You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@syncope.apache.org by Colm O hEigeartaigh <co...@apache.org> on 2013/03/19 12:18:51 UTC
Console Resource mappings window
Hi all,
Two questions on the Resource mapping windows in the Console following the
merge to be able to have different mappings for propagation/synchronization:
a) The panel is not wide enough on my resolution to accomodate the
"purpose" tab - should it be made wider?
b) Should we default to "BOTH" given that this was the old (default)
behaviour?
Colm.
--
Colm O hEigeartaigh
Talend Community Coder
http://coders.talend.com
Re: Console Resource mappings window
Posted by Colm O hEigeartaigh <co...@apache.org>.
Cool, thanks!
Colm.
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Fabio Martelli
<fa...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> Il giorno 19/mar/2013, alle ore 12.18, Colm O hEigeartaigh ha scritto:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Two questions on the Resource mapping windows in the Console following
> the
> > merge to be able to have different mappings for
> propagation/synchronization:
> >
> > a) The panel is not wide enough on my resolution to accomodate the
> > "purpose" tab - should it be made wider?
> I will try to fix it by working on SYNCOPE-336
> > b) Should we default to "BOTH" given that this was the old (default)
> > behaviour?
> You are arught. As per point (a) ...
> >
> > Colm.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Colm O hEigeartaigh
> >
> > Talend Community Coder
> > http://coders.talend.com
>
>
--
Colm O hEigeartaigh
Talend Community Coder
http://coders.talend.com
Re: Console Resource mappings window
Posted by Fabio Martelli <fa...@gmail.com>.
Il giorno 19/mar/2013, alle ore 12.18, Colm O hEigeartaigh ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> Two questions on the Resource mapping windows in the Console following the
> merge to be able to have different mappings for propagation/synchronization:
>
> a) The panel is not wide enough on my resolution to accomodate the
> "purpose" tab - should it be made wider?
I will try to fix it by working on SYNCOPE-336
> b) Should we default to "BOTH" given that this was the old (default)
> behaviour?
You are arught. As per point (a) ...
>
> Colm.
>
>
> --
> Colm O hEigeartaigh
>
> Talend Community Coder
> http://coders.talend.com