Re: svn commit: r1855211 - /subversion/site/publish/docs/community-guide/releasing.part.html

[Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name>]

julianfoad@apache.org wrote on Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:35 +00:00:
> Author: julianfoad
> Date: Mon Mar 11 11:35:43 2019
> New Revision: 1855211
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1855211&view=rev
> Log:
> * publish/docs/community-guide/releasing.part.html:
>   Don't use reporter.apache.org for pre-releases.

For what it's worth:

reporter.a.o is AFAIK only used for drafting Board reports; I would
expect the Board to care equally much about any release regardless of
its alpha/beta/RC/GA status; therefore, I would consider release
of an RC to be as worthy of mention in the quarterly report as any
GA release.

Cheers,

Daniel

Re: svn commit: r1855211 - /subversion/site/publish/docs/community-guide/releasing.part.html

[Julian Foad <ju...@apache.org>]

Daniel Shahaf wrote on 2019-03-13:
> julianfoad@apache.org wrote on Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:35 +00:00:
> > Author: julianfoad
> > Date: Mon Mar 11 11:35:43 2019
> > New Revision: 1855211
> > 
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1855211&view=rev
> > Log:
> > * publish/docs/community-guide/releasing.part.html:
> >   Don't use reporter.apache.org for pre-releases.
> 
> For what it's worth:
> 
> reporter.a.o is AFAIK only used for drafting Board reports; I would
> expect the Board to care equally much about any release regardless of
> its alpha/beta/RC/GA status; therefore, I would consider release
> of an RC to be as worthy of mention in the quarterly report as any
> GA release.

Hmm, yes. I think I made the wrong decision there, carelessly assuming it was similar to our "doap" file[1] which doesn't need to mention pre-releases.

I'll revert this. r1855435. Thanks.

-- 
- Julian