You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@nutch.apache.org by kevin chen <ke...@bdsing.com> on 2007/08/01 03:28:17 UTC
Re: Tomcat without Apache
Well, according to Tomcat, "With the performance of Tomcat 5 and 6,
performance reasons become harder to justify." (to integrate Apache with
Tomcat).
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 11:33 -0700, Kai_testing Middleton wrote:
> Tomcat can act as a web server entirely on its own;
> that's how I serve my small website at home. It's
> just not good for high volume service.
>
> --- "Kursun, Mahmut" <Ma...@com-magazin.de>
> wrote:
>
> > I made a funny experience while trying out nutch.
> >
> > I think it was on a machine with Fedora Core 6 or 7.
> > Tomcat was running, Apache not.
> >
> > Tomcat 5.5 responded to http://localhost:8080 with
> > the start-page.
> >
> > Is this really possible or was it any mistake that I
> > made?
> > I tought that Apache was needed in order to run
> > Tomcat.
> >
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Yahoo!'s user panel and lay it on us. http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7
>
Re: Tomcat without Apache
Posted by Enzo Michelangeli <en...@gmail.com>.
Has anybody noticed that the "RSS" (i.e., OpenSearch) links in the pages
returned directly by Tomcat are wrong if the webapp's URL is like
http://localhost:8080/nutch-0.9/ ? Those links lack the '/nutch-0.9' part.
On the other hand, they are OK if the access passes through an Apache
connector.
Enzo
----- Original Message -----
From: "kevin chen" <ke...@bdsing.com>
To: <nu...@lucene.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: Tomcat without Apache
>
> Well, according to Tomcat, "With the performance of Tomcat 5 and 6,
> performance reasons become harder to justify." (to integrate Apache with
> Tomcat).
>
> On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 11:33 -0700, Kai_testing Middleton wrote:
>> Tomcat can act as a web server entirely on its own;
>> that's how I serve my small website at home. It's
>> just not good for high volume service.
>>
>> --- "Kursun, Mahmut" <Ma...@com-magazin.de>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I made a funny experience while trying out nutch.
>> >
>> > I think it was on a machine with Fedora Core 6 or 7.
>> > Tomcat was running, Apache not.
>> >
>> > Tomcat 5.5 responded to http://localhost:8080 with
>> > the start-page.
>> >
>> > Is this really possible or was it any mistake that I
>> > made?
>> > I tought that Apache was needed in order to run
>> > Tomcat.
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________________________________
>> Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Yahoo!'s user
>> panel and lay it on us.
>> http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7
>>
>