You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> on 2009/08/25 19:41:00 UTC

[Trinidad] 1.0.11 release candidate - please test

Hi folks,

has been a while since the last 1.0.x release.
After some initial issue I was able to get a _working_ build.

While this ticket remains open (see [1]), I'd like to ask you to test
the artifacts.

I did an upload to here:
http://people.apache.org/~matzew/trinidad1011/

My quick test-drive was successful, but I don't have any Trinidad
1.0.x application
in production (just 1.2.x-based stuff)

Please help to get this 1.0.11 release out of the door!

Thanks,
Matthias

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1542

-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

Re: [Trinidad] 1.0.11 release candidate - please test

Posted by Rafa Pérez <ra...@gmail.com>.
We also have an 1.0.x application, will let you know...

Thanks Matthias.

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Paul Mander <pa...@gmail.com>wrote:

>
> Thanks Matthias,
>
> We have a 1.0.x application (WebSphere 6.1, myfaces 1.1.15). I'll run
> through the app and let you know.
>
> Matthias Wessendorf-4 wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > has been a while since the last 1.0.x release.
> > After some initial issue I was able to get a _working_ build.
> >
> > While this ticket remains open (see [1]), I'd like to ask you to test
> > the artifacts.
> >
> > I did an upload to here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~matzew/trinidad1011/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ematzew/trinidad1011/>
> >
> > My quick test-drive was successful, but I don't have any Trinidad
> > 1.0.x application
> > in production (just 1.2.x-based stuff)
> >
> > Please help to get this 1.0.11 release out of the door!
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Matthias
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1542
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/-Trinidad--1.0.11-release-candidate---please-test-tp25138955p25147850.html
> Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Re: [Trinidad] 1.0.11 release candidate - please test

Posted by Rafa Pérez <ra...@gmail.com>.
Everything seems to be ok with our application.

Regards,

-- Rafa

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Paul Mander<pa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> > Matthias Wessendorf-4 wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Paul Mander<pa...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Application functions as expected.
> >>>
> >>> Checked
> >>>
> >>> TRINIDAD-992
> >>> TRINIDAD-1317
> >>> TRINIDAD-790 (fixed in 1.0.9)
> >>> TRINIDAD-1209 (fixed in 1.0.9)
> >>>
> >>> from our custom 1.0.7 release.
> >>
> >>>thanks for helping out, Paul!
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Does not fix TRINIDAD-941/1071 (but i didn't expect it to) - tested
> 1071
> >>> fix
> >>> and it seems to fix these problems - would have been nice to have in
> this
> >>> build - people do use ie6 you know...
> >>
> >>>so, you are saying, with using patch for "TRINIDAD-1071" the stuff
> >>>works in IE 6?
> >>>(I don't have that browser on any of my computers ;-) )
> >>
> >>>-Matthias
> >>
> >> There is a lightweightdialog rendering issue with "heavyweight" controls
> >> such as combo boxes. These don't render first time on an ie6 platform in
> a
> >> lightweight dialog. There is a supplied fix attached to bug#1071. This
> >> appears to solve this problem with a change to ChooseDateRenderer.
> >> However, any combo boxes on the parent page are temporarily removed
> whilst
> >> the lightweight dialog is present (they are re-rendered correctly when
> you
> >> return from the dialog).
>
> I see - maybe we should make this become part of 1.0.12 ?
> Question: Can you upload a DIFF ? That makes reviewing much easier, instead
> of replacing a .java file
>
> Thanks!
> Matthias
>
> >>
> >> I use windows 7 with an xp virtual machine to test ie6.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> Paul
> >>>
> >>> Paul Mander wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks Matthias,
> >>>>
> >>>> We have a 1.0.x application (WebSphere 6.1, myfaces 1.1.15). I'll run
> >>>> through the app and let you know.
> >>>>
> >>>> Matthias Wessendorf-4 wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi folks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> has been a while since the last 1.0.x release.
> >>>>> After some initial issue I was able to get a _working_ build.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> While this ticket remains open (see [1]), I'd like to ask you to test
> >>>>> the artifacts.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I did an upload to here:
> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~matzew/trinidad1011/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ematzew/trinidad1011/>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> My quick test-drive was successful, but I don't have any Trinidad
> >>>>> 1.0.x application
> >>>>> in production (just 1.2.x-based stuff)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please help to get this 1.0.11 release out of the door!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Matthias
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1542
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
> >>>>>
> >>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> >>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> View this message in context:
> >>>
> http://www.nabble.com/-Trinidad--1.0.11-release-candidate---please-test-tp25138955p25148429.html
> >>> Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Matthias Wessendorf
> >>
> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/-Trinidad--1.0.11-release-candidate---please-test-tp25138955p25148731.html
> > Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>

Re: [Trinidad] 1.0.11 release candidate - please test

Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Matthias Wessendorf<ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> ok, I will handle it, maybe already for 1.0.11.

I marked this for 1.0.12.

-Matthias

>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> I am keeping this "testing mode" open for the rest of the week,
> so that we can hit the VOTE next week. Which means by
> end-of-next-week there should be a 1.0.11 out
>
> -Matthias
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Paul Mander<pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> It appears that this class hasn't changed since the fix was provided. The
>> change is to introduce a new method:
>>
>>  private void _renderShowComboBoxScriptForIE6(FacesContext context,
>>          RenderingContext    arc,
>>          FacesBean           bean,
>>          String              baseId) throws IOException
>> {
>> if ("ie".equals(arc.getAgent().getAgentName()) &&
>> arc.getAgent().getAgentVersion().startsWith("6"))
>> {
>> // IE6 only
>> final ResponseWriter writer = context.getResponseWriter();
>> final String monthId = (baseId != null) ? baseId +
>> ChooseDateRenderer.MONTH_PARAM : ChooseDateRenderer.MONTH_PARAM;
>> final String yearId = (baseId != null) ? baseId +
>> ChooseDateRenderer.YEAR_PARAM : ChooseDateRenderer.YEAR_PARAM;
>>
>> writer.startElement("script", null);
>> writer.writeAttribute("type", "text/javascript", null);
>> writer.writeText("window.onload=showCombo; \n", null);
>> writer.writeText("function showCombo() { \n", null);
>> // Normal Trinidad onLoad;
>> writer.writeText("_checkLoad(); \n", null);
>> writer.writeText("document.getElementById('" + monthId + "').style.cssText =
>> 'display: inline !important; visibility: visible !important;'; \n", null);
>> writer.writeText("document.getElementById('" + yearId +  "').style.cssText =
>> 'display: inline !important; visibility: visible !important;'; \n", null);
>> // ToDo: Resize iframe to remove scrollbars:
>> writer.writeText("return true; \n", null);
>> writer.writeText("} \n", null);
>>
>> writer.endElement("script");
>> }
>>
>> }
>>
>> and call it unconditionally at the very end of encodeAll.
>>
>> Sorry, but I'm not in a position to to a diff.
>>
>>
>> Matthias Wessendorf-4 wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I see - maybe we should make this become part of 1.0.12 ?
>>> Question: Can you upload a DIFF ? That makes reviewing much easier,
>>> instead
>>> of replacing a .java file
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Trinidad--1.0.11-release-candidate---please-test-tp25138955p25150152.html
>> Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

Re: [Trinidad] 1.0.11 release candidate - please test

Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
ok, I will handle it, maybe already for 1.0.11.

Thanks for your help.

I am keeping this "testing mode" open for the rest of the week,
so that we can hit the VOTE next week. Which means by
end-of-next-week there should be a 1.0.11 out

-Matthias

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Paul Mander<pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It appears that this class hasn't changed since the fix was provided. The
> change is to introduce a new method:
>
>  private void _renderShowComboBoxScriptForIE6(FacesContext context,
>          RenderingContext    arc,
>          FacesBean           bean,
>          String              baseId) throws IOException
> {
> if ("ie".equals(arc.getAgent().getAgentName()) &&
> arc.getAgent().getAgentVersion().startsWith("6"))
> {
> // IE6 only
> final ResponseWriter writer = context.getResponseWriter();
> final String monthId = (baseId != null) ? baseId +
> ChooseDateRenderer.MONTH_PARAM : ChooseDateRenderer.MONTH_PARAM;
> final String yearId = (baseId != null) ? baseId +
> ChooseDateRenderer.YEAR_PARAM : ChooseDateRenderer.YEAR_PARAM;
>
> writer.startElement("script", null);
> writer.writeAttribute("type", "text/javascript", null);
> writer.writeText("window.onload=showCombo; \n", null);
> writer.writeText("function showCombo() { \n", null);
> // Normal Trinidad onLoad;
> writer.writeText("_checkLoad(); \n", null);
> writer.writeText("document.getElementById('" + monthId + "').style.cssText =
> 'display: inline !important; visibility: visible !important;'; \n", null);
> writer.writeText("document.getElementById('" + yearId +  "').style.cssText =
> 'display: inline !important; visibility: visible !important;'; \n", null);
> // ToDo: Resize iframe to remove scrollbars:
> writer.writeText("return true; \n", null);
> writer.writeText("} \n", null);
>
> writer.endElement("script");
> }
>
> }
>
> and call it unconditionally at the very end of encodeAll.
>
> Sorry, but I'm not in a position to to a diff.
>
>
> Matthias Wessendorf-4 wrote:
>>
>>
>> I see - maybe we should make this become part of 1.0.12 ?
>> Question: Can you upload a DIFF ? That makes reviewing much easier,
>> instead
>> of replacing a .java file
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Matthias
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Trinidad--1.0.11-release-candidate---please-test-tp25138955p25150152.html
> Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

Re: [Trinidad] 1.0.11 release candidate - please test

Posted by Paul Mander <pa...@gmail.com>.
It appears that this class hasn't changed since the fix was provided. The
change is to introduce a new method:

 private void _renderShowComboBoxScriptForIE6(FacesContext context,
          RenderingContext    arc,    
          FacesBean           bean,
          String              baseId) throws IOException 
{
if ("ie".equals(arc.getAgent().getAgentName()) &&
arc.getAgent().getAgentVersion().startsWith("6")) 
{
// IE6 only
final ResponseWriter writer = context.getResponseWriter();
final String monthId = (baseId != null) ? baseId +
ChooseDateRenderer.MONTH_PARAM : ChooseDateRenderer.MONTH_PARAM;
final String yearId = (baseId != null) ? baseId +
ChooseDateRenderer.YEAR_PARAM : ChooseDateRenderer.YEAR_PARAM;

writer.startElement("script", null);
writer.writeAttribute("type", "text/javascript", null);
writer.writeText("window.onload=showCombo; \n", null);
writer.writeText("function showCombo() { \n", null);
// Normal Trinidad onLoad;
writer.writeText("_checkLoad(); \n", null);      
writer.writeText("document.getElementById('" + monthId + "').style.cssText =
'display: inline !important; visibility: visible !important;'; \n", null);
writer.writeText("document.getElementById('" + yearId +  "').style.cssText =
'display: inline !important; visibility: visible !important;'; \n", null);
// ToDo: Resize iframe to remove scrollbars:
writer.writeText("return true; \n", null);
writer.writeText("} \n", null);

writer.endElement("script");
}

} 

and call it unconditionally at the very end of encodeAll.

Sorry, but I'm not in a position to to a diff.


Matthias Wessendorf-4 wrote:
> 
> 
> I see - maybe we should make this become part of 1.0.12 ?
> Question: Can you upload a DIFF ? That makes reviewing much easier,
> instead
> of replacing a .java file
> 
> Thanks!
> Matthias
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Trinidad--1.0.11-release-candidate---please-test-tp25138955p25150152.html
Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: [Trinidad] 1.0.11 release candidate - please test

Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Paul Mander<pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
> Matthias Wessendorf-4 wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Paul Mander<pa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>>
>>> Application functions as expected.
>>>
>>> Checked
>>>
>>> TRINIDAD-992
>>> TRINIDAD-1317
>>> TRINIDAD-790 (fixed in 1.0.9)
>>> TRINIDAD-1209 (fixed in 1.0.9)
>>>
>>> from our custom 1.0.7 release.
>>
>>>thanks for helping out, Paul!
>>
>>>
>>> Does not fix TRINIDAD-941/1071 (but i didn't expect it to) - tested 1071
>>> fix
>>> and it seems to fix these problems - would have been nice to have in this
>>> build - people do use ie6 you know...
>>
>>>so, you are saying, with using patch for "TRINIDAD-1071" the stuff
>>>works in IE 6?
>>>(I don't have that browser on any of my computers ;-) )
>>
>>>-Matthias
>>
>> There is a lightweightdialog rendering issue with "heavyweight" controls
>> such as combo boxes. These don't render first time on an ie6 platform in a
>> lightweight dialog. There is a supplied fix attached to bug#1071. This
>> appears to solve this problem with a change to ChooseDateRenderer.
>> However, any combo boxes on the parent page are temporarily removed whilst
>> the lightweight dialog is present (they are re-rendered correctly when you
>> return from the dialog).

I see - maybe we should make this become part of 1.0.12 ?
Question: Can you upload a DIFF ? That makes reviewing much easier, instead
of replacing a .java file

Thanks!
Matthias

>>
>> I use windows 7 with an xp virtual machine to test ie6.
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Paul
>>>
>>> Paul Mander wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Matthias,
>>>>
>>>> We have a 1.0.x application (WebSphere 6.1, myfaces 1.1.15). I'll run
>>>> through the app and let you know.
>>>>
>>>> Matthias Wessendorf-4 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>
>>>>> has been a while since the last 1.0.x release.
>>>>> After some initial issue I was able to get a _working_ build.
>>>>>
>>>>> While this ticket remains open (see [1]), I'd like to ask you to test
>>>>> the artifacts.
>>>>>
>>>>> I did an upload to here:
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~matzew/trinidad1011/
>>>>>
>>>>> My quick test-drive was successful, but I don't have any Trinidad
>>>>> 1.0.x application
>>>>> in production (just 1.2.x-based stuff)
>>>>>
>>>>> Please help to get this 1.0.11 release out of the door!
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1542
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>>
>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://www.nabble.com/-Trinidad--1.0.11-release-candidate---please-test-tp25138955p25148429.html
>>> Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Trinidad--1.0.11-release-candidate---please-test-tp25138955p25148731.html
> Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

Re: [Trinidad] 1.0.11 release candidate - please test

Posted by Paul Mander <pa...@gmail.com>.

>
Matthias Wessendorf-4 wrote:
> 
>>On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Paul Mander<pa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>> Application functions as expected.
>>
>> Checked
>>
>> TRINIDAD-992
>> TRINIDAD-1317
>> TRINIDAD-790 (fixed in 1.0.9)
>> TRINIDAD-1209 (fixed in 1.0.9)
>>
>> from our custom 1.0.7 release.
> 
>>thanks for helping out, Paul!
> 
>>
>> Does not fix TRINIDAD-941/1071 (but i didn't expect it to) - tested 1071
>> fix
>> and it seems to fix these problems - would have been nice to have in this
>> build - people do use ie6 you know...
> 
>>so, you are saying, with using patch for "TRINIDAD-1071" the stuff
>>works in IE 6?
>>(I don't have that browser on any of my computers ;-) )
> 
>>-Matthias
> 
> There is a lightweightdialog rendering issue with "heavyweight" controls
> such as combo boxes. These don't render first time on an ie6 platform in a
> lightweight dialog. There is a supplied fix attached to bug#1071. This
> appears to solve this problem with a change to ChooseDateRenderer.
> However, any combo boxes on the parent page are temporarily removed whilst
> the lightweight dialog is present (they are re-rendered correctly when you
> return from the dialog).
> 
> I use windows 7 with an xp virtual machine to test ie6.
> 
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> Paul Mander wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks Matthias,
>>>
>>> We have a 1.0.x application (WebSphere 6.1, myfaces 1.1.15). I'll run
>>> through the app and let you know.
>>>
>>> Matthias Wessendorf-4 wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>> has been a while since the last 1.0.x release.
>>>> After some initial issue I was able to get a _working_ build.
>>>>
>>>> While this ticket remains open (see [1]), I'd like to ask you to test
>>>> the artifacts.
>>>>
>>>> I did an upload to here:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~matzew/trinidad1011/
>>>>
>>>> My quick test-drive was successful, but I don't have any Trinidad
>>>> 1.0.x application
>>>> in production (just 1.2.x-based stuff)
>>>>
>>>> Please help to get this 1.0.11 release out of the door!
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1542
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>
>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/-Trinidad--1.0.11-release-candidate---please-test-tp25138955p25148429.html
>> Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Trinidad--1.0.11-release-candidate---please-test-tp25138955p25148731.html
Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: [Trinidad] 1.0.11 release candidate - please test

Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Paul Mander<pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Application functions as expected.
>
> Checked
>
> TRINIDAD-992
> TRINIDAD-1317
> TRINIDAD-790 (fixed in 1.0.9)
> TRINIDAD-1209 (fixed in 1.0.9)
>
> from our custom 1.0.7 release.

thanks for helping out, Paul!

>
> Does not fix TRINIDAD-941/1071 (but i didn't expect it to) - tested 1071 fix
> and it seems to fix these problems - would have been nice to have in this
> build - people do use ie6 you know...

so, you are saying, with using patch for "TRINIDAD-1071" the stuff
works in IE 6?
(I don't have that browser on any of my computers ;-) )

-Matthias

>
> Thanks
>
> Paul
>
> Paul Mander wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Matthias,
>>
>> We have a 1.0.x application (WebSphere 6.1, myfaces 1.1.15). I'll run
>> through the app and let you know.
>>
>> Matthias Wessendorf-4 wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> has been a while since the last 1.0.x release.
>>> After some initial issue I was able to get a _working_ build.
>>>
>>> While this ticket remains open (see [1]), I'd like to ask you to test
>>> the artifacts.
>>>
>>> I did an upload to here:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~matzew/trinidad1011/
>>>
>>> My quick test-drive was successful, but I don't have any Trinidad
>>> 1.0.x application
>>> in production (just 1.2.x-based stuff)
>>>
>>> Please help to get this 1.0.11 release out of the door!
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1542
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Trinidad--1.0.11-release-candidate---please-test-tp25138955p25148429.html
> Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

Re: [Trinidad] 1.0.11 release candidate - please test

Posted by Paul Mander <pa...@gmail.com>.
Application functions as expected.

Checked 

TRINIDAD-992
TRINIDAD-1317
TRINIDAD-790 (fixed in 1.0.9)
TRINIDAD-1209 (fixed in 1.0.9)

from our custom 1.0.7 release.

Does not fix TRINIDAD-941/1071 (but i didn't expect it to) - tested 1071 fix
and it seems to fix these problems - would have been nice to have in this
build - people do use ie6 you know...

Thanks

Paul

Paul Mander wrote:
> 
> Thanks Matthias,
> 
> We have a 1.0.x application (WebSphere 6.1, myfaces 1.1.15). I'll run
> through the app and let you know.
> 
> Matthias Wessendorf-4 wrote:
>> 
>> Hi folks,
>> 
>> has been a while since the last 1.0.x release.
>> After some initial issue I was able to get a _working_ build.
>> 
>> While this ticket remains open (see [1]), I'd like to ask you to test
>> the artifacts.
>> 
>> I did an upload to here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~matzew/trinidad1011/
>> 
>> My quick test-drive was successful, but I don't have any Trinidad
>> 1.0.x application
>> in production (just 1.2.x-based stuff)
>> 
>> Please help to get this 1.0.11 release out of the door!
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Matthias
>> 
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1542
>> 
>> -- 
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>> 
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Trinidad--1.0.11-release-candidate---please-test-tp25138955p25148429.html
Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: [Trinidad] 1.0.11 release candidate - please test

Posted by Paul Mander <pa...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Matthias,

We have a 1.0.x application (WebSphere 6.1, myfaces 1.1.15). I'll run
through the app and let you know.

Matthias Wessendorf-4 wrote:
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> has been a while since the last 1.0.x release.
> After some initial issue I was able to get a _working_ build.
> 
> While this ticket remains open (see [1]), I'd like to ask you to test
> the artifacts.
> 
> I did an upload to here:
> http://people.apache.org/~matzew/trinidad1011/
> 
> My quick test-drive was successful, but I don't have any Trinidad
> 1.0.x application
> in production (just 1.2.x-based stuff)
> 
> Please help to get this 1.0.11 release out of the door!
> 
> Thanks,
> Matthias
> 
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1542
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Trinidad--1.0.11-release-candidate---please-test-tp25138955p25147850.html
Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.