You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ofbiz.apache.org by "Jacopo Cappellato (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/04/21 14:53:16 UTC
[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-149) Better describe complex party
relationships
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Jacopo Cappellato closed OFBIZ-149.
-----------------------------------
Resolution: Later
> Better describe complex party relationships
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-149
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-149
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: party
> Reporter: Chris Howe
> Assignee: David E. Jones
> Attachments: ASF.LICENSE.NOT.GRANTED--PartyRelationship.patch, necessaryChangeLog.txt
>
>
> Change to the party data model to support relationships where parties act in several capacities (roles) and allowing polynary relationships.
> If someone could describe a situation where the direcition of the role matters (partyIdTo/partyIdFrom) and where the roleType is insuficient to understand the direction I will try to come up with a solution. I'm trying to understand if simply better role designations would alleviate ambiguity or if there is a real need to support direction.
> I began a discussion on this topic, there has yet to be any response
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ofbiz-dev/200608.mbox/%3c20060809155147.18528.qmail@web80615.mail.yahoo.com%3e
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)