You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@geronimo.apache.org by Wilbert Ribeiro <wk...@gmail.com> on 2008/05/31 19:03:34 UTC
reason to use the geronimo
Hello,
I am testing the geronimo in environments of tests, but wanted to think of
people more specialised on the subject. In general what the advantages of
geronimo in relation to other free solutions.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/reason-to-use-the-geronimo-tp17577359s134p17577359.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: reason to use the geronimo
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Jun 1, 2008, at 9:36 PM, Wilbert Ribeiro wrote:
<snip>
>
> thanks again, these days I have thoroughly tested the geronimo, and
> in the
> end I am satisfied with its performance, I read in a material and I
> am more
> excited to see it in production, but many application s need to
> adapt. will
> be that you could give a tutorial on setting a JEE application for the
> geronimo?
Hi Wilbert,
Documentation on our latest 2.1 release is here -- http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC21/documentation.html
It includes documentation on sample applications (something we're
currently working on) -- http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC21/sample-applications.html
It also includes some tutorials for developing using Eclipse -- http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC21/tutorials.html
--kevan
Re: reason to use the geronimo
Posted by Wilbert Ribeiro <wk...@gmail.com>.
Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>
> On May 31, 2008, at 7:34 PM, Wilbert Ribeiro wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>>
>> Hi kevan, thanks for you response, but you know say if the
>> performance,
>> memory consumption, pool management, security and response time of the
>> geronimo is compared to its competitors?
>
> Hi Wilbert,
> Here's a pointer to the latest performance report on Geronimo, that
> I'm aware of
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/performance/geronimo/2.0/Geronimo2.0.2PerformanceReport-v01draft.pdf
>
> This report isn't really a "competitive" comparison. So, I doubt that
> it will answer your questions.
>
> There is also
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/Geronimo-1.1.1-PerformanceReport.pdf
> Which is an older study. However, it did include comparisons to a
> "Performance Target", which was a based on measurements of a number of
> unnamed app servers (proprietary and open source). Geronimo was
> compared to the best result in each category.
>
> --kevan
>
>
>
>
>
thanks again, these days I have thoroughly tested the geronimo, and in the
end I am satisfied with its performance, I read in a material and I am more
excited to see it in production, but many application s need to adapt. will
be that you could give a tutorial on setting a JEE application for the
geronimo?
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/reason-to-use-the-geronimo-tp17577359s134p17592680.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: reason to use the geronimo
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On May 31, 2008, at 7:34 PM, Wilbert Ribeiro wrote:
<snip>
>
> Hi kevan, thanks for you response, but you know say if the
> performance,
> memory consumption, pool management, security and response time of the
> geronimo is compared to its competitors?
Hi Wilbert,
Here's a pointer to the latest performance report on Geronimo, that
I'm aware of
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/performance/geronimo/2.0/Geronimo2.0.2PerformanceReport-v01draft.pdf
This report isn't really a "competitive" comparison. So, I doubt that
it will answer your questions.
There is also http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/Geronimo-1.1.1-PerformanceReport.pdf
Which is an older study. However, it did include comparisons to a
"Performance Target", which was a based on measurements of a number of
unnamed app servers (proprietary and open source). Geronimo was
compared to the best result in each category.
--kevan
Re: reason to use the geronimo
Posted by Wilbert Ribeiro <wk...@gmail.com>.
Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>
> On May 31, 2008, at 1:03 PM, Wilbert Ribeiro wrote:
>
>> Hello, I am testing the geronimo in environments of tests, but
>> wanted to think of people more specialised on the subject. In
>> general what the advantages of geronimo in relation to other free
>> solutions.
>
> Hi Wilbert,
> Here are a few reasons:
>
> * flexible server -- geronimo is a component based server (has been
> from the beginning). We provide a JEE5 compliant and Web Tier (JSP/
> Servlet) server images. However, you can easily build server images
> which are customized to your application requirements. For example, if
> your application(s) don't use JMS, the server images won't contain
> them. Alternatively, you can choose the functions that you'd like to
> include (e.g. JSP/Servlet, JMS, deploy, and admin console).
>
> * maven -- maven integration for building server images (see above),
> controlling servers, and deploying applications
>
> * plugins -- geronimo plugins provide an easy mechanism for installing
> server function or user applications into a geronimo server
>
> * admin console -- easy to use interface for modifying a server's
> configuration and settings survive server restart.
>
> * jee 5 certified
>
> * apache -- apache community, license, etc
>
> --kevan
>
>
>
Hi kevan, thanks for you response, but you know say if the performance,
memory consumption, pool management, security and response time of the
geronimo is compared to its competitors?
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/reason-to-use-the-geronimo-tp17577359s134p17580733.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: reason to use the geronimo
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On May 31, 2008, at 1:03 PM, Wilbert Ribeiro wrote:
> Hello, I am testing the geronimo in environments of tests, but
> wanted to think of people more specialised on the subject. In
> general what the advantages of geronimo in relation to other free
> solutions.
Hi Wilbert,
Here are a few reasons:
* flexible server -- geronimo is a component based server (has been
from the beginning). We provide a JEE5 compliant and Web Tier (JSP/
Servlet) server images. However, you can easily build server images
which are customized to your application requirements. For example, if
your application(s) don't use JMS, the server images won't contain
them. Alternatively, you can choose the functions that you'd like to
include (e.g. JSP/Servlet, JMS, deploy, and admin console).
* maven -- maven integration for building server images (see above),
controlling servers, and deploying applications
* plugins -- geronimo plugins provide an easy mechanism for installing
server function or user applications into a geronimo server
* admin console -- easy to use interface for modifying a server's
configuration and settings survive server restart.
* jee 5 certified
* apache -- apache community, license, etc
--kevan