You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jmeter.apache.org by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com> on 2016/04/01 23:37:10 UTC
When can we start the release of 3.0 ?
hello,
I think trunk is now ready for a release.
I see no pending bug and I think 3.0 is really expected.
Are you ok to start ?
Thanks
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Re: When can we start the release of 3.0 ?
Posted by Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra...@gmail.com>.
Thank to your quick answer
If anybody have the time to do it it will be great
2016-04-12 19:32 GMT+02:00 sebb <se...@gmail.com>:
> On 12 April 2016 at 18:17, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi Sebb,
> >
> > My opinion is it will be better to merge it for 3.0 because the majority
> of
> > my PR are about HTML report.
> >
> > And the majority of users will see the HTML report for the first time in
> > this release and the first impression is very important.
> >
> > And if you check my PR you can see:
>
> Sorry, but I don't have time to review the changes.
>
> > modification of label to be consistent with other listener and between
> > tables in HTML report
> > modification of some axis label to be more accurate (I have add "average"
> > to avoid user search in documentation which metric is)
> > fix a bug about encoding accent when the HTML report are generated in a
> > French OS
> >
> > It's details but details are very important in my opinion
> >
> > There are PR for other details (one PR to have a better (for me) IHM,
> > another to have another default column sort (more usefull in my opinion)
> >
> > I am planning to fix other details and add some features for 3.1 release
> (I
> > have take some free time to fix the previous PR to 3.0 release before to
> > implement the new one)
> >
> > Antonio
> >
> > 2016-04-12 15:17 GMT+02:00 sebb <se...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> On 12 April 2016 at 13:50, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> >
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> > I cannot merge before thursday evening.
> >> > Anybody else can ?
> >> > Milamber when do you plan to make the release ?
> >> >
> >> > Should we merge those or wait for 3.1 ?
> >>
> >> wait for 3.1
> >>
> >> > Regards
> >> >
> >> > On Monday, April 11, 2016, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi all,
> >> >>
> >> >> I have made some PR to allow the user have a better experience with
> 3.0
> >> >>
> >> >> If it's possible, one of you can check my PR and merge it if it's ok
> >> before
> >> >> 3.0 release?
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks
> >> >> Antonio
> >> >>
> >> >> <
> >> >>
> >>
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2200-b
> >> >> >
> >> >> Garanti
> >> >> sans virus. www.avast.com
> >> >> <
> >> >>
> >>
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2200-b
> >> >> >
> >> >> <#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
> >> >>
> >> >> 2016-04-04 23:14 GMT+02:00 Milamber <milamber@apache.org
> >> <javascript:;>>:
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On 04/04/2016 14:23, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Hi,
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> As it appears there is no pending issue to release a 3.0, any
> >> volunteer
> >> >> >> to
> >> >> >> act as RM for 3.0 ?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Yes, with great pleasure for this great new version!
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I can start a release process next Saturday (or Sunday)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Milamber
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Regards
> >> >> >> Philippe
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Sunday, April 3, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <
> >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> >> >> <javascript:;>>
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> As suggested by Felix, I think this enhancement can be delayed to
> >> next
> >> >> >>> release following 3.0.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> If so, @sebb and all, can we start the release process ?
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Regards
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> On Saturday, April 2, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <
> >> >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <javascript:;>
> >> >> >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> >> >> <javascript:;>');>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>> On Saturday, April 2, 2016, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> On 1 April 2016 at 23:58, Philippe Mouawad <
> >> >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> >> >> >>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> It's developed.
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> I know.
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> Just need to decide which option is best.
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> Not possible to decide without knowing how expensive the
> options
> >> are.
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> the first option (LRU like) is expensive as per Vladimir notes.
> >> >> >>>> We could reduce cost by dropping every N additions.
> >> >> >>>> But bear in mind that cost start to be high when we reach the
> >> limit,
> >> >> >>>> without it GC would have a cost as memory would keep increasing.
> >> >> >>>> But it is hard to make a comparison
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> Option 2 (warn and stop adding) has nearly 0 overhead
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> As I wrote, that needs to be resolved.
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> But we can delay its integration if needed
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> Regardd
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> On Friday, April 1, 2016, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> On 1 April 2016 at 22:37, Philippe Mouawad <
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <javascript:;>
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>> hello,
> >> >> >>>>>>>> I think trunk is now ready for a release.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>> I see no pending bug and I think 3.0 is really expected.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> What about the OOM issue?
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> That either needs to be resolved or postponed.
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> Are you ok to start ?
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>> --
> >> >> >>>>>>>> Cordialement.
> >> >> >>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> --
> >> >> >>>>>> Cordialement.
> >> >> >>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>> --
> >> >> >>>> Cordialement.
> >> >> >>>> Philippe Mouawad.
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> --
> >> >> >>> Cordialement.
> >> >> >>> Philippe Mouawad.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Cordialement.
> >> > Philippe Mouawad.
> >>
>
Re: When can we start the release of 3.0 ?
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 12 April 2016 at 18:17, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Sebb,
>
> My opinion is it will be better to merge it for 3.0 because the majority of
> my PR are about HTML report.
>
> And the majority of users will see the HTML report for the first time in
> this release and the first impression is very important.
>
> And if you check my PR you can see:
Sorry, but I don't have time to review the changes.
> modification of label to be consistent with other listener and between
> tables in HTML report
> modification of some axis label to be more accurate (I have add "average"
> to avoid user search in documentation which metric is)
> fix a bug about encoding accent when the HTML report are generated in a
> French OS
>
> It's details but details are very important in my opinion
>
> There are PR for other details (one PR to have a better (for me) IHM,
> another to have another default column sort (more usefull in my opinion)
>
> I am planning to fix other details and add some features for 3.1 release (I
> have take some free time to fix the previous PR to 3.0 release before to
> implement the new one)
>
> Antonio
>
> 2016-04-12 15:17 GMT+02:00 sebb <se...@gmail.com>:
>
>> On 12 April 2016 at 13:50, Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > I cannot merge before thursday evening.
>> > Anybody else can ?
>> > Milamber when do you plan to make the release ?
>> >
>> > Should we merge those or wait for 3.1 ?
>>
>> wait for 3.1
>>
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > On Monday, April 11, 2016, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> I have made some PR to allow the user have a better experience with 3.0
>> >>
>> >> If it's possible, one of you can check my PR and merge it if it's ok
>> before
>> >> 3.0 release?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >> Antonio
>> >>
>> >> <
>> >>
>> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2200-b
>> >> >
>> >> Garanti
>> >> sans virus. www.avast.com
>> >> <
>> >>
>> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2200-b
>> >> >
>> >> <#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>> >>
>> >> 2016-04-04 23:14 GMT+02:00 Milamber <milamber@apache.org
>> <javascript:;>>:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On 04/04/2016 14:23, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Hi,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> As it appears there is no pending issue to release a 3.0, any
>> volunteer
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> act as RM for 3.0 ?
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Yes, with great pleasure for this great new version!
>> >> >
>> >> > I can start a release process next Saturday (or Sunday)
>> >> >
>> >> > Milamber
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> Regards
>> >> >> Philippe
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Sunday, April 3, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <
>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>> >> <javascript:;>>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> As suggested by Felix, I think this enhancement can be delayed to
>> next
>> >> >>> release following 3.0.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> If so, @sebb and all, can we start the release process ?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Regards
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On Saturday, April 2, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <
>> >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <javascript:;>
>> >> >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>> >> <javascript:;>');>> wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>> On Saturday, April 2, 2016, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> On 1 April 2016 at 23:58, Philippe Mouawad <
>> >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
>> >> >>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> It's developed.
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>> I know.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Just need to decide which option is best.
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Not possible to decide without knowing how expensive the options
>> are.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> the first option (LRU like) is expensive as per Vladimir notes.
>> >> >>>> We could reduce cost by dropping every N additions.
>> >> >>>> But bear in mind that cost start to be high when we reach the
>> limit,
>> >> >>>> without it GC would have a cost as memory would keep increasing.
>> >> >>>> But it is hard to make a comparison
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Option 2 (warn and stop adding) has nearly 0 overhead
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> As I wrote, that needs to be resolved.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> But we can delay its integration if needed
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> Regardd
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> On Friday, April 1, 2016, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> On 1 April 2016 at 22:37, Philippe Mouawad <
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <javascript:;>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>> hello,
>> >> >>>>>>>> I think trunk is now ready for a release.
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>> I see no pending bug and I think 3.0 is really expected.
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> What about the OOM issue?
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> That either needs to be resolved or postponed.
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> Are you ok to start ?
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>> --
>> >> >>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>> >> >>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> --
>> >> >>>>>> Cordialement.
>> >> >>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>> --
>> >> >>>> Cordialement.
>> >> >>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> --
>> >> >>> Cordialement.
>> >> >>> Philippe Mouawad.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Cordialement.
>> > Philippe Mouawad.
>>
Re: When can we start the release of 3.0 ?
Posted by Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra...@gmail.com>.
Hi Sebb,
My opinion is it will be better to merge it for 3.0 because the majority of
my PR are about HTML report.
And the majority of users will see the HTML report for the first time in
this release and the first impression is very important.
And if you check my PR you can see:
modification of label to be consistent with other listener and between
tables in HTML report
modification of some axis label to be more accurate (I have add "average"
to avoid user search in documentation which metric is)
fix a bug about encoding accent when the HTML report are generated in a
French OS
It's details but details are very important in my opinion
There are PR for other details (one PR to have a better (for me) IHM,
another to have another default column sort (more usefull in my opinion)
I am planning to fix other details and add some features for 3.1 release (I
have take some free time to fix the previous PR to 3.0 release before to
implement the new one)
Antonio
2016-04-12 15:17 GMT+02:00 sebb <se...@gmail.com>:
> On 12 April 2016 at 13:50, Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I cannot merge before thursday evening.
> > Anybody else can ?
> > Milamber when do you plan to make the release ?
> >
> > Should we merge those or wait for 3.1 ?
>
> wait for 3.1
>
> > Regards
> >
> > On Monday, April 11, 2016, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I have made some PR to allow the user have a better experience with 3.0
> >>
> >> If it's possible, one of you can check my PR and merge it if it's ok
> before
> >> 3.0 release?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Antonio
> >>
> >> <
> >>
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2200-b
> >> >
> >> Garanti
> >> sans virus. www.avast.com
> >> <
> >>
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2200-b
> >> >
> >> <#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
> >>
> >> 2016-04-04 23:14 GMT+02:00 Milamber <milamber@apache.org
> <javascript:;>>:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 04/04/2016 14:23, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> As it appears there is no pending issue to release a 3.0, any
> volunteer
> >> >> to
> >> >> act as RM for 3.0 ?
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Yes, with great pleasure for this great new version!
> >> >
> >> > I can start a release process next Saturday (or Sunday)
> >> >
> >> > Milamber
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Regards
> >> >> Philippe
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sunday, April 3, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <
> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> >> <javascript:;>>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> As suggested by Felix, I think this enhancement can be delayed to
> next
> >> >>> release following 3.0.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> If so, @sebb and all, can we start the release process ?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Regards
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Saturday, April 2, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <
> >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <javascript:;>
> >> >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> >> <javascript:;>');>> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> On Saturday, April 2, 2016, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On 1 April 2016 at 23:58, Philippe Mouawad <
> >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> >> >>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> It's developed.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>> I know.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Just need to decide which option is best.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>> Not possible to decide without knowing how expensive the options
> are.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> the first option (LRU like) is expensive as per Vladimir notes.
> >> >>>> We could reduce cost by dropping every N additions.
> >> >>>> But bear in mind that cost start to be high when we reach the
> limit,
> >> >>>> without it GC would have a cost as memory would keep increasing.
> >> >>>> But it is hard to make a comparison
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Option 2 (warn and stop adding) has nearly 0 overhead
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> As I wrote, that needs to be resolved.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> But we can delay its integration if needed
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Regardd
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> On Friday, April 1, 2016, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> On 1 April 2016 at 22:37, Philippe Mouawad <
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <javascript:;>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> hello,
> >> >>>>>>>> I think trunk is now ready for a release.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> I see no pending bug and I think 3.0 is really expected.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> What about the OOM issue?
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> That either needs to be resolved or postponed.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Are you ok to start ?
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>>>> Cordialement.
> >> >>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>> Cordialement.
> >> >>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>> --
> >> >>>> Cordialement.
> >> >>>> Philippe Mouawad.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> --
> >> >>> Cordialement.
> >> >>> Philippe Mouawad.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cordialement.
> > Philippe Mouawad.
>
Re: When can we start the release of 3.0 ?
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 12 April 2016 at 13:50, Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I cannot merge before thursday evening.
> Anybody else can ?
> Milamber when do you plan to make the release ?
>
> Should we merge those or wait for 3.1 ?
wait for 3.1
> Regards
>
> On Monday, April 11, 2016, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have made some PR to allow the user have a better experience with 3.0
>>
>> If it's possible, one of you can check my PR and merge it if it's ok before
>> 3.0 release?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Antonio
>>
>> <
>> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2200-b
>> >
>> Garanti
>> sans virus. www.avast.com
>> <
>> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2200-b
>> >
>> <#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>>
>> 2016-04-04 23:14 GMT+02:00 Milamber <milamber@apache.org <javascript:;>>:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On 04/04/2016 14:23, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> As it appears there is no pending issue to release a 3.0, any volunteer
>> >> to
>> >> act as RM for 3.0 ?
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > Yes, with great pleasure for this great new version!
>> >
>> > I can start a release process next Saturday (or Sunday)
>> >
>> > Milamber
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> Regards
>> >> Philippe
>> >>
>> >> On Sunday, April 3, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>> <javascript:;>>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> As suggested by Felix, I think this enhancement can be delayed to next
>> >>> release following 3.0.
>> >>>
>> >>> If so, @sebb and all, can we start the release process ?
>> >>>
>> >>> Regards
>> >>>
>> >>> On Saturday, April 2, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <
>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <javascript:;>
>> >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>> <javascript:;>');>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>> On Saturday, April 2, 2016, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 1 April 2016 at 23:58, Philippe Mouawad <
>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
>> >>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> It's developed.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>> I know.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Just need to decide which option is best.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>> Not possible to decide without knowing how expensive the options are.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> the first option (LRU like) is expensive as per Vladimir notes.
>> >>>> We could reduce cost by dropping every N additions.
>> >>>> But bear in mind that cost start to be high when we reach the limit,
>> >>>> without it GC would have a cost as memory would keep increasing.
>> >>>> But it is hard to make a comparison
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Option 2 (warn and stop adding) has nearly 0 overhead
>> >>>>
>> >>>> As I wrote, that needs to be resolved.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> But we can delay its integration if needed
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Regardd
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Friday, April 1, 2016, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On 1 April 2016 at 22:37, Philippe Mouawad <
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <javascript:;>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> hello,
>> >>>>>>>> I think trunk is now ready for a release.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> I see no pending bug and I think 3.0 is really expected.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> What about the OOM issue?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> That either needs to be resolved or postponed.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Are you ok to start ?
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Thanks
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>> >>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>> --
>> >>>>>> Cordialement.
>> >>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> Cordialement.
>> >>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>> Cordialement.
>> >>> Philippe Mouawad.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >
>>
>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
Re: When can we start the release of 3.0 ?
Posted by Milamber <mi...@apache.org>.
Hello,
I start the process to do the RC1 of 3.0.
Ping me on freenode.org, channel #jmeter if needs
Milamber
On 12/04/2016 19:20, Milamber wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I will start the RC process for 3.0RC1 next Saturday (16th)
>
> With all changes in this version, we need to update a lot of
> screenshots before the RC (see Bug 59126). I will try to do this
> before Saturday.
>
> Milamber
>
>
>
>
> On 12/04/2016 13:50, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I cannot merge before thursday evening.
>> Anybody else can ?
>> Milamber when do you plan to make the release ?
>>
>> Should we merge those or wait for 3.1 ?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> On Monday, April 11, 2016, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have made some PR to allow the user have a better experience with 3.0
>>>
>>> If it's possible, one of you can check my PR and merge it if it's ok
>>> before
>>> 3.0 release?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Antonio
>>>
>>> <
>>> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2200-b
>>>
>>> Garanti
>>> sans virus. www.avast.com
>>> <
>>> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2200-b
>>>
>>> <#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>>>
>>> 2016-04-04 23:14 GMT+02:00 Milamber <milamber@apache.org
>>> <javascript:;>>:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 04/04/2016 14:23, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> As it appears there is no pending issue to release a 3.0, any
>>>>> volunteer
>>>>> to
>>>>> act as RM for 3.0 ?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, with great pleasure for this great new version!
>>>>
>>>> I can start a release process next Saturday (or Sunday)
>>>>
>>>> Milamber
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sunday, April 3, 2016, Philippe Mouawad
>>>>> <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> As suggested by Felix, I think this enhancement can be delayed to
>>>>> next
>>>>>> release following 3.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If so, @sebb and all, can we start the release process ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Saturday, April 2, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <
>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <javascript:;>
>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>> <javascript:;>');>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Saturday, April 2, 2016, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 1 April 2016 at 23:58, Philippe Mouawad <
>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's developed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I know.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just need to decide which option is best.
>>>>>>>> Not possible to decide without knowing how expensive the
>>>>>>>> options are.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the first option (LRU like) is expensive as per Vladimir notes.
>>>>>>> We could reduce cost by dropping every N additions.
>>>>>>> But bear in mind that cost start to be high when we reach the
>>>>>>> limit,
>>>>>>> without it GC would have a cost as memory would keep increasing.
>>>>>>> But it is hard to make a comparison
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Option 2 (warn and stop adding) has nearly 0 overhead
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As I wrote, that needs to be resolved.
>>>>>>>> But we can delay its integration if needed
>>>>>>>>> Regardd
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Friday, April 1, 2016, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 1 April 2016 at 22:37, Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <javascript:;>
>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> hello,
>>>>>>>>>>> I think trunk is now ready for a release.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I see no pending bug and I think 3.0 is really expected.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What about the OOM issue?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That either needs to be resolved or postponed.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Are you ok to start ?
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>
>
>
Re: When can we start the release of 3.0 ?
Posted by Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Thanks to Felix and Milamber to have merged some of my PR.
If you have time to merge the other, it's will be great too
Antonio
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Garanti
sans virus. www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
2016-04-12 20:20 GMT+02:00 Milamber <mi...@apache.org>:
> Hello,
>
> I will start the RC process for 3.0RC1 next Saturday (16th)
>
> With all changes in this version, we need to update a lot of screenshots
> before the RC (see Bug 59126). I will try to do this before Saturday.
>
> Milamber
>
>
>
>
>
> On 12/04/2016 13:50, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I cannot merge before thursday evening.
>> Anybody else can ?
>> Milamber when do you plan to make the release ?
>>
>> Should we merge those or wait for 3.1 ?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> On Monday, April 11, 2016, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have made some PR to allow the user have a better experience with 3.0
>>>
>>> If it's possible, one of you can check my PR and merge it if it's ok
>>> before
>>> 3.0 release?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Antonio
>>>
>>> <
>>>
>>> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2200-b
>>> Garanti
>>> sans virus. www.avast.com
>>> <
>>>
>>> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2200-b
>>> <#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>>>
>>> 2016-04-04 23:14 GMT+02:00 Milamber <milamber@apache.org
>>> <javascript:;>>:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 04/04/2016 14:23, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> As it appears there is no pending issue to release a 3.0, any
>>>>> volunteer
>>>>> to
>>>>> act as RM for 3.0 ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Yes, with great pleasure for this great new version!
>>>>
>>>> I can start a release process next Saturday (or Sunday)
>>>>
>>>> Milamber
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sunday, April 3, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> As suggested by Felix, I think this enhancement can be delayed to next
>>>>>
>>>>>> release following 3.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If so, @sebb and all, can we start the release process ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Saturday, April 2, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>
>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <javascript:;>
>>>
>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>
>>>>> <javascript:;>');>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> On Saturday, April 2, 2016, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 1 April 2016 at 23:58, Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's developed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I know.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just need to decide which option is best.
>>>>>>>> Not possible to decide without knowing how expensive the options
>>>>>>>> are.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the first option (LRU like) is expensive as per Vladimir notes.
>>>>>>> We could reduce cost by dropping every N additions.
>>>>>>> But bear in mind that cost start to be high when we reach the limit,
>>>>>>> without it GC would have a cost as memory would keep increasing.
>>>>>>> But it is hard to make a comparison
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Option 2 (warn and stop adding) has nearly 0 overhead
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As I wrote, that needs to be resolved.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But we can delay its integration if needed
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regardd
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Friday, April 1, 2016, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 1 April 2016 at 22:37, Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <javascript:;>
>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> hello,
>>>>>>>>>>> I think trunk is now ready for a release.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I see no pending bug and I think 3.0 is really expected.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What about the OOM issue?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That either needs to be resolved or postponed.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Are you ok to start ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>
>
Re: When can we start the release of 3.0 ?
Posted by Milamber <mi...@apache.org>.
Hello,
I will start the RC process for 3.0RC1 next Saturday (16th)
With all changes in this version, we need to update a lot of screenshots
before the RC (see Bug 59126). I will try to do this before Saturday.
Milamber
On 12/04/2016 13:50, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
> Hi,
> I cannot merge before thursday evening.
> Anybody else can ?
> Milamber when do you plan to make the release ?
>
> Should we merge those or wait for 3.1 ?
>
> Regards
>
> On Monday, April 11, 2016, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have made some PR to allow the user have a better experience with 3.0
>>
>> If it's possible, one of you can check my PR and merge it if it's ok before
>> 3.0 release?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Antonio
>>
>> <
>> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2200-b
>> Garanti
>> sans virus. www.avast.com
>> <
>> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2200-b
>> <#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>>
>> 2016-04-04 23:14 GMT+02:00 Milamber <milamber@apache.org <javascript:;>>:
>>
>>>
>>> On 04/04/2016 14:23, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> As it appears there is no pending issue to release a 3.0, any volunteer
>>>> to
>>>> act as RM for 3.0 ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, with great pleasure for this great new version!
>>>
>>> I can start a release process next Saturday (or Sunday)
>>>
>>> Milamber
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Philippe
>>>>
>>>> On Sunday, April 3, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>> <javascript:;>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> As suggested by Felix, I think this enhancement can be delayed to next
>>>>> release following 3.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> If so, @sebb and all, can we start the release process ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> On Saturday, April 2, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <
>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <javascript:;>
>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>> <javascript:;>');>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Saturday, April 2, 2016, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
>> wrote:
>>>>>> On 1 April 2016 at 23:58, Philippe Mouawad <
>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's developed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I know.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just need to decide which option is best.
>>>>>>> Not possible to decide without knowing how expensive the options are.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> the first option (LRU like) is expensive as per Vladimir notes.
>>>>>> We could reduce cost by dropping every N additions.
>>>>>> But bear in mind that cost start to be high when we reach the limit,
>>>>>> without it GC would have a cost as memory would keep increasing.
>>>>>> But it is hard to make a comparison
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Option 2 (warn and stop adding) has nearly 0 overhead
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As I wrote, that needs to be resolved.
>>>>>>> But we can delay its integration if needed
>>>>>>>> Regardd
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Friday, April 1, 2016, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 1 April 2016 at 22:37, Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <javascript:;>
>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> hello,
>>>>>>>>>> I think trunk is now ready for a release.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I see no pending bug and I think 3.0 is really expected.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What about the OOM issue?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That either needs to be resolved or postponed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Are you ok to start ?
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>
Re: When can we start the release of 3.0 ?
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I cannot merge before thursday evening.
Anybody else can ?
Milamber when do you plan to make the release ?
Should we merge those or wait for 3.1 ?
Regards
On Monday, April 11, 2016, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have made some PR to allow the user have a better experience with 3.0
>
> If it's possible, one of you can check my PR and merge it if it's ok before
> 3.0 release?
>
> Thanks
> Antonio
>
> <
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2200-b
> >
> Garanti
> sans virus. www.avast.com
> <
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2200-b
> >
> <#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
> 2016-04-04 23:14 GMT+02:00 Milamber <milamber@apache.org <javascript:;>>:
>
> >
> >
> > On 04/04/2016 14:23, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> As it appears there is no pending issue to release a 3.0, any volunteer
> >> to
> >> act as RM for 3.0 ?
> >>
> >
> >
> > Yes, with great pleasure for this great new version!
> >
> > I can start a release process next Saturday (or Sunday)
> >
> > Milamber
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> Regards
> >> Philippe
> >>
> >> On Sunday, April 3, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> As suggested by Felix, I think this enhancement can be delayed to next
> >>> release following 3.0.
> >>>
> >>> If so, @sebb and all, can we start the release process ?
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>>
> >>> On Saturday, April 2, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <
> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <javascript:;>
> >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>');>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On Saturday, April 2, 2016, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 1 April 2016 at 23:58, Philippe Mouawad <
> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> It's developed.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> I know.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Just need to decide which option is best.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> Not possible to decide without knowing how expensive the options are.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> the first option (LRU like) is expensive as per Vladimir notes.
> >>>> We could reduce cost by dropping every N additions.
> >>>> But bear in mind that cost start to be high when we reach the limit,
> >>>> without it GC would have a cost as memory would keep increasing.
> >>>> But it is hard to make a comparison
> >>>>
> >>>> Option 2 (warn and stop adding) has nearly 0 overhead
> >>>>
> >>>> As I wrote, that needs to be resolved.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> But we can delay its integration if needed
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regardd
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Friday, April 1, 2016, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 1 April 2016 at 22:37, Philippe Mouawad <
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <javascript:;>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> hello,
> >>>>>>>> I think trunk is now ready for a release.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I see no pending bug and I think 3.0 is really expected.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> What about the OOM issue?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> That either needs to be resolved or postponed.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Are you ok to start ?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Cordialement.
> >>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Cordialement.
> >>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Cordialement.
> >>>> Philippe Mouawad.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>> Cordialement.
> >>> Philippe Mouawad.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Re: When can we start the release of 3.0 ?
Posted by Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
I have made some PR to allow the user have a better experience with 3.0
If it's possible, one of you can check my PR and merge it if it's ok before
3.0 release?
Thanks
Antonio
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2200-b>
Garanti
sans virus. www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2200-b>
<#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
2016-04-04 23:14 GMT+02:00 Milamber <mi...@apache.org>:
>
>
> On 04/04/2016 14:23, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As it appears there is no pending issue to release a 3.0, any volunteer
>> to
>> act as RM for 3.0 ?
>>
>
>
> Yes, with great pleasure for this great new version!
>
> I can start a release process next Saturday (or Sunday)
>
> Milamber
>
>
>
>
>> Regards
>> Philippe
>>
>> On Sunday, April 3, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> As suggested by Felix, I think this enhancement can be delayed to next
>>> release following 3.0.
>>>
>>> If so, @sebb and all, can we start the release process ?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> On Saturday, April 2, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Saturday, April 2, 2016, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 1 April 2016 at 23:58, Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> It's developed.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I know.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just need to decide which option is best.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Not possible to decide without knowing how expensive the options are.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> the first option (LRU like) is expensive as per Vladimir notes.
>>>> We could reduce cost by dropping every N additions.
>>>> But bear in mind that cost start to be high when we reach the limit,
>>>> without it GC would have a cost as memory would keep increasing.
>>>> But it is hard to make a comparison
>>>>
>>>> Option 2 (warn and stop adding) has nearly 0 overhead
>>>>
>>>> As I wrote, that needs to be resolved.
>>>>>
>>>>> But we can delay its integration if needed
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regardd
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Friday, April 1, 2016, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1 April 2016 at 22:37, Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> hello,
>>>>>>>> I think trunk is now ready for a release.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I see no pending bug and I think 3.0 is really expected.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What about the OOM issue?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That either needs to be resolved or postponed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you ok to start ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cordialement.
>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> Cordialement.
>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
Re: When can we start the release of 3.0 ?
Posted by Milamber <mi...@apache.org>.
On 04/04/2016 14:23, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As it appears there is no pending issue to release a 3.0, any volunteer to
> act as RM for 3.0 ?
Yes, with great pleasure for this great new version!
I can start a release process next Saturday (or Sunday)
Milamber
>
> Regards
> Philippe
>
> On Sunday, April 3, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> As suggested by Felix, I think this enhancement can be delayed to next
>> release following 3.0.
>>
>> If so, @sebb and all, can we start the release process ?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> On Saturday, April 2, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Saturday, April 2, 2016, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 1 April 2016 at 23:58, Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> It's developed.
>>>> I know.
>>>>
>>>>> Just need to decide which option is best.
>>>> Not possible to decide without knowing how expensive the options are.
>>>
>>> the first option (LRU like) is expensive as per Vladimir notes.
>>> We could reduce cost by dropping every N additions.
>>> But bear in mind that cost start to be high when we reach the limit,
>>> without it GC would have a cost as memory would keep increasing.
>>> But it is hard to make a comparison
>>>
>>> Option 2 (warn and stop adding) has nearly 0 overhead
>>>
>>>> As I wrote, that needs to be resolved.
>>>>
>>>>> But we can delay its integration if needed
>>>>>
>>>>> Regardd
>>>>>
>>>>> On Friday, April 1, 2016, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1 April 2016 at 22:37, Philippe Mouawad <
>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>> hello,
>>>>>>> I think trunk is now ready for a release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I see no pending bug and I think 3.0 is really expected.
>>>>>> What about the OOM issue?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That either needs to be resolved or postponed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you ok to start ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cordialement.
>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Cordialement.
>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: When can we start the release of 3.0 ?
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
As it appears there is no pending issue to release a 3.0, any volunteer to
act as RM for 3.0 ?
Regards
Philippe
On Sunday, April 3, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> As suggested by Felix, I think this enhancement can be delayed to next
> release following 3.0.
>
> If so, @sebb and all, can we start the release process ?
>
> Regards
>
> On Saturday, April 2, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, April 2, 2016, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 1 April 2016 at 23:58, Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > It's developed.
>>>
>>> I know.
>>>
>>> > Just need to decide which option is best.
>>>
>>> Not possible to decide without knowing how expensive the options are.
>>
>>
>> the first option (LRU like) is expensive as per Vladimir notes.
>> We could reduce cost by dropping every N additions.
>> But bear in mind that cost start to be high when we reach the limit,
>> without it GC would have a cost as memory would keep increasing.
>> But it is hard to make a comparison
>>
>> Option 2 (warn and stop adding) has nearly 0 overhead
>>
>>>
>>> As I wrote, that needs to be resolved.
>>>
>>> > But we can delay its integration if needed
>>> >
>>> > Regardd
>>> >
>>> > On Friday, April 1, 2016, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> On 1 April 2016 at 22:37, Philippe Mouawad <
>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>> >> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>> >> > hello,
>>> >> > I think trunk is now ready for a release.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I see no pending bug and I think 3.0 is really expected.
>>> >>
>>> >> What about the OOM issue?
>>> >>
>>> >> That either needs to be resolved or postponed.
>>> >>
>>> >> > Are you ok to start ?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Thanks
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > --
>>> >> > Cordialement.
>>> >> > Philippe Mouawad.
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Cordialement.
>>> > Philippe Mouawad.
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cordialement.
>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
>
>
>
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Re: When can we start the release of 3.0 ?
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
As suggested by Felix, I think this enhancement can be delayed to next
release following 3.0.
If so, @sebb and all, can we start the release process ?
Regards
On Saturday, April 2, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Saturday, April 2, 2016, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','sebbaz@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>> On 1 April 2016 at 23:58, Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > It's developed.
>>
>> I know.
>>
>> > Just need to decide which option is best.
>>
>> Not possible to decide without knowing how expensive the options are.
>
>
> the first option (LRU like) is expensive as per Vladimir notes.
> We could reduce cost by dropping every N additions.
> But bear in mind that cost start to be high when we reach the limit,
> without it GC would have a cost as memory would keep increasing.
> But it is hard to make a comparison
>
> Option 2 (warn and stop adding) has nearly 0 overhead
>
>>
>> As I wrote, that needs to be resolved.
>>
>> > But we can delay its integration if needed
>> >
>> > Regardd
>> >
>> > On Friday, April 1, 2016, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 1 April 2016 at 22:37, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>> >> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> >> > hello,
>> >> > I think trunk is now ready for a release.
>> >> >
>> >> > I see no pending bug and I think 3.0 is really expected.
>> >>
>> >> What about the OOM issue?
>> >>
>> >> That either needs to be resolved or postponed.
>> >>
>> >> > Are you ok to start ?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Cordialement.
>> >> > Philippe Mouawad.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Cordialement.
>> > Philippe Mouawad.
>>
>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
>
>
>
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Re: When can we start the release of 3.0 ?
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
On Saturday, April 2, 2016, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1 April 2016 at 23:58, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > It's developed.
>
> I know.
>
> > Just need to decide which option is best.
>
> Not possible to decide without knowing how expensive the options are.
the first option (LRU like) is expensive as per Vladimir notes.
We could reduce cost by dropping every N additions.
But bear in mind that cost start to be high when we reach the limit,
without it GC would have a cost as memory would keep increasing.
But it is hard to make a comparison
Option 2 (warn and stop adding) has nearly 0 overhead
>
> As I wrote, that needs to be resolved.
>
> > But we can delay its integration if needed
> >
> > Regardd
> >
> > On Friday, April 1, 2016, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> >> On 1 April 2016 at 22:37, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>
> >> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >> > hello,
> >> > I think trunk is now ready for a release.
> >> >
> >> > I see no pending bug and I think 3.0 is really expected.
> >>
> >> What about the OOM issue?
> >>
> >> That either needs to be resolved or postponed.
> >>
> >> > Are you ok to start ?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Cordialement.
> >> > Philippe Mouawad.
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cordialement.
> > Philippe Mouawad.
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Re: When can we start the release of 3.0 ?
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 1 April 2016 at 23:58, Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's developed.
I know.
> Just need to decide which option is best.
Not possible to decide without knowing how expensive the options are.
As I wrote, that needs to be resolved.
> But we can delay its integration if needed
>
> Regardd
>
> On Friday, April 1, 2016, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 1 April 2016 at 22:37, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> > hello,
>> > I think trunk is now ready for a release.
>> >
>> > I see no pending bug and I think 3.0 is really expected.
>>
>> What about the OOM issue?
>>
>> That either needs to be resolved or postponed.
>>
>> > Are you ok to start ?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Cordialement.
>> > Philippe Mouawad.
>>
>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
Re: When can we start the release of 3.0 ?
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
It's developed. Just need to decide which option is best.
But we can delay its integration if needed
Regardd
On Friday, April 1, 2016, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1 April 2016 at 22:37, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > hello,
> > I think trunk is now ready for a release.
> >
> > I see no pending bug and I think 3.0 is really expected.
>
> What about the OOM issue?
>
> That either needs to be resolved or postponed.
>
> > Are you ok to start ?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cordialement.
> > Philippe Mouawad.
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Re: When can we start the release of 3.0 ?
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 1 April 2016 at 22:37, Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hello,
> I think trunk is now ready for a release.
>
> I see no pending bug and I think 3.0 is really expected.
What about the OOM issue?
That either needs to be resolved or postponed.
> Are you ok to start ?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.