You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@solr.apache.org by "Nick Shanin (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2026/10/01 21:39:00 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-18134) ancestor_path field type no longer works; Solr-10 upgrade notes suggested change also does not work
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-18134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18121188#comment-18121188 ]
Nick Shanin edited comment on SOLR-18134 at 10/1/26 9:38 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks, [~ab].
I'm withdrawing my PR and will try to nudge the Lucene PR for this issue:
[https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/16402]
was (Author: JIRAUSER314749):
Thanks [~ab].
I'm withdrawing my PR and will try to nudge the Lucene PR for this issue:
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/16402
> ancestor_path field type no longer works; Solr-10 upgrade notes suggested change also does not work
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-18134
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-18134
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 10.0
> Reporter: Chris M. Hostetter
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Time Spent: 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> While trying the Solr-10.0.0 RCs, and reviewing the {{major-changes-in-solr-10.adoc}} I noticed this commit made a while back as part of SOLR-17631 ...
> [https://github.com/apache/solr/commit/0f4cd0f846c]
>
> * The test changes (both to the test configs and java test code) convert {{testAncestors()}} into a test of _descendant_ behavior – not _ancestor_ behavior
> ** this problem is also reflected in the suggested configuration change in {{major-changes-in-solr-10.adoc}} (it's not going to work for finding "ancestors", no matter what type of query you send)
> * The {{_default}} schema still uses the "old" configuration
> ** But the underlying lucene functionality for "ancestor path" type use cases appears (AFAICT) to be fundamentally broken in Lucene > 10.0: [#15769|https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/15769] (unless maybe you write a custom query parser)
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@solr.apache.org