You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to adffaces-user@incubator.apache.org by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> on 2006/07/17 00:22:19 UTC
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the form searching
routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family - so the trinidad
form should be found as well.
I'd be glad about any test results!
regards,
Martin
On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the <t:commandLink>
> problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces renderer for the
> <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
>
>
>
> 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF implementation.
> >
> > see http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> >
> >
> > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain component family needs
> > > to be able to render out all components belonging to this family? I
> > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different renderer-type for the
> > > UIXForm component...
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about component families, we only
> > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > >
> > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied by not extending UIForm.
> > > > In general, component family should follow subclassing
> > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > Renderers.
> > > >
> > > > -- Adam
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a different component
> > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread talked about that.)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > searching for the component family instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component, a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component, the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink> recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF Faces
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink> components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you using?
> > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > >
> > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > >
> > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
Excellent observation!
regards,
Martin
On 7/27/06, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think this may be a problem with AJAX (option 3) as the links can be
> clicked more than once and different links can be clicked. This could
> be solved by JavaScript code though (store the last ID as a javascript
> global variable that stores the ID of generated element and removes it
> from the DOM on click):
>
> if (window['jsfCommandId'])
> {
> var elem =document.getElementById(window['jsfCommandId'])
> if (elem)
> elem.parentNode.removeChild(elem)
> }
> var hiddenLink=document.createElement('input');
> hiddenLink.type='hidden';
> hiddenLink.name='someName';
> hiddenLink.value=this.id;
> window['jsfCommandId'] = this.id
> form.appendChild(hiddenLink);
> form.submit();
>
> On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Now if this works, it's a very good solution!
> >
> > Well, you're right, on browser-back we'll loose the current DOM, and
> > so the dynamically added link will vanish. Like it!
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I like more option 2..
> > >
> > > Let's add another one.
> > >
> > > 3. option:
> > > =======
> > >
> > > each Link, in its onclick attribute, renders:
> > >
> > > "var hiddenLink=document.createElement('input');
> > > hiddenLink.type='hidden';
> > > hiddenLink.name='someName';
> > > hiddenLink.value=this.id;
> > > form.appendChild(hiddenLink);
> > > form.submit();"
> > >
> > > or, having defined a function in one of the js libraries:
> > >
> > > "generateHiddenLink(form, 'someName', this.id); form.submit();"
> > >
> > > Of course, the renderer should not encode the hidden field. This way
> > > we could forget about clearing at all, as all those hidden fields are
> > > missing when the page is loaded, and only the required parameters is
> > > actually added to the page.
> > >
> > >
> > > Cosma
> > >
> > >
> > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > Of course, all of this without dojo ;)
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > No.
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. option:
> > > > > =======
> > > > >
> > > > > each Link renders:
> > > > >
> > > > > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",function(){ // clear the parameter of this link});
> > > > >
> > > > > in the onclick method:
> > > > >
> > > > > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",function(){//set parameter of this
> > > > > link}); form.submit();
> > > > >
> > > > > (as the event is added as the last event, the parameters will remain
> > > > > set, as the other parameters are deleted, all is well)
> > > > >
> > > > > 2. option:
> > > > > =======
> > > > >
> > > > > each Link renders:
> > > > >
> > > > > dojo.event.bind(body,"load",function(){ // clear the parameter of this link});
> > > > >
> > > > > and:
> > > > >
> > > > > onclick="/*set parameters of this link */; form.submit();"
> > > > >
> > > > > form.submit stands in both options for what we have for this in
> > > > > MyFaces currently.
> > > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > With the first one, I if understand well, the trick is that the form
> > > > > > parameter will not exists on page loading after the submit, so an old
> > > > > > value will not be restored (thus no need for a clear function).. then
> > > > > > create the parameter on the fly when the user click on the
> > > > > > commandLink, right?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I haven't understood the second part :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > Well, we could queue onsubmit, and queue a second script which will
> > > > > > > add the link hidden param and the params onsubmit as well.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Or we queue onload, and then set the correct params for the one link
> > > > > > > that has been clicked.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > To avoid a central method, every commandLink could queue its own clear
> > > > > > > > javascript to the body onload event, in addition to the form onsubmit
> > > > > > > > event.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > Ok, another talk with Manfred made me wiser.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - Manfred says there is no guarantee that the clear method will be
> > > > > > > > > called after the submit has happened (he says that is browser
> > > > > > > > > dependent)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - this is why _all_ hidden parameters and child params of all links
> > > > > > > > > need to be cleared out in the beginning, and why there is a central
> > > > > > > > > clear method, which is called before the submit actually happens
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - so even when you have a cached submit value (due to browser-back),
> > > > > > > > > it is cleared out before the submit
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Plan of action:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 1) render a hidden parameter _per_ link (so there are no
> > > > > > > > > > interdependencies between components)
> > > > > > > > > > 2) clear the hidden parameter(s) of the link after submit has happened
> > > > > > > > > > 3) for other frameworks, eventually clear out their hidden
> > > > > > > > > > parameter(s) as well, to cater for compatibility
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > with this we should be on our way better ;)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Ah, yes, now I see it - I didn't even look so far!
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > well, then the clear is pretty useless, right ;)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > It calls clear__5Fid0() but, some ";" after, it does
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > document.forms['_id0'].elements['_id0:_link_hidden_'].value='_id0:_id1:1:_id2'
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > document.forms['_id0'].elements['language'].value='en';
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > At this point, the centralized clear isn't very useful :-)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Cosma,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I probably don't see something obvious - but how can our current
> > > > > > > > > > > > > script work at all, if we call the clear method before we call submit?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > This should reset the parameter, right?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > onclick="clear__5Fid0();document.forms['_id0'].elements['autoScroll'].value=getScrolling();document.forms['_id0'].elements['_id0:_link_hidden_'].value='_id0:_id1:1:_id2';document.forms['_id0'].elements['language'].value='en';if(document.forms['_id0'].onsubmit){var
> > > > > > > > > > > > > result=document.forms['_id0'].onsubmit(); if( (typeof result ==
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 'undefined') || result )
> > > > > > > > > > > > > {document.forms['_id0'].submit();}}else{document.forms['_id0'].submit();}return
> > > > > > > > > > > > > false;"
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I do know it works, but how ;) ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just discussed with Manfred, and this is how it should work:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if you click on a link, a hidden parameter is set, then the form is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > submitted, and then the hidden parameter is cleared out again.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Manfred means that it doesn't matter if there is one parameter per
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > link or one parameter for the whole form, the renderer needs to work
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > correctly, though. If we have links from several frameworks in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > game, it should probably be one parameter per link, right?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, having an hidden field for each single link would avoid
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > dependecies among components, that's fine.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In any case, I don't see how the current javascript method does
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > anything even close to this behaviour...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > It seems to me that this is exactly the behaviour of MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > commandLink component, except for the "common" hidden parameter. I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't know how Trinidad implements commandLinks... I'll take I look
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ASAP :-)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I mean the generated html of course, not the jsf source :)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you explain me better how do you mean for "clears all hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fields for all links, and their parameters"? I'm looking at the source
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of this page: http://www.irian.at/home.jsf (I don't have a myfaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > playground to experiment with at this time), and I don't see an hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > field for *each* commandLink, I see two forms, so two _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fields and two clear methods..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, as it is implemented in MyFaces currently, it clears all hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fields for all links, and their parameters, right?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to understand how links work. We have:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - single "_link_hidden_" field in the form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - a single function in the form that clear _link_hidden_ value and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reset the form target
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - every link in the onClick call the clear function, set it own id in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_, then call the onsubmit form handler (checking the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > return value), and finally submit the form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why the clear method should know about every links? It seems that it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just clear the _link_hidden_ field.. I must be missing something
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Cosma,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think it was developed this way cause the clear method needed to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > know about all links anyways, so it was centrally done.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, the component namespace standard is definitely a good idea. If we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > find a clean solution to do this in MyFaces, I think that both
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad and the RI will be happy to build on this as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Using a central way is not my option, I only said that, being it the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > way things are currently implemented, there should be a clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > advantage for switching now.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thinking about first solution, I think you're right. The thing I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > didn't like is the hack of adding hidden form fields to the DOM using
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript, but I agree on having component's renderer simply write
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out the <input type="hidden" .../> along the other html..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The only thing I could add is some component "namespace" standard to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > avoid parameters collision.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, do you remember why the hidden fields form service was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implemented, instead of going this way?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S.: your option - using a central way of doing this - is nothing I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would fancy. That's where we are right now, and it doesn't help us
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with compatibility, really.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, that is the second thing - we'll need the component let add
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hidden parameters to the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, as the component is embedded in the form, why can it not just
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > render out the hidden element?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This doesn't remind me of BASIC at all, but of component orientation -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > everything that the component needs should be wrapped up in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component itself, don't you think so?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Where does the need of dynamically added client-side fields stem from
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > again, I don't see it right now?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What needs to be added dynamically is the clear-script. And this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > really is complicated, it touches the base of what dojo has to offer
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with its event system. I don't know if we can replicate this without
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > having a dependency on dojo in our implementation, and I'm pretty sure
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we don't want this. Does somebody know how
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind()
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > works under the covers, and if it's easy (meaning one or two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions) to replicate?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not sure that the problem is related only to links.. there can be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other components that need an hidden form parameter.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For example, JSCookMenu encodes the links in the html with some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > special prefix syntax, set this value in an hidden form named
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "jscook_action" on click, and intercept and decode it in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > server-side decode logic.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think that the choice is between letting every component to add
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hidden fields dynamically on the DOM (dojo can help? its not that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > difficult anyway), or provide some sort of central service to do so,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that's the current approach.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First solution doesn't create dependency between components, but I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't like very much.. it reminds me of those BASIC programs that used
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > variables without declaring them ;) On the other hand second solution
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > does create dependency, and we must be careful to allow mixing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component libraries.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/26, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's the clear-problem, right?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For this problem, this is what I was thinking about:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > every link renders a javascript which adds a function as an onsubmit-handler
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",myFunction() { clearLink and param} );
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so there would be no central clear script anymore, but each link would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear itself, we'd loose the interdependency between link and form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/19/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Take a look at how the addHiddenCommandParameter is implemented in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public static void addHiddenCommandParameter(UIComponent form,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > String paramName)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Set set = (Set)form.getAttributes().get(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if (set == null)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set = new HashSet();
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form.getAttributes().put(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR, set);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set.add(paramName);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This has no dependency at all on the HtmlFormRendererBase, not even on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIForm. It simply add an attribute with a particular name on a generic
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIComponent. Somewhere, something will read that attribute and create
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the hidden links.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We could simply:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Move this method and the HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR constant
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > outside of the HtmlFormRendererBase, maybe in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > shared\util\_ComponentUtils.java
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Define the same constant and create a method that does the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thing in some Trinidad's util class
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Have the Trinidad form renderer look at that attribute, and render
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the requested hidden fields just as HtmlFormRendererBase does.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This way, any Trinidad and MyFaces/Tomahawk component can find the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > parent form (without caring if it is a Trinidad or a MyFaces one) and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ask for an hidden field with the respective utility method.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think about this? The only ungly thing is having the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > constant/method in two different places, but as long as we'll keep the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > two codebases separated I don't think that much can be done on this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/19, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any ideas on this? :-)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Adam, technically it could be done, but I'm wondering where we can do that.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Having some centralized code in a renderer that inject the javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't bring us again on the same problem? (it would be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-dependent)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In my hack, is the routine itself that manipulate the DOM, but I don't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > think this solution can be adopted at large scale.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Modern browsers have no difficulty being told to add hidden fields
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to the DOM on the fly; MyFaces could use this solution, which
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad uses (at least in some parts of the code).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see two problem with this:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value-bounded exists?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > itself as a submit handler?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First attemp:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implement it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > those non-standard services.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > good
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dropped. The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we want
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > js hack
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > similar to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > example,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to use the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > integration is the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > presumibly also
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addressed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > required
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in another
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with yours if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form searching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > matzew@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > >
> > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > >
> > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > >
> > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > Courses in English and German
> > > >
> > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>.
I think this may be a problem with AJAX (option 3) as the links can be
clicked more than once and different links can be clicked. This could
be solved by JavaScript code though (store the last ID as a javascript
global variable that stores the ID of generated element and removes it
from the DOM on click):
if (window['jsfCommandId'])
{
var elem =document.getElementById(window['jsfCommandId'])
if (elem)
elem.parentNode.removeChild(elem)
}
var hiddenLink=document.createElement('input');
hiddenLink.type='hidden';
hiddenLink.name='someName';
hiddenLink.value=this.id;
window['jsfCommandId'] = this.id
form.appendChild(hiddenLink);
form.submit();
On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Now if this works, it's a very good solution!
>
> Well, you're right, on browser-back we'll loose the current DOM, and
> so the dynamically added link will vanish. Like it!
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I like more option 2..
> >
> > Let's add another one.
> >
> > 3. option:
> > =======
> >
> > each Link, in its onclick attribute, renders:
> >
> > "var hiddenLink=document.createElement('input');
> > hiddenLink.type='hidden';
> > hiddenLink.name='someName';
> > hiddenLink.value=this.id;
> > form.appendChild(hiddenLink);
> > form.submit();"
> >
> > or, having defined a function in one of the js libraries:
> >
> > "generateHiddenLink(form, 'someName', this.id); form.submit();"
> >
> > Of course, the renderer should not encode the hidden field. This way
> > we could forget about clearing at all, as all those hidden fields are
> > missing when the page is loaded, and only the required parameters is
> > actually added to the page.
> >
> >
> > Cosma
> >
> >
> > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > Of course, all of this without dojo ;)
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > No.
> > > >
> > > > 1. option:
> > > > =======
> > > >
> > > > each Link renders:
> > > >
> > > > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",function(){ // clear the parameter of this link});
> > > >
> > > > in the onclick method:
> > > >
> > > > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",function(){//set parameter of this
> > > > link}); form.submit();
> > > >
> > > > (as the event is added as the last event, the parameters will remain
> > > > set, as the other parameters are deleted, all is well)
> > > >
> > > > 2. option:
> > > > =======
> > > >
> > > > each Link renders:
> > > >
> > > > dojo.event.bind(body,"load",function(){ // clear the parameter of this link});
> > > >
> > > > and:
> > > >
> > > > onclick="/*set parameters of this link */; form.submit();"
> > > >
> > > > form.submit stands in both options for what we have for this in
> > > > MyFaces currently.
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > With the first one, I if understand well, the trick is that the form
> > > > > parameter will not exists on page loading after the submit, so an old
> > > > > value will not be restored (thus no need for a clear function).. then
> > > > > create the parameter on the fly when the user click on the
> > > > > commandLink, right?
> > > > >
> > > > > I haven't understood the second part :-)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > Well, we could queue onsubmit, and queue a second script which will
> > > > > > add the link hidden param and the params onsubmit as well.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Or we queue onload, and then set the correct params for the one link
> > > > > > that has been clicked.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Martin
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > To avoid a central method, every commandLink could queue its own clear
> > > > > > > javascript to the body onload event, in addition to the form onsubmit
> > > > > > > event.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > Ok, another talk with Manfred made me wiser.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > - Manfred says there is no guarantee that the clear method will be
> > > > > > > > called after the submit has happened (he says that is browser
> > > > > > > > dependent)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > - this is why _all_ hidden parameters and child params of all links
> > > > > > > > need to be cleared out in the beginning, and why there is a central
> > > > > > > > clear method, which is called before the submit actually happens
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > - so even when you have a cached submit value (due to browser-back),
> > > > > > > > it is cleared out before the submit
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Plan of action:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 1) render a hidden parameter _per_ link (so there are no
> > > > > > > > > interdependencies between components)
> > > > > > > > > 2) clear the hidden parameter(s) of the link after submit has happened
> > > > > > > > > 3) for other frameworks, eventually clear out their hidden
> > > > > > > > > parameter(s) as well, to cater for compatibility
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > with this we should be on our way better ;)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Ah, yes, now I see it - I didn't even look so far!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > well, then the clear is pretty useless, right ;)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > It calls clear__5Fid0() but, some ";" after, it does
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > document.forms['_id0'].elements['_id0:_link_hidden_'].value='_id0:_id1:1:_id2'
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > document.forms['_id0'].elements['language'].value='en';
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > At this point, the centralized clear isn't very useful :-)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Cosma,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I probably don't see something obvious - but how can our current
> > > > > > > > > > > > script work at all, if we call the clear method before we call submit?
> > > > > > > > > > > > This should reset the parameter, right?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > onclick="clear__5Fid0();document.forms['_id0'].elements['autoScroll'].value=getScrolling();document.forms['_id0'].elements['_id0:_link_hidden_'].value='_id0:_id1:1:_id2';document.forms['_id0'].elements['language'].value='en';if(document.forms['_id0'].onsubmit){var
> > > > > > > > > > > > result=document.forms['_id0'].onsubmit(); if( (typeof result ==
> > > > > > > > > > > > 'undefined') || result )
> > > > > > > > > > > > {document.forms['_id0'].submit();}}else{document.forms['_id0'].submit();}return
> > > > > > > > > > > > false;"
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I do know it works, but how ;) ?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just discussed with Manfred, and this is how it should work:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > if you click on a link, a hidden parameter is set, then the form is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > submitted, and then the hidden parameter is cleared out again.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Manfred means that it doesn't matter if there is one parameter per
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > link or one parameter for the whole form, the renderer needs to work
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > correctly, though. If we have links from several frameworks in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > game, it should probably be one parameter per link, right?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, having an hidden field for each single link would avoid
> > > > > > > > > > > > > dependecies among components, that's fine.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > In any case, I don't see how the current javascript method does
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > anything even close to this behaviour...
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > It seems to me that this is exactly the behaviour of MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > commandLink component, except for the "common" hidden parameter. I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > don't know how Trinidad implements commandLinks... I'll take I look
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ASAP :-)
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I mean the generated html of course, not the jsf source :)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you explain me better how do you mean for "clears all hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fields for all links, and their parameters"? I'm looking at the source
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of this page: http://www.irian.at/home.jsf (I don't have a myfaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > playground to experiment with at this time), and I don't see an hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > field for *each* commandLink, I see two forms, so two _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fields and two clear methods..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, as it is implemented in MyFaces currently, it clears all hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fields for all links, and their parameters, right?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to understand how links work. We have:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - single "_link_hidden_" field in the form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - a single function in the form that clear _link_hidden_ value and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reset the form target
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - every link in the onClick call the clear function, set it own id in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_, then call the onsubmit form handler (checking the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > return value), and finally submit the form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why the clear method should know about every links? It seems that it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just clear the _link_hidden_ field.. I must be missing something
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Cosma,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think it was developed this way cause the clear method needed to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > know about all links anyways, so it was centrally done.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, the component namespace standard is definitely a good idea. If we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > find a clean solution to do this in MyFaces, I think that both
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad and the RI will be happy to build on this as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Using a central way is not my option, I only said that, being it the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > way things are currently implemented, there should be a clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > advantage for switching now.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thinking about first solution, I think you're right. The thing I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > didn't like is the hack of adding hidden form fields to the DOM using
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript, but I agree on having component's renderer simply write
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out the <input type="hidden" .../> along the other html..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The only thing I could add is some component "namespace" standard to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > avoid parameters collision.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, do you remember why the hidden fields form service was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implemented, instead of going this way?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S.: your option - using a central way of doing this - is nothing I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would fancy. That's where we are right now, and it doesn't help us
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with compatibility, really.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, that is the second thing - we'll need the component let add
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hidden parameters to the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, as the component is embedded in the form, why can it not just
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > render out the hidden element?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This doesn't remind me of BASIC at all, but of component orientation -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > everything that the component needs should be wrapped up in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component itself, don't you think so?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Where does the need of dynamically added client-side fields stem from
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > again, I don't see it right now?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What needs to be added dynamically is the clear-script. And this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > really is complicated, it touches the base of what dojo has to offer
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with its event system. I don't know if we can replicate this without
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > having a dependency on dojo in our implementation, and I'm pretty sure
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we don't want this. Does somebody know how
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind()
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > works under the covers, and if it's easy (meaning one or two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions) to replicate?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not sure that the problem is related only to links.. there can be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other components that need an hidden form parameter.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For example, JSCookMenu encodes the links in the html with some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > special prefix syntax, set this value in an hidden form named
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "jscook_action" on click, and intercept and decode it in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > server-side decode logic.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think that the choice is between letting every component to add
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hidden fields dynamically on the DOM (dojo can help? its not that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > difficult anyway), or provide some sort of central service to do so,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that's the current approach.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First solution doesn't create dependency between components, but I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't like very much.. it reminds me of those BASIC programs that used
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > variables without declaring them ;) On the other hand second solution
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > does create dependency, and we must be careful to allow mixing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component libraries.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/26, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's the clear-problem, right?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For this problem, this is what I was thinking about:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > every link renders a javascript which adds a function as an onsubmit-handler
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",myFunction() { clearLink and param} );
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so there would be no central clear script anymore, but each link would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear itself, we'd loose the interdependency between link and form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/19/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Take a look at how the addHiddenCommandParameter is implemented in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public static void addHiddenCommandParameter(UIComponent form,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > String paramName)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Set set = (Set)form.getAttributes().get(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if (set == null)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set = new HashSet();
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form.getAttributes().put(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR, set);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set.add(paramName);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This has no dependency at all on the HtmlFormRendererBase, not even on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIForm. It simply add an attribute with a particular name on a generic
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIComponent. Somewhere, something will read that attribute and create
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the hidden links.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We could simply:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Move this method and the HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR constant
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > outside of the HtmlFormRendererBase, maybe in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > shared\util\_ComponentUtils.java
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Define the same constant and create a method that does the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thing in some Trinidad's util class
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Have the Trinidad form renderer look at that attribute, and render
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the requested hidden fields just as HtmlFormRendererBase does.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This way, any Trinidad and MyFaces/Tomahawk component can find the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > parent form (without caring if it is a Trinidad or a MyFaces one) and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ask for an hidden field with the respective utility method.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think about this? The only ungly thing is having the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > constant/method in two different places, but as long as we'll keep the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > two codebases separated I don't think that much can be done on this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/19, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any ideas on this? :-)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Adam, technically it could be done, but I'm wondering where we can do that.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Having some centralized code in a renderer that inject the javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't bring us again on the same problem? (it would be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-dependent)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In my hack, is the routine itself that manipulate the DOM, but I don't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > think this solution can be adopted at large scale.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Modern browsers have no difficulty being told to add hidden fields
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to the DOM on the fly; MyFaces could use this solution, which
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad uses (at least in some parts of the code).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see two problem with this:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value-bounded exists?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > itself as a submit handler?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First attemp:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implement it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > those non-standard services.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > good
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dropped. The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we want
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > js hack
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > similar to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > example,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to use the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > integration is the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > presumibly also
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addressed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > required
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in another
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with yours if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form searching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > matzew@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > >
> > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > Courses in English and German
> > > >
> > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
Now if this works, it's a very good solution!
Well, you're right, on browser-back we'll loose the current DOM, and
so the dynamically added link will vanish. Like it!
regards,
Martin
On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I like more option 2..
>
> Let's add another one.
>
> 3. option:
> =======
>
> each Link, in its onclick attribute, renders:
>
> "var hiddenLink=document.createElement('input');
> hiddenLink.type='hidden';
> hiddenLink.name='someName';
> hiddenLink.value=this.id;
> form.appendChild(hiddenLink);
> form.submit();"
>
> or, having defined a function in one of the js libraries:
>
> "generateHiddenLink(form, 'someName', this.id); form.submit();"
>
> Of course, the renderer should not encode the hidden field. This way
> we could forget about clearing at all, as all those hidden fields are
> missing when the page is loaded, and only the required parameters is
> actually added to the page.
>
>
> Cosma
>
>
> 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > Of course, all of this without dojo ;)
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > No.
> > >
> > > 1. option:
> > > =======
> > >
> > > each Link renders:
> > >
> > > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",function(){ // clear the parameter of this link});
> > >
> > > in the onclick method:
> > >
> > > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",function(){//set parameter of this
> > > link}); form.submit();
> > >
> > > (as the event is added as the last event, the parameters will remain
> > > set, as the other parameters are deleted, all is well)
> > >
> > > 2. option:
> > > =======
> > >
> > > each Link renders:
> > >
> > > dojo.event.bind(body,"load",function(){ // clear the parameter of this link});
> > >
> > > and:
> > >
> > > onclick="/*set parameters of this link */; form.submit();"
> > >
> > > form.submit stands in both options for what we have for this in
> > > MyFaces currently.
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > With the first one, I if understand well, the trick is that the form
> > > > parameter will not exists on page loading after the submit, so an old
> > > > value will not be restored (thus no need for a clear function).. then
> > > > create the parameter on the fly when the user click on the
> > > > commandLink, right?
> > > >
> > > > I haven't understood the second part :-)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > Well, we could queue onsubmit, and queue a second script which will
> > > > > add the link hidden param and the params onsubmit as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > Or we queue onload, and then set the correct params for the one link
> > > > > that has been clicked.
> > > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > To avoid a central method, every commandLink could queue its own clear
> > > > > > javascript to the body onload event, in addition to the form onsubmit
> > > > > > event.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > Ok, another talk with Manfred made me wiser.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > - Manfred says there is no guarantee that the clear method will be
> > > > > > > called after the submit has happened (he says that is browser
> > > > > > > dependent)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > - this is why _all_ hidden parameters and child params of all links
> > > > > > > need to be cleared out in the beginning, and why there is a central
> > > > > > > clear method, which is called before the submit actually happens
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > - so even when you have a cached submit value (due to browser-back),
> > > > > > > it is cleared out before the submit
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Plan of action:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 1) render a hidden parameter _per_ link (so there are no
> > > > > > > > interdependencies between components)
> > > > > > > > 2) clear the hidden parameter(s) of the link after submit has happened
> > > > > > > > 3) for other frameworks, eventually clear out their hidden
> > > > > > > > parameter(s) as well, to cater for compatibility
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > with this we should be on our way better ;)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Ah, yes, now I see it - I didn't even look so far!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > well, then the clear is pretty useless, right ;)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > It calls clear__5Fid0() but, some ";" after, it does
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > document.forms['_id0'].elements['_id0:_link_hidden_'].value='_id0:_id1:1:_id2'
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > document.forms['_id0'].elements['language'].value='en';
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > At this point, the centralized clear isn't very useful :-)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > Hi Cosma,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I probably don't see something obvious - but how can our current
> > > > > > > > > > > script work at all, if we call the clear method before we call submit?
> > > > > > > > > > > This should reset the parameter, right?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > onclick="clear__5Fid0();document.forms['_id0'].elements['autoScroll'].value=getScrolling();document.forms['_id0'].elements['_id0:_link_hidden_'].value='_id0:_id1:1:_id2';document.forms['_id0'].elements['language'].value='en';if(document.forms['_id0'].onsubmit){var
> > > > > > > > > > > result=document.forms['_id0'].onsubmit(); if( (typeof result ==
> > > > > > > > > > > 'undefined') || result )
> > > > > > > > > > > {document.forms['_id0'].submit();}}else{document.forms['_id0'].submit();}return
> > > > > > > > > > > false;"
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I do know it works, but how ;) ?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Just discussed with Manfred, and this is how it should work:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > if you click on a link, a hidden parameter is set, then the form is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > submitted, and then the hidden parameter is cleared out again.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Manfred means that it doesn't matter if there is one parameter per
> > > > > > > > > > > > > link or one parameter for the whole form, the renderer needs to work
> > > > > > > > > > > > > correctly, though. If we have links from several frameworks in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > game, it should probably be one parameter per link, right?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, having an hidden field for each single link would avoid
> > > > > > > > > > > > dependecies among components, that's fine.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > In any case, I don't see how the current javascript method does
> > > > > > > > > > > > > anything even close to this behaviour...
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > It seems to me that this is exactly the behaviour of MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > commandLink component, except for the "common" hidden parameter. I
> > > > > > > > > > > > don't know how Trinidad implements commandLinks... I'll take I look
> > > > > > > > > > > > ASAP :-)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I mean the generated html of course, not the jsf source :)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you explain me better how do you mean for "clears all hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fields for all links, and their parameters"? I'm looking at the source
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of this page: http://www.irian.at/home.jsf (I don't have a myfaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > playground to experiment with at this time), and I don't see an hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > field for *each* commandLink, I see two forms, so two _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fields and two clear methods..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, as it is implemented in MyFaces currently, it clears all hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fields for all links, and their parameters, right?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to understand how links work. We have:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - single "_link_hidden_" field in the form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - a single function in the form that clear _link_hidden_ value and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reset the form target
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - every link in the onClick call the clear function, set it own id in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_, then call the onsubmit form handler (checking the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > return value), and finally submit the form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why the clear method should know about every links? It seems that it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just clear the _link_hidden_ field.. I must be missing something
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Cosma,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think it was developed this way cause the clear method needed to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > know about all links anyways, so it was centrally done.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, the component namespace standard is definitely a good idea. If we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > find a clean solution to do this in MyFaces, I think that both
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad and the RI will be happy to build on this as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Using a central way is not my option, I only said that, being it the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > way things are currently implemented, there should be a clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > advantage for switching now.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thinking about first solution, I think you're right. The thing I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > didn't like is the hack of adding hidden form fields to the DOM using
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript, but I agree on having component's renderer simply write
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out the <input type="hidden" .../> along the other html..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The only thing I could add is some component "namespace" standard to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > avoid parameters collision.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, do you remember why the hidden fields form service was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implemented, instead of going this way?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S.: your option - using a central way of doing this - is nothing I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would fancy. That's where we are right now, and it doesn't help us
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with compatibility, really.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, that is the second thing - we'll need the component let add
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hidden parameters to the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, as the component is embedded in the form, why can it not just
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > render out the hidden element?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This doesn't remind me of BASIC at all, but of component orientation -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > everything that the component needs should be wrapped up in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component itself, don't you think so?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Where does the need of dynamically added client-side fields stem from
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > again, I don't see it right now?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What needs to be added dynamically is the clear-script. And this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > really is complicated, it touches the base of what dojo has to offer
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with its event system. I don't know if we can replicate this without
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > having a dependency on dojo in our implementation, and I'm pretty sure
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we don't want this. Does somebody know how
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind()
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > works under the covers, and if it's easy (meaning one or two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions) to replicate?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not sure that the problem is related only to links.. there can be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other components that need an hidden form parameter.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For example, JSCookMenu encodes the links in the html with some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > special prefix syntax, set this value in an hidden form named
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "jscook_action" on click, and intercept and decode it in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > server-side decode logic.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think that the choice is between letting every component to add
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hidden fields dynamically on the DOM (dojo can help? its not that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > difficult anyway), or provide some sort of central service to do so,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that's the current approach.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First solution doesn't create dependency between components, but I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't like very much.. it reminds me of those BASIC programs that used
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > variables without declaring them ;) On the other hand second solution
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > does create dependency, and we must be careful to allow mixing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component libraries.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/26, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's the clear-problem, right?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For this problem, this is what I was thinking about:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > every link renders a javascript which adds a function as an onsubmit-handler
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",myFunction() { clearLink and param} );
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so there would be no central clear script anymore, but each link would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear itself, we'd loose the interdependency between link and form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/19/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Take a look at how the addHiddenCommandParameter is implemented in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public static void addHiddenCommandParameter(UIComponent form,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > String paramName)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Set set = (Set)form.getAttributes().get(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if (set == null)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set = new HashSet();
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form.getAttributes().put(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR, set);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set.add(paramName);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This has no dependency at all on the HtmlFormRendererBase, not even on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIForm. It simply add an attribute with a particular name on a generic
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIComponent. Somewhere, something will read that attribute and create
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the hidden links.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We could simply:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Move this method and the HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR constant
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > outside of the HtmlFormRendererBase, maybe in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > shared\util\_ComponentUtils.java
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Define the same constant and create a method that does the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thing in some Trinidad's util class
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Have the Trinidad form renderer look at that attribute, and render
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the requested hidden fields just as HtmlFormRendererBase does.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This way, any Trinidad and MyFaces/Tomahawk component can find the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > parent form (without caring if it is a Trinidad or a MyFaces one) and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ask for an hidden field with the respective utility method.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think about this? The only ungly thing is having the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > constant/method in two different places, but as long as we'll keep the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > two codebases separated I don't think that much can be done on this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/19, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any ideas on this? :-)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Adam, technically it could be done, but I'm wondering where we can do that.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Having some centralized code in a renderer that inject the javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't bring us again on the same problem? (it would be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-dependent)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In my hack, is the routine itself that manipulate the DOM, but I don't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > think this solution can be adopted at large scale.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Modern browsers have no difficulty being told to add hidden fields
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to the DOM on the fly; MyFaces could use this solution, which
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad uses (at least in some parts of the code).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see two problem with this:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value-bounded exists?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > itself as a submit handler?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First attemp:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implement it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > those non-standard services.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > good
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dropped. The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we want
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > js hack
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > similar to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > example,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to use the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > integration is the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > presumibly also
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addressed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > required
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in another
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with yours if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form searching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > matzew@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > >
> > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > >
> > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>.
I like more option 2..
Let's add another one.
3. option:
=======
each Link, in its onclick attribute, renders:
"var hiddenLink=document.createElement('input');
hiddenLink.type='hidden';
hiddenLink.name='someName';
hiddenLink.value=this.id;
form.appendChild(hiddenLink);
form.submit();"
or, having defined a function in one of the js libraries:
"generateHiddenLink(form, 'someName', this.id); form.submit();"
Of course, the renderer should not encode the hidden field. This way
we could forget about clearing at all, as all those hidden fields are
missing when the page is loaded, and only the required parameters is
actually added to the page.
Cosma
2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> Of course, all of this without dojo ;)
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > No.
> >
> > 1. option:
> > =======
> >
> > each Link renders:
> >
> > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",function(){ // clear the parameter of this link});
> >
> > in the onclick method:
> >
> > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",function(){//set parameter of this
> > link}); form.submit();
> >
> > (as the event is added as the last event, the parameters will remain
> > set, as the other parameters are deleted, all is well)
> >
> > 2. option:
> > =======
> >
> > each Link renders:
> >
> > dojo.event.bind(body,"load",function(){ // clear the parameter of this link});
> >
> > and:
> >
> > onclick="/*set parameters of this link */; form.submit();"
> >
> > form.submit stands in both options for what we have for this in
> > MyFaces currently.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > With the first one, I if understand well, the trick is that the form
> > > parameter will not exists on page loading after the submit, so an old
> > > value will not be restored (thus no need for a clear function).. then
> > > create the parameter on the fly when the user click on the
> > > commandLink, right?
> > >
> > > I haven't understood the second part :-)
> > >
> > >
> > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > Well, we could queue onsubmit, and queue a second script which will
> > > > add the link hidden param and the params onsubmit as well.
> > > >
> > > > Or we queue onload, and then set the correct params for the one link
> > > > that has been clicked.
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > To avoid a central method, every commandLink could queue its own clear
> > > > > javascript to the body onload event, in addition to the form onsubmit
> > > > > event.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cosma
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > Ok, another talk with Manfred made me wiser.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Manfred says there is no guarantee that the clear method will be
> > > > > > called after the submit has happened (he says that is browser
> > > > > > dependent)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - this is why _all_ hidden parameters and child params of all links
> > > > > > need to be cleared out in the beginning, and why there is a central
> > > > > > clear method, which is called before the submit actually happens
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - so even when you have a cached submit value (due to browser-back),
> > > > > > it is cleared out before the submit
> > > > > >
> > > > > > regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Martin
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Plan of action:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1) render a hidden parameter _per_ link (so there are no
> > > > > > > interdependencies between components)
> > > > > > > 2) clear the hidden parameter(s) of the link after submit has happened
> > > > > > > 3) for other frameworks, eventually clear out their hidden
> > > > > > > parameter(s) as well, to cater for compatibility
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > with this we should be on our way better ;)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Ah, yes, now I see it - I didn't even look so far!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > well, then the clear is pretty useless, right ;)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > It calls clear__5Fid0() but, some ";" after, it does
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > document.forms['_id0'].elements['_id0:_link_hidden_'].value='_id0:_id1:1:_id2'
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > document.forms['_id0'].elements['language'].value='en';
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > At this point, the centralized clear isn't very useful :-)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > Hi Cosma,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I probably don't see something obvious - but how can our current
> > > > > > > > > > script work at all, if we call the clear method before we call submit?
> > > > > > > > > > This should reset the parameter, right?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > onclick="clear__5Fid0();document.forms['_id0'].elements['autoScroll'].value=getScrolling();document.forms['_id0'].elements['_id0:_link_hidden_'].value='_id0:_id1:1:_id2';document.forms['_id0'].elements['language'].value='en';if(document.forms['_id0'].onsubmit){var
> > > > > > > > > > result=document.forms['_id0'].onsubmit(); if( (typeof result ==
> > > > > > > > > > 'undefined') || result )
> > > > > > > > > > {document.forms['_id0'].submit();}}else{document.forms['_id0'].submit();}return
> > > > > > > > > > false;"
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I do know it works, but how ;) ?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Just discussed with Manfred, and this is how it should work:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > if you click on a link, a hidden parameter is set, then the form is
> > > > > > > > > > > > submitted, and then the hidden parameter is cleared out again.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Manfred means that it doesn't matter if there is one parameter per
> > > > > > > > > > > > link or one parameter for the whole form, the renderer needs to work
> > > > > > > > > > > > correctly, though. If we have links from several frameworks in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > game, it should probably be one parameter per link, right?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Ok, having an hidden field for each single link would avoid
> > > > > > > > > > > dependecies among components, that's fine.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > In any case, I don't see how the current javascript method does
> > > > > > > > > > > > anything even close to this behaviour...
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > It seems to me that this is exactly the behaviour of MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > commandLink component, except for the "common" hidden parameter. I
> > > > > > > > > > > don't know how Trinidad implements commandLinks... I'll take I look
> > > > > > > > > > > ASAP :-)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I mean the generated html of course, not the jsf source :)
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you explain me better how do you mean for "clears all hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > fields for all links, and their parameters"? I'm looking at the source
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > of this page: http://www.irian.at/home.jsf (I don't have a myfaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > playground to experiment with at this time), and I don't see an hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > field for *each* commandLink, I see two forms, so two _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > fields and two clear methods..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, as it is implemented in MyFaces currently, it clears all hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fields for all links, and their parameters, right?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to understand how links work. We have:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - single "_link_hidden_" field in the form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - a single function in the form that clear _link_hidden_ value and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reset the form target
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - every link in the onClick call the clear function, set it own id in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_, then call the onsubmit form handler (checking the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > return value), and finally submit the form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why the clear method should know about every links? It seems that it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just clear the _link_hidden_ field.. I must be missing something
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Cosma,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think it was developed this way cause the clear method needed to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > know about all links anyways, so it was centrally done.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, the component namespace standard is definitely a good idea. If we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > find a clean solution to do this in MyFaces, I think that both
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad and the RI will be happy to build on this as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Using a central way is not my option, I only said that, being it the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > way things are currently implemented, there should be a clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > advantage for switching now.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thinking about first solution, I think you're right. The thing I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > didn't like is the hack of adding hidden form fields to the DOM using
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript, but I agree on having component's renderer simply write
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out the <input type="hidden" .../> along the other html..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The only thing I could add is some component "namespace" standard to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > avoid parameters collision.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, do you remember why the hidden fields form service was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implemented, instead of going this way?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S.: your option - using a central way of doing this - is nothing I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would fancy. That's where we are right now, and it doesn't help us
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with compatibility, really.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, that is the second thing - we'll need the component let add
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hidden parameters to the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, as the component is embedded in the form, why can it not just
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > render out the hidden element?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This doesn't remind me of BASIC at all, but of component orientation -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > everything that the component needs should be wrapped up in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component itself, don't you think so?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Where does the need of dynamically added client-side fields stem from
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > again, I don't see it right now?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What needs to be added dynamically is the clear-script. And this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > really is complicated, it touches the base of what dojo has to offer
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with its event system. I don't know if we can replicate this without
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > having a dependency on dojo in our implementation, and I'm pretty sure
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we don't want this. Does somebody know how
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind()
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > works under the covers, and if it's easy (meaning one or two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions) to replicate?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not sure that the problem is related only to links.. there can be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other components that need an hidden form parameter.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For example, JSCookMenu encodes the links in the html with some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > special prefix syntax, set this value in an hidden form named
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "jscook_action" on click, and intercept and decode it in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > server-side decode logic.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think that the choice is between letting every component to add
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hidden fields dynamically on the DOM (dojo can help? its not that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > difficult anyway), or provide some sort of central service to do so,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that's the current approach.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First solution doesn't create dependency between components, but I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't like very much.. it reminds me of those BASIC programs that used
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > variables without declaring them ;) On the other hand second solution
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > does create dependency, and we must be careful to allow mixing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component libraries.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/26, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's the clear-problem, right?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For this problem, this is what I was thinking about:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > every link renders a javascript which adds a function as an onsubmit-handler
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",myFunction() { clearLink and param} );
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so there would be no central clear script anymore, but each link would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear itself, we'd loose the interdependency between link and form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/19/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Take a look at how the addHiddenCommandParameter is implemented in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public static void addHiddenCommandParameter(UIComponent form,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > String paramName)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Set set = (Set)form.getAttributes().get(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if (set == null)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set = new HashSet();
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form.getAttributes().put(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR, set);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set.add(paramName);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This has no dependency at all on the HtmlFormRendererBase, not even on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIForm. It simply add an attribute with a particular name on a generic
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIComponent. Somewhere, something will read that attribute and create
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the hidden links.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We could simply:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Move this method and the HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR constant
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > outside of the HtmlFormRendererBase, maybe in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > shared\util\_ComponentUtils.java
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Define the same constant and create a method that does the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thing in some Trinidad's util class
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Have the Trinidad form renderer look at that attribute, and render
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the requested hidden fields just as HtmlFormRendererBase does.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This way, any Trinidad and MyFaces/Tomahawk component can find the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > parent form (without caring if it is a Trinidad or a MyFaces one) and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ask for an hidden field with the respective utility method.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think about this? The only ungly thing is having the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > constant/method in two different places, but as long as we'll keep the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > two codebases separated I don't think that much can be done on this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/19, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any ideas on this? :-)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Adam, technically it could be done, but I'm wondering where we can do that.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Having some centralized code in a renderer that inject the javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't bring us again on the same problem? (it would be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-dependent)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In my hack, is the routine itself that manipulate the DOM, but I don't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > think this solution can be adopted at large scale.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Modern browsers have no difficulty being told to add hidden fields
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to the DOM on the fly; MyFaces could use this solution, which
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad uses (at least in some parts of the code).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see two problem with this:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value-bounded exists?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > itself as a submit handler?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First attemp:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implement it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > those non-standard services.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > good
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dropped. The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we want
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > js hack
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > similar to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > example,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to use the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > integration is the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > presumibly also
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addressed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > required
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in another
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with yours if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form searching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > matzew@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > >
> > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > Courses in English and German
> > > >
> > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
Of course, all of this without dojo ;)
regards,
Martin
On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No.
>
> 1. option:
> =======
>
> each Link renders:
>
> dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",function(){ // clear the parameter of this link});
>
> in the onclick method:
>
> dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",function(){//set parameter of this
> link}); form.submit();
>
> (as the event is added as the last event, the parameters will remain
> set, as the other parameters are deleted, all is well)
>
> 2. option:
> =======
>
> each Link renders:
>
> dojo.event.bind(body,"load",function(){ // clear the parameter of this link});
>
> and:
>
> onclick="/*set parameters of this link */; form.submit();"
>
> form.submit stands in both options for what we have for this in
> MyFaces currently.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > With the first one, I if understand well, the trick is that the form
> > parameter will not exists on page loading after the submit, so an old
> > value will not be restored (thus no need for a clear function).. then
> > create the parameter on the fly when the user click on the
> > commandLink, right?
> >
> > I haven't understood the second part :-)
> >
> >
> > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > Well, we could queue onsubmit, and queue a second script which will
> > > add the link hidden param and the params onsubmit as well.
> > >
> > > Or we queue onload, and then set the correct params for the one link
> > > that has been clicked.
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > To avoid a central method, every commandLink could queue its own clear
> > > > javascript to the body onload event, in addition to the form onsubmit
> > > > event.
> > > >
> > > > Cosma
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > Ok, another talk with Manfred made me wiser.
> > > > >
> > > > > - Manfred says there is no guarantee that the clear method will be
> > > > > called after the submit has happened (he says that is browser
> > > > > dependent)
> > > > >
> > > > > - this is why _all_ hidden parameters and child params of all links
> > > > > need to be cleared out in the beginning, and why there is a central
> > > > > clear method, which is called before the submit actually happens
> > > > >
> > > > > - so even when you have a cached submit value (due to browser-back),
> > > > > it is cleared out before the submit
> > > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Plan of action:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1) render a hidden parameter _per_ link (so there are no
> > > > > > interdependencies between components)
> > > > > > 2) clear the hidden parameter(s) of the link after submit has happened
> > > > > > 3) for other frameworks, eventually clear out their hidden
> > > > > > parameter(s) as well, to cater for compatibility
> > > > > >
> > > > > > with this we should be on our way better ;)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Martin
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Ah, yes, now I see it - I didn't even look so far!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > well, then the clear is pretty useless, right ;)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > It calls clear__5Fid0() but, some ";" after, it does
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > document.forms['_id0'].elements['_id0:_link_hidden_'].value='_id0:_id1:1:_id2'
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > document.forms['_id0'].elements['language'].value='en';
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > At this point, the centralized clear isn't very useful :-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > Hi Cosma,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I probably don't see something obvious - but how can our current
> > > > > > > > > script work at all, if we call the clear method before we call submit?
> > > > > > > > > This should reset the parameter, right?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > onclick="clear__5Fid0();document.forms['_id0'].elements['autoScroll'].value=getScrolling();document.forms['_id0'].elements['_id0:_link_hidden_'].value='_id0:_id1:1:_id2';document.forms['_id0'].elements['language'].value='en';if(document.forms['_id0'].onsubmit){var
> > > > > > > > > result=document.forms['_id0'].onsubmit(); if( (typeof result ==
> > > > > > > > > 'undefined') || result )
> > > > > > > > > {document.forms['_id0'].submit();}}else{document.forms['_id0'].submit();}return
> > > > > > > > > false;"
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I do know it works, but how ;) ?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > Just discussed with Manfred, and this is how it should work:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > if you click on a link, a hidden parameter is set, then the form is
> > > > > > > > > > > submitted, and then the hidden parameter is cleared out again.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Manfred means that it doesn't matter if there is one parameter per
> > > > > > > > > > > link or one parameter for the whole form, the renderer needs to work
> > > > > > > > > > > correctly, though. If we have links from several frameworks in the
> > > > > > > > > > > game, it should probably be one parameter per link, right?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Ok, having an hidden field for each single link would avoid
> > > > > > > > > > dependecies among components, that's fine.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > In any case, I don't see how the current javascript method does
> > > > > > > > > > > anything even close to this behaviour...
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > It seems to me that this is exactly the behaviour of MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > commandLink component, except for the "common" hidden parameter. I
> > > > > > > > > > don't know how Trinidad implements commandLinks... I'll take I look
> > > > > > > > > > ASAP :-)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I mean the generated html of course, not the jsf source :)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you explain me better how do you mean for "clears all hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > fields for all links, and their parameters"? I'm looking at the source
> > > > > > > > > > > > > of this page: http://www.irian.at/home.jsf (I don't have a myfaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > playground to experiment with at this time), and I don't see an hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > field for *each* commandLink, I see two forms, so two _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > fields and two clear methods..
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, as it is implemented in MyFaces currently, it clears all hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > fields for all links, and their parameters, right?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to understand how links work. We have:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - single "_link_hidden_" field in the form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - a single function in the form that clear _link_hidden_ value and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reset the form target
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - every link in the onClick call the clear function, set it own id in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_, then call the onsubmit form handler (checking the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > return value), and finally submit the form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why the clear method should know about every links? It seems that it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just clear the _link_hidden_ field.. I must be missing something
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Cosma,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think it was developed this way cause the clear method needed to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > know about all links anyways, so it was centrally done.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, the component namespace standard is definitely a good idea. If we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > find a clean solution to do this in MyFaces, I think that both
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad and the RI will be happy to build on this as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Using a central way is not my option, I only said that, being it the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > way things are currently implemented, there should be a clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > advantage for switching now.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thinking about first solution, I think you're right. The thing I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > didn't like is the hack of adding hidden form fields to the DOM using
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript, but I agree on having component's renderer simply write
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out the <input type="hidden" .../> along the other html..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The only thing I could add is some component "namespace" standard to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > avoid parameters collision.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, do you remember why the hidden fields form service was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implemented, instead of going this way?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S.: your option - using a central way of doing this - is nothing I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would fancy. That's where we are right now, and it doesn't help us
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with compatibility, really.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, that is the second thing - we'll need the component let add
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hidden parameters to the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, as the component is embedded in the form, why can it not just
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > render out the hidden element?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This doesn't remind me of BASIC at all, but of component orientation -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > everything that the component needs should be wrapped up in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component itself, don't you think so?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Where does the need of dynamically added client-side fields stem from
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > again, I don't see it right now?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What needs to be added dynamically is the clear-script. And this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > really is complicated, it touches the base of what dojo has to offer
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with its event system. I don't know if we can replicate this without
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > having a dependency on dojo in our implementation, and I'm pretty sure
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we don't want this. Does somebody know how
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind()
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > works under the covers, and if it's easy (meaning one or two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions) to replicate?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not sure that the problem is related only to links.. there can be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other components that need an hidden form parameter.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For example, JSCookMenu encodes the links in the html with some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > special prefix syntax, set this value in an hidden form named
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "jscook_action" on click, and intercept and decode it in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > server-side decode logic.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think that the choice is between letting every component to add
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hidden fields dynamically on the DOM (dojo can help? its not that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > difficult anyway), or provide some sort of central service to do so,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that's the current approach.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First solution doesn't create dependency between components, but I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't like very much.. it reminds me of those BASIC programs that used
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > variables without declaring them ;) On the other hand second solution
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > does create dependency, and we must be careful to allow mixing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component libraries.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/26, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's the clear-problem, right?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For this problem, this is what I was thinking about:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > every link renders a javascript which adds a function as an onsubmit-handler
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",myFunction() { clearLink and param} );
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so there would be no central clear script anymore, but each link would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear itself, we'd loose the interdependency between link and form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/19/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Take a look at how the addHiddenCommandParameter is implemented in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public static void addHiddenCommandParameter(UIComponent form,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > String paramName)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Set set = (Set)form.getAttributes().get(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if (set == null)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set = new HashSet();
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form.getAttributes().put(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR, set);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set.add(paramName);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This has no dependency at all on the HtmlFormRendererBase, not even on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIForm. It simply add an attribute with a particular name on a generic
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIComponent. Somewhere, something will read that attribute and create
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the hidden links.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We could simply:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Move this method and the HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR constant
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > outside of the HtmlFormRendererBase, maybe in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > shared\util\_ComponentUtils.java
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Define the same constant and create a method that does the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thing in some Trinidad's util class
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Have the Trinidad form renderer look at that attribute, and render
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the requested hidden fields just as HtmlFormRendererBase does.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This way, any Trinidad and MyFaces/Tomahawk component can find the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > parent form (without caring if it is a Trinidad or a MyFaces one) and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ask for an hidden field with the respective utility method.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think about this? The only ungly thing is having the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > constant/method in two different places, but as long as we'll keep the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > two codebases separated I don't think that much can be done on this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/19, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any ideas on this? :-)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Adam, technically it could be done, but I'm wondering where we can do that.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Having some centralized code in a renderer that inject the javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't bring us again on the same problem? (it would be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-dependent)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In my hack, is the routine itself that manipulate the DOM, but I don't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > think this solution can be adopted at large scale.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Modern browsers have no difficulty being told to add hidden fields
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to the DOM on the fly; MyFaces could use this solution, which
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad uses (at least in some parts of the code).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see two problem with this:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value-bounded exists?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > itself as a submit handler?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First attemp:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implement it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > those non-standard services.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > good
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dropped. The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we want
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > js hack
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > similar to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > example,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to use the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > integration is the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > presumibly also
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addressed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > required
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in another
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with yours if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form searching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > matzew@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > >
> > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > >
> > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
No.
1. option:
=======
each Link renders:
dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",function(){ // clear the parameter of this link});
in the onclick method:
dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",function(){//set parameter of this
link}); form.submit();
(as the event is added as the last event, the parameters will remain
set, as the other parameters are deleted, all is well)
2. option:
=======
each Link renders:
dojo.event.bind(body,"load",function(){ // clear the parameter of this link});
and:
onclick="/*set parameters of this link */; form.submit();"
form.submit stands in both options for what we have for this in
MyFaces currently.
regards,
Martin
On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> With the first one, I if understand well, the trick is that the form
> parameter will not exists on page loading after the submit, so an old
> value will not be restored (thus no need for a clear function).. then
> create the parameter on the fly when the user click on the
> commandLink, right?
>
> I haven't understood the second part :-)
>
>
> 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > Well, we could queue onsubmit, and queue a second script which will
> > add the link hidden param and the params onsubmit as well.
> >
> > Or we queue onload, and then set the correct params for the one link
> > that has been clicked.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > To avoid a central method, every commandLink could queue its own clear
> > > javascript to the body onload event, in addition to the form onsubmit
> > > event.
> > >
> > > Cosma
> > >
> > >
> > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > Ok, another talk with Manfred made me wiser.
> > > >
> > > > - Manfred says there is no guarantee that the clear method will be
> > > > called after the submit has happened (he says that is browser
> > > > dependent)
> > > >
> > > > - this is why _all_ hidden parameters and child params of all links
> > > > need to be cleared out in the beginning, and why there is a central
> > > > clear method, which is called before the submit actually happens
> > > >
> > > > - so even when you have a cached submit value (due to browser-back),
> > > > it is cleared out before the submit
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Plan of action:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1) render a hidden parameter _per_ link (so there are no
> > > > > interdependencies between components)
> > > > > 2) clear the hidden parameter(s) of the link after submit has happened
> > > > > 3) for other frameworks, eventually clear out their hidden
> > > > > parameter(s) as well, to cater for compatibility
> > > > >
> > > > > with this we should be on our way better ;)
> > > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Ah, yes, now I see it - I didn't even look so far!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > well, then the clear is pretty useless, right ;)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Martin
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > It calls clear__5Fid0() but, some ";" after, it does
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > document.forms['_id0'].elements['_id0:_link_hidden_'].value='_id0:_id1:1:_id2'
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > document.forms['_id0'].elements['language'].value='en';
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > At this point, the centralized clear isn't very useful :-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > Hi Cosma,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I probably don't see something obvious - but how can our current
> > > > > > > > script work at all, if we call the clear method before we call submit?
> > > > > > > > This should reset the parameter, right?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > onclick="clear__5Fid0();document.forms['_id0'].elements['autoScroll'].value=getScrolling();document.forms['_id0'].elements['_id0:_link_hidden_'].value='_id0:_id1:1:_id2';document.forms['_id0'].elements['language'].value='en';if(document.forms['_id0'].onsubmit){var
> > > > > > > > result=document.forms['_id0'].onsubmit(); if( (typeof result ==
> > > > > > > > 'undefined') || result )
> > > > > > > > {document.forms['_id0'].submit();}}else{document.forms['_id0'].submit();}return
> > > > > > > > false;"
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I do know it works, but how ;) ?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > Just discussed with Manfred, and this is how it should work:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > if you click on a link, a hidden parameter is set, then the form is
> > > > > > > > > > submitted, and then the hidden parameter is cleared out again.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Manfred means that it doesn't matter if there is one parameter per
> > > > > > > > > > link or one parameter for the whole form, the renderer needs to work
> > > > > > > > > > correctly, though. If we have links from several frameworks in the
> > > > > > > > > > game, it should probably be one parameter per link, right?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Ok, having an hidden field for each single link would avoid
> > > > > > > > > dependecies among components, that's fine.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > In any case, I don't see how the current javascript method does
> > > > > > > > > > anything even close to this behaviour...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > It seems to me that this is exactly the behaviour of MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > commandLink component, except for the "common" hidden parameter. I
> > > > > > > > > don't know how Trinidad implements commandLinks... I'll take I look
> > > > > > > > > ASAP :-)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I mean the generated html of course, not the jsf source :)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Can you explain me better how do you mean for "clears all hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > fields for all links, and their parameters"? I'm looking at the source
> > > > > > > > > > > > of this page: http://www.irian.at/home.jsf (I don't have a myfaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > playground to experiment with at this time), and I don't see an hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > field for *each* commandLink, I see two forms, so two _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > fields and two clear methods..
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, as it is implemented in MyFaces currently, it clears all hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > fields for all links, and their parameters, right?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to understand how links work. We have:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > - single "_link_hidden_" field in the form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > - a single function in the form that clear _link_hidden_ value and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > reset the form target
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > - every link in the onClick call the clear function, set it own id in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_, then call the onsubmit form handler (checking the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > return value), and finally submit the form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why the clear method should know about every links? It seems that it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > just clear the _link_hidden_ field.. I must be missing something
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Cosma,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think it was developed this way cause the clear method needed to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > know about all links anyways, so it was centrally done.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, the component namespace standard is definitely a good idea. If we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > find a clean solution to do this in MyFaces, I think that both
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad and the RI will be happy to build on this as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Using a central way is not my option, I only said that, being it the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > way things are currently implemented, there should be a clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > advantage for switching now.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thinking about first solution, I think you're right. The thing I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > didn't like is the hack of adding hidden form fields to the DOM using
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript, but I agree on having component's renderer simply write
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out the <input type="hidden" .../> along the other html..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The only thing I could add is some component "namespace" standard to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > avoid parameters collision.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, do you remember why the hidden fields form service was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implemented, instead of going this way?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S.: your option - using a central way of doing this - is nothing I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would fancy. That's where we are right now, and it doesn't help us
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with compatibility, really.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, that is the second thing - we'll need the component let add
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hidden parameters to the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, as the component is embedded in the form, why can it not just
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > render out the hidden element?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This doesn't remind me of BASIC at all, but of component orientation -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > everything that the component needs should be wrapped up in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component itself, don't you think so?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Where does the need of dynamically added client-side fields stem from
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > again, I don't see it right now?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What needs to be added dynamically is the clear-script. And this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > really is complicated, it touches the base of what dojo has to offer
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with its event system. I don't know if we can replicate this without
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > having a dependency on dojo in our implementation, and I'm pretty sure
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we don't want this. Does somebody know how
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind()
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > works under the covers, and if it's easy (meaning one or two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions) to replicate?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not sure that the problem is related only to links.. there can be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other components that need an hidden form parameter.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For example, JSCookMenu encodes the links in the html with some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > special prefix syntax, set this value in an hidden form named
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "jscook_action" on click, and intercept and decode it in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > server-side decode logic.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think that the choice is between letting every component to add
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hidden fields dynamically on the DOM (dojo can help? its not that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > difficult anyway), or provide some sort of central service to do so,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that's the current approach.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First solution doesn't create dependency between components, but I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't like very much.. it reminds me of those BASIC programs that used
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > variables without declaring them ;) On the other hand second solution
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > does create dependency, and we must be careful to allow mixing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component libraries.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/26, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's the clear-problem, right?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For this problem, this is what I was thinking about:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > every link renders a javascript which adds a function as an onsubmit-handler
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",myFunction() { clearLink and param} );
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so there would be no central clear script anymore, but each link would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear itself, we'd loose the interdependency between link and form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/19/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Take a look at how the addHiddenCommandParameter is implemented in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public static void addHiddenCommandParameter(UIComponent form,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > String paramName)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Set set = (Set)form.getAttributes().get(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if (set == null)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set = new HashSet();
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form.getAttributes().put(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR, set);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set.add(paramName);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This has no dependency at all on the HtmlFormRendererBase, not even on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIForm. It simply add an attribute with a particular name on a generic
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIComponent. Somewhere, something will read that attribute and create
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the hidden links.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We could simply:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Move this method and the HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR constant
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > outside of the HtmlFormRendererBase, maybe in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > shared\util\_ComponentUtils.java
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Define the same constant and create a method that does the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thing in some Trinidad's util class
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Have the Trinidad form renderer look at that attribute, and render
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the requested hidden fields just as HtmlFormRendererBase does.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This way, any Trinidad and MyFaces/Tomahawk component can find the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > parent form (without caring if it is a Trinidad or a MyFaces one) and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ask for an hidden field with the respective utility method.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think about this? The only ungly thing is having the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > constant/method in two different places, but as long as we'll keep the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > two codebases separated I don't think that much can be done on this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/19, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any ideas on this? :-)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Adam, technically it could be done, but I'm wondering where we can do that.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Having some centralized code in a renderer that inject the javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't bring us again on the same problem? (it would be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-dependent)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In my hack, is the routine itself that manipulate the DOM, but I don't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > think this solution can be adopted at large scale.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Modern browsers have no difficulty being told to add hidden fields
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to the DOM on the fly; MyFaces could use this solution, which
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad uses (at least in some parts of the code).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see two problem with this:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value-bounded exists?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > itself as a submit handler?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First attemp:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implement it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > those non-standard services.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > good
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dropped. The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we want
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > js hack
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > similar to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > example,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to use the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > integration is the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > presumibly also
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addressed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > required
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in another
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with yours if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form searching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > matzew@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > >
> > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > >
> > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > >
> > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > Courses in English and German
> > > >
> > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>.
With the first one, I if understand well, the trick is that the form
parameter will not exists on page loading after the submit, so an old
value will not be restored (thus no need for a clear function).. then
create the parameter on the fly when the user click on the
commandLink, right?
I haven't understood the second part :-)
2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> Well, we could queue onsubmit, and queue a second script which will
> add the link hidden param and the params onsubmit as well.
>
> Or we queue onload, and then set the correct params for the one link
> that has been clicked.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > To avoid a central method, every commandLink could queue its own clear
> > javascript to the body onload event, in addition to the form onsubmit
> > event.
> >
> > Cosma
> >
> >
> > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > Ok, another talk with Manfred made me wiser.
> > >
> > > - Manfred says there is no guarantee that the clear method will be
> > > called after the submit has happened (he says that is browser
> > > dependent)
> > >
> > > - this is why _all_ hidden parameters and child params of all links
> > > need to be cleared out in the beginning, and why there is a central
> > > clear method, which is called before the submit actually happens
> > >
> > > - so even when you have a cached submit value (due to browser-back),
> > > it is cleared out before the submit
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Plan of action:
> > > >
> > > > 1) render a hidden parameter _per_ link (so there are no
> > > > interdependencies between components)
> > > > 2) clear the hidden parameter(s) of the link after submit has happened
> > > > 3) for other frameworks, eventually clear out their hidden
> > > > parameter(s) as well, to cater for compatibility
> > > >
> > > > with this we should be on our way better ;)
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Ah, yes, now I see it - I didn't even look so far!
> > > > >
> > > > > well, then the clear is pretty useless, right ;)
> > > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > It calls clear__5Fid0() but, some ";" after, it does
> > > > > >
> > > > > > document.forms['_id0'].elements['_id0:_link_hidden_'].value='_id0:_id1:1:_id2'
> > > > > >
> > > > > > and
> > > > > >
> > > > > > document.forms['_id0'].elements['language'].value='en';
> > > > > >
> > > > > > At this point, the centralized clear isn't very useful :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > Hi Cosma,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I probably don't see something obvious - but how can our current
> > > > > > > script work at all, if we call the clear method before we call submit?
> > > > > > > This should reset the parameter, right?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > onclick="clear__5Fid0();document.forms['_id0'].elements['autoScroll'].value=getScrolling();document.forms['_id0'].elements['_id0:_link_hidden_'].value='_id0:_id1:1:_id2';document.forms['_id0'].elements['language'].value='en';if(document.forms['_id0'].onsubmit){var
> > > > > > > result=document.forms['_id0'].onsubmit(); if( (typeof result ==
> > > > > > > 'undefined') || result )
> > > > > > > {document.forms['_id0'].submit();}}else{document.forms['_id0'].submit();}return
> > > > > > > false;"
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I do know it works, but how ;) ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > Just discussed with Manfred, and this is how it should work:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > if you click on a link, a hidden parameter is set, then the form is
> > > > > > > > > submitted, and then the hidden parameter is cleared out again.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Manfred means that it doesn't matter if there is one parameter per
> > > > > > > > > link or one parameter for the whole form, the renderer needs to work
> > > > > > > > > correctly, though. If we have links from several frameworks in the
> > > > > > > > > game, it should probably be one parameter per link, right?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Ok, having an hidden field for each single link would avoid
> > > > > > > > dependecies among components, that's fine.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > In any case, I don't see how the current javascript method does
> > > > > > > > > anything even close to this behaviour...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It seems to me that this is exactly the behaviour of MyFaces
> > > > > > > > commandLink component, except for the "common" hidden parameter. I
> > > > > > > > don't know how Trinidad implements commandLinks... I'll take I look
> > > > > > > > ASAP :-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > P.S. I mean the generated html of course, not the jsf source :)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > Can you explain me better how do you mean for "clears all hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > fields for all links, and their parameters"? I'm looking at the source
> > > > > > > > > > > of this page: http://www.irian.at/home.jsf (I don't have a myfaces
> > > > > > > > > > > playground to experiment with at this time), and I don't see an hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > field for *each* commandLink, I see two forms, so two _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > fields and two clear methods..
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Well, as it is implemented in MyFaces currently, it clears all hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > fields for all links, and their parameters, right?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to understand how links work. We have:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - single "_link_hidden_" field in the form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - a single function in the form that clear _link_hidden_ value and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > reset the form target
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - every link in the onClick call the clear function, set it own id in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_, then call the onsubmit form handler (checking the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > return value), and finally submit the form
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Why the clear method should know about every links? It seems that it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > just clear the _link_hidden_ field.. I must be missing something
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Cosma,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think it was developed this way cause the clear method needed to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > know about all links anyways, so it was centrally done.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, the component namespace standard is definitely a good idea. If we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > find a clean solution to do this in MyFaces, I think that both
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad and the RI will be happy to build on this as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Using a central way is not my option, I only said that, being it the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > way things are currently implemented, there should be a clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > advantage for switching now.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thinking about first solution, I think you're right. The thing I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > didn't like is the hack of adding hidden form fields to the DOM using
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript, but I agree on having component's renderer simply write
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out the <input type="hidden" .../> along the other html..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The only thing I could add is some component "namespace" standard to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > avoid parameters collision.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, do you remember why the hidden fields form service was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implemented, instead of going this way?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S.: your option - using a central way of doing this - is nothing I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would fancy. That's where we are right now, and it doesn't help us
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with compatibility, really.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, that is the second thing - we'll need the component let add
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hidden parameters to the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, as the component is embedded in the form, why can it not just
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > render out the hidden element?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This doesn't remind me of BASIC at all, but of component orientation -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > everything that the component needs should be wrapped up in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component itself, don't you think so?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Where does the need of dynamically added client-side fields stem from
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > again, I don't see it right now?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What needs to be added dynamically is the clear-script. And this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > really is complicated, it touches the base of what dojo has to offer
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with its event system. I don't know if we can replicate this without
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > having a dependency on dojo in our implementation, and I'm pretty sure
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we don't want this. Does somebody know how
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind()
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > works under the covers, and if it's easy (meaning one or two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions) to replicate?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not sure that the problem is related only to links.. there can be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other components that need an hidden form parameter.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For example, JSCookMenu encodes the links in the html with some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > special prefix syntax, set this value in an hidden form named
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "jscook_action" on click, and intercept and decode it in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > server-side decode logic.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think that the choice is between letting every component to add
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hidden fields dynamically on the DOM (dojo can help? its not that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > difficult anyway), or provide some sort of central service to do so,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that's the current approach.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First solution doesn't create dependency between components, but I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't like very much.. it reminds me of those BASIC programs that used
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > variables without declaring them ;) On the other hand second solution
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > does create dependency, and we must be careful to allow mixing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component libraries.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/26, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's the clear-problem, right?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For this problem, this is what I was thinking about:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > every link renders a javascript which adds a function as an onsubmit-handler
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",myFunction() { clearLink and param} );
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so there would be no central clear script anymore, but each link would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear itself, we'd loose the interdependency between link and form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/19/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Take a look at how the addHiddenCommandParameter is implemented in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public static void addHiddenCommandParameter(UIComponent form,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > String paramName)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Set set = (Set)form.getAttributes().get(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if (set == null)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set = new HashSet();
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form.getAttributes().put(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR, set);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set.add(paramName);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This has no dependency at all on the HtmlFormRendererBase, not even on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIForm. It simply add an attribute with a particular name on a generic
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIComponent. Somewhere, something will read that attribute and create
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the hidden links.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We could simply:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Move this method and the HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR constant
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > outside of the HtmlFormRendererBase, maybe in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > shared\util\_ComponentUtils.java
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Define the same constant and create a method that does the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thing in some Trinidad's util class
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Have the Trinidad form renderer look at that attribute, and render
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the requested hidden fields just as HtmlFormRendererBase does.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This way, any Trinidad and MyFaces/Tomahawk component can find the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > parent form (without caring if it is a Trinidad or a MyFaces one) and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ask for an hidden field with the respective utility method.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think about this? The only ungly thing is having the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > constant/method in two different places, but as long as we'll keep the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > two codebases separated I don't think that much can be done on this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/19, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any ideas on this? :-)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Adam, technically it could be done, but I'm wondering where we can do that.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Having some centralized code in a renderer that inject the javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't bring us again on the same problem? (it would be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-dependent)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In my hack, is the routine itself that manipulate the DOM, but I don't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > think this solution can be adopted at large scale.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Modern browsers have no difficulty being told to add hidden fields
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to the DOM on the fly; MyFaces could use this solution, which
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad uses (at least in some parts of the code).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see two problem with this:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value-bounded exists?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > itself as a submit handler?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First attemp:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implement it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > those non-standard services.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > good
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dropped. The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we want
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > js hack
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > similar to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > example,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to use the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > integration is the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > presumibly also
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addressed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > required
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in another
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with yours if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form searching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > matzew@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > >
> > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > >
> > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > >
> > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > Courses in English and German
> > > >
> > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
Well, we could queue onsubmit, and queue a second script which will
add the link hidden param and the params onsubmit as well.
Or we queue onload, and then set the correct params for the one link
that has been clicked.
regards,
Martin
On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> To avoid a central method, every commandLink could queue its own clear
> javascript to the body onload event, in addition to the form onsubmit
> event.
>
> Cosma
>
>
> 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > Ok, another talk with Manfred made me wiser.
> >
> > - Manfred says there is no guarantee that the clear method will be
> > called after the submit has happened (he says that is browser
> > dependent)
> >
> > - this is why _all_ hidden parameters and child params of all links
> > need to be cleared out in the beginning, and why there is a central
> > clear method, which is called before the submit actually happens
> >
> > - so even when you have a cached submit value (due to browser-back),
> > it is cleared out before the submit
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Plan of action:
> > >
> > > 1) render a hidden parameter _per_ link (so there are no
> > > interdependencies between components)
> > > 2) clear the hidden parameter(s) of the link after submit has happened
> > > 3) for other frameworks, eventually clear out their hidden
> > > parameter(s) as well, to cater for compatibility
> > >
> > > with this we should be on our way better ;)
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Ah, yes, now I see it - I didn't even look so far!
> > > >
> > > > well, then the clear is pretty useless, right ;)
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > It calls clear__5Fid0() but, some ";" after, it does
> > > > >
> > > > > document.forms['_id0'].elements['_id0:_link_hidden_'].value='_id0:_id1:1:_id2'
> > > > >
> > > > > and
> > > > >
> > > > > document.forms['_id0'].elements['language'].value='en';
> > > > >
> > > > > At this point, the centralized clear isn't very useful :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Cosma
> > > > >
> > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > Hi Cosma,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I probably don't see something obvious - but how can our current
> > > > > > script work at all, if we call the clear method before we call submit?
> > > > > > This should reset the parameter, right?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > onclick="clear__5Fid0();document.forms['_id0'].elements['autoScroll'].value=getScrolling();document.forms['_id0'].elements['_id0:_link_hidden_'].value='_id0:_id1:1:_id2';document.forms['_id0'].elements['language'].value='en';if(document.forms['_id0'].onsubmit){var
> > > > > > result=document.forms['_id0'].onsubmit(); if( (typeof result ==
> > > > > > 'undefined') || result )
> > > > > > {document.forms['_id0'].submit();}}else{document.forms['_id0'].submit();}return
> > > > > > false;"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I do know it works, but how ;) ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Martin
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > Just discussed with Manfred, and this is how it should work:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > if you click on a link, a hidden parameter is set, then the form is
> > > > > > > > submitted, and then the hidden parameter is cleared out again.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Manfred means that it doesn't matter if there is one parameter per
> > > > > > > > link or one parameter for the whole form, the renderer needs to work
> > > > > > > > correctly, though. If we have links from several frameworks in the
> > > > > > > > game, it should probably be one parameter per link, right?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ok, having an hidden field for each single link would avoid
> > > > > > > dependecies among components, that's fine.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In any case, I don't see how the current javascript method does
> > > > > > > > anything even close to this behaviour...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It seems to me that this is exactly the behaviour of MyFaces
> > > > > > > commandLink component, except for the "common" hidden parameter. I
> > > > > > > don't know how Trinidad implements commandLinks... I'll take I look
> > > > > > > ASAP :-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > P.S. I mean the generated html of course, not the jsf source :)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > Can you explain me better how do you mean for "clears all hidden
> > > > > > > > > > fields for all links, and their parameters"? I'm looking at the source
> > > > > > > > > > of this page: http://www.irian.at/home.jsf (I don't have a myfaces
> > > > > > > > > > playground to experiment with at this time), and I don't see an hidden
> > > > > > > > > > field for *each* commandLink, I see two forms, so two _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > fields and two clear methods..
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > Well, as it is implemented in MyFaces currently, it clears all hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > fields for all links, and their parameters, right?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to understand how links work. We have:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > - single "_link_hidden_" field in the form
> > > > > > > > > > > > - a single function in the form that clear _link_hidden_ value and
> > > > > > > > > > > > reset the form target
> > > > > > > > > > > > - every link in the onClick call the clear function, set it own id in
> > > > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_, then call the onsubmit form handler (checking the
> > > > > > > > > > > > return value), and finally submit the form
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Why the clear method should know about every links? It seems that it
> > > > > > > > > > > > just clear the _link_hidden_ field.. I must be missing something
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Cosma,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I think it was developed this way cause the clear method needed to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > know about all links anyways, so it was centrally done.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, the component namespace standard is definitely a good idea. If we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > find a clean solution to do this in MyFaces, I think that both
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad and the RI will be happy to build on this as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Using a central way is not my option, I only said that, being it the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > way things are currently implemented, there should be a clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > advantage for switching now.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thinking about first solution, I think you're right. The thing I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > didn't like is the hack of adding hidden form fields to the DOM using
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript, but I agree on having component's renderer simply write
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > out the <input type="hidden" .../> along the other html..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > The only thing I could add is some component "namespace" standard to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > avoid parameters collision.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, do you remember why the hidden fields form service was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > implemented, instead of going this way?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S.: your option - using a central way of doing this - is nothing I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would fancy. That's where we are right now, and it doesn't help us
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with compatibility, really.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, that is the second thing - we'll need the component let add
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hidden parameters to the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, as the component is embedded in the form, why can it not just
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > render out the hidden element?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This doesn't remind me of BASIC at all, but of component orientation -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > everything that the component needs should be wrapped up in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component itself, don't you think so?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Where does the need of dynamically added client-side fields stem from
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > again, I don't see it right now?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What needs to be added dynamically is the clear-script. And this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > really is complicated, it touches the base of what dojo has to offer
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with its event system. I don't know if we can replicate this without
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > having a dependency on dojo in our implementation, and I'm pretty sure
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we don't want this. Does somebody know how
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind()
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > works under the covers, and if it's easy (meaning one or two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions) to replicate?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not sure that the problem is related only to links.. there can be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other components that need an hidden form parameter.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For example, JSCookMenu encodes the links in the html with some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > special prefix syntax, set this value in an hidden form named
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "jscook_action" on click, and intercept and decode it in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > server-side decode logic.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think that the choice is between letting every component to add
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hidden fields dynamically on the DOM (dojo can help? its not that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > difficult anyway), or provide some sort of central service to do so,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that's the current approach.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First solution doesn't create dependency between components, but I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't like very much.. it reminds me of those BASIC programs that used
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > variables without declaring them ;) On the other hand second solution
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > does create dependency, and we must be careful to allow mixing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component libraries.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/26, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's the clear-problem, right?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For this problem, this is what I was thinking about:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > every link renders a javascript which adds a function as an onsubmit-handler
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",myFunction() { clearLink and param} );
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so there would be no central clear script anymore, but each link would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear itself, we'd loose the interdependency between link and form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/19/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Take a look at how the addHiddenCommandParameter is implemented in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public static void addHiddenCommandParameter(UIComponent form,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > String paramName)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Set set = (Set)form.getAttributes().get(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if (set == null)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set = new HashSet();
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form.getAttributes().put(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR, set);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set.add(paramName);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This has no dependency at all on the HtmlFormRendererBase, not even on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIForm. It simply add an attribute with a particular name on a generic
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIComponent. Somewhere, something will read that attribute and create
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the hidden links.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We could simply:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Move this method and the HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR constant
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > outside of the HtmlFormRendererBase, maybe in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > shared\util\_ComponentUtils.java
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Define the same constant and create a method that does the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thing in some Trinidad's util class
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Have the Trinidad form renderer look at that attribute, and render
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the requested hidden fields just as HtmlFormRendererBase does.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This way, any Trinidad and MyFaces/Tomahawk component can find the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > parent form (without caring if it is a Trinidad or a MyFaces one) and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ask for an hidden field with the respective utility method.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think about this? The only ungly thing is having the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > constant/method in two different places, but as long as we'll keep the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > two codebases separated I don't think that much can be done on this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/19, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any ideas on this? :-)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Adam, technically it could be done, but I'm wondering where we can do that.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Having some centralized code in a renderer that inject the javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't bring us again on the same problem? (it would be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-dependent)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In my hack, is the routine itself that manipulate the DOM, but I don't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > think this solution can be adopted at large scale.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Modern browsers have no difficulty being told to add hidden fields
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to the DOM on the fly; MyFaces could use this solution, which
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad uses (at least in some parts of the code).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see two problem with this:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value-bounded exists?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > itself as a submit handler?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First attemp:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implement it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > those non-standard services.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > good
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dropped. The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we want
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > js hack
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > similar to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > example,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to use the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > integration is the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > presumibly also
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addressed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > required
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in another
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with yours if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form searching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > matzew@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > >
> > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > Courses in English and German
> > > >
> > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>.
To avoid a central method, every commandLink could queue its own clear
javascript to the body onload event, in addition to the form onsubmit
event.
Cosma
2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> Ok, another talk with Manfred made me wiser.
>
> - Manfred says there is no guarantee that the clear method will be
> called after the submit has happened (he says that is browser
> dependent)
>
> - this is why _all_ hidden parameters and child params of all links
> need to be cleared out in the beginning, and why there is a central
> clear method, which is called before the submit actually happens
>
> - so even when you have a cached submit value (due to browser-back),
> it is cleared out before the submit
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Plan of action:
> >
> > 1) render a hidden parameter _per_ link (so there are no
> > interdependencies between components)
> > 2) clear the hidden parameter(s) of the link after submit has happened
> > 3) for other frameworks, eventually clear out their hidden
> > parameter(s) as well, to cater for compatibility
> >
> > with this we should be on our way better ;)
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Ah, yes, now I see it - I didn't even look so far!
> > >
> > > well, then the clear is pretty useless, right ;)
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > It calls clear__5Fid0() but, some ";" after, it does
> > > >
> > > > document.forms['_id0'].elements['_id0:_link_hidden_'].value='_id0:_id1:1:_id2'
> > > >
> > > > and
> > > >
> > > > document.forms['_id0'].elements['language'].value='en';
> > > >
> > > > At this point, the centralized clear isn't very useful :-)
> > > >
> > > > Cosma
> > > >
> > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > Hi Cosma,
> > > > >
> > > > > I probably don't see something obvious - but how can our current
> > > > > script work at all, if we call the clear method before we call submit?
> > > > > This should reset the parameter, right?
> > > > >
> > > > > onclick="clear__5Fid0();document.forms['_id0'].elements['autoScroll'].value=getScrolling();document.forms['_id0'].elements['_id0:_link_hidden_'].value='_id0:_id1:1:_id2';document.forms['_id0'].elements['language'].value='en';if(document.forms['_id0'].onsubmit){var
> > > > > result=document.forms['_id0'].onsubmit(); if( (typeof result ==
> > > > > 'undefined') || result )
> > > > > {document.forms['_id0'].submit();}}else{document.forms['_id0'].submit();}return
> > > > > false;"
> > > > >
> > > > > I do know it works, but how ;) ?
> > > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > Just discussed with Manfred, and this is how it should work:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > if you click on a link, a hidden parameter is set, then the form is
> > > > > > > submitted, and then the hidden parameter is cleared out again.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Manfred means that it doesn't matter if there is one parameter per
> > > > > > > link or one parameter for the whole form, the renderer needs to work
> > > > > > > correctly, though. If we have links from several frameworks in the
> > > > > > > game, it should probably be one parameter per link, right?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ok, having an hidden field for each single link would avoid
> > > > > > dependecies among components, that's fine.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > In any case, I don't see how the current javascript method does
> > > > > > > anything even close to this behaviour...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It seems to me that this is exactly the behaviour of MyFaces
> > > > > > commandLink component, except for the "common" hidden parameter. I
> > > > > > don't know how Trinidad implements commandLinks... I'll take I look
> > > > > > ASAP :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > P.S. I mean the generated html of course, not the jsf source :)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > Can you explain me better how do you mean for "clears all hidden
> > > > > > > > > fields for all links, and their parameters"? I'm looking at the source
> > > > > > > > > of this page: http://www.irian.at/home.jsf (I don't have a myfaces
> > > > > > > > > playground to experiment with at this time), and I don't see an hidden
> > > > > > > > > field for *each* commandLink, I see two forms, so two _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > fields and two clear methods..
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > Well, as it is implemented in MyFaces currently, it clears all hidden
> > > > > > > > > > fields for all links, and their parameters, right?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Hi Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to understand how links work. We have:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > - single "_link_hidden_" field in the form
> > > > > > > > > > > - a single function in the form that clear _link_hidden_ value and
> > > > > > > > > > > reset the form target
> > > > > > > > > > > - every link in the onClick call the clear function, set it own id in
> > > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_, then call the onsubmit form handler (checking the
> > > > > > > > > > > return value), and finally submit the form
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Why the clear method should know about every links? It seems that it
> > > > > > > > > > > just clear the _link_hidden_ field.. I must be missing something
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Cosma,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I think it was developed this way cause the clear method needed to
> > > > > > > > > > > > know about all links anyways, so it was centrally done.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, the component namespace standard is definitely a good idea. If we
> > > > > > > > > > > > find a clean solution to do this in MyFaces, I think that both
> > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad and the RI will be happy to build on this as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Using a central way is not my option, I only said that, being it the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > way things are currently implemented, there should be a clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > advantage for switching now.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thinking about first solution, I think you're right. The thing I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > didn't like is the hack of adding hidden form fields to the DOM using
> > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript, but I agree on having component's renderer simply write
> > > > > > > > > > > > > out the <input type="hidden" .../> along the other html..
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The only thing I could add is some component "namespace" standard to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > avoid parameters collision.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, do you remember why the hidden fields form service was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > implemented, instead of going this way?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S.: your option - using a central way of doing this - is nothing I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > would fancy. That's where we are right now, and it doesn't help us
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > with compatibility, really.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, that is the second thing - we'll need the component let add
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hidden parameters to the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, as the component is embedded in the form, why can it not just
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > render out the hidden element?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This doesn't remind me of BASIC at all, but of component orientation -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > everything that the component needs should be wrapped up in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component itself, don't you think so?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Where does the need of dynamically added client-side fields stem from
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > again, I don't see it right now?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What needs to be added dynamically is the clear-script. And this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > really is complicated, it touches the base of what dojo has to offer
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with its event system. I don't know if we can replicate this without
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > having a dependency on dojo in our implementation, and I'm pretty sure
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we don't want this. Does somebody know how
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind()
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > works under the covers, and if it's easy (meaning one or two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions) to replicate?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not sure that the problem is related only to links.. there can be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other components that need an hidden form parameter.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For example, JSCookMenu encodes the links in the html with some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > special prefix syntax, set this value in an hidden form named
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "jscook_action" on click, and intercept and decode it in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > server-side decode logic.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think that the choice is between letting every component to add
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hidden fields dynamically on the DOM (dojo can help? its not that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > difficult anyway), or provide some sort of central service to do so,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that's the current approach.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First solution doesn't create dependency between components, but I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't like very much.. it reminds me of those BASIC programs that used
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > variables without declaring them ;) On the other hand second solution
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > does create dependency, and we must be careful to allow mixing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component libraries.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/26, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's the clear-problem, right?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For this problem, this is what I was thinking about:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > every link renders a javascript which adds a function as an onsubmit-handler
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",myFunction() { clearLink and param} );
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so there would be no central clear script anymore, but each link would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear itself, we'd loose the interdependency between link and form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/19/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Take a look at how the addHiddenCommandParameter is implemented in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public static void addHiddenCommandParameter(UIComponent form,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > String paramName)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Set set = (Set)form.getAttributes().get(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if (set == null)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set = new HashSet();
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form.getAttributes().put(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR, set);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set.add(paramName);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This has no dependency at all on the HtmlFormRendererBase, not even on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIForm. It simply add an attribute with a particular name on a generic
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIComponent. Somewhere, something will read that attribute and create
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the hidden links.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We could simply:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Move this method and the HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR constant
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > outside of the HtmlFormRendererBase, maybe in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > shared\util\_ComponentUtils.java
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Define the same constant and create a method that does the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thing in some Trinidad's util class
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Have the Trinidad form renderer look at that attribute, and render
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the requested hidden fields just as HtmlFormRendererBase does.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This way, any Trinidad and MyFaces/Tomahawk component can find the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > parent form (without caring if it is a Trinidad or a MyFaces one) and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ask for an hidden field with the respective utility method.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think about this? The only ungly thing is having the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > constant/method in two different places, but as long as we'll keep the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > two codebases separated I don't think that much can be done on this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/19, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any ideas on this? :-)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Adam, technically it could be done, but I'm wondering where we can do that.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Having some centralized code in a renderer that inject the javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't bring us again on the same problem? (it would be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-dependent)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In my hack, is the routine itself that manipulate the DOM, but I don't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > think this solution can be adopted at large scale.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Modern browsers have no difficulty being told to add hidden fields
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to the DOM on the fly; MyFaces could use this solution, which
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad uses (at least in some parts of the code).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see two problem with this:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value-bounded exists?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > itself as a submit handler?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First attemp:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implement it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > those non-standard services.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > good
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dropped. The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we want
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > js hack
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > similar to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > example,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to use the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > integration is the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > presumibly also
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addressed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > required
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in another
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with yours if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form searching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > matzew@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > >
> > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > >
> > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
Ok, another talk with Manfred made me wiser.
- Manfred says there is no guarantee that the clear method will be
called after the submit has happened (he says that is browser
dependent)
- this is why _all_ hidden parameters and child params of all links
need to be cleared out in the beginning, and why there is a central
clear method, which is called before the submit actually happens
- so even when you have a cached submit value (due to browser-back),
it is cleared out before the submit
regards,
Martin
On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Plan of action:
>
> 1) render a hidden parameter _per_ link (so there are no
> interdependencies between components)
> 2) clear the hidden parameter(s) of the link after submit has happened
> 3) for other frameworks, eventually clear out their hidden
> parameter(s) as well, to cater for compatibility
>
> with this we should be on our way better ;)
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Ah, yes, now I see it - I didn't even look so far!
> >
> > well, then the clear is pretty useless, right ;)
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > It calls clear__5Fid0() but, some ";" after, it does
> > >
> > > document.forms['_id0'].elements['_id0:_link_hidden_'].value='_id0:_id1:1:_id2'
> > >
> > > and
> > >
> > > document.forms['_id0'].elements['language'].value='en';
> > >
> > > At this point, the centralized clear isn't very useful :-)
> > >
> > > Cosma
> > >
> > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > Hi Cosma,
> > > >
> > > > I probably don't see something obvious - but how can our current
> > > > script work at all, if we call the clear method before we call submit?
> > > > This should reset the parameter, right?
> > > >
> > > > onclick="clear__5Fid0();document.forms['_id0'].elements['autoScroll'].value=getScrolling();document.forms['_id0'].elements['_id0:_link_hidden_'].value='_id0:_id1:1:_id2';document.forms['_id0'].elements['language'].value='en';if(document.forms['_id0'].onsubmit){var
> > > > result=document.forms['_id0'].onsubmit(); if( (typeof result ==
> > > > 'undefined') || result )
> > > > {document.forms['_id0'].submit();}}else{document.forms['_id0'].submit();}return
> > > > false;"
> > > >
> > > > I do know it works, but how ;) ?
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > Just discussed with Manfred, and this is how it should work:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > if you click on a link, a hidden parameter is set, then the form is
> > > > > > submitted, and then the hidden parameter is cleared out again.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Manfred means that it doesn't matter if there is one parameter per
> > > > > > link or one parameter for the whole form, the renderer needs to work
> > > > > > correctly, though. If we have links from several frameworks in the
> > > > > > game, it should probably be one parameter per link, right?
> > > > >
> > > > > Ok, having an hidden field for each single link would avoid
> > > > > dependecies among components, that's fine.
> > > > >
> > > > > > In any case, I don't see how the current javascript method does
> > > > > > anything even close to this behaviour...
> > > > >
> > > > > It seems to me that this is exactly the behaviour of MyFaces
> > > > > commandLink component, except for the "common" hidden parameter. I
> > > > > don't know how Trinidad implements commandLinks... I'll take I look
> > > > > ASAP :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > > regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Martin
> > > > >
> > > > > Bye
> > > > > Cosma
> > > > >
> > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > P.S. I mean the generated html of course, not the jsf source :)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > Can you explain me better how do you mean for "clears all hidden
> > > > > > > > fields for all links, and their parameters"? I'm looking at the source
> > > > > > > > of this page: http://www.irian.at/home.jsf (I don't have a myfaces
> > > > > > > > playground to experiment with at this time), and I don't see an hidden
> > > > > > > > field for *each* commandLink, I see two forms, so two _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > fields and two clear methods..
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > Well, as it is implemented in MyFaces currently, it clears all hidden
> > > > > > > > > fields for all links, and their parameters, right?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Hi Martin,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to understand how links work. We have:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > - single "_link_hidden_" field in the form
> > > > > > > > > > - a single function in the form that clear _link_hidden_ value and
> > > > > > > > > > reset the form target
> > > > > > > > > > - every link in the onClick call the clear function, set it own id in
> > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_, then call the onsubmit form handler (checking the
> > > > > > > > > > return value), and finally submit the form
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Why the clear method should know about every links? It seems that it
> > > > > > > > > > just clear the _link_hidden_ field.. I must be missing something
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > Hi Cosma,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I think it was developed this way cause the clear method needed to
> > > > > > > > > > > know about all links anyways, so it was centrally done.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Yes, the component namespace standard is definitely a good idea. If we
> > > > > > > > > > > find a clean solution to do this in MyFaces, I think that both
> > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad and the RI will be happy to build on this as well.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Using a central way is not my option, I only said that, being it the
> > > > > > > > > > > > way things are currently implemented, there should be a clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > advantage for switching now.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Thinking about first solution, I think you're right. The thing I
> > > > > > > > > > > > didn't like is the hack of adding hidden form fields to the DOM using
> > > > > > > > > > > > javascript, but I agree on having component's renderer simply write
> > > > > > > > > > > > out the <input type="hidden" .../> along the other html..
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > The only thing I could add is some component "namespace" standard to
> > > > > > > > > > > > avoid parameters collision.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, do you remember why the hidden fields form service was
> > > > > > > > > > > > implemented, instead of going this way?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S.: your option - using a central way of doing this - is nothing I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > would fancy. That's where we are right now, and it doesn't help us
> > > > > > > > > > > > > with compatibility, really.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, that is the second thing - we'll need the component let add
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > hidden parameters to the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, as the component is embedded in the form, why can it not just
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > render out the hidden element?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > This doesn't remind me of BASIC at all, but of component orientation -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > everything that the component needs should be wrapped up in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > component itself, don't you think so?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Where does the need of dynamically added client-side fields stem from
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > again, I don't see it right now?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > What needs to be added dynamically is the clear-script. And this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > really is complicated, it touches the base of what dojo has to offer
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > with its event system. I don't know if we can replicate this without
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > having a dependency on dojo in our implementation, and I'm pretty sure
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > we don't want this. Does somebody know how
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind()
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > works under the covers, and if it's easy (meaning one or two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions) to replicate?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not sure that the problem is related only to links.. there can be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other components that need an hidden form parameter.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For example, JSCookMenu encodes the links in the html with some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > special prefix syntax, set this value in an hidden form named
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "jscook_action" on click, and intercept and decode it in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > server-side decode logic.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think that the choice is between letting every component to add
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hidden fields dynamically on the DOM (dojo can help? its not that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > difficult anyway), or provide some sort of central service to do so,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that's the current approach.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First solution doesn't create dependency between components, but I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't like very much.. it reminds me of those BASIC programs that used
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > variables without declaring them ;) On the other hand second solution
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > does create dependency, and we must be careful to allow mixing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component libraries.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/26, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's the clear-problem, right?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For this problem, this is what I was thinking about:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > every link renders a javascript which adds a function as an onsubmit-handler
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",myFunction() { clearLink and param} );
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so there would be no central clear script anymore, but each link would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear itself, we'd loose the interdependency between link and form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/19/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Take a look at how the addHiddenCommandParameter is implemented in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public static void addHiddenCommandParameter(UIComponent form,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > String paramName)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Set set = (Set)form.getAttributes().get(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if (set == null)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set = new HashSet();
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form.getAttributes().put(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR, set);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set.add(paramName);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This has no dependency at all on the HtmlFormRendererBase, not even on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIForm. It simply add an attribute with a particular name on a generic
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIComponent. Somewhere, something will read that attribute and create
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the hidden links.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We could simply:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Move this method and the HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR constant
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > outside of the HtmlFormRendererBase, maybe in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > shared\util\_ComponentUtils.java
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Define the same constant and create a method that does the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thing in some Trinidad's util class
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Have the Trinidad form renderer look at that attribute, and render
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the requested hidden fields just as HtmlFormRendererBase does.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This way, any Trinidad and MyFaces/Tomahawk component can find the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > parent form (without caring if it is a Trinidad or a MyFaces one) and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ask for an hidden field with the respective utility method.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think about this? The only ungly thing is having the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > constant/method in two different places, but as long as we'll keep the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > two codebases separated I don't think that much can be done on this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/19, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any ideas on this? :-)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Adam, technically it could be done, but I'm wondering where we can do that.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Having some centralized code in a renderer that inject the javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't bring us again on the same problem? (it would be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-dependent)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In my hack, is the routine itself that manipulate the DOM, but I don't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > think this solution can be adopted at large scale.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Modern browsers have no difficulty being told to add hidden fields
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to the DOM on the fly; MyFaces could use this solution, which
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad uses (at least in some parts of the code).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see two problem with this:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value-bounded exists?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > itself as a submit handler?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First attemp:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implement it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > those non-standard services.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > good
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dropped. The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we want
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > js hack
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > similar to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > example,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to use the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > integration is the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > presumibly also
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addressed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > required
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in another
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with yours if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form searching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > matzew@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > >
> > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > Courses in English and German
> > > >
> > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
Plan of action:
1) render a hidden parameter _per_ link (so there are no
interdependencies between components)
2) clear the hidden parameter(s) of the link after submit has happened
3) for other frameworks, eventually clear out their hidden
parameter(s) as well, to cater for compatibility
with this we should be on our way better ;)
regards,
Martin
On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah, yes, now I see it - I didn't even look so far!
>
> well, then the clear is pretty useless, right ;)
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It calls clear__5Fid0() but, some ";" after, it does
> >
> > document.forms['_id0'].elements['_id0:_link_hidden_'].value='_id0:_id1:1:_id2'
> >
> > and
> >
> > document.forms['_id0'].elements['language'].value='en';
> >
> > At this point, the centralized clear isn't very useful :-)
> >
> > Cosma
> >
> > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > Hi Cosma,
> > >
> > > I probably don't see something obvious - but how can our current
> > > script work at all, if we call the clear method before we call submit?
> > > This should reset the parameter, right?
> > >
> > > onclick="clear__5Fid0();document.forms['_id0'].elements['autoScroll'].value=getScrolling();document.forms['_id0'].elements['_id0:_link_hidden_'].value='_id0:_id1:1:_id2';document.forms['_id0'].elements['language'].value='en';if(document.forms['_id0'].onsubmit){var
> > > result=document.forms['_id0'].onsubmit(); if( (typeof result ==
> > > 'undefined') || result )
> > > {document.forms['_id0'].submit();}}else{document.forms['_id0'].submit();}return
> > > false;"
> > >
> > > I do know it works, but how ;) ?
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > Just discussed with Manfred, and this is how it should work:
> > > > >
> > > > > if you click on a link, a hidden parameter is set, then the form is
> > > > > submitted, and then the hidden parameter is cleared out again.
> > > > >
> > > > > Manfred means that it doesn't matter if there is one parameter per
> > > > > link or one parameter for the whole form, the renderer needs to work
> > > > > correctly, though. If we have links from several frameworks in the
> > > > > game, it should probably be one parameter per link, right?
> > > >
> > > > Ok, having an hidden field for each single link would avoid
> > > > dependecies among components, that's fine.
> > > >
> > > > > In any case, I don't see how the current javascript method does
> > > > > anything even close to this behaviour...
> > > >
> > > > It seems to me that this is exactly the behaviour of MyFaces
> > > > commandLink component, except for the "common" hidden parameter. I
> > > > don't know how Trinidad implements commandLinks... I'll take I look
> > > > ASAP :-)
> > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > > Bye
> > > > Cosma
> > > >
> > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > P.S. I mean the generated html of course, not the jsf source :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2006/7/27, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > Can you explain me better how do you mean for "clears all hidden
> > > > > > > fields for all links, and their parameters"? I'm looking at the source
> > > > > > > of this page: http://www.irian.at/home.jsf (I don't have a myfaces
> > > > > > > playground to experiment with at this time), and I don't see an hidden
> > > > > > > field for *each* commandLink, I see two forms, so two _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > fields and two clear methods..
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > Well, as it is implemented in MyFaces currently, it clears all hidden
> > > > > > > > fields for all links, and their parameters, right?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Hi Martin,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'm trying to understand how links work. We have:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - single "_link_hidden_" field in the form
> > > > > > > > > - a single function in the form that clear _link_hidden_ value and
> > > > > > > > > reset the form target
> > > > > > > > > - every link in the onClick call the clear function, set it own id in
> > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_, then call the onsubmit form handler (checking the
> > > > > > > > > return value), and finally submit the form
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Why the clear method should know about every links? It seems that it
> > > > > > > > > just clear the _link_hidden_ field.. I must be missing something
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > Hi Cosma,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I think it was developed this way cause the clear method needed to
> > > > > > > > > > know about all links anyways, so it was centrally done.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Yes, the component namespace standard is definitely a good idea. If we
> > > > > > > > > > find a clean solution to do this in MyFaces, I think that both
> > > > > > > > > > Trinidad and the RI will be happy to build on this as well.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Using a central way is not my option, I only said that, being it the
> > > > > > > > > > > way things are currently implemented, there should be a clear
> > > > > > > > > > > advantage for switching now.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thinking about first solution, I think you're right. The thing I
> > > > > > > > > > > didn't like is the hack of adding hidden form fields to the DOM using
> > > > > > > > > > > javascript, but I agree on having component's renderer simply write
> > > > > > > > > > > out the <input type="hidden" .../> along the other html..
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The only thing I could add is some component "namespace" standard to
> > > > > > > > > > > avoid parameters collision.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > BTW, do you remember why the hidden fields form service was
> > > > > > > > > > > implemented, instead of going this way?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > P.S.: your option - using a central way of doing this - is nothing I
> > > > > > > > > > > > would fancy. That's where we are right now, and it doesn't help us
> > > > > > > > > > > > with compatibility, really.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, that is the second thing - we'll need the component let add
> > > > > > > > > > > > > hidden parameters to the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, as the component is embedded in the form, why can it not just
> > > > > > > > > > > > > render out the hidden element?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > This doesn't remind me of BASIC at all, but of component orientation -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > everything that the component needs should be wrapped up in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > component itself, don't you think so?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Where does the need of dynamically added client-side fields stem from
> > > > > > > > > > > > > again, I don't see it right now?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > What needs to be added dynamically is the clear-script. And this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > really is complicated, it touches the base of what dojo has to offer
> > > > > > > > > > > > > with its event system. I don't know if we can replicate this without
> > > > > > > > > > > > > having a dependency on dojo in our implementation, and I'm pretty sure
> > > > > > > > > > > > > we don't want this. Does somebody know how
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind()
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > works under the covers, and if it's easy (meaning one or two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions) to replicate?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not sure that the problem is related only to links.. there can be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > other components that need an hidden form parameter.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > For example, JSCookMenu encodes the links in the html with some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > special prefix syntax, set this value in an hidden form named
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "jscook_action" on click, and intercept and decode it in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > server-side decode logic.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think that the choice is between letting every component to add
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > hidden fields dynamically on the DOM (dojo can help? its not that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > difficult anyway), or provide some sort of central service to do so,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > that's the current approach.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > First solution doesn't create dependency between components, but I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't like very much.. it reminds me of those BASIC programs that used
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > variables without declaring them ;) On the other hand second solution
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > does create dependency, and we must be careful to allow mixing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > component libraries.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/26, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's the clear-problem, right?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For this problem, this is what I was thinking about:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > every link renders a javascript which adds a function as an onsubmit-handler
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",myFunction() { clearLink and param} );
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so there would be no central clear script anymore, but each link would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear itself, we'd loose the interdependency between link and form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/19/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Take a look at how the addHiddenCommandParameter is implemented in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public static void addHiddenCommandParameter(UIComponent form,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > String paramName)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Set set = (Set)form.getAttributes().get(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if (set == null)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set = new HashSet();
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form.getAttributes().put(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR, set);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set.add(paramName);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This has no dependency at all on the HtmlFormRendererBase, not even on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIForm. It simply add an attribute with a particular name on a generic
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIComponent. Somewhere, something will read that attribute and create
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the hidden links.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We could simply:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Move this method and the HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR constant
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > outside of the HtmlFormRendererBase, maybe in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > shared\util\_ComponentUtils.java
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Define the same constant and create a method that does the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thing in some Trinidad's util class
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Have the Trinidad form renderer look at that attribute, and render
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the requested hidden fields just as HtmlFormRendererBase does.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This way, any Trinidad and MyFaces/Tomahawk component can find the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > parent form (without caring if it is a Trinidad or a MyFaces one) and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ask for an hidden field with the respective utility method.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think about this? The only ungly thing is having the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > constant/method in two different places, but as long as we'll keep the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > two codebases separated I don't think that much can be done on this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/19, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any ideas on this? :-)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Adam, technically it could be done, but I'm wondering where we can do that.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Having some centralized code in a renderer that inject the javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't bring us again on the same problem? (it would be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-dependent)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In my hack, is the routine itself that manipulate the DOM, but I don't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > think this solution can be adopted at large scale.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Modern browsers have no difficulty being told to add hidden fields
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to the DOM on the fly; MyFaces could use this solution, which
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad uses (at least in some parts of the code).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see two problem with this:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value-bounded exists?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > itself as a submit handler?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First attemp:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implement it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > those non-standard services.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > good
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dropped. The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we want
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > js hack
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > similar to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > example,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to use the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > integration is the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > presumibly also
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addressed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > required
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in another
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with yours if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form searching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > matzew@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > >
> > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > >
> > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
Ah, yes, now I see it - I didn't even look so far!
well, then the clear is pretty useless, right ;)
regards,
Martin
On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It calls clear__5Fid0() but, some ";" after, it does
>
> document.forms['_id0'].elements['_id0:_link_hidden_'].value='_id0:_id1:1:_id2'
>
> and
>
> document.forms['_id0'].elements['language'].value='en';
>
> At this point, the centralized clear isn't very useful :-)
>
> Cosma
>
> 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > Hi Cosma,
> >
> > I probably don't see something obvious - but how can our current
> > script work at all, if we call the clear method before we call submit?
> > This should reset the parameter, right?
> >
> > onclick="clear__5Fid0();document.forms['_id0'].elements['autoScroll'].value=getScrolling();document.forms['_id0'].elements['_id0:_link_hidden_'].value='_id0:_id1:1:_id2';document.forms['_id0'].elements['language'].value='en';if(document.forms['_id0'].onsubmit){var
> > result=document.forms['_id0'].onsubmit(); if( (typeof result ==
> > 'undefined') || result )
> > {document.forms['_id0'].submit();}}else{document.forms['_id0'].submit();}return
> > false;"
> >
> > I do know it works, but how ;) ?
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > Just discussed with Manfred, and this is how it should work:
> > > >
> > > > if you click on a link, a hidden parameter is set, then the form is
> > > > submitted, and then the hidden parameter is cleared out again.
> > > >
> > > > Manfred means that it doesn't matter if there is one parameter per
> > > > link or one parameter for the whole form, the renderer needs to work
> > > > correctly, though. If we have links from several frameworks in the
> > > > game, it should probably be one parameter per link, right?
> > >
> > > Ok, having an hidden field for each single link would avoid
> > > dependecies among components, that's fine.
> > >
> > > > In any case, I don't see how the current javascript method does
> > > > anything even close to this behaviour...
> > >
> > > It seems to me that this is exactly the behaviour of MyFaces
> > > commandLink component, except for the "common" hidden parameter. I
> > > don't know how Trinidad implements commandLinks... I'll take I look
> > > ASAP :-)
> > >
> > > > regards,
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > >
> > > Bye
> > > Cosma
> > >
> > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > P.S. I mean the generated html of course, not the jsf source :)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2006/7/27, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > Can you explain me better how do you mean for "clears all hidden
> > > > > > fields for all links, and their parameters"? I'm looking at the source
> > > > > > of this page: http://www.irian.at/home.jsf (I don't have a myfaces
> > > > > > playground to experiment with at this time), and I don't see an hidden
> > > > > > field for *each* commandLink, I see two forms, so two _link_hidden_
> > > > > > fields and two clear methods..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > Well, as it is implemented in MyFaces currently, it clears all hidden
> > > > > > > fields for all links, and their parameters, right?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hi Martin,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm trying to understand how links work. We have:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > - single "_link_hidden_" field in the form
> > > > > > > > - a single function in the form that clear _link_hidden_ value and
> > > > > > > > reset the form target
> > > > > > > > - every link in the onClick call the clear function, set it own id in
> > > > > > > > _link_hidden_, then call the onsubmit form handler (checking the
> > > > > > > > return value), and finally submit the form
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Why the clear method should know about every links? It seems that it
> > > > > > > > just clear the _link_hidden_ field.. I must be missing something
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > Hi Cosma,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I think it was developed this way cause the clear method needed to
> > > > > > > > > know about all links anyways, so it was centrally done.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Yes, the component namespace standard is definitely a good idea. If we
> > > > > > > > > find a clean solution to do this in MyFaces, I think that both
> > > > > > > > > Trinidad and the RI will be happy to build on this as well.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Using a central way is not my option, I only said that, being it the
> > > > > > > > > > way things are currently implemented, there should be a clear
> > > > > > > > > > advantage for switching now.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thinking about first solution, I think you're right. The thing I
> > > > > > > > > > didn't like is the hack of adding hidden form fields to the DOM using
> > > > > > > > > > javascript, but I agree on having component's renderer simply write
> > > > > > > > > > out the <input type="hidden" .../> along the other html..
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The only thing I could add is some component "namespace" standard to
> > > > > > > > > > avoid parameters collision.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > BTW, do you remember why the hidden fields form service was
> > > > > > > > > > implemented, instead of going this way?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > P.S.: your option - using a central way of doing this - is nothing I
> > > > > > > > > > > would fancy. That's where we are right now, and it doesn't help us
> > > > > > > > > > > with compatibility, really.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, that is the second thing - we'll need the component let add
> > > > > > > > > > > > hidden parameters to the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Now, as the component is embedded in the form, why can it not just
> > > > > > > > > > > > render out the hidden element?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > This doesn't remind me of BASIC at all, but of component orientation -
> > > > > > > > > > > > everything that the component needs should be wrapped up in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > component itself, don't you think so?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Where does the need of dynamically added client-side fields stem from
> > > > > > > > > > > > again, I don't see it right now?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > What needs to be added dynamically is the clear-script. And this
> > > > > > > > > > > > really is complicated, it touches the base of what dojo has to offer
> > > > > > > > > > > > with its event system. I don't know if we can replicate this without
> > > > > > > > > > > > having a dependency on dojo in our implementation, and I'm pretty sure
> > > > > > > > > > > > we don't want this. Does somebody know how
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind()
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > works under the covers, and if it's easy (meaning one or two
> > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions) to replicate?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not sure that the problem is related only to links.. there can be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > other components that need an hidden form parameter.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > For example, JSCookMenu encodes the links in the html with some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > special prefix syntax, set this value in an hidden form named
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "jscook_action" on click, and intercept and decode it in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > server-side decode logic.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I think that the choice is between letting every component to add
> > > > > > > > > > > > > hidden fields dynamically on the DOM (dojo can help? its not that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > difficult anyway), or provide some sort of central service to do so,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > that's the current approach.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > First solution doesn't create dependency between components, but I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > don't like very much.. it reminds me of those BASIC programs that used
> > > > > > > > > > > > > variables without declaring them ;) On the other hand second solution
> > > > > > > > > > > > > does create dependency, and we must be careful to allow mixing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > component libraries.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/26, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's the clear-problem, right?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > For this problem, this is what I was thinking about:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > every link renders a javascript which adds a function as an onsubmit-handler
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",myFunction() { clearLink and param} );
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > so there would be no central clear script anymore, but each link would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear itself, we'd loose the interdependency between link and form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/19/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Take a look at how the addHiddenCommandParameter is implemented in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public static void addHiddenCommandParameter(UIComponent form,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > String paramName)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Set set = (Set)form.getAttributes().get(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if (set == null)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set = new HashSet();
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form.getAttributes().put(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR, set);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set.add(paramName);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This has no dependency at all on the HtmlFormRendererBase, not even on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIForm. It simply add an attribute with a particular name on a generic
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIComponent. Somewhere, something will read that attribute and create
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the hidden links.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We could simply:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Move this method and the HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR constant
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > outside of the HtmlFormRendererBase, maybe in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > shared\util\_ComponentUtils.java
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Define the same constant and create a method that does the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thing in some Trinidad's util class
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Have the Trinidad form renderer look at that attribute, and render
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the requested hidden fields just as HtmlFormRendererBase does.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This way, any Trinidad and MyFaces/Tomahawk component can find the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > parent form (without caring if it is a Trinidad or a MyFaces one) and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ask for an hidden field with the respective utility method.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think about this? The only ungly thing is having the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > constant/method in two different places, but as long as we'll keep the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > two codebases separated I don't think that much can be done on this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/19, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any ideas on this? :-)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Adam, technically it could be done, but I'm wondering where we can do that.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Having some centralized code in a renderer that inject the javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't bring us again on the same problem? (it would be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-dependent)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In my hack, is the routine itself that manipulate the DOM, but I don't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > think this solution can be adopted at large scale.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Modern browsers have no difficulty being told to add hidden fields
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to the DOM on the fly; MyFaces could use this solution, which
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad uses (at least in some parts of the code).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see two problem with this:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value-bounded exists?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > itself as a submit handler?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First attemp:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implement it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > those non-standard services.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > good
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dropped. The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we want
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > js hack
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > similar to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > example,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to use the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > integration is the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > presumibly also
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addressed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > required
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in another
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with yours if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form searching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > matzew@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > >
> > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > Courses in English and German
> > > >
> > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>.
It calls clear__5Fid0() but, some ";" after, it does
document.forms['_id0'].elements['_id0:_link_hidden_'].value='_id0:_id1:1:_id2'
and
document.forms['_id0'].elements['language'].value='en';
At this point, the centralized clear isn't very useful :-)
Cosma
2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Cosma,
>
> I probably don't see something obvious - but how can our current
> script work at all, if we call the clear method before we call submit?
> This should reset the parameter, right?
>
> onclick="clear__5Fid0();document.forms['_id0'].elements['autoScroll'].value=getScrolling();document.forms['_id0'].elements['_id0:_link_hidden_'].value='_id0:_id1:1:_id2';document.forms['_id0'].elements['language'].value='en';if(document.forms['_id0'].onsubmit){var
> result=document.forms['_id0'].onsubmit(); if( (typeof result ==
> 'undefined') || result )
> {document.forms['_id0'].submit();}}else{document.forms['_id0'].submit();}return
> false;"
>
> I do know it works, but how ;) ?
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > Just discussed with Manfred, and this is how it should work:
> > >
> > > if you click on a link, a hidden parameter is set, then the form is
> > > submitted, and then the hidden parameter is cleared out again.
> > >
> > > Manfred means that it doesn't matter if there is one parameter per
> > > link or one parameter for the whole form, the renderer needs to work
> > > correctly, though. If we have links from several frameworks in the
> > > game, it should probably be one parameter per link, right?
> >
> > Ok, having an hidden field for each single link would avoid
> > dependecies among components, that's fine.
> >
> > > In any case, I don't see how the current javascript method does
> > > anything even close to this behaviour...
> >
> > It seems to me that this is exactly the behaviour of MyFaces
> > commandLink component, except for the "common" hidden parameter. I
> > don't know how Trinidad implements commandLinks... I'll take I look
> > ASAP :-)
> >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> >
> > Bye
> > Cosma
> >
> > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > P.S. I mean the generated html of course, not the jsf source :)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2006/7/27, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > Can you explain me better how do you mean for "clears all hidden
> > > > > fields for all links, and their parameters"? I'm looking at the source
> > > > > of this page: http://www.irian.at/home.jsf (I don't have a myfaces
> > > > > playground to experiment with at this time), and I don't see an hidden
> > > > > field for *each* commandLink, I see two forms, so two _link_hidden_
> > > > > fields and two clear methods..
> > > > >
> > > > > Cosma
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > Well, as it is implemented in MyFaces currently, it clears all hidden
> > > > > > fields for all links, and their parameters, right?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Martin
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi Martin,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm trying to understand how links work. We have:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > - single "_link_hidden_" field in the form
> > > > > > > - a single function in the form that clear _link_hidden_ value and
> > > > > > > reset the form target
> > > > > > > - every link in the onClick call the clear function, set it own id in
> > > > > > > _link_hidden_, then call the onsubmit form handler (checking the
> > > > > > > return value), and finally submit the form
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Why the clear method should know about every links? It seems that it
> > > > > > > just clear the _link_hidden_ field.. I must be missing something
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > Hi Cosma,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I think it was developed this way cause the clear method needed to
> > > > > > > > know about all links anyways, so it was centrally done.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yes, the component namespace standard is definitely a good idea. If we
> > > > > > > > find a clean solution to do this in MyFaces, I think that both
> > > > > > > > Trinidad and the RI will be happy to build on this as well.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Using a central way is not my option, I only said that, being it the
> > > > > > > > > way things are currently implemented, there should be a clear
> > > > > > > > > advantage for switching now.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thinking about first solution, I think you're right. The thing I
> > > > > > > > > didn't like is the hack of adding hidden form fields to the DOM using
> > > > > > > > > javascript, but I agree on having component's renderer simply write
> > > > > > > > > out the <input type="hidden" .../> along the other html..
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The only thing I could add is some component "namespace" standard to
> > > > > > > > > avoid parameters collision.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > BTW, do you remember why the hidden fields form service was
> > > > > > > > > implemented, instead of going this way?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > P.S.: your option - using a central way of doing this - is nothing I
> > > > > > > > > > would fancy. That's where we are right now, and it doesn't help us
> > > > > > > > > > with compatibility, really.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Yes, that is the second thing - we'll need the component let add
> > > > > > > > > > > hidden parameters to the form.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Now, as the component is embedded in the form, why can it not just
> > > > > > > > > > > render out the hidden element?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > This doesn't remind me of BASIC at all, but of component orientation -
> > > > > > > > > > > everything that the component needs should be wrapped up in the
> > > > > > > > > > > component itself, don't you think so?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Where does the need of dynamically added client-side fields stem from
> > > > > > > > > > > again, I don't see it right now?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > What needs to be added dynamically is the clear-script. And this
> > > > > > > > > > > really is complicated, it touches the base of what dojo has to offer
> > > > > > > > > > > with its event system. I don't know if we can replicate this without
> > > > > > > > > > > having a dependency on dojo in our implementation, and I'm pretty sure
> > > > > > > > > > > we don't want this. Does somebody know how
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind()
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > works under the covers, and if it's easy (meaning one or two
> > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions) to replicate?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 7/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I am not sure that the problem is related only to links.. there can be
> > > > > > > > > > > > other components that need an hidden form parameter.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > For example, JSCookMenu encodes the links in the html with some
> > > > > > > > > > > > special prefix syntax, set this value in an hidden form named
> > > > > > > > > > > > "jscook_action" on click, and intercept and decode it in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > server-side decode logic.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I think that the choice is between letting every component to add
> > > > > > > > > > > > hidden fields dynamically on the DOM (dojo can help? its not that
> > > > > > > > > > > > difficult anyway), or provide some sort of central service to do so,
> > > > > > > > > > > > that's the current approach.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > First solution doesn't create dependency between components, but I
> > > > > > > > > > > > don't like very much.. it reminds me of those BASIC programs that used
> > > > > > > > > > > > variables without declaring them ;) On the other hand second solution
> > > > > > > > > > > > does create dependency, and we must be careful to allow mixing
> > > > > > > > > > > > component libraries.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/26, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > That's the clear-problem, right?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > For this problem, this is what I was thinking about:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > every link renders a javascript which adds a function as an onsubmit-handler
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",myFunction() { clearLink and param} );
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > so there would be no central clear script anymore, but each link would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > clear itself, we'd loose the interdependency between link and form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/19/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Take a look at how the addHiddenCommandParameter is implemented in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > public static void addHiddenCommandParameter(UIComponent form,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > String paramName)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Set set = (Set)form.getAttributes().get(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > if (set == null)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > set = new HashSet();
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > form.getAttributes().put(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR, set);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > set.add(paramName);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > This has no dependency at all on the HtmlFormRendererBase, not even on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIForm. It simply add an attribute with a particular name on a generic
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIComponent. Somewhere, something will read that attribute and create
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the hidden links.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > We could simply:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Move this method and the HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR constant
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > outside of the HtmlFormRendererBase, maybe in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > shared\util\_ComponentUtils.java
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Define the same constant and create a method that does the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > thing in some Trinidad's util class
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Have the Trinidad form renderer look at that attribute, and render
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the requested hidden fields just as HtmlFormRendererBase does.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > This way, any Trinidad and MyFaces/Tomahawk component can find the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > parent form (without caring if it is a Trinidad or a MyFaces one) and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ask for an hidden field with the respective utility method.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think about this? The only ungly thing is having the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > constant/method in two different places, but as long as we'll keep the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > two codebases separated I don't think that much can be done on this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/19, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any ideas on this? :-)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Adam, technically it could be done, but I'm wondering where we can do that.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Having some centralized code in a renderer that inject the javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't bring us again on the same problem? (it would be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-dependent)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In my hack, is the routine itself that manipulate the DOM, but I don't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > think this solution can be adopted at large scale.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Modern browsers have no difficulty being told to add hidden fields
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to the DOM on the fly; MyFaces could use this solution, which
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad uses (at least in some parts of the code).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see two problem with this:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value-bounded exists?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > itself as a submit handler?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First attemp:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implement it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > those non-standard services.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > good
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dropped. The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we want
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > js hack
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > similar to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > example,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to use the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > integration is the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > presumibly also
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addressed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > required
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in another
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with yours if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form searching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > matzew@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
Hi Cosma,
I probably don't see something obvious - but how can our current
script work at all, if we call the clear method before we call submit?
This should reset the parameter, right?
onclick="clear__5Fid0();document.forms['_id0'].elements['autoScroll'].value=getScrolling();document.forms['_id0'].elements['_id0:_link_hidden_'].value='_id0:_id1:1:_id2';document.forms['_id0'].elements['language'].value='en';if(document.forms['_id0'].onsubmit){var
result=document.forms['_id0'].onsubmit(); if( (typeof result ==
'undefined') || result )
{document.forms['_id0'].submit();}}else{document.forms['_id0'].submit();}return
false;"
I do know it works, but how ;) ?
regards,
Martin
On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > Just discussed with Manfred, and this is how it should work:
> >
> > if you click on a link, a hidden parameter is set, then the form is
> > submitted, and then the hidden parameter is cleared out again.
> >
> > Manfred means that it doesn't matter if there is one parameter per
> > link or one parameter for the whole form, the renderer needs to work
> > correctly, though. If we have links from several frameworks in the
> > game, it should probably be one parameter per link, right?
>
> Ok, having an hidden field for each single link would avoid
> dependecies among components, that's fine.
>
> > In any case, I don't see how the current javascript method does
> > anything even close to this behaviour...
>
> It seems to me that this is exactly the behaviour of MyFaces
> commandLink component, except for the "common" hidden parameter. I
> don't know how Trinidad implements commandLinks... I'll take I look
> ASAP :-)
>
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
>
> Bye
> Cosma
>
> > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > P.S. I mean the generated html of course, not the jsf source :)
> > >
> > >
> > > 2006/7/27, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > Can you explain me better how do you mean for "clears all hidden
> > > > fields for all links, and their parameters"? I'm looking at the source
> > > > of this page: http://www.irian.at/home.jsf (I don't have a myfaces
> > > > playground to experiment with at this time), and I don't see an hidden
> > > > field for *each* commandLink, I see two forms, so two _link_hidden_
> > > > fields and two clear methods..
> > > >
> > > > Cosma
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > Well, as it is implemented in MyFaces currently, it clears all hidden
> > > > > fields for all links, and their parameters, right?
> > > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Martin,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm trying to understand how links work. We have:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - single "_link_hidden_" field in the form
> > > > > > - a single function in the form that clear _link_hidden_ value and
> > > > > > reset the form target
> > > > > > - every link in the onClick call the clear function, set it own id in
> > > > > > _link_hidden_, then call the onsubmit form handler (checking the
> > > > > > return value), and finally submit the form
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Why the clear method should know about every links? It seems that it
> > > > > > just clear the _link_hidden_ field.. I must be missing something
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > Hi Cosma,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think it was developed this way cause the clear method needed to
> > > > > > > know about all links anyways, so it was centrally done.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yes, the component namespace standard is definitely a good idea. If we
> > > > > > > find a clean solution to do this in MyFaces, I think that both
> > > > > > > Trinidad and the RI will be happy to build on this as well.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Using a central way is not my option, I only said that, being it the
> > > > > > > > way things are currently implemented, there should be a clear
> > > > > > > > advantage for switching now.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thinking about first solution, I think you're right. The thing I
> > > > > > > > didn't like is the hack of adding hidden form fields to the DOM using
> > > > > > > > javascript, but I agree on having component's renderer simply write
> > > > > > > > out the <input type="hidden" .../> along the other html..
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The only thing I could add is some component "namespace" standard to
> > > > > > > > avoid parameters collision.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > BTW, do you remember why the hidden fields form service was
> > > > > > > > implemented, instead of going this way?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > P.S.: your option - using a central way of doing this - is nothing I
> > > > > > > > > would fancy. That's where we are right now, and it doesn't help us
> > > > > > > > > with compatibility, really.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Yes, that is the second thing - we'll need the component let add
> > > > > > > > > > hidden parameters to the form.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Now, as the component is embedded in the form, why can it not just
> > > > > > > > > > render out the hidden element?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > This doesn't remind me of BASIC at all, but of component orientation -
> > > > > > > > > > everything that the component needs should be wrapped up in the
> > > > > > > > > > component itself, don't you think so?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Where does the need of dynamically added client-side fields stem from
> > > > > > > > > > again, I don't see it right now?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > What needs to be added dynamically is the clear-script. And this
> > > > > > > > > > really is complicated, it touches the base of what dojo has to offer
> > > > > > > > > > with its event system. I don't know if we can replicate this without
> > > > > > > > > > having a dependency on dojo in our implementation, and I'm pretty sure
> > > > > > > > > > we don't want this. Does somebody know how
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind()
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > works under the covers, and if it's easy (meaning one or two
> > > > > > > > > > javascript functions) to replicate?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 7/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I am not sure that the problem is related only to links.. there can be
> > > > > > > > > > > other components that need an hidden form parameter.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > For example, JSCookMenu encodes the links in the html with some
> > > > > > > > > > > special prefix syntax, set this value in an hidden form named
> > > > > > > > > > > "jscook_action" on click, and intercept and decode it in the
> > > > > > > > > > > server-side decode logic.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I think that the choice is between letting every component to add
> > > > > > > > > > > hidden fields dynamically on the DOM (dojo can help? its not that
> > > > > > > > > > > difficult anyway), or provide some sort of central service to do so,
> > > > > > > > > > > that's the current approach.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > First solution doesn't create dependency between components, but I
> > > > > > > > > > > don't like very much.. it reminds me of those BASIC programs that used
> > > > > > > > > > > variables without declaring them ;) On the other hand second solution
> > > > > > > > > > > does create dependency, and we must be careful to allow mixing
> > > > > > > > > > > component libraries.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/26, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > That's the clear-problem, right?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > For this problem, this is what I was thinking about:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > every link renders a javascript which adds a function as an onsubmit-handler
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",myFunction() { clearLink and param} );
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > so there would be no central clear script anymore, but each link would
> > > > > > > > > > > > clear itself, we'd loose the interdependency between link and form.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/19/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Take a look at how the addHiddenCommandParameter is implemented in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > public static void addHiddenCommandParameter(UIComponent form,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > String paramName)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Set set = (Set)form.getAttributes().get(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > if (set == null)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > set = new HashSet();
> > > > > > > > > > > > > form.getAttributes().put(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR, set);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > set.add(paramName);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > This has no dependency at all on the HtmlFormRendererBase, not even on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > UIForm. It simply add an attribute with a particular name on a generic
> > > > > > > > > > > > > UIComponent. Somewhere, something will read that attribute and create
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the hidden links.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > We could simply:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Move this method and the HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR constant
> > > > > > > > > > > > > outside of the HtmlFormRendererBase, maybe in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > shared\util\_ComponentUtils.java
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Define the same constant and create a method that does the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > thing in some Trinidad's util class
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Have the Trinidad form renderer look at that attribute, and render
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the requested hidden fields just as HtmlFormRendererBase does.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > This way, any Trinidad and MyFaces/Tomahawk component can find the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > parent form (without caring if it is a Trinidad or a MyFaces one) and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ask for an hidden field with the respective utility method.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think about this? The only ungly thing is having the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > constant/method in two different places, but as long as we'll keep the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > two codebases separated I don't think that much can be done on this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/19, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any ideas on this? :-)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Adam, technically it could be done, but I'm wondering where we can do that.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Having some centralized code in a renderer that inject the javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't bring us again on the same problem? (it would be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-dependent)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In my hack, is the routine itself that manipulate the DOM, but I don't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > think this solution can be adopted at large scale.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Modern browsers have no difficulty being told to add hidden fields
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to the DOM on the fly; MyFaces could use this solution, which
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad uses (at least in some parts of the code).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see two problem with this:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value-bounded exists?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > itself as a submit handler?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First attemp:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implement it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > those non-standard services.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > good
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dropped. The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we want
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > js hack
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > similar to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > example,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to use the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > integration is the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > presumibly also
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addressed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > required
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in another
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with yours if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form searching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > matzew@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > >
> > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > >
> > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>.
2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> Just discussed with Manfred, and this is how it should work:
>
> if you click on a link, a hidden parameter is set, then the form is
> submitted, and then the hidden parameter is cleared out again.
>
> Manfred means that it doesn't matter if there is one parameter per
> link or one parameter for the whole form, the renderer needs to work
> correctly, though. If we have links from several frameworks in the
> game, it should probably be one parameter per link, right?
Ok, having an hidden field for each single link would avoid
dependecies among components, that's fine.
> In any case, I don't see how the current javascript method does
> anything even close to this behaviour...
It seems to me that this is exactly the behaviour of MyFaces
commandLink component, except for the "common" hidden parameter. I
don't know how Trinidad implements commandLinks... I'll take I look
ASAP :-)
> regards,
>
> Martin
Bye
Cosma
> On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > P.S. I mean the generated html of course, not the jsf source :)
> >
> >
> > 2006/7/27, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > Can you explain me better how do you mean for "clears all hidden
> > > fields for all links, and their parameters"? I'm looking at the source
> > > of this page: http://www.irian.at/home.jsf (I don't have a myfaces
> > > playground to experiment with at this time), and I don't see an hidden
> > > field for *each* commandLink, I see two forms, so two _link_hidden_
> > > fields and two clear methods..
> > >
> > > Cosma
> > >
> > >
> > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > Well, as it is implemented in MyFaces currently, it clears all hidden
> > > > fields for all links, and their parameters, right?
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Hi Martin,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm trying to understand how links work. We have:
> > > > >
> > > > > - single "_link_hidden_" field in the form
> > > > > - a single function in the form that clear _link_hidden_ value and
> > > > > reset the form target
> > > > > - every link in the onClick call the clear function, set it own id in
> > > > > _link_hidden_, then call the onsubmit form handler (checking the
> > > > > return value), and finally submit the form
> > > > >
> > > > > Why the clear method should know about every links? It seems that it
> > > > > just clear the _link_hidden_ field.. I must be missing something
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Cosma
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > Hi Cosma,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think it was developed this way cause the clear method needed to
> > > > > > know about all links anyways, so it was centrally done.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yes, the component namespace standard is definitely a good idea. If we
> > > > > > find a clean solution to do this in MyFaces, I think that both
> > > > > > Trinidad and the RI will be happy to build on this as well.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Martin
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Using a central way is not my option, I only said that, being it the
> > > > > > > way things are currently implemented, there should be a clear
> > > > > > > advantage for switching now.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thinking about first solution, I think you're right. The thing I
> > > > > > > didn't like is the hack of adding hidden form fields to the DOM using
> > > > > > > javascript, but I agree on having component's renderer simply write
> > > > > > > out the <input type="hidden" .../> along the other html..
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The only thing I could add is some component "namespace" standard to
> > > > > > > avoid parameters collision.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > BTW, do you remember why the hidden fields form service was
> > > > > > > implemented, instead of going this way?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > P.S.: your option - using a central way of doing this - is nothing I
> > > > > > > > would fancy. That's where we are right now, and it doesn't help us
> > > > > > > > with compatibility, really.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Yes, that is the second thing - we'll need the component let add
> > > > > > > > > hidden parameters to the form.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Now, as the component is embedded in the form, why can it not just
> > > > > > > > > render out the hidden element?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > This doesn't remind me of BASIC at all, but of component orientation -
> > > > > > > > > everything that the component needs should be wrapped up in the
> > > > > > > > > component itself, don't you think so?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Where does the need of dynamically added client-side fields stem from
> > > > > > > > > again, I don't see it right now?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > What needs to be added dynamically is the clear-script. And this
> > > > > > > > > really is complicated, it touches the base of what dojo has to offer
> > > > > > > > > with its event system. I don't know if we can replicate this without
> > > > > > > > > having a dependency on dojo in our implementation, and I'm pretty sure
> > > > > > > > > we don't want this. Does somebody know how
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind()
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > works under the covers, and if it's easy (meaning one or two
> > > > > > > > > javascript functions) to replicate?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 7/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I am not sure that the problem is related only to links.. there can be
> > > > > > > > > > other components that need an hidden form parameter.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > For example, JSCookMenu encodes the links in the html with some
> > > > > > > > > > special prefix syntax, set this value in an hidden form named
> > > > > > > > > > "jscook_action" on click, and intercept and decode it in the
> > > > > > > > > > server-side decode logic.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I think that the choice is between letting every component to add
> > > > > > > > > > hidden fields dynamically on the DOM (dojo can help? its not that
> > > > > > > > > > difficult anyway), or provide some sort of central service to do so,
> > > > > > > > > > that's the current approach.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > First solution doesn't create dependency between components, but I
> > > > > > > > > > don't like very much.. it reminds me of those BASIC programs that used
> > > > > > > > > > variables without declaring them ;) On the other hand second solution
> > > > > > > > > > does create dependency, and we must be careful to allow mixing
> > > > > > > > > > component libraries.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/26, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > That's the clear-problem, right?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > For this problem, this is what I was thinking about:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > every link renders a javascript which adds a function as an onsubmit-handler
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",myFunction() { clearLink and param} );
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > so there would be no central clear script anymore, but each link would
> > > > > > > > > > > clear itself, we'd loose the interdependency between link and form.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 7/19/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Take a look at how the addHiddenCommandParameter is implemented in
> > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > public static void addHiddenCommandParameter(UIComponent form,
> > > > > > > > > > > > String paramName)
> > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > Set set = (Set)form.getAttributes().get(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR);
> > > > > > > > > > > > if (set == null)
> > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > set = new HashSet();
> > > > > > > > > > > > form.getAttributes().put(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR, set);
> > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > set.add(paramName);
> > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > This has no dependency at all on the HtmlFormRendererBase, not even on
> > > > > > > > > > > > UIForm. It simply add an attribute with a particular name on a generic
> > > > > > > > > > > > UIComponent. Somewhere, something will read that attribute and create
> > > > > > > > > > > > the hidden links.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > We could simply:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Move this method and the HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR constant
> > > > > > > > > > > > outside of the HtmlFormRendererBase, maybe in
> > > > > > > > > > > > shared\util\_ComponentUtils.java
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Define the same constant and create a method that does the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > thing in some Trinidad's util class
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Have the Trinidad form renderer look at that attribute, and render
> > > > > > > > > > > > the requested hidden fields just as HtmlFormRendererBase does.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > This way, any Trinidad and MyFaces/Tomahawk component can find the
> > > > > > > > > > > > parent form (without caring if it is a Trinidad or a MyFaces one) and
> > > > > > > > > > > > ask for an hidden field with the respective utility method.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think about this? The only ungly thing is having the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > constant/method in two different places, but as long as we'll keep the
> > > > > > > > > > > > two codebases separated I don't think that much can be done on this.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/19, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Any ideas on this? :-)
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Adam, technically it could be done, but I'm wondering where we can do that.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Having some centralized code in a renderer that inject the javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't bring us again on the same problem? (it would be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-dependent)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > In my hack, is the routine itself that manipulate the DOM, but I don't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > think this solution can be adopted at large scale.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Modern browsers have no difficulty being told to add hidden fields
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to the DOM on the fly; MyFaces could use this solution, which
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad uses (at least in some parts of the code).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see two problem with this:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value-bounded exists?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > itself as a submit handler?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First attemp:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implement it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > those non-standard services.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > good
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dropped. The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we want
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > js hack
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > similar to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > example,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to use the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > integration is the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > presumibly also
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addressed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > required
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in another
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with yours if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form searching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > matzew@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > >
> > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > Courses in English and German
> > > >
> > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
Just discussed with Manfred, and this is how it should work:
if you click on a link, a hidden parameter is set, then the form is
submitted, and then the hidden parameter is cleared out again.
Manfred means that it doesn't matter if there is one parameter per
link or one parameter for the whole form, the renderer needs to work
correctly, though. If we have links from several frameworks in the
game, it should probably be one parameter per link, right?
In any case, I don't see how the current javascript method does
anything even close to this behaviour...
regards,
Martin
On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> P.S. I mean the generated html of course, not the jsf source :)
>
>
> 2006/7/27, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > Can you explain me better how do you mean for "clears all hidden
> > fields for all links, and their parameters"? I'm looking at the source
> > of this page: http://www.irian.at/home.jsf (I don't have a myfaces
> > playground to experiment with at this time), and I don't see an hidden
> > field for *each* commandLink, I see two forms, so two _link_hidden_
> > fields and two clear methods..
> >
> > Cosma
> >
> >
> > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > Well, as it is implemented in MyFaces currently, it clears all hidden
> > > fields for all links, and their parameters, right?
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi Martin,
> > > >
> > > > I'm trying to understand how links work. We have:
> > > >
> > > > - single "_link_hidden_" field in the form
> > > > - a single function in the form that clear _link_hidden_ value and
> > > > reset the form target
> > > > - every link in the onClick call the clear function, set it own id in
> > > > _link_hidden_, then call the onsubmit form handler (checking the
> > > > return value), and finally submit the form
> > > >
> > > > Why the clear method should know about every links? It seems that it
> > > > just clear the _link_hidden_ field.. I must be missing something
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Cosma
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > Hi Cosma,
> > > > >
> > > > > I think it was developed this way cause the clear method needed to
> > > > > know about all links anyways, so it was centrally done.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, the component namespace standard is definitely a good idea. If we
> > > > > find a clean solution to do this in MyFaces, I think that both
> > > > > Trinidad and the RI will be happy to build on this as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Using a central way is not my option, I only said that, being it the
> > > > > > way things are currently implemented, there should be a clear
> > > > > > advantage for switching now.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thinking about first solution, I think you're right. The thing I
> > > > > > didn't like is the hack of adding hidden form fields to the DOM using
> > > > > > javascript, but I agree on having component's renderer simply write
> > > > > > out the <input type="hidden" .../> along the other html..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The only thing I could add is some component "namespace" standard to
> > > > > > avoid parameters collision.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > BTW, do you remember why the hidden fields form service was
> > > > > > implemented, instead of going this way?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > P.S.: your option - using a central way of doing this - is nothing I
> > > > > > > would fancy. That's where we are right now, and it doesn't help us
> > > > > > > with compatibility, really.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Yes, that is the second thing - we'll need the component let add
> > > > > > > > hidden parameters to the form.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Now, as the component is embedded in the form, why can it not just
> > > > > > > > render out the hidden element?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This doesn't remind me of BASIC at all, but of component orientation -
> > > > > > > > everything that the component needs should be wrapped up in the
> > > > > > > > component itself, don't you think so?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Where does the need of dynamically added client-side fields stem from
> > > > > > > > again, I don't see it right now?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > What needs to be added dynamically is the clear-script. And this
> > > > > > > > really is complicated, it touches the base of what dojo has to offer
> > > > > > > > with its event system. I don't know if we can replicate this without
> > > > > > > > having a dependency on dojo in our implementation, and I'm pretty sure
> > > > > > > > we don't want this. Does somebody know how
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind()
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > works under the covers, and if it's easy (meaning one or two
> > > > > > > > javascript functions) to replicate?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 7/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I am not sure that the problem is related only to links.. there can be
> > > > > > > > > other components that need an hidden form parameter.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > For example, JSCookMenu encodes the links in the html with some
> > > > > > > > > special prefix syntax, set this value in an hidden form named
> > > > > > > > > "jscook_action" on click, and intercept and decode it in the
> > > > > > > > > server-side decode logic.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I think that the choice is between letting every component to add
> > > > > > > > > hidden fields dynamically on the DOM (dojo can help? its not that
> > > > > > > > > difficult anyway), or provide some sort of central service to do so,
> > > > > > > > > that's the current approach.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > First solution doesn't create dependency between components, but I
> > > > > > > > > don't like very much.. it reminds me of those BASIC programs that used
> > > > > > > > > variables without declaring them ;) On the other hand second solution
> > > > > > > > > does create dependency, and we must be careful to allow mixing
> > > > > > > > > component libraries.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Any thoughts?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2006/7/26, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > That's the clear-problem, right?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > For this problem, this is what I was thinking about:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > every link renders a javascript which adds a function as an onsubmit-handler
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",myFunction() { clearLink and param} );
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > so there would be no central clear script anymore, but each link would
> > > > > > > > > > clear itself, we'd loose the interdependency between link and form.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 7/19/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Take a look at how the addHiddenCommandParameter is implemented in
> > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > public static void addHiddenCommandParameter(UIComponent form,
> > > > > > > > > > > String paramName)
> > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > Set set = (Set)form.getAttributes().get(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR);
> > > > > > > > > > > if (set == null)
> > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > set = new HashSet();
> > > > > > > > > > > form.getAttributes().put(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR, set);
> > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > set.add(paramName);
> > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > This has no dependency at all on the HtmlFormRendererBase, not even on
> > > > > > > > > > > UIForm. It simply add an attribute with a particular name on a generic
> > > > > > > > > > > UIComponent. Somewhere, something will read that attribute and create
> > > > > > > > > > > the hidden links.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > We could simply:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 1) Move this method and the HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR constant
> > > > > > > > > > > outside of the HtmlFormRendererBase, maybe in
> > > > > > > > > > > shared\util\_ComponentUtils.java
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 2) Define the same constant and create a method that does the same
> > > > > > > > > > > thing in some Trinidad's util class
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 3) Have the Trinidad form renderer look at that attribute, and render
> > > > > > > > > > > the requested hidden fields just as HtmlFormRendererBase does.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > This way, any Trinidad and MyFaces/Tomahawk component can find the
> > > > > > > > > > > parent form (without caring if it is a Trinidad or a MyFaces one) and
> > > > > > > > > > > ask for an hidden field with the respective utility method.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > What do you think about this? The only ungly thing is having the same
> > > > > > > > > > > constant/method in two different places, but as long as we'll keep the
> > > > > > > > > > > two codebases separated I don't think that much can be done on this.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/19, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Any ideas on this? :-)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Adam, technically it could be done, but I'm wondering where we can do that.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Having some centralized code in a renderer that inject the javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > don't bring us again on the same problem? (it would be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-dependent)
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > In my hack, is the routine itself that manipulate the DOM, but I don't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > think this solution can be adopted at large scale.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Modern browsers have no difficulty being told to add hidden fields
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > to the DOM on the fly; MyFaces could use this solution, which
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad uses (at least in some parts of the code).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see two problem with this:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value-bounded exists?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > itself as a submit handler?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First attemp:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implement it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > those non-standard services.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > good
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dropped. The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we want
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > js hack
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > similar to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > example,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to use the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > integration is the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > presumibly also
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addressed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > required
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in another
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with yours if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form searching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > matzew@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > >
> > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > >
> > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > >
> >
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>.
P.S. I mean the generated html of course, not the jsf source :)
2006/7/27, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> Can you explain me better how do you mean for "clears all hidden
> fields for all links, and their parameters"? I'm looking at the source
> of this page: http://www.irian.at/home.jsf (I don't have a myfaces
> playground to experiment with at this time), and I don't see an hidden
> field for *each* commandLink, I see two forms, so two _link_hidden_
> fields and two clear methods..
>
> Cosma
>
>
> 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > Well, as it is implemented in MyFaces currently, it clears all hidden
> > fields for all links, and their parameters, right?
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Martin,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to understand how links work. We have:
> > >
> > > - single "_link_hidden_" field in the form
> > > - a single function in the form that clear _link_hidden_ value and
> > > reset the form target
> > > - every link in the onClick call the clear function, set it own id in
> > > _link_hidden_, then call the onsubmit form handler (checking the
> > > return value), and finally submit the form
> > >
> > > Why the clear method should know about every links? It seems that it
> > > just clear the _link_hidden_ field.. I must be missing something
> > >
> > >
> > > Cosma
> > >
> > >
> > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > Hi Cosma,
> > > >
> > > > I think it was developed this way cause the clear method needed to
> > > > know about all links anyways, so it was centrally done.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, the component namespace standard is definitely a good idea. If we
> > > > find a clean solution to do this in MyFaces, I think that both
> > > > Trinidad and the RI will be happy to build on this as well.
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Using a central way is not my option, I only said that, being it the
> > > > > way things are currently implemented, there should be a clear
> > > > > advantage for switching now.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thinking about first solution, I think you're right. The thing I
> > > > > didn't like is the hack of adding hidden form fields to the DOM using
> > > > > javascript, but I agree on having component's renderer simply write
> > > > > out the <input type="hidden" .../> along the other html..
> > > > >
> > > > > The only thing I could add is some component "namespace" standard to
> > > > > avoid parameters collision.
> > > > >
> > > > > BTW, do you remember why the hidden fields form service was
> > > > > implemented, instead of going this way?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Cosma
> > > > >
> > > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > P.S.: your option - using a central way of doing this - is nothing I
> > > > > > would fancy. That's where we are right now, and it doesn't help us
> > > > > > with compatibility, really.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Martin
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Yes, that is the second thing - we'll need the component let add
> > > > > > > hidden parameters to the form.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Now, as the component is embedded in the form, why can it not just
> > > > > > > render out the hidden element?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This doesn't remind me of BASIC at all, but of component orientation -
> > > > > > > everything that the component needs should be wrapped up in the
> > > > > > > component itself, don't you think so?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Where does the need of dynamically added client-side fields stem from
> > > > > > > again, I don't see it right now?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What needs to be added dynamically is the clear-script. And this
> > > > > > > really is complicated, it touches the base of what dojo has to offer
> > > > > > > with its event system. I don't know if we can replicate this without
> > > > > > > having a dependency on dojo in our implementation, and I'm pretty sure
> > > > > > > we don't want this. Does somebody know how
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > dojo.event.bind()
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > works under the covers, and if it's easy (meaning one or two
> > > > > > > javascript functions) to replicate?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 7/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I am not sure that the problem is related only to links.. there can be
> > > > > > > > other components that need an hidden form parameter.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > For example, JSCookMenu encodes the links in the html with some
> > > > > > > > special prefix syntax, set this value in an hidden form named
> > > > > > > > "jscook_action" on click, and intercept and decode it in the
> > > > > > > > server-side decode logic.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I think that the choice is between letting every component to add
> > > > > > > > hidden fields dynamically on the DOM (dojo can help? its not that
> > > > > > > > difficult anyway), or provide some sort of central service to do so,
> > > > > > > > that's the current approach.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > First solution doesn't create dependency between components, but I
> > > > > > > > don't like very much.. it reminds me of those BASIC programs that used
> > > > > > > > variables without declaring them ;) On the other hand second solution
> > > > > > > > does create dependency, and we must be careful to allow mixing
> > > > > > > > component libraries.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Any thoughts?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2006/7/26, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > That's the clear-problem, right?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > For this problem, this is what I was thinking about:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > every link renders a javascript which adds a function as an onsubmit-handler
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",myFunction() { clearLink and param} );
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > so there would be no central clear script anymore, but each link would
> > > > > > > > > clear itself, we'd loose the interdependency between link and form.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 7/19/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Take a look at how the addHiddenCommandParameter is implemented in
> > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > public static void addHiddenCommandParameter(UIComponent form,
> > > > > > > > > > String paramName)
> > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > Set set = (Set)form.getAttributes().get(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR);
> > > > > > > > > > if (set == null)
> > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > set = new HashSet();
> > > > > > > > > > form.getAttributes().put(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR, set);
> > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > set.add(paramName);
> > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > This has no dependency at all on the HtmlFormRendererBase, not even on
> > > > > > > > > > UIForm. It simply add an attribute with a particular name on a generic
> > > > > > > > > > UIComponent. Somewhere, something will read that attribute and create
> > > > > > > > > > the hidden links.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > We could simply:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 1) Move this method and the HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR constant
> > > > > > > > > > outside of the HtmlFormRendererBase, maybe in
> > > > > > > > > > shared\util\_ComponentUtils.java
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 2) Define the same constant and create a method that does the same
> > > > > > > > > > thing in some Trinidad's util class
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 3) Have the Trinidad form renderer look at that attribute, and render
> > > > > > > > > > the requested hidden fields just as HtmlFormRendererBase does.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > This way, any Trinidad and MyFaces/Tomahawk component can find the
> > > > > > > > > > parent form (without caring if it is a Trinidad or a MyFaces one) and
> > > > > > > > > > ask for an hidden field with the respective utility method.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > What do you think about this? The only ungly thing is having the same
> > > > > > > > > > constant/method in two different places, but as long as we'll keep the
> > > > > > > > > > two codebases separated I don't think that much can be done on this.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/19, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > Any ideas on this? :-)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Adam, technically it could be done, but I'm wondering where we can do that.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Having some centralized code in a renderer that inject the javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > don't bring us again on the same problem? (it would be
> > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-dependent)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > In my hack, is the routine itself that manipulate the DOM, but I don't
> > > > > > > > > > > > think this solution can be adopted at large scale.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Modern browsers have no difficulty being told to add hidden fields
> > > > > > > > > > > > > to the DOM on the fly; MyFaces could use this solution, which
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad uses (at least in some parts of the code).
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > (see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > see two problem with this:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > value-bounded exists?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > itself as a submit handler?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First attemp:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implement it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > those non-standard services.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > good
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > dropped. The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > we want
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > js hack
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > similar to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > example,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > to use the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > integration is the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > presumibly also
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > but with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > addressed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > have two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > required
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > in another
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > with yours if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > form searching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > matzew@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > >
> > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > Courses in English and German
> > > >
> > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>.
Can you explain me better how do you mean for "clears all hidden
fields for all links, and their parameters"? I'm looking at the source
of this page: http://www.irian.at/home.jsf (I don't have a myfaces
playground to experiment with at this time), and I don't see an hidden
field for *each* commandLink, I see two forms, so two _link_hidden_
fields and two clear methods..
Cosma
2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> Well, as it is implemented in MyFaces currently, it clears all hidden
> fields for all links, and their parameters, right?
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > I'm trying to understand how links work. We have:
> >
> > - single "_link_hidden_" field in the form
> > - a single function in the form that clear _link_hidden_ value and
> > reset the form target
> > - every link in the onClick call the clear function, set it own id in
> > _link_hidden_, then call the onsubmit form handler (checking the
> > return value), and finally submit the form
> >
> > Why the clear method should know about every links? It seems that it
> > just clear the _link_hidden_ field.. I must be missing something
> >
> >
> > Cosma
> >
> >
> > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > Hi Cosma,
> > >
> > > I think it was developed this way cause the clear method needed to
> > > know about all links anyways, so it was centrally done.
> > >
> > > Yes, the component namespace standard is definitely a good idea. If we
> > > find a clean solution to do this in MyFaces, I think that both
> > > Trinidad and the RI will be happy to build on this as well.
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Using a central way is not my option, I only said that, being it the
> > > > way things are currently implemented, there should be a clear
> > > > advantage for switching now.
> > > >
> > > > Thinking about first solution, I think you're right. The thing I
> > > > didn't like is the hack of adding hidden form fields to the DOM using
> > > > javascript, but I agree on having component's renderer simply write
> > > > out the <input type="hidden" .../> along the other html..
> > > >
> > > > The only thing I could add is some component "namespace" standard to
> > > > avoid parameters collision.
> > > >
> > > > BTW, do you remember why the hidden fields form service was
> > > > implemented, instead of going this way?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Cosma
> > > >
> > > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > P.S.: your option - using a central way of doing this - is nothing I
> > > > > would fancy. That's where we are right now, and it doesn't help us
> > > > > with compatibility, really.
> > > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Yes, that is the second thing - we'll need the component let add
> > > > > > hidden parameters to the form.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Now, as the component is embedded in the form, why can it not just
> > > > > > render out the hidden element?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This doesn't remind me of BASIC at all, but of component orientation -
> > > > > > everything that the component needs should be wrapped up in the
> > > > > > component itself, don't you think so?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Where does the need of dynamically added client-side fields stem from
> > > > > > again, I don't see it right now?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What needs to be added dynamically is the clear-script. And this
> > > > > > really is complicated, it touches the base of what dojo has to offer
> > > > > > with its event system. I don't know if we can replicate this without
> > > > > > having a dependency on dojo in our implementation, and I'm pretty sure
> > > > > > we don't want this. Does somebody know how
> > > > > >
> > > > > > dojo.event.bind()
> > > > > >
> > > > > > works under the covers, and if it's easy (meaning one or two
> > > > > > javascript functions) to replicate?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Martin
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 7/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am not sure that the problem is related only to links.. there can be
> > > > > > > other components that need an hidden form parameter.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > For example, JSCookMenu encodes the links in the html with some
> > > > > > > special prefix syntax, set this value in an hidden form named
> > > > > > > "jscook_action" on click, and intercept and decode it in the
> > > > > > > server-side decode logic.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think that the choice is between letting every component to add
> > > > > > > hidden fields dynamically on the DOM (dojo can help? its not that
> > > > > > > difficult anyway), or provide some sort of central service to do so,
> > > > > > > that's the current approach.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > First solution doesn't create dependency between components, but I
> > > > > > > don't like very much.. it reminds me of those BASIC programs that used
> > > > > > > variables without declaring them ;) On the other hand second solution
> > > > > > > does create dependency, and we must be careful to allow mixing
> > > > > > > component libraries.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Any thoughts?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2006/7/26, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > That's the clear-problem, right?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > For this problem, this is what I was thinking about:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > every link renders a javascript which adds a function as an onsubmit-handler
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",myFunction() { clearLink and param} );
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > so there would be no central clear script anymore, but each link would
> > > > > > > > clear itself, we'd loose the interdependency between link and form.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 7/19/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Take a look at how the addHiddenCommandParameter is implemented in
> > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > public static void addHiddenCommandParameter(UIComponent form,
> > > > > > > > > String paramName)
> > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > Set set = (Set)form.getAttributes().get(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR);
> > > > > > > > > if (set == null)
> > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > set = new HashSet();
> > > > > > > > > form.getAttributes().put(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR, set);
> > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > set.add(paramName);
> > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > This has no dependency at all on the HtmlFormRendererBase, not even on
> > > > > > > > > UIForm. It simply add an attribute with a particular name on a generic
> > > > > > > > > UIComponent. Somewhere, something will read that attribute and create
> > > > > > > > > the hidden links.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > We could simply:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 1) Move this method and the HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR constant
> > > > > > > > > outside of the HtmlFormRendererBase, maybe in
> > > > > > > > > shared\util\_ComponentUtils.java
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2) Define the same constant and create a method that does the same
> > > > > > > > > thing in some Trinidad's util class
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 3) Have the Trinidad form renderer look at that attribute, and render
> > > > > > > > > the requested hidden fields just as HtmlFormRendererBase does.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > This way, any Trinidad and MyFaces/Tomahawk component can find the
> > > > > > > > > parent form (without caring if it is a Trinidad or a MyFaces one) and
> > > > > > > > > ask for an hidden field with the respective utility method.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > What do you think about this? The only ungly thing is having the same
> > > > > > > > > constant/method in two different places, but as long as we'll keep the
> > > > > > > > > two codebases separated I don't think that much can be done on this.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2006/7/19, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > Any ideas on this? :-)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > Adam, technically it could be done, but I'm wondering where we can do that.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Having some centralized code in a renderer that inject the javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > don't bring us again on the same problem? (it would be
> > > > > > > > > > > renderer-dependent)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > In my hack, is the routine itself that manipulate the DOM, but I don't
> > > > > > > > > > > think this solution can be adopted at large scale.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Modern browsers have no difficulty being told to add hidden fields
> > > > > > > > > > > > to the DOM on the fly; MyFaces could use this solution, which
> > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad uses (at least in some parts of the code).
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
> > > > > > > > > > > > > solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > > field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > see two problem with this:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
> > > > > > > > > > > > > value-bounded exists?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > itself as a submit handler?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First attemp:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implement it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > those non-standard services.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field
> > > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > good
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > dropped. The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do
> > > > > > > > > > > > > we want
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > js hack
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very
> > > > > > > > > > > > > similar to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For
> > > > > > > > > > > > > example,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method
> > > > > > > > > > > > > to use the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > integration is the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but
> > > > > > > > > > > > > presumibly also
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > but with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading
> > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded
> > > > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > addressed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > have two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > required
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out
> > > > > > > > > > > > > in another
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict
> > > > > > > > > > > > > with yours if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > form searching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain
> > > > > > > > > > > > > component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components
> > > > > > > > > > > > > belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different
> > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about
> > > > > > > > > > > > > component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so
> > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied
> > > > > > > > > > > > > by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow
> > > > > > > > > > > > > subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread
> > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family
> > > > > > > > > > > > > instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably
> > > > > > > > > > > > > this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info
> > > > > > > > > > > > > about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest
> > > > > > > > > > > > > snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues
> > > > > > > > > > > > > with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > matzew@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string
> > > > > > > > > > > > > <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more
> > > > > > > > > > > > > carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using
> > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you
> > > > > > > > > > > > > using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around
> > > > > > > > > > > > > commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > >
> > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > >
> > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
Well, as it is implemented in MyFaces currently, it clears all hidden
fields for all links, and their parameters, right?
regards,
Martin
On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> I'm trying to understand how links work. We have:
>
> - single "_link_hidden_" field in the form
> - a single function in the form that clear _link_hidden_ value and
> reset the form target
> - every link in the onClick call the clear function, set it own id in
> _link_hidden_, then call the onsubmit form handler (checking the
> return value), and finally submit the form
>
> Why the clear method should know about every links? It seems that it
> just clear the _link_hidden_ field.. I must be missing something
>
>
> Cosma
>
>
> 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > Hi Cosma,
> >
> > I think it was developed this way cause the clear method needed to
> > know about all links anyways, so it was centrally done.
> >
> > Yes, the component namespace standard is definitely a good idea. If we
> > find a clean solution to do this in MyFaces, I think that both
> > Trinidad and the RI will be happy to build on this as well.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Using a central way is not my option, I only said that, being it the
> > > way things are currently implemented, there should be a clear
> > > advantage for switching now.
> > >
> > > Thinking about first solution, I think you're right. The thing I
> > > didn't like is the hack of adding hidden form fields to the DOM using
> > > javascript, but I agree on having component's renderer simply write
> > > out the <input type="hidden" .../> along the other html..
> > >
> > > The only thing I could add is some component "namespace" standard to
> > > avoid parameters collision.
> > >
> > > BTW, do you remember why the hidden fields form service was
> > > implemented, instead of going this way?
> > >
> > >
> > > Cosma
> > >
> > > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > P.S.: your option - using a central way of doing this - is nothing I
> > > > would fancy. That's where we are right now, and it doesn't help us
> > > > with compatibility, really.
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Yes, that is the second thing - we'll need the component let add
> > > > > hidden parameters to the form.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now, as the component is embedded in the form, why can it not just
> > > > > render out the hidden element?
> > > > >
> > > > > This doesn't remind me of BASIC at all, but of component orientation -
> > > > > everything that the component needs should be wrapped up in the
> > > > > component itself, don't you think so?
> > > > >
> > > > > Where does the need of dynamically added client-side fields stem from
> > > > > again, I don't see it right now?
> > > > >
> > > > > What needs to be added dynamically is the clear-script. And this
> > > > > really is complicated, it touches the base of what dojo has to offer
> > > > > with its event system. I don't know if we can replicate this without
> > > > > having a dependency on dojo in our implementation, and I'm pretty sure
> > > > > we don't want this. Does somebody know how
> > > > >
> > > > > dojo.event.bind()
> > > > >
> > > > > works under the covers, and if it's easy (meaning one or two
> > > > > javascript functions) to replicate?
> > > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am not sure that the problem is related only to links.. there can be
> > > > > > other components that need an hidden form parameter.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For example, JSCookMenu encodes the links in the html with some
> > > > > > special prefix syntax, set this value in an hidden form named
> > > > > > "jscook_action" on click, and intercept and decode it in the
> > > > > > server-side decode logic.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think that the choice is between letting every component to add
> > > > > > hidden fields dynamically on the DOM (dojo can help? its not that
> > > > > > difficult anyway), or provide some sort of central service to do so,
> > > > > > that's the current approach.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > First solution doesn't create dependency between components, but I
> > > > > > don't like very much.. it reminds me of those BASIC programs that used
> > > > > > variables without declaring them ;) On the other hand second solution
> > > > > > does create dependency, and we must be careful to allow mixing
> > > > > > component libraries.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any thoughts?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2006/7/26, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > That's the clear-problem, right?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > For this problem, this is what I was thinking about:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > every link renders a javascript which adds a function as an onsubmit-handler
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",myFunction() { clearLink and param} );
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > so there would be no central clear script anymore, but each link would
> > > > > > > clear itself, we'd loose the interdependency between link and form.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 7/19/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Take a look at how the addHiddenCommandParameter is implemented in
> > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > public static void addHiddenCommandParameter(UIComponent form,
> > > > > > > > String paramName)
> > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > Set set = (Set)form.getAttributes().get(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR);
> > > > > > > > if (set == null)
> > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > set = new HashSet();
> > > > > > > > form.getAttributes().put(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR, set);
> > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > set.add(paramName);
> > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This has no dependency at all on the HtmlFormRendererBase, not even on
> > > > > > > > UIForm. It simply add an attribute with a particular name on a generic
> > > > > > > > UIComponent. Somewhere, something will read that attribute and create
> > > > > > > > the hidden links.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > We could simply:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 1) Move this method and the HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR constant
> > > > > > > > outside of the HtmlFormRendererBase, maybe in
> > > > > > > > shared\util\_ComponentUtils.java
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2) Define the same constant and create a method that does the same
> > > > > > > > thing in some Trinidad's util class
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 3) Have the Trinidad form renderer look at that attribute, and render
> > > > > > > > the requested hidden fields just as HtmlFormRendererBase does.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This way, any Trinidad and MyFaces/Tomahawk component can find the
> > > > > > > > parent form (without caring if it is a Trinidad or a MyFaces one) and
> > > > > > > > ask for an hidden field with the respective utility method.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > What do you think about this? The only ungly thing is having the same
> > > > > > > > constant/method in two different places, but as long as we'll keep the
> > > > > > > > two codebases separated I don't think that much can be done on this.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2006/7/19, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > Any ideas on this? :-)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > Adam, technically it could be done, but I'm wondering where we can do that.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Having some centralized code in a renderer that inject the javascript
> > > > > > > > > > don't bring us again on the same problem? (it would be
> > > > > > > > > > renderer-dependent)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > In my hack, is the routine itself that manipulate the DOM, but I don't
> > > > > > > > > > think this solution can be adopted at large scale.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > Modern browsers have no difficulty being told to add hidden fields
> > > > > > > > > > > to the DOM on the fly; MyFaces could use this solution, which
> > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad uses (at least in some parts of the code).
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
> > > > > > > > > > > > solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
> > > > > > > > > > > > javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
> > > > > > > > > > > > (see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > > field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > see two problem with this:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
> > > > > > > > > > > > we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
> > > > > > > > > > > > value-bounded exists?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > itself as a submit handler?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > First attemp:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > implement it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > those non-standard services.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field
> > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a
> > > > > > > > > > > > good
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the
> > > > > > > > > > > > form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > dropped. The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do
> > > > > > > > > > > > we want
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the
> > > > > > > > > > > > js hack
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very
> > > > > > > > > > > > similar to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For
> > > > > > > > > > > > example,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method
> > > > > > > > > > > > to use the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > integration is the
> > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but
> > > > > > > > > > > > presumibly also
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters,
> > > > > > > > > > > > but with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading
> > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded
> > > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be
> > > > > > > > > > > > addressed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we
> > > > > > > > > > > > have two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be
> > > > > > > > > > > > required
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out
> > > > > > > > > > > > in another
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict
> > > > > > > > > > > > with yours if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the
> > > > > > > > > > > > form searching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family -
> > > > > > > > > > > > so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the
> > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF
> > > > > > > > > > > > implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain
> > > > > > > > > > > > component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components
> > > > > > > > > > > > belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different
> > > > > > > > > > > > renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about
> > > > > > > > > > > > component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so
> > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied
> > > > > > > > > > > > by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow
> > > > > > > > > > > > subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get
> > > > > > > > > > > > ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread
> > > > > > > > > > > > talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by
> > > > > > > > > > > > Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family
> > > > > > > > > > > > instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on
> > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a
> > > > > > > > > > > > submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably
> > > > > > > > > > > > this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a
> > > > > > > > > > > > "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the
> > > > > > > > > > > > component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > > the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info
> > > > > > > > > > > > about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest
> > > > > > > > > > > > snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues
> > > > > > > > > > > > with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it
> > > > > > > > > > > > tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <
> > > > > > > > > > > > matzew@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on
> > > > > > > > > > > > the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF
> > > > > > > > > > > > Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the
> > > > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string
> > > > > > > > > > > > <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both
> > > > > > > > > > > > the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are
> > > > > > > > > > > > actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would
> > > > > > > > > > > > happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some
> > > > > > > > > > > > discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more
> > > > > > > > > > > > carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using
> > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you
> > > > > > > > > > > > using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around
> > > > > > > > > > > > commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed
> > > > > > > > > > > > on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > >
> > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > >
> > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > >
> > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > Courses in English and German
> > > >
> > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>.
Hi Martin,
I'm trying to understand how links work. We have:
- single "_link_hidden_" field in the form
- a single function in the form that clear _link_hidden_ value and
reset the form target
- every link in the onClick call the clear function, set it own id in
_link_hidden_, then call the onsubmit form handler (checking the
return value), and finally submit the form
Why the clear method should know about every links? It seems that it
just clear the _link_hidden_ field.. I must be missing something
Cosma
2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Cosma,
>
> I think it was developed this way cause the clear method needed to
> know about all links anyways, so it was centrally done.
>
> Yes, the component namespace standard is definitely a good idea. If we
> find a clean solution to do this in MyFaces, I think that both
> Trinidad and the RI will be happy to build on this as well.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Using a central way is not my option, I only said that, being it the
> > way things are currently implemented, there should be a clear
> > advantage for switching now.
> >
> > Thinking about first solution, I think you're right. The thing I
> > didn't like is the hack of adding hidden form fields to the DOM using
> > javascript, but I agree on having component's renderer simply write
> > out the <input type="hidden" .../> along the other html..
> >
> > The only thing I could add is some component "namespace" standard to
> > avoid parameters collision.
> >
> > BTW, do you remember why the hidden fields form service was
> > implemented, instead of going this way?
> >
> >
> > Cosma
> >
> > 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > P.S.: your option - using a central way of doing this - is nothing I
> > > would fancy. That's where we are right now, and it doesn't help us
> > > with compatibility, really.
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Yes, that is the second thing - we'll need the component let add
> > > > hidden parameters to the form.
> > > >
> > > > Now, as the component is embedded in the form, why can it not just
> > > > render out the hidden element?
> > > >
> > > > This doesn't remind me of BASIC at all, but of component orientation -
> > > > everything that the component needs should be wrapped up in the
> > > > component itself, don't you think so?
> > > >
> > > > Where does the need of dynamically added client-side fields stem from
> > > > again, I don't see it right now?
> > > >
> > > > What needs to be added dynamically is the clear-script. And this
> > > > really is complicated, it touches the base of what dojo has to offer
> > > > with its event system. I don't know if we can replicate this without
> > > > having a dependency on dojo in our implementation, and I'm pretty sure
> > > > we don't want this. Does somebody know how
> > > >
> > > > dojo.event.bind()
> > > >
> > > > works under the covers, and if it's easy (meaning one or two
> > > > javascript functions) to replicate?
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > > On 7/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Martin,
> > > > >
> > > > > I am not sure that the problem is related only to links.. there can be
> > > > > other components that need an hidden form parameter.
> > > > >
> > > > > For example, JSCookMenu encodes the links in the html with some
> > > > > special prefix syntax, set this value in an hidden form named
> > > > > "jscook_action" on click, and intercept and decode it in the
> > > > > server-side decode logic.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think that the choice is between letting every component to add
> > > > > hidden fields dynamically on the DOM (dojo can help? its not that
> > > > > difficult anyway), or provide some sort of central service to do so,
> > > > > that's the current approach.
> > > > >
> > > > > First solution doesn't create dependency between components, but I
> > > > > don't like very much.. it reminds me of those BASIC programs that used
> > > > > variables without declaring them ;) On the other hand second solution
> > > > > does create dependency, and we must be careful to allow mixing
> > > > > component libraries.
> > > > >
> > > > > Any thoughts?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Cosma
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2006/7/26, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > That's the clear-problem, right?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For this problem, this is what I was thinking about:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > every link renders a javascript which adds a function as an onsubmit-handler
> > > > > >
> > > > > > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",myFunction() { clearLink and param} );
> > > > > >
> > > > > > so there would be no central clear script anymore, but each link would
> > > > > > clear itself, we'd loose the interdependency between link and form.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Martin
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 7/19/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Take a look at how the addHiddenCommandParameter is implemented in
> > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > public static void addHiddenCommandParameter(UIComponent form,
> > > > > > > String paramName)
> > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > Set set = (Set)form.getAttributes().get(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR);
> > > > > > > if (set == null)
> > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > set = new HashSet();
> > > > > > > form.getAttributes().put(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR, set);
> > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > set.add(paramName);
> > > > > > > }
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This has no dependency at all on the HtmlFormRendererBase, not even on
> > > > > > > UIForm. It simply add an attribute with a particular name on a generic
> > > > > > > UIComponent. Somewhere, something will read that attribute and create
> > > > > > > the hidden links.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We could simply:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1) Move this method and the HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR constant
> > > > > > > outside of the HtmlFormRendererBase, maybe in
> > > > > > > shared\util\_ComponentUtils.java
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2) Define the same constant and create a method that does the same
> > > > > > > thing in some Trinidad's util class
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 3) Have the Trinidad form renderer look at that attribute, and render
> > > > > > > the requested hidden fields just as HtmlFormRendererBase does.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This way, any Trinidad and MyFaces/Tomahawk component can find the
> > > > > > > parent form (without caring if it is a Trinidad or a MyFaces one) and
> > > > > > > ask for an hidden field with the respective utility method.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What do you think about this? The only ungly thing is having the same
> > > > > > > constant/method in two different places, but as long as we'll keep the
> > > > > > > two codebases separated I don't think that much can be done on this.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2006/7/19, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > Any ideas on this? :-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > Adam, technically it could be done, but I'm wondering where we can do that.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Having some centralized code in a renderer that inject the javascript
> > > > > > > > > don't bring us again on the same problem? (it would be
> > > > > > > > > renderer-dependent)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > In my hack, is the routine itself that manipulate the DOM, but I don't
> > > > > > > > > think this solution can be adopted at large scale.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > Modern browsers have no difficulty being told to add hidden fields
> > > > > > > > > > to the DOM on the fly; MyFaces could use this solution, which
> > > > > > > > > > Trinidad uses (at least in some parts of the code).
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
> > > > > > > > > > > solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
> > > > > > > > > > > javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
> > > > > > > > > > > (see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
> > > > > > > > > > > field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
> > > > > > > > > > > see two problem with this:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
> > > > > > > > > > > we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
> > > > > > > > > > > value-bounded exists?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> > > > > > > > > > > > purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> > > > > > > > > > > > itself as a submit handler?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > First attemp:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > > > > > > > > > > > > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > > > > > > > > > > > > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > implement it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > those non-standard services.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field
> > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a
> > > > > > > > > > > good
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the
> > > > > > > > > > > form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be
> > > > > > > > > > > dropped. The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do
> > > > > > > > > > > we want
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the
> > > > > > > > > > > js hack
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very
> > > > > > > > > > > similar to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For
> > > > > > > > > > > example,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method
> > > > > > > > > > > to use the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > integration is the
> > > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but
> > > > > > > > > > > presumibly also
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters,
> > > > > > > > > > > but with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading
> > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded
> > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be
> > > > > > > > > > > addressed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we
> > > > > > > > > > > have two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be
> > > > > > > > > > > required
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out
> > > > > > > > > > > in another
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict
> > > > > > > > > > > with yours if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the
> > > > > > > > > > > form searching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family -
> > > > > > > > > > > so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the
> > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF
> > > > > > > > > > > implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain
> > > > > > > > > > > component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components
> > > > > > > > > > > belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different
> > > > > > > > > > > renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about
> > > > > > > > > > > component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so
> > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied
> > > > > > > > > > > by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow
> > > > > > > > > > > subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get
> > > > > > > > > > > ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a
> > > > > > > > > > > different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread
> > > > > > > > > > > talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by
> > > > > > > > > > > Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family
> > > > > > > > > > > instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on
> > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a
> > > > > > > > > > > submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably
> > > > > > > > > > > this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a
> > > > > > > > > > > "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the
> > > > > > > > > > > component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > > the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the
> > > > > > > > > > > page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info
> > > > > > > > > > > about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest
> > > > > > > > > > > snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues
> > > > > > > > > > > with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it
> > > > > > > > > > > tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <
> > > > > > > > > > > matzew@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on
> > > > > > > > > > > the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF
> > > > > > > > > > > Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the
> > > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string
> > > > > > > > > > > <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both
> > > > > > > > > > > the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are
> > > > > > > > > > > actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would
> > > > > > > > > > > happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some
> > > > > > > > > > > discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more
> > > > > > > > > > > carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using
> > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you
> > > > > > > > > > > using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around
> > > > > > > > > > > commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed
> > > > > > > > > > > on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > >
> > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > Courses in English and German
> > > >
> > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
Hi Cosma,
I think it was developed this way cause the clear method needed to
know about all links anyways, so it was centrally done.
Yes, the component namespace standard is definitely a good idea. If we
find a clean solution to do this in MyFaces, I think that both
Trinidad and the RI will be happy to build on this as well.
regards,
Martin
On 7/27/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Using a central way is not my option, I only said that, being it the
> way things are currently implemented, there should be a clear
> advantage for switching now.
>
> Thinking about first solution, I think you're right. The thing I
> didn't like is the hack of adding hidden form fields to the DOM using
> javascript, but I agree on having component's renderer simply write
> out the <input type="hidden" .../> along the other html..
>
> The only thing I could add is some component "namespace" standard to
> avoid parameters collision.
>
> BTW, do you remember why the hidden fields form service was
> implemented, instead of going this way?
>
>
> Cosma
>
> 2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > P.S.: your option - using a central way of doing this - is nothing I
> > would fancy. That's where we are right now, and it doesn't help us
> > with compatibility, really.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Yes, that is the second thing - we'll need the component let add
> > > hidden parameters to the form.
> > >
> > > Now, as the component is embedded in the form, why can it not just
> > > render out the hidden element?
> > >
> > > This doesn't remind me of BASIC at all, but of component orientation -
> > > everything that the component needs should be wrapped up in the
> > > component itself, don't you think so?
> > >
> > > Where does the need of dynamically added client-side fields stem from
> > > again, I don't see it right now?
> > >
> > > What needs to be added dynamically is the clear-script. And this
> > > really is complicated, it touches the base of what dojo has to offer
> > > with its event system. I don't know if we can replicate this without
> > > having a dependency on dojo in our implementation, and I'm pretty sure
> > > we don't want this. Does somebody know how
> > >
> > > dojo.event.bind()
> > >
> > > works under the covers, and if it's easy (meaning one or two
> > > javascript functions) to replicate?
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > On 7/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Martin,
> > > >
> > > > I am not sure that the problem is related only to links.. there can be
> > > > other components that need an hidden form parameter.
> > > >
> > > > For example, JSCookMenu encodes the links in the html with some
> > > > special prefix syntax, set this value in an hidden form named
> > > > "jscook_action" on click, and intercept and decode it in the
> > > > server-side decode logic.
> > > >
> > > > I think that the choice is between letting every component to add
> > > > hidden fields dynamically on the DOM (dojo can help? its not that
> > > > difficult anyway), or provide some sort of central service to do so,
> > > > that's the current approach.
> > > >
> > > > First solution doesn't create dependency between components, but I
> > > > don't like very much.. it reminds me of those BASIC programs that used
> > > > variables without declaring them ;) On the other hand second solution
> > > > does create dependency, and we must be careful to allow mixing
> > > > component libraries.
> > > >
> > > > Any thoughts?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Cosma
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2006/7/26, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > That's the clear-problem, right?
> > > > >
> > > > > For this problem, this is what I was thinking about:
> > > > >
> > > > > every link renders a javascript which adds a function as an onsubmit-handler
> > > > >
> > > > > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",myFunction() { clearLink and param} );
> > > > >
> > > > > so there would be no central clear script anymore, but each link would
> > > > > clear itself, we'd loose the interdependency between link and form.
> > > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/19/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Take a look at how the addHiddenCommandParameter is implemented in
> > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > public static void addHiddenCommandParameter(UIComponent form,
> > > > > > String paramName)
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > Set set = (Set)form.getAttributes().get(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR);
> > > > > > if (set == null)
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > set = new HashSet();
> > > > > > form.getAttributes().put(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR, set);
> > > > > > }
> > > > > > set.add(paramName);
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This has no dependency at all on the HtmlFormRendererBase, not even on
> > > > > > UIForm. It simply add an attribute with a particular name on a generic
> > > > > > UIComponent. Somewhere, something will read that attribute and create
> > > > > > the hidden links.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We could simply:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1) Move this method and the HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR constant
> > > > > > outside of the HtmlFormRendererBase, maybe in
> > > > > > shared\util\_ComponentUtils.java
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2) Define the same constant and create a method that does the same
> > > > > > thing in some Trinidad's util class
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 3) Have the Trinidad form renderer look at that attribute, and render
> > > > > > the requested hidden fields just as HtmlFormRendererBase does.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This way, any Trinidad and MyFaces/Tomahawk component can find the
> > > > > > parent form (without caring if it is a Trinidad or a MyFaces one) and
> > > > > > ask for an hidden field with the respective utility method.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What do you think about this? The only ungly thing is having the same
> > > > > > constant/method in two different places, but as long as we'll keep the
> > > > > > two codebases separated I don't think that much can be done on this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2006/7/19, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > Any ideas on this? :-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > Adam, technically it could be done, but I'm wondering where we can do that.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Having some centralized code in a renderer that inject the javascript
> > > > > > > > don't bring us again on the same problem? (it would be
> > > > > > > > renderer-dependent)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In my hack, is the routine itself that manipulate the DOM, but I don't
> > > > > > > > think this solution can be adopted at large scale.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > Modern browsers have no difficulty being told to add hidden fields
> > > > > > > > > to the DOM on the fly; MyFaces could use this solution, which
> > > > > > > > > Trinidad uses (at least in some parts of the code).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
> > > > > > > > > > solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
> > > > > > > > > > javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
> > > > > > > > > > (see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
> > > > > > > > > > field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
> > > > > > > > > > see two problem with this:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
> > > > > > > > > > we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
> > > > > > > > > > value-bounded exists?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> > > > > > > > > > > purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> > > > > > > > > > > itself as a submit handler?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > First attemp:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > > > > > > > > > > > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > > > > > > > > > > > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > > > > > > > > > > > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > > > > > > > > > > > implement it.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > > > > > > > > > > > those non-standard services.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field
> > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a
> > > > > > > > > > good
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the
> > > > > > > > > > form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be
> > > > > > > > > > dropped. The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do
> > > > > > > > > > we want
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the
> > > > > > > > > > js hack
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very
> > > > > > > > > > similar to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For
> > > > > > > > > > example,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method
> > > > > > > > > > to use the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > integration is the
> > > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but
> > > > > > > > > > presumibly also
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters,
> > > > > > > > > > but with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading
> > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded
> > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be
> > > > > > > > > > addressed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we
> > > > > > > > > > have two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be
> > > > > > > > > > required
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out
> > > > > > > > > > in another
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict
> > > > > > > > > > with yours if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the
> > > > > > > > > > form searching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family -
> > > > > > > > > > so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the
> > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF
> > > > > > > > > > implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain
> > > > > > > > > > component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components
> > > > > > > > > > belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different
> > > > > > > > > > renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about
> > > > > > > > > > component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so
> > > > > > > > > > UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied
> > > > > > > > > > by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow
> > > > > > > > > > subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get
> > > > > > > > > > ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a
> > > > > > > > > > different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread
> > > > > > > > > > talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by
> > > > > > > > > > Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family
> > > > > > > > > > instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on
> > > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a
> > > > > > > > > > submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably
> > > > > > > > > > this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a
> > > > > > > > > > "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the
> > > > > > > > > > component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > > the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the
> > > > > > > > > > page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info
> > > > > > > > > > about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest
> > > > > > > > > > snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues
> > > > > > > > > > with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it
> > > > > > > > > > tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <
> > > > > > > > > > matzew@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on
> > > > > > > > > > the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF
> > > > > > > > > > Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the
> > > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string
> > > > > > > > > > <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both
> > > > > > > > > > the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are
> > > > > > > > > > actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would
> > > > > > > > > > happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some
> > > > > > > > > > discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more
> > > > > > > > > > carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using
> > > > > > > > > > MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you
> > > > > > > > > > using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around
> > > > > > > > > > commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed
> > > > > > > > > > on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > >
> > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > >
> > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>.
Using a central way is not my option, I only said that, being it the
way things are currently implemented, there should be a clear
advantage for switching now.
Thinking about first solution, I think you're right. The thing I
didn't like is the hack of adding hidden form fields to the DOM using
javascript, but I agree on having component's renderer simply write
out the <input type="hidden" .../> along the other html..
The only thing I could add is some component "namespace" standard to
avoid parameters collision.
BTW, do you remember why the hidden fields form service was
implemented, instead of going this way?
Cosma
2006/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> P.S.: your option - using a central way of doing this - is nothing I
> would fancy. That's where we are right now, and it doesn't help us
> with compatibility, really.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yes, that is the second thing - we'll need the component let add
> > hidden parameters to the form.
> >
> > Now, as the component is embedded in the form, why can it not just
> > render out the hidden element?
> >
> > This doesn't remind me of BASIC at all, but of component orientation -
> > everything that the component needs should be wrapped up in the
> > component itself, don't you think so?
> >
> > Where does the need of dynamically added client-side fields stem from
> > again, I don't see it right now?
> >
> > What needs to be added dynamically is the clear-script. And this
> > really is complicated, it touches the base of what dojo has to offer
> > with its event system. I don't know if we can replicate this without
> > having a dependency on dojo in our implementation, and I'm pretty sure
> > we don't want this. Does somebody know how
> >
> > dojo.event.bind()
> >
> > works under the covers, and if it's easy (meaning one or two
> > javascript functions) to replicate?
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 7/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Martin,
> > >
> > > I am not sure that the problem is related only to links.. there can be
> > > other components that need an hidden form parameter.
> > >
> > > For example, JSCookMenu encodes the links in the html with some
> > > special prefix syntax, set this value in an hidden form named
> > > "jscook_action" on click, and intercept and decode it in the
> > > server-side decode logic.
> > >
> > > I think that the choice is between letting every component to add
> > > hidden fields dynamically on the DOM (dojo can help? its not that
> > > difficult anyway), or provide some sort of central service to do so,
> > > that's the current approach.
> > >
> > > First solution doesn't create dependency between components, but I
> > > don't like very much.. it reminds me of those BASIC programs that used
> > > variables without declaring them ;) On the other hand second solution
> > > does create dependency, and we must be careful to allow mixing
> > > component libraries.
> > >
> > > Any thoughts?
> > >
> > >
> > > Cosma
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2006/7/26, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > That's the clear-problem, right?
> > > >
> > > > For this problem, this is what I was thinking about:
> > > >
> > > > every link renders a javascript which adds a function as an onsubmit-handler
> > > >
> > > > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",myFunction() { clearLink and param} );
> > > >
> > > > so there would be no central clear script anymore, but each link would
> > > > clear itself, we'd loose the interdependency between link and form.
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > > On 7/19/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Take a look at how the addHiddenCommandParameter is implemented in
> > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase:
> > > > >
> > > > > public static void addHiddenCommandParameter(UIComponent form,
> > > > > String paramName)
> > > > > {
> > > > > Set set = (Set)form.getAttributes().get(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR);
> > > > > if (set == null)
> > > > > {
> > > > > set = new HashSet();
> > > > > form.getAttributes().put(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR, set);
> > > > > }
> > > > > set.add(paramName);
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > This has no dependency at all on the HtmlFormRendererBase, not even on
> > > > > UIForm. It simply add an attribute with a particular name on a generic
> > > > > UIComponent. Somewhere, something will read that attribute and create
> > > > > the hidden links.
> > > > >
> > > > > We could simply:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1) Move this method and the HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR constant
> > > > > outside of the HtmlFormRendererBase, maybe in
> > > > > shared\util\_ComponentUtils.java
> > > > >
> > > > > 2) Define the same constant and create a method that does the same
> > > > > thing in some Trinidad's util class
> > > > >
> > > > > 3) Have the Trinidad form renderer look at that attribute, and render
> > > > > the requested hidden fields just as HtmlFormRendererBase does.
> > > > >
> > > > > This way, any Trinidad and MyFaces/Tomahawk component can find the
> > > > > parent form (without caring if it is a Trinidad or a MyFaces one) and
> > > > > ask for an hidden field with the respective utility method.
> > > > >
> > > > > What do you think about this? The only ungly thing is having the same
> > > > > constant/method in two different places, but as long as we'll keep the
> > > > > two codebases separated I don't think that much can be done on this.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Cosma
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2006/7/19, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > Any ideas on this? :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > Adam, technically it could be done, but I'm wondering where we can do that.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Having some centralized code in a renderer that inject the javascript
> > > > > > > don't bring us again on the same problem? (it would be
> > > > > > > renderer-dependent)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In my hack, is the routine itself that manipulate the DOM, but I don't
> > > > > > > think this solution can be adopted at large scale.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > Modern browsers have no difficulty being told to add hidden fields
> > > > > > > > to the DOM on the fly; MyFaces could use this solution, which
> > > > > > > > Trinidad uses (at least in some parts of the code).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
> > > > > > > > > solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
> > > > > > > > > javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
> > > > > > > > > (see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
> > > > > > > > > field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
> > > > > > > > > see two problem with this:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
> > > > > > > > > we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
> > > > > > > > > value-bounded exists?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> > > > > > > > > > purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> > > > > > > > > > itself as a submit handler?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > First attemp:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > > > > > > > > > > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > > > > > > > > > > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > > > > > > > > > > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > > > > > > > > > > implement it.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > > > > > > > > > > those non-standard services.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field
> > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a
> > > > > > > > > good
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the
> > > > > > > > > form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be
> > > > > > > > > dropped. The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do
> > > > > > > > > we want
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the
> > > > > > > > > js hack
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very
> > > > > > > > > similar to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For
> > > > > > > > > example,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method
> > > > > > > > > to use the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > integration is the
> > > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but
> > > > > > > > > presumibly also
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters,
> > > > > > > > > but with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded
> > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be
> > > > > > > > > addressed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we
> > > > > > > > > have two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be
> > > > > > > > > required
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out
> > > > > > > > > in another
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict
> > > > > > > > > with yours if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the
> > > > > > > > > form searching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family -
> > > > > > > > > so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the
> > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF
> > > > > > > > > implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain
> > > > > > > > > component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components
> > > > > > > > > belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different
> > > > > > > > > renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about
> > > > > > > > > component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so
> > > > > > > > > UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied
> > > > > > > > > by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow
> > > > > > > > > subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get
> > > > > > > > > ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a
> > > > > > > > > different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread
> > > > > > > > > talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by
> > > > > > > > > Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family
> > > > > > > > > instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on
> > > > > > > > > <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a
> > > > > > > > > submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably
> > > > > > > > > this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a
> > > > > > > > > "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the
> > > > > > > > > component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component,
> > > > > > > > > the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the
> > > > > > > > > page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info
> > > > > > > > > about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest
> > > > > > > > > snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues
> > > > > > > > > with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it
> > > > > > > > > tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <
> > > > > > > > > matzew@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on
> > > > > > > > > the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF
> > > > > > > > > Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the
> > > > > > > > > _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string
> > > > > > > > > <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both
> > > > > > > > > the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are
> > > > > > > > > actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would
> > > > > > > > > happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some
> > > > > > > > > discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more
> > > > > > > > > carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using
> > > > > > > > > MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you
> > > > > > > > > using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around
> > > > > > > > > commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed
> > > > > > > > > on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > >
> > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > Courses in English and German
> > > >
> > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
P.S.: your option - using a central way of doing this - is nothing I
would fancy. That's where we are right now, and it doesn't help us
with compatibility, really.
regards,
Martin
On 7/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, that is the second thing - we'll need the component let add
> hidden parameters to the form.
>
> Now, as the component is embedded in the form, why can it not just
> render out the hidden element?
>
> This doesn't remind me of BASIC at all, but of component orientation -
> everything that the component needs should be wrapped up in the
> component itself, don't you think so?
>
> Where does the need of dynamically added client-side fields stem from
> again, I don't see it right now?
>
> What needs to be added dynamically is the clear-script. And this
> really is complicated, it touches the base of what dojo has to offer
> with its event system. I don't know if we can replicate this without
> having a dependency on dojo in our implementation, and I'm pretty sure
> we don't want this. Does somebody know how
>
> dojo.event.bind()
>
> works under the covers, and if it's easy (meaning one or two
> javascript functions) to replicate?
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 7/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Martin,
> >
> > I am not sure that the problem is related only to links.. there can be
> > other components that need an hidden form parameter.
> >
> > For example, JSCookMenu encodes the links in the html with some
> > special prefix syntax, set this value in an hidden form named
> > "jscook_action" on click, and intercept and decode it in the
> > server-side decode logic.
> >
> > I think that the choice is between letting every component to add
> > hidden fields dynamically on the DOM (dojo can help? its not that
> > difficult anyway), or provide some sort of central service to do so,
> > that's the current approach.
> >
> > First solution doesn't create dependency between components, but I
> > don't like very much.. it reminds me of those BASIC programs that used
> > variables without declaring them ;) On the other hand second solution
> > does create dependency, and we must be careful to allow mixing
> > component libraries.
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> >
> > Cosma
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2006/7/26, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > That's the clear-problem, right?
> > >
> > > For this problem, this is what I was thinking about:
> > >
> > > every link renders a javascript which adds a function as an onsubmit-handler
> > >
> > > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",myFunction() { clearLink and param} );
> > >
> > > so there would be no central clear script anymore, but each link would
> > > clear itself, we'd loose the interdependency between link and form.
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > On 7/19/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Take a look at how the addHiddenCommandParameter is implemented in
> > > > HtmlFormRendererBase:
> > > >
> > > > public static void addHiddenCommandParameter(UIComponent form,
> > > > String paramName)
> > > > {
> > > > Set set = (Set)form.getAttributes().get(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR);
> > > > if (set == null)
> > > > {
> > > > set = new HashSet();
> > > > form.getAttributes().put(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR, set);
> > > > }
> > > > set.add(paramName);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > This has no dependency at all on the HtmlFormRendererBase, not even on
> > > > UIForm. It simply add an attribute with a particular name on a generic
> > > > UIComponent. Somewhere, something will read that attribute and create
> > > > the hidden links.
> > > >
> > > > We could simply:
> > > >
> > > > 1) Move this method and the HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR constant
> > > > outside of the HtmlFormRendererBase, maybe in
> > > > shared\util\_ComponentUtils.java
> > > >
> > > > 2) Define the same constant and create a method that does the same
> > > > thing in some Trinidad's util class
> > > >
> > > > 3) Have the Trinidad form renderer look at that attribute, and render
> > > > the requested hidden fields just as HtmlFormRendererBase does.
> > > >
> > > > This way, any Trinidad and MyFaces/Tomahawk component can find the
> > > > parent form (without caring if it is a Trinidad or a MyFaces one) and
> > > > ask for an hidden field with the respective utility method.
> > > >
> > > > What do you think about this? The only ungly thing is having the same
> > > > constant/method in two different places, but as long as we'll keep the
> > > > two codebases separated I don't think that much can be done on this.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Cosma
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2006/7/19, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > Any ideas on this? :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Cosma
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > Adam, technically it could be done, but I'm wondering where we can do that.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Having some centralized code in a renderer that inject the javascript
> > > > > > don't bring us again on the same problem? (it would be
> > > > > > renderer-dependent)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In my hack, is the routine itself that manipulate the DOM, but I don't
> > > > > > think this solution can be adopted at large scale.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2006/7/17, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > Modern browsers have no difficulty being told to add hidden fields
> > > > > > > to the DOM on the fly; MyFaces could use this solution, which
> > > > > > > Trinidad uses (at least in some parts of the code).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
> > > > > > > > solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
> > > > > > > > javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
> > > > > > > > (see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
> > > > > > > > field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
> > > > > > > > see two problem with this:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
> > > > > > > > we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
> > > > > > > > value-bounded exists?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> > > > > > > > > and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> > > > > > > > > purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> > > > > > > > > itself as a submit handler?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > First attemp:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > > > > > > > > > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > > > > > > > > > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > > > > > > > > > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > > > > > > > > > implement it.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > > > > > > > > > those non-standard services.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field
> > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a
> > > > > > > > good
> > > > > > > > > > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the
> > > > > > > > form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be
> > > > > > > > dropped. The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do
> > > > > > > > we want
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the
> > > > > > > > js hack
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very
> > > > > > > > similar to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For
> > > > > > > > example,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method
> > > > > > > > to use the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > integration is the
> > > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but
> > > > > > > > presumibly also
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters,
> > > > > > > > but with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded
> > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be
> > > > > > > > addressed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we
> > > > > > > > have two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be
> > > > > > > > required
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out
> > > > > > > > in another
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict
> > > > > > > > with yours if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the
> > > > > > > > form searching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family -
> > > > > > > > so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the
> > > > > > > > <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF
> > > > > > > > implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain
> > > > > > > > component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components
> > > > > > > > belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different
> > > > > > > > renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about
> > > > > > > > component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so
> > > > > > > > UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied
> > > > > > > > by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow
> > > > > > > > subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get
> > > > > > > > ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a
> > > > > > > > different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread
> > > > > > > > talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by
> > > > > > > > Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family
> > > > > > > > instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component,
> > > > > > > > a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on
> > > > > > > > <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a
> > > > > > > > submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably
> > > > > > > > this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a
> > > > > > > > "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the
> > > > > > > > component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component,
> > > > > > > > the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the
> > > > > > > > page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info
> > > > > > > > about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest
> > > > > > > > snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues
> > > > > > > > with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it
> > > > > > > > tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <
> > > > > > > > matzew@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on
> > > > > > > > the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF
> > > > > > > > Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces
> > > > > > > > javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the
> > > > > > > > _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string
> > > > > > > > <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both
> > > > > > > > the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are
> > > > > > > > actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would
> > > > > > > > happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some
> > > > > > > > discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more
> > > > > > > > carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using
> > > > > > > > MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you
> > > > > > > > using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around
> > > > > > > > commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed
> > > > > > > > on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
Yes, that is the second thing - we'll need the component let add
hidden parameters to the form.
Now, as the component is embedded in the form, why can it not just
render out the hidden element?
This doesn't remind me of BASIC at all, but of component orientation -
everything that the component needs should be wrapped up in the
component itself, don't you think so?
Where does the need of dynamically added client-side fields stem from
again, I don't see it right now?
What needs to be added dynamically is the clear-script. And this
really is complicated, it touches the base of what dojo has to offer
with its event system. I don't know if we can replicate this without
having a dependency on dojo in our implementation, and I'm pretty sure
we don't want this. Does somebody know how
dojo.event.bind()
works under the covers, and if it's easy (meaning one or two
javascript functions) to replicate?
regards,
Martin
On 7/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Martin,
>
> I am not sure that the problem is related only to links.. there can be
> other components that need an hidden form parameter.
>
> For example, JSCookMenu encodes the links in the html with some
> special prefix syntax, set this value in an hidden form named
> "jscook_action" on click, and intercept and decode it in the
> server-side decode logic.
>
> I think that the choice is between letting every component to add
> hidden fields dynamically on the DOM (dojo can help? its not that
> difficult anyway), or provide some sort of central service to do so,
> that's the current approach.
>
> First solution doesn't create dependency between components, but I
> don't like very much.. it reminds me of those BASIC programs that used
> variables without declaring them ;) On the other hand second solution
> does create dependency, and we must be careful to allow mixing
> component libraries.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
>
> Cosma
>
>
>
>
>
> 2006/7/26, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > That's the clear-problem, right?
> >
> > For this problem, this is what I was thinking about:
> >
> > every link renders a javascript which adds a function as an onsubmit-handler
> >
> > dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",myFunction() { clearLink and param} );
> >
> > so there would be no central clear script anymore, but each link would
> > clear itself, we'd loose the interdependency between link and form.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 7/19/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Take a look at how the addHiddenCommandParameter is implemented in
> > > HtmlFormRendererBase:
> > >
> > > public static void addHiddenCommandParameter(UIComponent form,
> > > String paramName)
> > > {
> > > Set set = (Set)form.getAttributes().get(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR);
> > > if (set == null)
> > > {
> > > set = new HashSet();
> > > form.getAttributes().put(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR, set);
> > > }
> > > set.add(paramName);
> > > }
> > >
> > > This has no dependency at all on the HtmlFormRendererBase, not even on
> > > UIForm. It simply add an attribute with a particular name on a generic
> > > UIComponent. Somewhere, something will read that attribute and create
> > > the hidden links.
> > >
> > > We could simply:
> > >
> > > 1) Move this method and the HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR constant
> > > outside of the HtmlFormRendererBase, maybe in
> > > shared\util\_ComponentUtils.java
> > >
> > > 2) Define the same constant and create a method that does the same
> > > thing in some Trinidad's util class
> > >
> > > 3) Have the Trinidad form renderer look at that attribute, and render
> > > the requested hidden fields just as HtmlFormRendererBase does.
> > >
> > > This way, any Trinidad and MyFaces/Tomahawk component can find the
> > > parent form (without caring if it is a Trinidad or a MyFaces one) and
> > > ask for an hidden field with the respective utility method.
> > >
> > > What do you think about this? The only ungly thing is having the same
> > > constant/method in two different places, but as long as we'll keep the
> > > two codebases separated I don't think that much can be done on this.
> > >
> > >
> > > Cosma
> > >
> > >
> > > 2006/7/19, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > Any ideas on this? :-)
> > > >
> > > > Cosma
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > Adam, technically it could be done, but I'm wondering where we can do that.
> > > > >
> > > > > Having some centralized code in a renderer that inject the javascript
> > > > > don't bring us again on the same problem? (it would be
> > > > > renderer-dependent)
> > > > >
> > > > > In my hack, is the routine itself that manipulate the DOM, but I don't
> > > > > think this solution can be adopted at large scale.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cosma
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2006/7/17, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > Modern browsers have no difficulty being told to add hidden fields
> > > > > > to the DOM on the fly; MyFaces could use this solution, which
> > > > > > Trinidad uses (at least in some parts of the code).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
> > > > > > > solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
> > > > > > > javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
> > > > > > > (see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
> > > > > > > field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
> > > > > > > see two problem with this:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
> > > > > > > we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
> > > > > > > value-bounded exists?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> > > > > > > > and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> > > > > > > > purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> > > > > > > > itself as a submit handler?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > First attemp:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > > > > > > > > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > > > > > > > > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > > > > > > > > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > > > > > > > > implement it.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > > > > > > > > those non-standard services.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a
> > > > > > > good
> > > > > > > > > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the
> > > > > > > form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be
> > > > > > > dropped. The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do
> > > > > > > we want
> > > > > > > > > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the
> > > > > > > js hack
> > > > > > > > > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very
> > > > > > > similar to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For
> > > > > > > example,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method
> > > > > > > to use the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > integration is the
> > > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but
> > > > > > > presumibly also
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters,
> > > > > > > but with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded
> > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be
> > > > > > > addressed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we
> > > > > > > have two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be
> > > > > > > required
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out
> > > > > > > in another
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict
> > > > > > > with yours if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the
> > > > > > > form searching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family -
> > > > > > > so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the
> > > > > > > <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces
> > > > > > > renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF
> > > > > > > implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain
> > > > > > > component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components
> > > > > > > belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different
> > > > > > > renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about
> > > > > > > component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so
> > > > > > > UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied
> > > > > > > by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow
> > > > > > > subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get
> > > > > > > ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a
> > > > > > > different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread
> > > > > > > talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by
> > > > > > > Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family
> > > > > > > instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component,
> > > > > > > a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on
> > > > > > > <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a
> > > > > > > submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably
> > > > > > > this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a
> > > > > > > "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the
> > > > > > > component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component,
> > > > > > > the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the
> > > > > > > page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info
> > > > > > > about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest
> > > > > > > snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues
> > > > > > > with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it
> > > > > > > tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <
> > > > > > > matzew@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on
> > > > > > > the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF
> > > > > > > Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces
> > > > > > > javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the
> > > > > > > _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string
> > > > > > > <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both
> > > > > > > the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are
> > > > > > > actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would
> > > > > > > happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some
> > > > > > > discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more
> > > > > > > carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using
> > > > > > > MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you
> > > > > > > using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around
> > > > > > > commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed
> > > > > > > on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>.
Martin,
I am not sure that the problem is related only to links.. there can be
other components that need an hidden form parameter.
For example, JSCookMenu encodes the links in the html with some
special prefix syntax, set this value in an hidden form named
"jscook_action" on click, and intercept and decode it in the
server-side decode logic.
I think that the choice is between letting every component to add
hidden fields dynamically on the DOM (dojo can help? its not that
difficult anyway), or provide some sort of central service to do so,
that's the current approach.
First solution doesn't create dependency between components, but I
don't like very much.. it reminds me of those BASIC programs that used
variables without declaring them ;) On the other hand second solution
does create dependency, and we must be careful to allow mixing
component libraries.
Any thoughts?
Cosma
2006/7/26, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> That's the clear-problem, right?
>
> For this problem, this is what I was thinking about:
>
> every link renders a javascript which adds a function as an onsubmit-handler
>
> dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",myFunction() { clearLink and param} );
>
> so there would be no central clear script anymore, but each link would
> clear itself, we'd loose the interdependency between link and form.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 7/19/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Take a look at how the addHiddenCommandParameter is implemented in
> > HtmlFormRendererBase:
> >
> > public static void addHiddenCommandParameter(UIComponent form,
> > String paramName)
> > {
> > Set set = (Set)form.getAttributes().get(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR);
> > if (set == null)
> > {
> > set = new HashSet();
> > form.getAttributes().put(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR, set);
> > }
> > set.add(paramName);
> > }
> >
> > This has no dependency at all on the HtmlFormRendererBase, not even on
> > UIForm. It simply add an attribute with a particular name on a generic
> > UIComponent. Somewhere, something will read that attribute and create
> > the hidden links.
> >
> > We could simply:
> >
> > 1) Move this method and the HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR constant
> > outside of the HtmlFormRendererBase, maybe in
> > shared\util\_ComponentUtils.java
> >
> > 2) Define the same constant and create a method that does the same
> > thing in some Trinidad's util class
> >
> > 3) Have the Trinidad form renderer look at that attribute, and render
> > the requested hidden fields just as HtmlFormRendererBase does.
> >
> > This way, any Trinidad and MyFaces/Tomahawk component can find the
> > parent form (without caring if it is a Trinidad or a MyFaces one) and
> > ask for an hidden field with the respective utility method.
> >
> > What do you think about this? The only ungly thing is having the same
> > constant/method in two different places, but as long as we'll keep the
> > two codebases separated I don't think that much can be done on this.
> >
> >
> > Cosma
> >
> >
> > 2006/7/19, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > Any ideas on this? :-)
> > >
> > > Cosma
> > >
> > >
> > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > Adam, technically it could be done, but I'm wondering where we can do that.
> > > >
> > > > Having some centralized code in a renderer that inject the javascript
> > > > don't bring us again on the same problem? (it would be
> > > > renderer-dependent)
> > > >
> > > > In my hack, is the routine itself that manipulate the DOM, but I don't
> > > > think this solution can be adopted at large scale.
> > > >
> > > > Cosma
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2006/7/17, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > Modern browsers have no difficulty being told to add hidden fields
> > > > > to the DOM on the fly; MyFaces could use this solution, which
> > > > > Trinidad uses (at least in some parts of the code).
> > > > >
> > > > > -- Adam
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
> > > > > > solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
> > > > > > javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
> > > > > > (see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
> > > > > > field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
> > > > > > see two problem with this:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
> > > > > > we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
> > > > > > value-bounded exists?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> > > > > > > and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> > > > > > > purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> > > > > > > itself as a submit handler?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > First attemp:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > > > > > > > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > > > > > > > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > > > > > > > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > > > > > > > implement it.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > > > > > > > those non-standard services.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a
> > > > > > good
> > > > > > > > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the
> > > > > > form
> > > > > > > > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be
> > > > > > dropped. The
> > > > > > > > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do
> > > > > > we want
> > > > > > > > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the
> > > > > > js hack
> > > > > > > > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very
> > > > > > similar to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For
> > > > > > example,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method
> > > > > > to use the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > integration is the
> > > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but
> > > > > > presumibly also
> > > > > > > > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters,
> > > > > > but with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be
> > > > > > addressed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we
> > > > > > have two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be
> > > > > > required
> > > > > > > > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out
> > > > > > in another
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict
> > > > > > with yours if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the
> > > > > > form searching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family -
> > > > > > so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the
> > > > > > <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces
> > > > > > renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF
> > > > > > implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain
> > > > > > component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components
> > > > > > belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different
> > > > > > renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about
> > > > > > component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so
> > > > > > UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied
> > > > > > by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow
> > > > > > subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get
> > > > > > ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a
> > > > > > different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread
> > > > > > talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by
> > > > > > Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family
> > > > > > instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component,
> > > > > > a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on
> > > > > > <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a
> > > > > > submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably
> > > > > > this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a
> > > > > > "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the
> > > > > > component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component,
> > > > > > the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the
> > > > > > page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info
> > > > > > about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest
> > > > > > snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues
> > > > > > with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it
> > > > > > tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <
> > > > > > matzew@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on
> > > > > > the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF
> > > > > > Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces
> > > > > > javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the
> > > > > > _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string
> > > > > > <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both
> > > > > > the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are
> > > > > > actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would
> > > > > > happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some
> > > > > > discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more
> > > > > > carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using
> > > > > > MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you
> > > > > > using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around
> > > > > > commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed
> > > > > > on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
That's the clear-problem, right?
For this problem, this is what I was thinking about:
every link renders a javascript which adds a function as an onsubmit-handler
dojo.event.bind(form,"submit",myFunction() { clearLink and param} );
so there would be no central clear script anymore, but each link would
clear itself, we'd loose the interdependency between link and form.
regards,
Martin
On 7/19/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Take a look at how the addHiddenCommandParameter is implemented in
> HtmlFormRendererBase:
>
> public static void addHiddenCommandParameter(UIComponent form,
> String paramName)
> {
> Set set = (Set)form.getAttributes().get(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR);
> if (set == null)
> {
> set = new HashSet();
> form.getAttributes().put(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR, set);
> }
> set.add(paramName);
> }
>
> This has no dependency at all on the HtmlFormRendererBase, not even on
> UIForm. It simply add an attribute with a particular name on a generic
> UIComponent. Somewhere, something will read that attribute and create
> the hidden links.
>
> We could simply:
>
> 1) Move this method and the HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR constant
> outside of the HtmlFormRendererBase, maybe in
> shared\util\_ComponentUtils.java
>
> 2) Define the same constant and create a method that does the same
> thing in some Trinidad's util class
>
> 3) Have the Trinidad form renderer look at that attribute, and render
> the requested hidden fields just as HtmlFormRendererBase does.
>
> This way, any Trinidad and MyFaces/Tomahawk component can find the
> parent form (without caring if it is a Trinidad or a MyFaces one) and
> ask for an hidden field with the respective utility method.
>
> What do you think about this? The only ungly thing is having the same
> constant/method in two different places, but as long as we'll keep the
> two codebases separated I don't think that much can be done on this.
>
>
> Cosma
>
>
> 2006/7/19, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > Any ideas on this? :-)
> >
> > Cosma
> >
> >
> > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > Adam, technically it could be done, but I'm wondering where we can do that.
> > >
> > > Having some centralized code in a renderer that inject the javascript
> > > don't bring us again on the same problem? (it would be
> > > renderer-dependent)
> > >
> > > In my hack, is the routine itself that manipulate the DOM, but I don't
> > > think this solution can be adopted at large scale.
> > >
> > > Cosma
> > >
> > >
> > > 2006/7/17, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
> > > > Modern browsers have no difficulty being told to add hidden fields
> > > > to the DOM on the fly; MyFaces could use this solution, which
> > > > Trinidad uses (at least in some parts of the code).
> > > >
> > > > -- Adam
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
> > > > > solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
> > > > > javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
> > > > > (see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
> > > > >
> > > > > Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
> > > > > field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
> > > > > see two problem with this:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
> > > > > we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
> > > > >
> > > > > 2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
> > > > > value-bounded exists?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Cosma
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> > > > > > and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> > > > > > purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> > > > > > itself as a submit handler?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Martin
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > First attemp:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > > > > > > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > > > > > > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > > > > > > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > > > > > > implement it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > > > > > > those non-standard services.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field
> > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a
> > > > > good
> > > > > > > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the
> > > > > form
> > > > > > > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be
> > > > > dropped. The
> > > > > > > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do
> > > > > we want
> > > > > > > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the
> > > > > js hack
> > > > > > > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very
> > > > > similar to
> > > > > > > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For
> > > > > example,
> > > > > > > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method
> > > > > to use the
> > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > > > > > > integration is the
> > > > > HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but
> > > > > presumibly also
> > > > > > > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters,
> > > > > but with
> > > > > > > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded
> > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be
> > > > > addressed
> > > > > > > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we
> > > > > have two
> > > > > > > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be
> > > > > required
> > > > > > > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out
> > > > > in another
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict
> > > > > with yours if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the
> > > > > form searching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family -
> > > > > so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the
> > > > > <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces
> > > > > renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF
> > > > > implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain
> > > > > component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components
> > > > > belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different
> > > > > renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about
> > > > > component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so
> > > > > UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied
> > > > > by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow
> > > > > subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get
> > > > > ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a
> > > > > different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread
> > > > > talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by
> > > > > Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family
> > > > > instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component,
> > > > > a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on
> > > > > <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a
> > > > > submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably
> > > > > this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a
> > > > > "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the
> > > > > component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component,
> > > > > the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the
> > > > > page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > > cosmacol@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info
> > > > > about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest
> > > > > snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues
> > > > > with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it
> > > > > tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <
> > > > > matzew@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on
> > > > > the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF
> > > > > Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink>
> > > > > components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces
> > > > > javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the
> > > > > _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string
> > > > > <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both
> > > > > the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are
> > > > > actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would
> > > > > happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some
> > > > > discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more
> > > > > carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using
> > > > > MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you
> > > > > using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around
> > > > > commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed
> > > > > on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>.
Take a look at how the addHiddenCommandParameter is implemented in
HtmlFormRendererBase:
public static void addHiddenCommandParameter(UIComponent form,
String paramName)
{
Set set = (Set)form.getAttributes().get(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR);
if (set == null)
{
set = new HashSet();
form.getAttributes().put(HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR, set);
}
set.add(paramName);
}
This has no dependency at all on the HtmlFormRendererBase, not even on
UIForm. It simply add an attribute with a particular name on a generic
UIComponent. Somewhere, something will read that attribute and create
the hidden links.
We could simply:
1) Move this method and the HIDDEN_COMMAND_INPUTS_SET_ATTR constant
outside of the HtmlFormRendererBase, maybe in
shared\util\_ComponentUtils.java
2) Define the same constant and create a method that does the same
thing in some Trinidad's util class
3) Have the Trinidad form renderer look at that attribute, and render
the requested hidden fields just as HtmlFormRendererBase does.
This way, any Trinidad and MyFaces/Tomahawk component can find the
parent form (without caring if it is a Trinidad or a MyFaces one) and
ask for an hidden field with the respective utility method.
What do you think about this? The only ungly thing is having the same
constant/method in two different places, but as long as we'll keep the
two codebases separated I don't think that much can be done on this.
Cosma
2006/7/19, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> Any ideas on this? :-)
>
> Cosma
>
>
> 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > Adam, technically it could be done, but I'm wondering where we can do that.
> >
> > Having some centralized code in a renderer that inject the javascript
> > don't bring us again on the same problem? (it would be
> > renderer-dependent)
> >
> > In my hack, is the routine itself that manipulate the DOM, but I don't
> > think this solution can be adopted at large scale.
> >
> > Cosma
> >
> >
> > 2006/7/17, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
> > > Modern browsers have no difficulty being told to add hidden fields
> > > to the DOM on the fly; MyFaces could use this solution, which
> > > Trinidad uses (at least in some parts of the code).
> > >
> > > -- Adam
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
> > > > solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
> > > > javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
> > > > (see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
> > > >
> > > > Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
> > > > field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
> > > > see two problem with this:
> > > >
> > > > 1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
> > > > we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
> > > >
> > > > 2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
> > > > value-bounded exists?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Cosma
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> > > > > and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> > > > > purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> > > > > itself as a submit handler?
> > > > >
> > > > > Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
> > > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > First attemp:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > > > > > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > > > > > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > > > > > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > > > > > implement it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > > > > > those non-standard services.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field
> > > > in
> > > > > > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a
> > > > good
> > > > > > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the
> > > > form
> > > > > > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be
> > > > dropped. The
> > > > > > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do
> > > > we want
> > > > > > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the
> > > > js hack
> > > > > > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very
> > > > similar to
> > > > > > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For
> > > > example,
> > > > > > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method
> > > > to use the
> > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > > > > > integration is the
> > > > HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but
> > > > presumibly also
> > > > > > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters,
> > > > but with
> > > > > > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading
> > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded
> > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be
> > > > addressed
> > > > > > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we
> > > > have two
> > > > > > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be
> > > > required
> > > > > > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out
> > > > in another
> > > > > > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict
> > > > with yours if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the
> > > > form searching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family -
> > > > so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the
> > > > <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces
> > > > renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF
> > > > implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain
> > > > component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components
> > > > belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different
> > > > renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about
> > > > component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so
> > > > UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied
> > > > by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow
> > > > subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get
> > > > ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a
> > > > different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread
> > > > talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by
> > > > Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family
> > > > instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > cosmacol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component,
> > > > a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on
> > > > <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a
> > > > submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably
> > > > this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a
> > > > "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the
> > > > component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component,
> > > > the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the
> > > > page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > > cosmacol@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info
> > > > about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest
> > > > snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues
> > > > with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it
> > > > tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <
> > > > matzew@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on
> > > > the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF
> > > > Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink>
> > > > components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces
> > > > javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the
> > > > _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string
> > > > <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both
> > > > the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are
> > > > actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would
> > > > happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some
> > > > discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more
> > > > carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using
> > > > MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you
> > > > using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around
> > > > commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed
> > > > on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > >
> > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > >
> > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>.
Any ideas on this? :-)
Cosma
2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> Adam, technically it could be done, but I'm wondering where we can do that.
>
> Having some centralized code in a renderer that inject the javascript
> don't bring us again on the same problem? (it would be
> renderer-dependent)
>
> In my hack, is the routine itself that manipulate the DOM, but I don't
> think this solution can be adopted at large scale.
>
> Cosma
>
>
> 2006/7/17, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
> > Modern browsers have no difficulty being told to add hidden fields
> > to the DOM on the fly; MyFaces could use this solution, which
> > Trinidad uses (at least in some parts of the code).
> >
> > -- Adam
> >
> >
> > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
> > > solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
> > > javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
> > > (see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
> > >
> > > Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
> > > field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
> > > see two problem with this:
> > >
> > > 1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
> > > we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
> > >
> > > 2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
> > > value-bounded exists?
> > >
> > >
> > > Cosma
> > >
> > >
> > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> > > > and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> > > > purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> > > > itself as a submit handler?
> > > >
> > > > Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > First attemp:
> > > > >
> > > > > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > > > > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > > > > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > > > > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > > > > implement it.
> > > > >
> > > > > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > > > > those non-standard services.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cosma
> > > > >
> > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Martin
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field
> > > in
> > > > > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a
> > > good
> > > > > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the
> > > form
> > > > > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be
> > > dropped. The
> > > > > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do
> > > we want
> > > > > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the
> > > js hack
> > > > > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very
> > > similar to
> > > > > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For
> > > example,
> > > > > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method
> > > to use the
> > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > > > > integration is the
> > > HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but
> > > presumibly also
> > > > > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters,
> > > but with
> > > > > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading
> > > to
> > > > > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded
> > > this
> > > > > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be
> > > addressed
> > > > > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we
> > > have two
> > > > > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be
> > > required
> > > > > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out
> > > in another
> > > > > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict
> > > with yours if
> > > > > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <
> > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the
> > > form searching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family -
> > > so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the
> > > <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces
> > > renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF
> > > implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain
> > > component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components
> > > belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different
> > > renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about
> > > component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so
> > > UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied
> > > by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow
> > > subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get
> > > ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a
> > > different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread
> > > talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by
> > > Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family
> > > instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > cosmacol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component,
> > > a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on
> > > <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a
> > > submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably
> > > this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a
> > > "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the
> > > component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component,
> > > the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink>
> > > recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the
> > > page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > > cosmacol@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info
> > > about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest
> > > snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues
> > > with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it
> > > tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <
> > > matzew@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on
> > > the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF
> > > Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink>
> > > components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces
> > > javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the
> > > _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string
> > > <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both
> > > the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are
> > > actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would
> > > happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some
> > > discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more
> > > carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using
> > > MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you
> > > using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around
> > > commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed
> > > on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > >
> > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > Courses in English and German
> > > >
> > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>.
Adam, technically it could be done, but I'm wondering where we can do that.
Having some centralized code in a renderer that inject the javascript
don't bring us again on the same problem? (it would be
renderer-dependent)
In my hack, is the routine itself that manipulate the DOM, but I don't
think this solution can be adopted at large scale.
Cosma
2006/7/17, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
> Modern browsers have no difficulty being told to add hidden fields
> to the DOM on the fly; MyFaces could use this solution, which
> Trinidad uses (at least in some parts of the code).
>
> -- Adam
>
>
> On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
> > solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
> > javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
> > (see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
> >
> > Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
> > field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
> > see two problem with this:
> >
> > 1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
> > we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
> >
> > 2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
> > value-bounded exists?
> >
> >
> > Cosma
> >
> >
> > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> > > and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> > > purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> > > itself as a submit handler?
> > >
> > > Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > First attemp:
> > > >
> > > > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > > > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > > > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > > > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > > > implement it.
> > > >
> > > > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > > > those non-standard services.
> > > >
> > > > Cosma
> > > >
> > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > > > >
> > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field
> > in
> > > > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a
> > good
> > > > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the
> > form
> > > > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be
> > dropped. The
> > > > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do
> > we want
> > > > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the
> > js hack
> > > > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very
> > similar to
> > > > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For
> > example,
> > > > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method
> > to use the
> > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > > > integration is the
> > HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but
> > presumibly also
> > > > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters,
> > but with
> > > > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading
> > to
> > > > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded
> > this
> > > > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be
> > addressed
> > > > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we
> > have two
> > > > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be
> > required
> > > > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out
> > in another
> > > > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict
> > with yours if
> > > > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <
> > martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the
> > form searching
> > > > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family -
> > so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the
> > <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces
> > renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF
> > implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain
> > component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components
> > belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different
> > renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about
> > component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so
> > UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied
> > by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow
> > subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get
> > ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a
> > different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread
> > talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> > martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by
> > Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family
> > instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > cosmacol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component,
> > a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on
> > <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a
> > submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably
> > this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a
> > "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the
> > component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component,
> > the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink>
> > recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the
> > page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <
> > cosmacol@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info
> > about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest
> > snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues
> > with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it
> > tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <
> > matzew@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on
> > the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF
> > Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink>
> > components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces
> > javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the
> > _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string
> > <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both
> > the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are
> > actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would
> > happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some
> > discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more
> > carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using
> > MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you
> > using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around
> > commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed
> > on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > >
> > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > >
> > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > >
> >
>
>
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>.
Modern browsers have no difficulty being told to add hidden fields
to the DOM on the fly; MyFaces could use this solution, which
Trinidad uses (at least in some parts of the code).
-- Adam
On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
> solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
> javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
> (see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
>
> Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
> field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
> see two problem with this:
>
> 1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
> we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
>
> 2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
> value-bounded exists?
>
>
> Cosma
>
>
> 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> > and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> > purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> > itself as a submit handler?
> >
> > Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > First attemp:
> > >
> > > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > > implement it.
> > >
> > > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > > those non-standard services.
> > >
> > > Cosma
> > >
> > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > > >
> > > > Any suggestions?
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field
> in
> > > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > > >
> > > > > Cosma
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a
> good
> > > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the
> form
> > > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be
> dropped. The
> > > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do
> we want
> > > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the
> js hack
> > > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very
> similar to
> > > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For
> example,
> > > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method
> to use the
> > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > > integration is the
> HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but
> presumibly also
> > > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters,
> but with
> > > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading
> to
> > > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded
> this
> > > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be
> addressed
> > > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we
> have two
> > > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be
> required
> > > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out
> in another
> > > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict
> with yours if
> > > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <
> martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the
> form searching
> > > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family -
> so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the
> <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces
> renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF
> implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <
> martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain
> component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components
> belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different
> renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about
> component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so
> UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied
> by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow
> subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get
> ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a
> different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread
> talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <
> martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by
> Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family
> instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <
> cosmacol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component,
> a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on
> <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a
> submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably
> this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a
> "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the
> component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component,
> the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink>
> recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the
> page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <
> cosmacol@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info
> about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest
> snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues
> with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it
> tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <
> matzew@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on
> the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF
> Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink>
> components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces
> javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the
> _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string
> <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both
> the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are
> actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would
> happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some
> discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more
> carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using
> MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you
> using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around
> commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed
> on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > >
> > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > Courses in English and German
> > > >
> > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>.
This makes things more complex.. anyway, I don't clearly see your
solution: will it solve the JSCookMenu problem? There we have a
javascript code that explicitly search a form field with a fixed name
(see MyFacesHack.js), that is added by the form renderer.
Question: is there any reason for components that need an hidden
field, to dinamically add one component to the tree that renders it? I
see two problem with this:
1) If it is done in the renderer of component A child of form B, are
we sure that a child added to B at this stage would get rendered?
2) Does a standard component to render an hidden field that is not
value-bounded exists?
Cosma
2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
> and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
> purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
> itself as a submit handler?
>
> Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > First attemp:
> >
> > move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> > as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> > renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> > code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> > implement it.
> >
> > At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> > those non-standard services.
> >
> > Cosma
> >
> > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> > >
> > > Any suggestions?
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field in
> > > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > > >
> > > > Cosma
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a good
> > > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the form
> > > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be dropped. The
> > > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do we want
> > > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the js hack
> > > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very similar to
> > > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For example,
> > > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method to use the
> > > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > > integration is the HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but presumibly also
> > > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters, but with
> > > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading to
> > > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded this
> > > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be addressed
> > > > > > > someway.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we have two
> > > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be required
> > > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out in another
> > > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict with yours if
> > > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the form searching
> > > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family - so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > see http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component, a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component, the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink> recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink> components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
Right now, no way. We don't have a common codebase between Trinidad
and Tomahawk. I wonder if this is a problem that can be solved on a
purely javascript basis - client side. How about each link attaching
itself as a submit handler?
Werner, what do you think? Javascript nightmares ahead?
regards,
Martin
On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> First attemp:
>
> move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
> as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
> renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
> code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
> implement it.
>
> At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
> those non-standard services.
>
> Cosma
>
> 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > We should fix this. Once and for all.
> >
> > Any suggestions?
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field in
> > > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> > >
> > > Cosma
> > >
> > >
> > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a good
> > > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the form
> > > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be dropped. The
> > > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do we want
> > > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the js hack
> > > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Cosma
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very similar to
> > > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For example,
> > > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method to use the
> > > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > > integration is the HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but presumibly also
> > > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters, but with
> > > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading to
> > > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded this
> > > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be addressed
> > > > > > someway.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we have two
> > > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be required
> > > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out in another
> > > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict with yours if
> > > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the form searching
> > > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family - so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > see http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component, a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component, the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink> recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink> components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>.
First attemp:
move addHiddenCommandParameter method in an external interface (such
as FormRendererUtils), and make both Trinidad and MyFaces form
renderers implement it. Components that need that service must then
code against that interface, and deal with renderers that doesn't
implement it.
At least, this way we can control/check at compile time the usage of
those non-standard services.
Cosma
2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> We should fix this. Once and for all.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field in
> > the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
> >
> > Cosma
> >
> >
> > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a good
> > > design and we should try to avoid it..
> > >
> > >
> > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the form
> > > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be dropped. The
> > > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do we want
> > > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the js hack
> > > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Cosma
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very similar to
> > > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For example,
> > > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method to use the
> > > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > > >
> > > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > > integration is the HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but presumibly also
> > > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters, but with
> > > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading to
> > > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded this
> > > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be addressed
> > > > > someway.
> > > > >
> > > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we have two
> > > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be required
> > > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Cosma
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Would be great!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out in another
> > > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict with yours if
> > > > > > > commited.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the form searching
> > > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family - so the trinidad
> > > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces renderer for the
> > > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF implementation.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > see http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component, a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component, the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink> recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink> components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > >
> > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
We should fix this. Once and for all.
Any suggestions?
regards,
Martin
On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field in
> the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
>
> Cosma
>
>
> 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a good
> > design and we should try to avoid it..
> >
> >
> > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the form
> > > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be dropped. The
> > > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do we want
> > > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the js hack
> > > to make JSCookMenu work?
> > >
> > >
> > > Cosma
> > >
> > >
> > > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very similar to
> > > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > > >
> > > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For example,
> > > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method to use the
> > > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > > >
> > > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > > integration is the HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but presumibly also
> > > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters, but with
> > > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading to
> > > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded this
> > > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be addressed
> > > > someway.
> > > >
> > > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we have two
> > > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be required
> > > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Cosma
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > > >
> > > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > > >
> > > > > Would be great!
> > > > >
> > > > > -Matthias
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out in another
> > > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict with yours if
> > > > > > commited.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the form searching
> > > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family - so the trinidad
> > > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces renderer for the
> > > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF implementation.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > see http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain component family needs
> > > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component, a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component, the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink> recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink> components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > >
> > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>.
I've only modified the JSCookMenu javascript to create that field in
the DOM if it isn't there. It's not an elegant solution, I know..
Cosma
2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a good
> design and we should try to avoid it..
>
>
> 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the form
> > searching routines, so that part of my patch should be dropped. The
> > addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do we want
> > to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the js hack
> > to make JSCookMenu work?
> >
> >
> > Cosma
> >
> >
> > 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very similar to
> > > the Martin code, with other things:
> > >
> > > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For example,
> > > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method to use the
> > > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> > >
> > > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > > integration is the HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but presumibly also
> > > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters, but with
> > > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading to
> > > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded this
> > > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be addressed
> > > someway.
> > >
> > > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we have two
> > > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be required
> > > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> > >
> > >
> > > Cosma
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > > >
> > > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > > >
> > > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > > >
> > > > Would be great!
> > > >
> > > > -Matthias
> > > >
> > > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Martin,
> > > > >
> > > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out in another
> > > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict with yours if
> > > > > commited.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Ciao
> > > > > Cosma
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the form searching
> > > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family - so the trinidad
> > > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Martin
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces renderer for the
> > > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF implementation.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > see http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain component family needs
> > > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow subclassing
> > > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a different component
> > > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component, a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component, the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink> recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink> components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > >
> > > > further stuff:
> > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>.
P.S. I think that a component relying on other renderers isn't a good
design and we should try to avoid it..
2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the form
> searching routines, so that part of my patch should be dropped. The
> addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do we want
> to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the js hack
> to make JSCookMenu work?
>
>
> Cosma
>
>
> 2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very similar to
> > the Martin code, with other things:
> >
> > 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For example,
> > HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> > rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method to use the
> > _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
> >
> > 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> > integration is the HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> > method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but presumibly also
> > by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters, but with
> > that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading to
> > javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded this
> > hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be addressed
> > someway.
> >
> > Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we have two
> > different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> > _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be required
> > if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
> >
> >
> > Cosma
> >
> >
> >
> > 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> > >
> > > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> > >
> > > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> > >
> > > Would be great!
> > >
> > > -Matthias
> > >
> > > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Martin,
> > > >
> > > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out in another
> > > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict with yours if
> > > > commited.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ciao
> > > > Cosma
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the form searching
> > > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family - so the trinidad
> > > > > form should be found as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces renderer for the
> > > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF implementation.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > see http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain component family needs
> > > > > > > > to be able to render out all components belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow subclassing
> > > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a different component
> > > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component, a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component, the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink> recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink> components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > >
> > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > >
> > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > further stuff:
> > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > >
> >
>
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>.
It looks like Martin has done a similar work, fixing all the form
searching routines, so that part of my patch should be dropped. The
addHiddenCommandParameter problem seems to be still there.. do we want
to wait for a complete solution or, in the meantime, apply the js hack
to make JSCookMenu work?
Cosma
2006/7/17, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very similar to
> the Martin code, with other things:
>
> 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For example,
> HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method to use the
> _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
>
> 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> integration is the HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but presumibly also
> by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters, but with
> that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading to
> javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded this
> hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be addressed
> someway.
>
> Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we have two
> different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be required
> if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
>
>
> Cosma
>
>
>
> 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> >
> > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> >
> > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> >
> > Would be great!
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Martin,
> > >
> > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out in another
> > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict with yours if
> > > commited.
> > >
> > >
> > > Ciao
> > > Cosma
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the form searching
> > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family - so the trinidad
> > > > form should be found as well.
> > > >
> > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces renderer for the
> > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF implementation.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > see http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain component family needs
> > > > > > > to be able to render out all components belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow subclassing
> > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a different component
> > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component, a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component, the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink> recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink> components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > >
> > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > Courses in English and German
> > > >
> > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> >
>
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
1 has all be done by me as well.
What was your hack in the case of 2?
There's really no good standard compliant solution for 2 in my point of view.
regards,
Martin
On 7/17/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very similar to
> the Martin code, with other things:
>
> 1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For example,
> HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
> rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method to use the
> _ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
>
> 2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
> integration is the HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
> method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but presumibly also
> by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters, but with
> that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading to
> javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded this
> hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be addressed
> someway.
>
> Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we have two
> different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
> _ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be required
> if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
>
>
> Cosma
>
>
>
> 2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
> >
> > You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> > Will (or must) take a look on it.
> >
> > Can you please give an update of the status ?
> > Also what's the *conflict* now is?
> >
> > Would be great!
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> > On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Martin,
> > >
> > > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out in another
> > > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict with yours if
> > > commited.
> > >
> > >
> > > Ciao
> > > Cosma
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the form searching
> > > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family - so the trinidad
> > > > form should be found as well.
> > > >
> > > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces renderer for the
> > > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF implementation.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > see http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain component family needs
> > > > > > > to be able to render out all components belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different renderer-type for the
> > > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about component families, we only
> > > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > > In general, component family should follow subclassing
> > > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a different component
> > > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component, a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component, the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink> recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink> components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > >
> > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > Courses in English and German
> > > >
> > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> >
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>.
Yes, I mean TOMAHAWK-516, it includes a change that is very similar to
the Martin code, with other things:
1) The _ComponentUtils method is not used everywhere. For example,
HtmlJSCookMenuRenderer implements one of its own, and other
rendererers do it as well. I tried to refactor those method to use the
_ComponentUtils one, see the JIRA for details.
2) Another potential source of trouble for Trinidad/Tomahawk
integration is the HtmlFormRendererBase.addHiddenCommandParameter
method. This is called at least by the JSCookMenu (but presumibly also
by other components) to queue adding hidden form parameters, but with
that rendered will not be used in a Trinidad project leading to
javascript errors. In my patch for JSCookMenu I workarounded this
hacking into MyFacesHack.js, but I think it should be addressed
someway.
Well I don't know SVN very well, but if it works as CVS we have two
different patch applied to the same lines of code (the
_ComponentUtils.findNestingForm method), so a merge will be required
if TOMAHAWK-516 will be commited.
Cosma
2006/7/17, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
>
> You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
> Will (or must) take a look on it.
>
> Can you please give an update of the status ?
> Also what's the *conflict* now is?
>
> Would be great!
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Martin,
> >
> > have you already committed that change? As I pointed out in another
> > thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict with yours if
> > commited.
> >
> >
> > Ciao
> > Cosma
> >
> >
> >
> > 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the form searching
> > > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family - so the trinidad
> > > form should be found as well.
> > >
> > > I'd be glad about any test results!
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the <t:commandLink>
> > > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces renderer for the
> > > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF implementation.
> > > > >
> > > > > see http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain component family needs
> > > > > > to be able to render out all components belonging to this family? I
> > > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different renderer-type for the
> > > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Martin
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about component families, we only
> > > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > > In general, component family should follow subclassing
> > > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a different component
> > > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread talked about that.)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > > searching for the component family instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component, a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component, the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink> recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink> components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > >
> > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > >
> > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
Yes that stuff is committed. _CompontUtils too.
You mean TOMAHAWK-516 ? I just asigned it to me.
Will (or must) take a look on it.
Can you please give an update of the status ?
Also what's the *conflict* now is?
Would be great!
-Matthias
On 7/16/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Martin,
>
> have you already committed that change? As I pointed out in another
> thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict with yours if
> commited.
>
>
> Ciao
> Cosma
>
>
>
> 2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the form searching
> > routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family - so the trinidad
> > form should be found as well.
> >
> > I'd be glad about any test results!
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> >
> >
> > On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the <t:commandLink>
> > > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces renderer for the
> > > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF implementation.
> > > >
> > > > see http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain component family needs
> > > > > to be able to render out all components belonging to this family? I
> > > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different renderer-type for the
> > > > > UIXForm component...
> > > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about component families, we only
> > > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > > In general, component family should follow subclassing
> > > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > > Renderers.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a different component
> > > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread talked about that.)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > > searching for the component family instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component, a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component, the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink> recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF Faces
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink> components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > >
> > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > >
> > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > >
> > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > Courses in English and German
> > > >
> > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: ADF Faces breaks many Tomahawk components
Posted by Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>.
Martin,
have you already committed that change? As I pointed out in another
thread, I've submitted a patch that will likely conflict with yours if
commited.
Ciao
Cosma
2006/7/17, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> As a workaround for the form problem, I've made the form searching
> routing of MyFaces aware of the Trinidad form family - so the trinidad
> form should be found as well.
>
> I'd be glad about any test results!
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> On 5/26/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thomas, I'm using the MyFaces RI. I think that the <t:commandLink>
> > problem is related to *not* using the MyFaces renderer for the
> > <h:form> component (like in TOMAHAWK-416).
> >
> >
> >
> > 2006/5/25, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>:
> > > Cosma, seems like you are using the Sun RI as JSF implementation.
> > >
> > > see http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > So it is a must that a renderer for a certain component family needs
> > > > to be able to render out all components belonging to this family? I
> > > > don't see why you couldn't just use a different renderer-type for the
> > > > UIXForm component...
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't remember a thread talking about component families, we only
> > > > > > talked about extending from UIForm - so UIXForm does not even have the
> > > > > > same component family as UIForm?
> > > > >
> > > > > No, it doesn't, which is more-or-less implied by not extending UIForm.
> > > > > In general, component family should follow subclassing
> > > > > as well, because otherwise you'd get ClassCastExceptions in
> > > > > Renderers.
> > > > >
> > > > > -- Adam
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Martin
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 5/24/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Actually, probably not... UIXForm is in a different component
> > > > > > > family from UIForm. (An earlier thread talked about that.)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Problem 1) should have been fixed by Mario's recent addition of
> > > > > > > > searching for the component family instead of the instance of UIForm.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > I've done some other tries:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 1) When using the <af:form> component, a dummy form and its clear
> > > > > > > > > method are created. Clicking on <t:commandLink> or
> > > > > > > > > <t:commandSortHeader> does trigger a submit, but the expected
> > > > > > > > > behaviour isn't executed. Probably this is because the _link_hidden_
> > > > > > > > > value is set telling JSF that a "linkDummyForm:commandLinkId" has been
> > > > > > > > > triggered, but the actual name of the component is different (its name
> > > > > > > > > contaner has a different id).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2) When using an <h:form> component, the dummy form isn't created
> > > > > > > > > (seems that the <t:commandLink> recognize its parent form), but no
> > > > > > > > > clear_ method is generated in the page, so the onclick javascript
> > > > > > > > > fails to submit the form.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Cosma Colanicchia <co...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > It would be useful to share info about making they work togheter, if
> > > > > > > > > > someone has resolved these problems.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Anyway I'm using the latest snapshots.. and I tried with both <h:form>
> > > > > > > > > > and <af:form>. I had some issues with dummyForm at first, if I can get
> > > > > > > > > > some detail I'll try to post it tomorrow, now I'm leaving the office.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Bye
> > > > > > > > > > Cosma
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 2006/5/23, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > Hi-
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > time by time there are people on the list, using both.
> > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces (incl. Tomahawk) and ADF Faces
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) <t:commandLink> components (and <t:commandSortHeader>s) don't work,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > because the MyFaces javascript functions such as clear_myFormId don't get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > generated. Also the _link_hidden_form isn't generated anymore. The rendered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML includes the string <!-- MYFACES JAVASCRIPT -->, and looking at the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > stack I can see that both the adfFaces and the ExtensionsFilter are invoked,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > but no MyFaces script are actually rendered in the page.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would happen, but this may be a MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > bug; I know there's been some discussion on the main MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > list about issues like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to search more carefully in the archives.. do you know if
> > > > > > > > > > > > someone had success using MyFaces, Tomahawk and ADF Faces in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > project?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Which version (of MyFaces) are you using?
> > > > > > > > > > > Can you wrapp <h:form> around commandLink?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > There where some issue - discussed on myfaces dev - regarding "auto
> > > > > > > > > > > generated form" aka dummy form
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > >
> > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > Courses in English and German
> > > >
> > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>