We can create an
> > enhancement to track it.
> > > 2. On the same lines, upgrade of network offering of the network
> > > tier is also possible I assume . (For example, from LB provided by
> > > VpcVirtualRouter to LB provided by Netscaler)
> > [Rajesh Battala] Upgrading of LB is possible but not supported currently.
> > 3. Also on the UI front, currently while creating
> > > network offering for the tier, if we choose VPC, Netscaler as
> > > service provider for LB is disabled. We need to enable this.
> > [Rajesh Battala] yes we need to enable this otherwise VPC n/w offering
> > cannot be created. I will add it in FS.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Sowmya
RE: [ACS42][QA] Test Plan for Support of Netscaler as external LB
in VPC
Posted by Sowmya Krishnan <so...@citrix.com>.
Thanks Rajesh. Could you please let me know the technical reason why we are not supporting Upgrade of VPC network offering or network tier LB?
This limitation needs to be documented. Also, could you please update the same in FS too.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rajesh Battala
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 1:54 PM
> To: Sowmya Krishnan; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [ACS42][QA] Test Plan for Support of Netscaler as external LB in
> VPC
>
> Please see my comments in-line. Please let me know your comments.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sowmya Krishnan
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2013 3:34 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Cc: Rajesh Battala
> > Subject: [ACS42][QA] Test Plan for Support of Netscaler as external LB
> > in VPC
> >
> > I am planning to take up test execution for the feature : "Support for
> > Netscaler as External Load Balancer in VPC"
> > I've written some test cases for the same. Please review and let me
> > know if any comments.
> > Here are Test cases:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Support+for+Net
> > s
> > caler+as+External+Load+Balancer+in+VPC+Tests
> >
> > Ref FS for the feature is here:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Support+of+Nets
> > c
> > aler+as+External+LoadBalancing+Provider+in+VPC
> >
> [Rajesh Battala]
> 48. Create VPC with shared NS : It should fail only when tier is created and
> implemented with NS as LB ( when NS of type only shared is available it should
> fail) not while creating VPC.
>
>
> Tests cases that should/can be include :
> 1. As External Devices (Netscaler) is involved while tier creation, cidr should be
> subset from the super cidr ( new cidr out of super cidr should not be generated)
> 2. When tier is created with LB as Netscaler ( and network is implemented) the
> VpcVR should have a new nic attached and the ip of the nic should be the
> gateway ip specified while creating the tier.
> 3. when tier is created with LB as NS, when a dedicated NS is available after tier
> got implemented NS state should be in allocated.
> 4. when the tier is delete where NS is dedicate, NS allocation state should be
> moved to free pool.
> 5. Deletion of NS device should fail if the device is in active/used in the tier.
>
>
> > There are few questions on the FS as I was writing the tests. Rajesh, could
> > you please let me know your response for these. I'll update the Test plan
> > accordingly.
> >
> > 1. I am assuming upgrade of VPC offering from Default offering to "Default
> > Offering with NS" is allowed. If not, need to update this in the FS if there are
> > any limitations on this front.
> [Rajesh Battala] Upgrading not supported currently. We can create an
> enhancement to track it.
> > 2. On the same lines, upgrade of network offering of the network tier is also
> > possible I assume . (For example, from LB provided by VpcVirtualRouter to LB
> > provided by Netscaler)
> [Rajesh Battala] Upgrading of LB is possible but not supported currently.
> 3. Also on the UI front, currently while creating
> > network offering for the tier, if we choose VPC, Netscaler as service provider
> > for LB is disabled. We need to enable this.
> [Rajesh Battala] yes we need to enable this otherwise VPC n/w offering cannot
> be created. I will add it in FS.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sowmya
RE: [ACS42][QA] Test Plan for Support of Netscaler as external LB
in VPC
Posted by Rajesh Battala <ra...@citrix.com>.
Please see my comments in-line. Please let me know your comments.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sowmya Krishnan
> Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2013 3:34 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Rajesh Battala
> Subject: [ACS42][QA] Test Plan for Support of Netscaler as external LB in VPC
>
> I am planning to take up test execution for the feature : "Support for
> Netscaler as External Load Balancer in VPC"
> I've written some test cases for the same. Please review and let me know if
> any comments.
> Here are Test cases:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Support+for+Nets
> caler+as+External+Load+Balancer+in+VPC+Tests
>
> Ref FS for the feature is here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Support+of+Netsc
> aler+as+External+LoadBalancing+Provider+in+VPC
>
[Rajesh Battala]
48. Create VPC with shared NS : It should fail only when tier is created and implemented with NS as LB ( when NS of type only shared is available it should fail) not while creating VPC.
Tests cases that should/can be include :
1. As External Devices (Netscaler) is involved while tier creation, cidr should be subset from the super cidr ( new cidr out of super cidr should not be generated)
2. When tier is created with LB as Netscaler ( and network is implemented) the VpcVR should have a new nic attached and the ip of the nic should be the gateway ip specified while creating the tier.
3. when tier is created with LB as NS, when a dedicated NS is available after tier got implemented NS state should be in allocated.
4. when the tier is delete where NS is dedicate, NS allocation state should be moved to free pool.
5. Deletion of NS device should fail if the device is in active/used in the tier.
> There are few questions on the FS as I was writing the tests. Rajesh, could
> you please let me know your response for these. I'll update the Test plan
> accordingly.
>
> 1. I am assuming upgrade of VPC offering from Default offering to "Default
> Offering with NS" is allowed. If not, need to update this in the FS if there are
> any limitations on this front.
[Rajesh Battala] Upgrading not supported currently. We can create an enhancement to track it.
> 2. On the same lines, upgrade of network offering of the network tier is also
> possible I assume . (For example, from LB provided by VpcVirtualRouter to LB
> provided by Netscaler)
[Rajesh Battala] Upgrading of LB is possible but not supported currently.
3. Also on the UI front, currently while creating
> network offering for the tier, if we choose VPC, Netscaler as service provider
> for LB is disabled. We need to enable this.
[Rajesh Battala] yes we need to enable this otherwise VPC n/w offering cannot be created. I will add it in FS.
>
> Thanks,
> Sowmya