You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openjpa.apache.org by "Jeremy Bauer (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/03/19 20:44:24 UTC

[jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-528) FK columns which contain reserved workds are renamed incorrectly.

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12580516#action_12580516 ] 

Jeremy Bauer commented on OPENJPA-528:
--------------------------------------

The original fix provided by Michael has been enhanced to eliminate the problems encountered in the TCK.

In short, when schema mapping occurs columns are inserted into a table object, including foreign key columns.  Then, when foreign keys are mapped into the same table the column name validator finds the column already exists and generates a new unique column with a numeric value appended.  This column is mapped to the foreign key.  Later, when the entity is persisted, the extra/incorrectly generated column name is not found in the database table.  The result is a SQLException.

To eliminate this problem, a new method was added to the DBDictionary to enable/disable the column name uniqueness check.  The method to populate the foreign key column was changed to disable uniqueness checking - since the FK column is already in the table.  Thus, an extra/incorrect column does not get generated.

A patch is provided as OPENJPA-528.patch.  Please review by tomorrow morning (3/20/08).

> FK columns which contain reserved workds are renamed incorrectly.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENJPA-528
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-528
>             Project: OpenJPA
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Michael Dick
>            Assignee: Michael Dick
>
> The check for reserved words in FK column names happens before we append the _ID suffixes. As a result if a reserved word is found  we end up appending a number to the reserved word and then appending _ID. 
> Whats worse is that the check for uniqueness also occurs before we append the _ID, which could lead to other problems down the road.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.