You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to c-dev@axis.apache.org by Franz Fehringer <fe...@isogmbh.de> on 2005/11/04 10:46:48 UTC
Axis2 versus C++
Hello,
I am slightly confused about the possibility of generating C/C++ Code with
Axis2.
Is C/C++ code generation possible
- using command line similar to Axis1
- only via Eclipse plugin
- not possible at all
???
I am using version 0.92.
Thanks in advance
Franz
Dr. Franz Fehringer (Dipl. Math.)
____________________________________
ISO Software Systeme
Eichendorffstrasse 29
90491 Nuremberg
Germany
Tel. : +49/(911) - 99594-0
Fax : +49/(911) - 99594-580
mailto:feh@isogmbh.de
http://www.isogmbh.de
Re: [Axis2] Added array_list
Posted by Damitha Kumarage <da...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I added linked list as well and wrote a test
thanks
damitha
Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:
> I added a utility struct impl for array list. This is because the Java
> implementation makes heavy use of ArrayList.
>
> Now we have both HashTable and ArrayList equivalants implemeted in C.
> Please use those in your implemntations when u write code.
>
> Thanks,
> Samisa...
>
>
[Axis2] implemented strdup
Posted by Samisa Abeysinghe <sa...@gmail.com>.
I wrote our own implementation of strdup. This is because, the default
strdup that we get with libs are not ANSI C complient.
Please use the AXIS2_STRDUP macro in the Axis2C code when you want to
duplicate strings.
The resulting pointer has to be freed using AXIS2_FREE
Thanks,
Samisa...
[Axis2] Added array_list
Posted by Samisa Abeysinghe <sa...@gmail.com>.
I added a utility struct impl for array list. This is because the Java
implementation makes heavy use of ArrayList.
Now we have both HashTable and ArrayList equivalants implemeted in C.
Please use those in your implemntations when u write code.
Thanks,
Samisa...
Re: Axis2 versus C++
Posted by Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>.
Hi John,
> We've got customer commitments on version 1 which make it impossible
> for us to help in v.2 - resources...resources...sigh .
Understood!
> This was the reason why I mentioned the tests. If we could see that
> the v2 was close to getting the complete set of tests working and was
> reasonably stable then I could make a case for supporting and thus
> working on v2. Otherwise, we'd just be swapping resource onto a system
> that was less stable than the one we use today while still having
> customer commitments. Swapping a team (and customers) from one
> codebase to another is non-trivial - and as we give customer drops of
> code on a frequent basis it'd be very hard to justify adding this
> level of instability to us or our customers . I'm sure you understand
> how it works :-)
+1 ... we will try our best to get the tests operational at the right
time; now is clearly not the right time! (We're a long way off :))
> Do you think that v2 is going to be able to support ws-* standards
> easily - what are your plans ? It'd be good to find a migration path
> so we can plan ahead.
>
> I don't see the plans for v2 being discussed in this list - where do
> you guys do this?
There haven't been any specific discussions around Axis2/C other than
the original stuff we discussed at the Axis2 F2Fs. The plan then was to
redo it for the reasons Paul indicated in his reply.
W.r.t. WS-*- yes we fully plan to keep pushing on building
WS-Addressing, WS-Security*, WS-ReliableMessaging and WS-AT on top of
Axis2/C. Unfortunately can't give a timeline right now but I'd like to
see Axis2/C getting to 1.0 with SOAP 1.1/1.2 and WS-Addr support early
next year. Then we are in a position to unleash WS-Sec/RM/AT etc. all in
parallel.
Hope this helps!
Sanjiva.
Re: Axis2 versus C++
Posted by Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com>.
Nadir
The version 2 idea was kicked off about a year ago. When we started Axis
Java v2 we decided to do both Java and C/C++. The push is the complete
change in the WS landscape that has happened since Axis 1 was written
(Async, WS-Addressing, WS-RM, move to document style services) plus a push
to support lazy parsing and more flexible models of XML handling.
v2 is a rewrite, in C instead of C++, and so far its too early to compare
them - v1 is a full SOAP implementation and v2 is still early days.
Paul
On 11/7/05, Nadir Amra <am...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> I would also like to the relationship between the 1 vs. 2. What is the
> difference? Benefits? Is one a subset of the other? Why are we doing
> version 2?
>
> Nadir K. Amra
>
>
> John Hawkins <HA...@uk.ibm.com> wrote on 11/07/2005 07:03:25 AM:
>
> >
> > hi Sanjiva,
> >
> > We've got customer commitments on version 1 which make it impossible
> > for us to help in v.2 - resources...resources...sigh .
> >
> > This was the reason why I mentioned the tests. If we could see that
> > the v2 was close to getting the complete set of tests working and
> > was reasonably stable then I could make a case for supporting and
> > thus working on v2. Otherwise, we'd just be swapping resource onto a
> > system that was less stable than the one we use today while still
> > having customer commitments. Swapping a team (and customers) from
> > one codebase to another is non-trivial - and as we give customer
> > drops of code on a frequent basis it'd be very hard to justify
> > adding this level of instability to us or our customers . I'm sure
> > you understand how it works :-)
> >
> > Do you think that v2 is going to be able to support ws-* standards
> > easily - what are your plans ? It'd be good to find a migration path
> > so we can plan ahead.
> > I don't see the plans for v2 being discussed in this list - where do
> > you guys do this?
> >
> > John.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> >
> > Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>
> > 06/11/2005 16:59
> >
> > Please respond to
> > "Apache AXIS C Developers List"
> >
> > To
> >
> > Apache AXIS C Developers List <ax...@ws.apache.org>
> >
> > cc
> >
> > Subject
> >
> > Re: Axis2 versus C++
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi John,
> >
> > Any chance of some of the IBM Axis/C++ folks helping with Axis2/C?
> >
> > Absolute +1 for sharing the test suite (and anything else that can be
> > shared!).
> >
> > Sanjiva.
> >
> > On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 11:28 +0000, Paul Fremantle wrote:
> > > Hi John
> > >
> > > We are targeting a pure C runtime with C++ wrappers. Its early days.
> > > We are just getting the object model and coding style right.
> > >
> > > As regards test suites.... sounds like a great idea.
> > >
> > > Paul
> > >
> > > On 11/4/05, John Hawkins <HA...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Paul,
> > >
> > > When do you think you'll have C++ going? Are you targeting C
> > > or C++ first?
> > >
> > > what kind of test suite do you have. I'd be interested if we
> > > could see the whole of the axisCPP *1* suite running against
> > > it - perhaps we could share test suites? It would save you
> > > guys a lot of effort.
> > >
> > > cheers,
> > > john.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Paul Fremantle
> > > <pz...@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > 04/11/2005 10:32
> > > Please respond to
> > > "Apache AXIS C Developers List"
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To
> > > Apache AXIS C
> > > Developers List
> > > <ax...@ws.apache.org>
> > > cc
> > >
> > >
> > > Subject
> > > Re: Axis2
> > > versus C++
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > H
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Franz
> > >
> > > There is an existing Axis*1* in C++
> > > http://ws.apache.org/axis/cpp/index.html
> > > We have only just started on building Axis*2* in C. At the
> > > moment there is some C# support in Axis2/Java which requires
> > > you to run Axis2/Java in IKVM under .NET.
> > >
> > >
> > > Paul
> > >
> > > On 11/4/05, Franz Fehringer <fe...@isogmbh.de> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I am slightly confused about the possibility of generating C/C
> > > ++ Code with
> > > Axis2.
> > > Is C/C++ code generation possible
> > >
> > > - using command line similar to Axis1
> > > - only via Eclipse plugin
> > > - not possible at all
> > >
> > > ???
> > >
> > > I am using version 0.92.
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance
> > >
> > > Franz
> > >
> > > Dr. Franz Fehringer (Dipl. Math.)
> > > ____________________________________
> > > ISO Software Systeme
> > > Eichendorffstrasse 29
> > > 90491 Nuremberg
> > > Germany
> > >
> > > Tel. : +49/(911) - 99594-0
> > > Fax : +49/(911) - 99594-580
> > >
> > > mailto:feh@isogmbh.de
> > > http://www.isogmbh.de
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Re: Axis2 versus C++
Posted by Nadir Amra <am...@us.ibm.com>.
I would also like to the relationship between the 1 vs. 2. What is the
difference? Benefits? Is one a subset of the other? Why are we doing
version 2?
Nadir K. Amra
John Hawkins <HA...@uk.ibm.com> wrote on 11/07/2005 07:03:25 AM:
>
> hi Sanjiva,
>
> We've got customer commitments on version 1 which make it impossible
> for us to help in v.2 - resources...resources...sigh .
>
> This was the reason why I mentioned the tests. If we could see that
> the v2 was close to getting the complete set of tests working and
> was reasonably stable then I could make a case for supporting and
> thus working on v2. Otherwise, we'd just be swapping resource onto a
> system that was less stable than the one we use today while still
> having customer commitments. Swapping a team (and customers) from
> one codebase to another is non-trivial - and as we give customer
> drops of code on a frequent basis it'd be very hard to justify
> adding this level of instability to us or our customers . I'm sure
> you understand how it works :-)
>
> Do you think that v2 is going to be able to support ws-* standards
> easily - what are your plans ? It'd be good to find a migration path
> so we can plan ahead.
> I don't see the plans for v2 being discussed in this list - where do
> you guys do this?
>
> John.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>
> 06/11/2005 16:59
>
> Please respond to
> "Apache AXIS C Developers List"
>
> To
>
> Apache AXIS C Developers List <ax...@ws.apache.org>
>
> cc
>
> Subject
>
> Re: Axis2 versus C++
>
>
>
>
> Hi John,
>
> Any chance of some of the IBM Axis/C++ folks helping with Axis2/C?
>
> Absolute +1 for sharing the test suite (and anything else that can be
> shared!).
>
> Sanjiva.
>
> On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 11:28 +0000, Paul Fremantle wrote:
> > Hi John
> >
> > We are targeting a pure C runtime with C++ wrappers. Its early days.
> > We are just getting the object model and coding style right.
> >
> > As regards test suites.... sounds like a great idea.
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > On 11/4/05, John Hawkins <HA...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > When do you think you'll have C++ going? Are you targeting C
> > or C++ first?
> >
> > what kind of test suite do you have. I'd be interested if we
> > could see the whole of the axisCPP *1* suite running against
> > it - perhaps we could share test suites? It would save you
> > guys a lot of effort.
> >
> > cheers,
> > john.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Paul Fremantle
> > <pz...@gmail.com>
> >
> > 04/11/2005 10:32
> > Please respond to
> > "Apache AXIS C Developers List"
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To
> > Apache AXIS C
> > Developers List
> > <ax...@ws.apache.org>
> > cc
> >
> >
> > Subject
> > Re: Axis2
> > versus C++
> >
> >
> >
> > H
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Franz
> >
> > There is an existing Axis*1* in C++
> > http://ws.apache.org/axis/cpp/index.html
> > We have only just started on building Axis*2* in C. At the
> > moment there is some C# support in Axis2/Java which requires
> > you to run Axis2/Java in IKVM under .NET.
> >
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > On 11/4/05, Franz Fehringer <fe...@isogmbh.de> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am slightly confused about the possibility of generating C/C
> > ++ Code with
> > Axis2.
> > Is C/C++ code generation possible
> >
> > - using command line similar to Axis1
> > - only via Eclipse plugin
> > - not possible at all
> >
> > ???
> >
> > I am using version 0.92.
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > Franz
> >
> > Dr. Franz Fehringer (Dipl. Math.)
> > ____________________________________
> > ISO Software Systeme
> > Eichendorffstrasse 29
> > 90491 Nuremberg
> > Germany
> >
> > Tel. : +49/(911) - 99594-0
> > Fax : +49/(911) - 99594-580
> >
> > mailto:feh@isogmbh.de
> > http://www.isogmbh.de
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: Axis2 versus C++
Posted by John Hawkins <HA...@uk.ibm.com>.
hi Sanjiva,
We've got customer commitments on version 1 which make it impossible for
us to help in v.2 - resources...resources...sigh .
This was the reason why I mentioned the tests. If we could see that the v2
was close to getting the complete set of tests working and was reasonably
stable then I could make a case for supporting and thus working on v2.
Otherwise, we'd just be swapping resource onto a system that was less
stable than the one we use today while still having customer commitments.
Swapping a team (and customers) from one codebase to another is
non-trivial - and as we give customer drops of code on a frequent basis
it'd be very hard to justify adding this level of instability to us or our
customers . I'm sure you understand how it works :-)
Do you think that v2 is going to be able to support ws-* standards easily
- what are your plans ? It'd be good to find a migration path so we can
plan ahead.
I don't see the plans for v2 being discussed in this list - where do you
guys do this?
John.
Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>
06/11/2005 16:59
Please respond to
"Apache AXIS C Developers List"
To
Apache AXIS C Developers List <ax...@ws.apache.org>
cc
Subject
Re: Axis2 versus C++
Hi John,
Any chance of some of the IBM Axis/C++ folks helping with Axis2/C?
Absolute +1 for sharing the test suite (and anything else that can be
shared!).
Sanjiva.
On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 11:28 +0000, Paul Fremantle wrote:
> Hi John
>
> We are targeting a pure C runtime with C++ wrappers. Its early days.
> We are just getting the object model and coding style right.
>
> As regards test suites.... sounds like a great idea.
>
> Paul
>
> On 11/4/05, John Hawkins <HA...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> When do you think you'll have C++ going? Are you targeting C
> or C++ first?
>
> what kind of test suite do you have. I'd be interested if we
> could see the whole of the axisCPP *1* suite running against
> it - perhaps we could share test suites? It would save you
> guys a lot of effort.
>
> cheers,
> john.
>
>
>
>
>
> Paul Fremantle
> <pz...@gmail.com>
>
> 04/11/2005 10:32
> Please respond to
> "Apache AXIS C Developers List"
>
>
>
>
> To
> Apache AXIS C
> Developers List
> <ax...@ws.apache.org>
> cc
>
>
> Subject
> Re: Axis2
> versus C++
>
>
>
> H
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Franz
>
> There is an existing Axis*1* in C++
> http://ws.apache.org/axis/cpp/index.html
> We have only just started on building Axis*2* in C. At the
> moment there is some C# support in Axis2/Java which requires
> you to run Axis2/Java in IKVM under .NET.
>
>
> Paul
>
> On 11/4/05, Franz Fehringer <fe...@isogmbh.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am slightly confused about the possibility of generating C/C
> ++ Code with
> Axis2.
> Is C/C++ code generation possible
>
> - using command line similar to Axis1
> - only via Eclipse plugin
> - not possible at all
>
> ???
>
> I am using version 0.92.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Franz
>
> Dr. Franz Fehringer (Dipl. Math.)
> ____________________________________
> ISO Software Systeme
> Eichendorffstrasse 29
> 90491 Nuremberg
> Germany
>
> Tel. : +49/(911) - 99594-0
> Fax : +49/(911) - 99594-580
>
> mailto:feh@isogmbh.de
> http://www.isogmbh.de
>
>
>
>
Re: Axis2 versus C++
Posted by Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>.
Hi John,
Any chance of some of the IBM Axis/C++ folks helping with Axis2/C?
Absolute +1 for sharing the test suite (and anything else that can be
shared!).
Sanjiva.
On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 11:28 +0000, Paul Fremantle wrote:
> Hi John
>
> We are targeting a pure C runtime with C++ wrappers. Its early days.
> We are just getting the object model and coding style right.
>
> As regards test suites.... sounds like a great idea.
>
> Paul
>
> On 11/4/05, John Hawkins <HA...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> When do you think you'll have C++ going? Are you targeting C
> or C++ first?
>
> what kind of test suite do you have. I'd be interested if we
> could see the whole of the axisCPP *1* suite running against
> it - perhaps we could share test suites? It would save you
> guys a lot of effort.
>
> cheers,
> john.
>
>
>
>
>
> Paul Fremantle
> <pz...@gmail.com>
>
> 04/11/2005 10:32
> Please respond to
> "Apache AXIS C Developers List"
>
>
>
>
> To
> Apache AXIS C
> Developers List
> <ax...@ws.apache.org>
> cc
>
>
> Subject
> Re: Axis2
> versus C++
>
>
>
> H
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Franz
>
> There is an existing Axis*1* in C++
> http://ws.apache.org/axis/cpp/index.html
> We have only just started on building Axis*2* in C. At the
> moment there is some C# support in Axis2/Java which requires
> you to run Axis2/Java in IKVM under .NET.
>
>
> Paul
>
> On 11/4/05, Franz Fehringer <fe...@isogmbh.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am slightly confused about the possibility of generating C/C
> ++ Code with
> Axis2.
> Is C/C++ code generation possible
>
> - using command line similar to Axis1
> - only via Eclipse plugin
> - not possible at all
>
> ???
>
> I am using version 0.92.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Franz
>
> Dr. Franz Fehringer (Dipl. Math.)
> ____________________________________
> ISO Software Systeme
> Eichendorffstrasse 29
> 90491 Nuremberg
> Germany
>
> Tel. : +49/(911) - 99594-0
> Fax : +49/(911) - 99594-580
>
> mailto:feh@isogmbh.de
> http://www.isogmbh.de
>
>
>
>
Re: Axis2 versus C++
Posted by Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com>.
Hi John
We are targeting a pure C runtime with C++ wrappers. Its early days. We are
just getting the object model and coding style right.
As regards test suites.... sounds like a great idea.
Paul
On 11/4/05, John Hawkins <HA...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> When do you think you'll have C++ going? Are you targeting C or C++ first?
>
> what kind of test suite do you have. I'd be interested if we could see the
> whole of the axisCPP *1* suite running against it - perhaps we could share
> test suites? It would save you guys a lot of effort.
>
> cheers,
> john.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com>*
>
> 04/11/2005 10:32 Please respond to
> "Apache AXIS C Developers List"
>
> To
> Apache AXIS C Developers List <ax...@ws.apache.org> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: Axis2 versus C++
>
> H
>
>
>
>
> Franz
>
> There is an existing Axis*1* in C++ *
> http://ws.apache.org/axis/cpp/index.html*<http://ws.apache.org/axis/cpp/index.html>
> We have only just started on building Axis*2* in C. At the moment there is
> some C# support in Axis2/Java which requires you to run Axis2/Java in IKVM
> under .NET.
>
>
> Paul
>
> On 11/4/05, *Franz Fehringer* <*feh@isogmbh.de* <fe...@isogmbh.de>> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am slightly confused about the possibility of generating C/C++ Code with
> Axis2.
> Is C/C++ code generation possible
>
> - using command line similar to Axis1
> - only via Eclipse plugin
> - not possible at all
>
> ???
>
> I am using version 0.92.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Franz
>
> Dr. Franz Fehringer (Dipl. Math.)
> ____________________________________
> ISO Software Systeme
> Eichendorffstrasse 29
> 90491 Nuremberg
> Germany
>
> Tel. : +49/(911) - 99594-0
> Fax : +49/(911) - 99594-580
>
> mailto:*feh@isogmbh.de* <fe...@isogmbh.de>*
> **http://www.isogmbh.de* <http://www.isogmbh.de/>
>
>
>
Re: Axis2 versus C++
Posted by John Hawkins <HA...@uk.ibm.com>.
Hi Paul,
When do you think you'll have C++ going? Are you targeting C or C++ first?
what kind of test suite do you have. I'd be interested if we could see the
whole of the axisCPP *1* suite running against it - perhaps we could share
test suites? It would save you guys a lot of effort.
cheers,
john.
Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com>
04/11/2005 10:32
Please respond to
"Apache AXIS C Developers List"
To
Apache AXIS C Developers List <ax...@ws.apache.org>
cc
Subject
Re: Axis2 versus C++
Franz
There is an existing Axis*1* in C++
http://ws.apache.org/axis/cpp/index.html
We have only just started on building Axis*2* in C. At the moment there is
some C# support in Axis2/Java which requires you to run Axis2/Java in IKVM
under .NET.
Paul
On 11/4/05, Franz Fehringer <fe...@isogmbh.de> wrote:
Hello,
I am slightly confused about the possibility of generating C/C++ Code with
Axis2.
Is C/C++ code generation possible
- using command line similar to Axis1
- only via Eclipse plugin
- not possible at all
???
I am using version 0.92.
Thanks in advance
Franz
Dr. Franz Fehringer (Dipl. Math.)
____________________________________
ISO Software Systeme
Eichendorffstrasse 29
90491 Nuremberg
Germany
Tel. : +49/(911) - 99594-0
Fax : +49/(911) - 99594-580
mailto:feh@isogmbh.de
http://www.isogmbh.de
Re: Axis2 versus C++
Posted by Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com>.
Franz
There is an existing Axis*1* in C++ http://ws.apache.org/axis/cpp/index.html
We have only just started on building Axis*2* in C. At the moment there is
some C# support in Axis2/Java which requires you to run Axis2/Java in IKVM
under .NET.
Paul
On 11/4/05, Franz Fehringer <fe...@isogmbh.de> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am slightly confused about the possibility of generating C/C++ Code with
> Axis2.
> Is C/C++ code generation possible
>
> - using command line similar to Axis1
> - only via Eclipse plugin
> - not possible at all
>
> ???
>
> I am using version 0.92.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Franz
>
> Dr. Franz Fehringer (Dipl. Math.)
> ____________________________________
> ISO Software Systeme
> Eichendorffstrasse 29
> 90491 Nuremberg
> Germany
>
> Tel. : +49/(911) - 99594-0
> Fax : +49/(911) - 99594-580
>
> mailto:feh@isogmbh.de
> http://www.isogmbh.de
>
>