You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by Karsten Bräckelmann <gu...@rudersport.de> on 2009/09/11 22:29:20 UTC
Re: [Bug 6196] FH_HELO_ENDS_DOT rule is overly aggressive in
assigning a spam score
Yes, text MAY be inline indeed. It is not only the top-posted crap that
counts.
On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 13:16 -0700, bugzilla-daemon wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6196
> --- Comment #3 from Tom Pawlowski <tp...@fortressitx.com> 2009-09-11 13:16:07 PST ---
> My apologies, here's the URL:
> http://forums.cpanel.net/f43/fh_helo_ends_dot-118261.html
Awesome. So you did not understand what I said in comment 2, that you
DID add the URL correctly -- despite the fact you even Cc'ed me on the
private reply, so you did read that comment.
And apparently, you didn't got it either when I stressed that fact again
on my reply telling you to add the comment to the bug report, instead of
replying by mail. Well, at least the most important fact you did read.
Cause I top-posted that? *sigh*
Sorry, really couldn't resist the urge to vent. Back to my cave now.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
Re: [Bug 6196] FH_HELO_ENDS_DOT rule is overly aggressive in
assigning a spam score
Posted by John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org>.
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009, Karsten Br�ckelmann wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 16:37 -0400, Tom Pawlowski wrote:
>> As for the URL, I did see your comment about it. It was more for the
>> benefit of John in case it wasn't rendering on his end for whatever
>> reason since he didn't see it the first time.
I said that because I don't yet have the habit of looking for the explicit
URL field and was looking for it in the text body. My bad, for that I
blush and apologize.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
USMC Rules of Gunfighting #2: Anything worth shooting is worth
shooting twice. Ammo is cheap. Your life is expensive.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Today: the 8th anniversary of 9/11
Re: [Bug 6196] FH_HELO_ENDS_DOT rule is overly aggressive in
assigning a spam score
Posted by Karsten Bräckelmann <gu...@rudersport.de>.
On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 17:02 -0400, Tom Pawlowski wrote:
> > In that case, you should have at least added the sender, too, not only
> > John and me. ;) Anyway...
>
> I think I did originally; well, replied to the original email that was
> sent, and received a bounceback from the bugzilla-daemon account. So I
> replied by hand. Should the reply-to have to been to
> dev@spamassassin.apache.org ?
No, there is only one way to add comments to bugzilla -- the web front-
end. Each bugzilla notification includes a handy link to the bug it
discusses, but it doesn't accept comments by mail.
The dev@ list I added, cause that's a list for development related
discussion, and also gets a copy of each bugzilla post.
> > Tom, please accept my apology -- you just caught me in a bad moment with
> > that, and I vented over a penny before really thinking a second time. I
> > should know better.
>
> No biggie, lord knows I've been there more times than I can count.
> Hope your evening gets a little less annoying.
>
> Take care,
> --T
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
Re: [Bug 6196] FH_HELO_ENDS_DOT rule is overly aggressive in
assigning a spam score
Posted by Karsten Bräckelmann <gu...@rudersport.de>.
On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 16:37 -0400, Tom Pawlowski wrote:
> I mistakenly thought replying via email would also update the web
> frontend, as a lot ticketing systems do. When you requested I add my
> reply to the comment field on the Bugzilla site, I did just that, so
> my original reply was resubmitted.
In that case, you should have at least added the sender, too, not only
John and me. ;) Anyway...
> As for the URL, I did see your comment about it. It was more for the
> benefit of John in case it wasn't rendering on his end for whatever
> reason since he didn't see it the first time. Is that really something
> to throw a hissy fit over?
Tom, please accept my apology -- you just caught me in a bad moment with
that, and I vented over a penny before really thinking a second time. I
should know better.
> 2009/9/11 Karsten Bräckelmann <gu...@rudersport.de>:
[...]
> > Sorry, really couldn't resist the urge to vent. Back to my cave now.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}