You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com> on 2006/10/11 15:19:48 UTC
Java SDO M2 relesae candidate 3 available
I have put a new release candidate for SDO Java up at
http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC3/
This tries to take into account the comments that the sample distribution
does not need to be stand alone, and that
javadoc should be shipped with the binary and sample distributions.
I have been fighting with the maven build environment to produce a good set
of javadoc as part of the build, from a user's
perspective, but that's not at all easy given the structure of our projects
and the nature of the maven javadoc plugin,
so currently the binary distribution carries javadoc for the sdo api and
all of the tuscany implementation. The README file
draws the attention of an SDO user to relevant classes in the tuscany
implementation javadoc.
Regards, Kelvin.
Re: Java SDO M2 relesae candidate 3 available
Posted by kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com>.
Simon,
I have made these changes, thanks.
I am unsure of one thing regarding the difference between CHANGES and
RELEASE_DOCUMENTATION. These files were provided by Yang as a JIRA
attachment in consultation with Frank, and I had been meaning to check the
difference in purpose of the two files. I can't see any apache
documentation to say that we need both, so as Yang and Frank are currently
tucked up in bed I imagine, I am making the assumption that CHANGES.txt is a
running log that is used in the production of any given release. If this is
wrong then I'll need to fix that, but currently my fix for your catch is to
put a note at the top of CHANGES.txt to explain its purpose and direct the
user of a new release to look at the RELEASE_NOTES.txt file.
Regards , Kelvin.
On 13/10/06, kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for all these good catches, will fix.
>
> Kelvin.
>
>
> On 12/10/06, Simon Nash <na...@hursley.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > This is getting very close now. Good work! I have a few minor
> > comments, mostly typos in the samples documentation.
> >
> > in sample/README.txt
> >
> > change "already build" to "already built"
> >
> > in sample/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/samples/sdo/overview.html
> >
> > change Samples Programs to Sample Programs
> > remove misplaced line breaks on penultimate lines of Overview and
> > Experimentation
> > sections
> > "third category" in Overview paragraph does not match the categories
> > in the
> > table that precedes this text when this file is displayed within
> > sample/site/apidocs/index.html (it's actually a subset of the first
> > category in the table). An easy fix is to change "and the third
> > category were"
> > to "or were"
> > in the "Getting Ready ..." section, first line, change "depend of" to
> > "depend on"
> > in the "Getting Ready ..." section, second last paragraph, first line,
> > change
> > "insrtuctions" to "instructions"
> > download link for the SDO 2.01 specs currently points to the IBM web
> > site and should
> > be changed to point to the osoa.org site
> >
> > in sample/site/apidocs/org/apache/tuscany/samples/sdo/package.html
> >
> > fix dangling reference at the end of this file
> >
> > in
> > sample/site/apidocs/org/apache/tuscany/samples/sdo/otherSources/package.html
> >
> >
> > in first sentence, change "specification" to "SDO Specification" (to
> > avoid forward reference when this text is displayed in the package overview
> > table in sample/site/apidocs/index.html)
> > change "usefull scnearios" to "useful scenarios"
> > download link for the SDO 2.01 specs currently points to the IBM web
> > site and should
> > be changed to point to the osoa.org site
> >
> > in
> > sample/site/apidocs/org/apache/tuscany/samples/sdo/specCodeSnippets/package.html
> >
> >
> > change "snipets" to "snippets" (twice)
> > change "flexability" to "flexibility"
> > change "desireable" to "desirable"
> > change "extend or improve" to "to extend or improve"
> > download link for the SDO 2.01 specs currently points to the IBM web
> > site and should
> > be changed to point to the osoa.org site
> >
> > in
> > sample/site/apidocs/org/apache/tuscany/samples/sdo/specExampleSection/package.html
> >
> >
> > change "specification, exceptions" to "specification; exceptions"
> > download link for the SDO 2.01 specs currently points to the IBM web
> > site and should
> > be changed to point to the osoa.org site
> >
> > in output from ExecuteSamples, CreatePurchaseOrder, and
> > ReadPurchaseOrder:
> >
> > change "Fuhwei Lo" to "Fuhwei Lwo"
> >
> > in SDO binary distribution
> >
> > there is duplication of content between RELEASE_NOTES.txt and
> > CHANGES.txt
> >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Simon
> >
> > kelvin goodson wrote:
> >
> > > I have put a new release candidate for SDO Java up at
> > > http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC3/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC3/>
> > >
> > > This tries to take into account the comments that the sample
> > distribution
> > > does not need to be stand alone, and that
> > > javadoc should be shipped with the binary and sample distributions.
> > >
> > > I have been fighting with the maven build environment to produce a
> > good set
> > > of javadoc as part of the build, from a user's
> > > perspective, but that's not at all easy given the structure of our
> > > projects
> > > and the nature of the maven javadoc plugin,
> > > so currently the binary distribution carries javadoc for the sdo api
> > and
> > > all of the tuscany implementation. The README file
> > > draws the attention of an SDO user to relevant classes in
> > the tuscany
> > > implementation javadoc.
> > >
> > > Regards, Kelvin.
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >
> >
>
Re: Java SDO M2 relesae candidate 3 available
Posted by kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for all these good catches, will fix.
Kelvin.
On 12/10/06, Simon Nash <na...@hursley.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> This is getting very close now. Good work! I have a few minor
> comments, mostly typos in the samples documentation.
>
> in sample/README.txt
>
> change "already build" to "already built"
>
> in sample/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/samples/sdo/overview.html
>
> change Samples Programs to Sample Programs
> remove misplaced line breaks on penultimate lines of Overview and
> Experimentation
> sections
> "third category" in Overview paragraph does not match the categories in
> the
> table that precedes this text when this file is displayed within
> sample/site/apidocs/index.html (it's actually a subset of the first
> category in the table). An easy fix is to change "and the third
> category were"
> to "or were"
> in the "Getting Ready ..." section, first line, change "depend of" to
> "depend on"
> in the "Getting Ready ..." section, second last paragraph, first line,
> change
> "insrtuctions" to "instructions"
> download link for the SDO 2.01 specs currently points to the IBM web
> site and should
> be changed to point to the osoa.org site
>
> in sample/site/apidocs/org/apache/tuscany/samples/sdo/package.html
>
> fix dangling reference at the end of this file
>
> in
> sample/site/apidocs/org/apache/tuscany/samples/sdo/otherSources/package.html
>
> in first sentence, change "specification" to "SDO Specification" (to
> avoid forward reference when this text is displayed in the package overview
> table in sample/site/apidocs/index.html)
> change "usefull scnearios" to "useful scenarios"
> download link for the SDO 2.01 specs currently points to the IBM web
> site and should
> be changed to point to the osoa.org site
>
> in
> sample/site/apidocs/org/apache/tuscany/samples/sdo/specCodeSnippets/package.html
>
> change "snipets" to "snippets" (twice)
> change "flexability" to "flexibility"
> change "desireable" to "desirable"
> change "extend or improve" to "to extend or improve"
> download link for the SDO 2.01 specs currently points to the IBM web
> site and should
> be changed to point to the osoa.org site
>
> in
> sample/site/apidocs/org/apache/tuscany/samples/sdo/specExampleSection/package.html
>
> change "specification, exceptions" to "specification; exceptions"
> download link for the SDO 2.01 specs currently points to the IBM web
> site and should
> be changed to point to the osoa.org site
>
> in output from ExecuteSamples, CreatePurchaseOrder, and ReadPurchaseOrder:
>
> change "Fuhwei Lo" to "Fuhwei Lwo"
>
> in SDO binary distribution
>
> there is duplication of content between RELEASE_NOTES.txt and
> CHANGES.txt
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Simon
>
> kelvin goodson wrote:
>
> > I have put a new release candidate for SDO Java up at
> > http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC3/
> >
> > This tries to take into account the comments that the sample
> distribution
> > does not need to be stand alone, and that
> > javadoc should be shipped with the binary and sample distributions.
> >
> > I have been fighting with the maven build environment to produce a good
> set
> > of javadoc as part of the build, from a user's
> > perspective, but that's not at all easy given the structure of our
> > projects
> > and the nature of the maven javadoc plugin,
> > so currently the binary distribution carries javadoc for the sdo api
> and
> > all of the tuscany implementation. The README file
> > draws the attention of an SDO user to relevant classes in the tuscany
> > implementation javadoc.
> >
> > Regards, Kelvin.
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
Re: Java SDO M2 relesae candidate 3 available
Posted by Simon Nash <na...@hursley.ibm.com>.
This is getting very close now. Good work! I have a few minor
comments, mostly typos in the samples documentation.
in sample/README.txt
change "already build" to "already built"
in sample/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/samples/sdo/overview.html
change Samples Programs to Sample Programs
remove misplaced line breaks on penultimate lines of Overview and Experimentation
sections
"third category" in Overview paragraph does not match the categories in the
table that precedes this text when this file is displayed within
sample/site/apidocs/index.html (it's actually a subset of the first
category in the table). An easy fix is to change "and the third category were"
to "or were"
in the "Getting Ready ..." section, first line, change "depend of" to "depend on"
in the "Getting Ready ..." section, second last paragraph, first line, change
"insrtuctions" to "instructions"
download link for the SDO 2.01 specs currently points to the IBM web site and should
be changed to point to the osoa.org site
in sample/site/apidocs/org/apache/tuscany/samples/sdo/package.html
fix dangling reference at the end of this file
in sample/site/apidocs/org/apache/tuscany/samples/sdo/otherSources/package.html
in first sentence, change "specification" to "SDO Specification" (to avoid forward reference when this text is displayed in the package overview table in sample/site/apidocs/index.html)
change "usefull scnearios" to "useful scenarios"
download link for the SDO 2.01 specs currently points to the IBM web site and should
be changed to point to the osoa.org site
in sample/site/apidocs/org/apache/tuscany/samples/sdo/specCodeSnippets/package.html
change "snipets" to "snippets" (twice)
change "flexability" to "flexibility"
change "desireable" to "desirable"
change "extend or improve" to "to extend or improve"
download link for the SDO 2.01 specs currently points to the IBM web site and should
be changed to point to the osoa.org site
in sample/site/apidocs/org/apache/tuscany/samples/sdo/specExampleSection/package.html
change "specification, exceptions" to "specification; exceptions"
download link for the SDO 2.01 specs currently points to the IBM web site and should
be changed to point to the osoa.org site
in output from ExecuteSamples, CreatePurchaseOrder, and ReadPurchaseOrder:
change "Fuhwei Lo" to "Fuhwei Lwo"
in SDO binary distribution
there is duplication of content between RELEASE_NOTES.txt and CHANGES.txt
Thanks.
Simon
kelvin goodson wrote:
> I have put a new release candidate for SDO Java up at
> http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC3/
>
> This tries to take into account the comments that the sample distribution
> does not need to be stand alone, and that
> javadoc should be shipped with the binary and sample distributions.
>
> I have been fighting with the maven build environment to produce a good set
> of javadoc as part of the build, from a user's
> perspective, but that's not at all easy given the structure of our
> projects
> and the nature of the maven javadoc plugin,
> so currently the binary distribution carries javadoc for the sdo api and
> all of the tuscany implementation. The README file
> draws the attention of an SDO user to relevant classes in the tuscany
> implementation javadoc.
>
> Regards, Kelvin.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Error running sample in Java SDO M2 RC3
Posted by kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com>.
Oops, not sure how that crept through. I started making a test case that
ran all the samples, to make sure this kind of thing doesn't happen, but it
wasn't trivial because the samples are so interactive. It would be good to
make a non-interactive option on them, so that we can run them as the test
suite of the samples project, then we wouldn't miss this kind of thing. For
now I will document that the release process should include running the
samples as well as the tests, which I ususaly do, but omited to do for
RC3.
Apologies, Kelvin.
On 12/10/06, Simon Nash <na...@hursley.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> I'm getting a NullPointerException from the UsingXPath sample in SDO M2
> RC3.
> Here's the output from the sample with some debug code that I added to
> print the exception and stack trace:
>
> ***************************************
> SDO Sample UsingXPath
> ***************************************
> Demonstrats accessing a created DataObject's properties using xPath.
> ***************************************
> DataObject created
> Accessing individual item from list using xpath expressionitems/item[1]
> DataObject toString :
> org.apache.tuscany.sdo.impl.DynamicDataObjectImpl@33f0de
> (eClass: org.apache.tuscany.sdo.impl.ClassImpl@68c26c (name: item)
> (instanceClassName: null)
> (abstract: false, interface: false))
> Item name:Lawnmower
> Part num: 872-AA
> Accessing individual item from list using xpath
> expressionitems/item[productName=Baby Monitor]
> Sorry there was an error executing expression
> items/item[productName=Baby Monitor]
> java.lang.NullPointerException
> at
> org.apache.tuscany.sdo.util.DataObjectUtil$Accessor.setFeatureName(
> DataObjectUtil.java:2054)
> at org.apache.tuscany.sdo.util.DataObjectUtil$Accessor.process(
> DataObjectUtil.java:2161)
> at org.apache.tuscany.sdo.util.DataObjectUtil$Accessor.init(
> DataObjectUtil.java:1940)
> at org.apache.tuscany.sdo.util.DataObjectUtil$Accessor.create(
> DataObjectUtil.java:1860)
> at org.apache.tuscany.sdo.util.DataObjectUtil.get(
> DataObjectUtil.java:744)
> at org.apache.tuscany.sdo.impl.DataObjectImpl.get(
> DataObjectImpl.java:216)
> at org.apache.tuscany.sdo.impl.DataObjectImpl.getDataObject(
> DataObjectImpl.java:326)
> at
> org.apache.tuscany.samples.sdo.specCodeSnippets.UsingXPath.accessDataObjectUsingXPath
> (UsingXPath.java:94)
> at org.apache.tuscany.samples.sdo.specCodeSnippets.UsingXPath.main
> (UsingXPath.java:140)
> at org.apache.tuscany.samples.sdo.ExecuteSamples.main(
> ExecuteSamples.java:123)
> GoodBye
>
> Simon
>
> kelvin goodson wrote:
>
> > I have put a new release candidate for SDO Java up at
> > http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC3/
> >
> > This tries to take into account the comments that the sample
> distribution
> > does not need to be stand alone, and that
> > javadoc should be shipped with the binary and sample distributions.
> >
> > I have been fighting with the maven build environment to produce a good
> set
> > of javadoc as part of the build, from a user's
> > perspective, but that's not at all easy given the structure of our
> > projects
> > and the nature of the maven javadoc plugin,
> > so currently the binary distribution carries javadoc for the sdo api
> and
> > all of the tuscany implementation. The README file
> > draws the attention of an SDO user to relevant classes in the tuscany
> > implementation javadoc.
> >
> > Regards, Kelvin.
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
Error running sample in Java SDO M2 RC3
Posted by Simon Nash <na...@hursley.ibm.com>.
I'm getting a NullPointerException from the UsingXPath sample in SDO M2 RC3.
Here's the output from the sample with some debug code that I added to
print the exception and stack trace:
***************************************
SDO Sample UsingXPath
***************************************
Demonstrats accessing a created DataObject's properties using xPath.
***************************************
DataObject created
Accessing individual item from list using xpath expressionitems/item[1]
DataObject toString : org.apache.tuscany.sdo.impl.DynamicDataObjectImpl@33f0de
(eClass: org.apache.tuscany.sdo.impl.ClassImpl@68c26c (name: item) (instanceClassName: null)
(abstract: false, interface: false))
Item name:Lawnmower
Part num: 872-AA
Accessing individual item from list using xpath expressionitems/item[productName=Baby Monitor]
Sorry there was an error executing expression items/item[productName=Baby Monitor]
java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.apache.tuscany.sdo.util.DataObjectUtil$Accessor.setFeatureName(DataObjectUtil.java:2054)
at org.apache.tuscany.sdo.util.DataObjectUtil$Accessor.process(DataObjectUtil.java:2161)
at org.apache.tuscany.sdo.util.DataObjectUtil$Accessor.init(DataObjectUtil.java:1940)
at org.apache.tuscany.sdo.util.DataObjectUtil$Accessor.create(DataObjectUtil.java:1860)
at org.apache.tuscany.sdo.util.DataObjectUtil.get(DataObjectUtil.java:744)
at org.apache.tuscany.sdo.impl.DataObjectImpl.get(DataObjectImpl.java:216)
at org.apache.tuscany.sdo.impl.DataObjectImpl.getDataObject(DataObjectImpl.java:326)
at org.apache.tuscany.samples.sdo.specCodeSnippets.UsingXPath.accessDataObjectUsingXPath(UsingXPath.java:94)
at org.apache.tuscany.samples.sdo.specCodeSnippets.UsingXPath.main(UsingXPath.java:140)
at org.apache.tuscany.samples.sdo.ExecuteSamples.main(ExecuteSamples.java:123)
GoodBye
Simon
kelvin goodson wrote:
> I have put a new release candidate for SDO Java up at
> http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC3/
>
> This tries to take into account the comments that the sample distribution
> does not need to be stand alone, and that
> javadoc should be shipped with the binary and sample distributions.
>
> I have been fighting with the maven build environment to produce a good set
> of javadoc as part of the build, from a user's
> perspective, but that's not at all easy given the structure of our
> projects
> and the nature of the maven javadoc plugin,
> so currently the binary distribution carries javadoc for the sdo api and
> all of the tuscany implementation. The README file
> draws the attention of an SDO user to relevant classes in the tuscany
> implementation javadoc.
>
> Regards, Kelvin.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org