Extra entries in LICENSE file for release candidate [WAS Re: [VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.99.1 RC1]

[Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@apache.org>]

Hi Abijeet,
thank you very much for your vote, I appreciate your time.

Currently we have only one shared LICENSE file for both source and binary artifact, so it's expected that it covers jars that are not shipped with source artifact. We've built the license file based on current binary artifact, so it should not have any extra entries. There are 3 main sources for third party jars in binary artifact:

* client/lib/
* server/lib/
* server/webapps/sqoop.war (inside the archive)

I would guess that the extra entries you're seeing are "hidden" in the sqoop.war archive.

Jarcec

On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 08:58:44PM +0530, abhijeet gaikwad wrote:
> src: build and test successful
> 
> Verified the artifacts.
> Few extra jar names in License.txt (src as well bin), but no reason for a
> re-spin!
> 
> +1.
> 
> Thanks,
> Abhijeet
> 
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@apache.org>wrote:
> 
> > This is the first cut of Sqoop 2 branch, version 1.99.1. Purpose of this
> > release is to provide early bits to our users so that they can test the
> > product and provide early feedback.
> >
> > Changes in RC1:
> >
> > * Fixed NOTICE file
> >
> > *** Please cast your vote by Friday 2012-12-24 ***
> >
> > The list of fixed issues:
> >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=blob;f=CHANGELOG.txt;h=568454754625bedd8be97d2cefed030725211051;hb=9158dc99b3b9bce812fdf2ed48f41231d701e025
> >
> > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5, *.sha1):
> > http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.99.1-rc1/
> >
> > The tag to be voted upon:
> >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.99.1-rc1
> >
> > The KEYS file:
> > http://www.apache.org/dist/sqoop/KEYS
> >

Re: Extra entries in LICENSE file for release candidate [WAS Re: [VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.99.1 RC1]

[abhijeet gaikwad <ab...@gmail.com>]

Sounds good!
Thanks for the clarification and hard work on this release.

Thanks,
Abhijeet
On 24 Dec 2012 14:38, "Jarek Jarcec Cecho" <ja...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Abijeet,
> thank you very much for your vote, I appreciate your time.
>
> Currently we have only one shared LICENSE file for both source and binary
> artifact, so it's expected that it covers jars that are not shipped with
> source artifact. We've built the license file based on current binary
> artifact, so it should not have any extra entries. There are 3 main sources
> for third party jars in binary artifact:
>
> * client/lib/
> * server/lib/
> * server/webapps/sqoop.war (inside the archive)
>
> I would guess that the extra entries you're seeing are "hidden" in the
> sqoop.war archive.
>
> Jarcec
>
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 08:58:44PM +0530, abhijeet gaikwad wrote:
> > src: build and test successful
> >
> > Verified the artifacts.
> > Few extra jar names in License.txt (src as well bin), but no reason for a
> > re-spin!
> >
> > +1.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Abhijeet
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <jarcec@apache.org
> >wrote:
> >
> > > This is the first cut of Sqoop 2 branch, version 1.99.1. Purpose of
> this
> > > release is to provide early bits to our users so that they can test the
> > > product and provide early feedback.
> > >
> > > Changes in RC1:
> > >
> > > * Fixed NOTICE file
> > >
> > > *** Please cast your vote by Friday 2012-12-24 ***
> > >
> > > The list of fixed issues:
> > >
> > >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=blob;f=CHANGELOG.txt;h=568454754625bedd8be97d2cefed030725211051;hb=9158dc99b3b9bce812fdf2ed48f41231d701e025
> > >
> > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5, *.sha1):
> > > http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.99.1-rc1/
> > >
> > > The tag to be voted upon:
> > >
> > >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.99.1-rc1
> > >
> > > The KEYS file:
> > > http://www.apache.org/dist/sqoop/KEYS
> > >
>