svn commit: r395401 - /httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/STATUS

[ji...@apache.org]

Author: jim
Date: Wed Apr 19 14:51:13 2006
New Revision: 395401

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395401&view=rev
Log:
Ask a question, since I'm lazy until tomorrow :)

Modified:
    httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/STATUS

Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/STATUS?rev=395401&r1=395400&r2=395401&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/STATUS (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/STATUS Wed Apr 19 14:51:13 2006
@@ -83,6 +83,11 @@
         a direct copy of ap_process_resource_config(), warts
         and all. That's where the fprintf's come from; it's
         existing behaviour.
+        Jim asks: but aren't we already getting that info when
+        we run ap_process_resource_config()? In other words, aren't
+        we just double printing the status info? (PS: No, I haven't
+        tried the patch yet, which, of course, would answer this
+        directly :) )
 
 RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP: