You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org> on 2014/07/03 09:15:17 UTC
HBase backend, is the OAK-784 still valid?
Hi,
I recently talked to someone who might be interested in reviving the
OAK-784 HBase microkernel that was contributed in April 2013.
That's based on the MicroKernel interface, is that still how you'd do
it today? I've lost track of the various ways of creating storage
backends.
-Bertrand
Re: HBase backend, is the OAK-784 still valid?
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
Hi Marcel,
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Marcel Reutegger <mr...@adobe.com> wrote:
> ...it is still possible to hook in a MicroKernel implementation into Oak,
> but the two primary implementations we have use the NodeStore API...
Thanks! I have added a reference to this to OAK-784.
-Bertrand
Re: HBase backend, is the OAK-784 still valid?
Posted by Julian Reschke <ju...@gmx.de>.
On 2014-07-03 10:12, Marcel Reutegger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it is still possible to hook in a MicroKernel implementation into Oak,
> but the two primary implementations we have use the NodeStore API:
>
> - SegmentNodeStore aka TarMK
> - DocumentNodeStore aka MongoMK
>
> both implementations have again their own storage abstraction, which
> means the SegmentNodeStore is not limited to a filesystem and e.g. a
> RDB backend is in the works for the DocumentNodeStore.
>
> it is probably easier to create an implementation for one of those
> storage abstractions.
>
> Regards
> Marcel
>
> On 03/07/14 09:15, "Bertrand Delacretaz" <bd...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I recently talked to someone who might be interested in reviving the
>> OAK-784 HBase microkernel that was contributed in April 2013.
>>
>> That's based on the MicroKernel interface, is that still how you'd do
>> it today? I've lost track of the various ways of creating storage
>> backends.
>>
>> -Bertrand
>
>
Re: HBase backend, is the OAK-784 still valid?
Posted by Marcel Reutegger <mr...@adobe.com>.
Hi,
it is still possible to hook in a MicroKernel implementation into Oak,
but the two primary implementations we have use the NodeStore API:
- SegmentNodeStore aka TarMK
- DocumentNodeStore aka MongoMK
both implementations have again their own storage abstraction, which
means the SegmentNodeStore is not limited to a filesystem and e.g. a
RDB backend is in the works for the DocumentNodeStore.
it is probably easier to create an implementation for one of those
storage abstractions.
Regards
Marcel
On 03/07/14 09:15, "Bertrand Delacretaz" <bd...@apache.org> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I recently talked to someone who might be interested in reviving the
>OAK-784 HBase microkernel that was contributed in April 2013.
>
>That's based on the MicroKernel interface, is that still how you'd do
>it today? I've lost track of the various ways of creating storage
>backends.
>
>-Bertrand