You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by "Jonathan Gray (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/06/06 22:52:07 UTC

[jira] Resolved: (HBASE-1410) compactions are not memory efficient

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Jonathan Gray resolved HBASE-1410.
----------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

Fixed as part of HBASE-1304 commit.

Compactions now use KeyValueHeap and new scanner implementation, much more memory efficient.

> compactions are not memory efficient 
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-1410
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1410
>             Project: Hadoop HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>             Fix For: 0.20.0
>
>
> Compactions read a lot of data into the heap. Prior to HBASE-1058 or successor issues, it was possible to stack up hundreds if not thousands of flushes in a store. Eventually when compaction is possible, no HRS has enough heap to commit for the compaction process and all OOME as the region in question is (re)deployed. HBASE-1058 is not the ideal solution.This issue suggests creating a memory efficient compaction process which can scale. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.