Re: Source re-structuring

[Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>]

I'd like to come back to this thread an handle it.
The number of modules is growing and it would be
cleaner to reorg all these modules.

So, unless someone objects, I will reorg the svn source
tree on friday.

On 7/28/06, Philip Dodds <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I put together a basic plan (with some help from Guillaume), here
>
> http://goopen.org/confluence/display/SM/Source+Structure
>
> The purpose of the new structure it two allow cleaner separation between:
>
> 1/ The JBI Container
> 2/ Deployables such as shared libraries/BC's/SE's
> 3/ Platform specific packaging projects
> 4/ Archetypes
> 5/ Tooling
> 6/ Sampels
>
> By categorizing the source it should become easier to read and therefore
> identifying what SE/BC's/SL's are available should become more obvious,  as
> well as cleanly showing what is required for core Container functionality.
>
> There are a couple of ommissions - first rather than one assembly (currently
> apache-servicemix project) I would like to add a root directories called
> assemblies and then create a few packaging (as previously mentioned)
>
> ie.
>
> assemblies
>    \ core-only
>    \ core-and-components
>    etc.
>
> The other is the servicemix-components package,  there are two ways to go
> here:
>
> 1/ Break up the components into different service engines
> 2/ Turn the servicemix-components jar into an SE,  add a dependencies on the
> servicemix-lwcontainer and then change all the libs to optional false
>
> I'm not keen on the first way because I think the conversion to real SE's
> will take some time and should be given space to make sure we are able to
> address things like WSDL for services etc.
>
> In the second option we end up with a large SE though I believe it will
> provide all the functionality,  I was thinknig that this would be a special
> packaging - ie. your can download just that big SE separate from the other
> assemblies.
>
> I would like to try and get a discussion going on this since once this is
> out of the way we could then look to the work invovled in converting some of
> the lw-container service engines into more complete JBI Service Engines
> (using the service-engine architype as a basis) and also work on puting more
> WSDL in place for those services :)
>
> P
>
>


-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet

Re: Source re-structuring

[Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>]

On 11/1/06, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd like to come back to this thread an handle it.
> The number of modules is growing and it would be
> cleaner to reorg all these modules.

+1

Please let me know if you need any help, Guillaume.

Bruce
-- 
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'

Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
Apache ActiveMQ - http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/
Apache ServiceMix - http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/
Castor - http://castor.org/