You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ofbiz.apache.org by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com> on 2011/03/15 16:39:50 UTC
Compiler issue with
FYI, we crossed an issue with
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/sql/src/org/ofbiz/sql/Planner.java?view=diff&r1=1076852&r2=1076853&pathrev=1076853
It does not compile with all Java version. So far at least 1.6.0_14 and 1.6.0_17 fail. It's ok with 1.6.0_23 and 1.6.0_24
HTH
Jacques
Re: Compiler issue with
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
David,
I think Adam uses it. Marco mades the change recently in his warnings effort. But I don't see anything in Eclipse nor while building
So I'm reverting this trivial change
Jacques
From: "David E Jones" <de...@me.com>
>
> On a side note, is that class even used anywhere by default? Or, is anyone using it?
>
> -David
>
>
> On Mar 15, 2011, at 9:39 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> FYI, we crossed an issue with
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/sql/src/org/ofbiz/sql/Planner.java?view=diff&r1=1076852&r2=1076853&pathrev=1076853
>> It does not compile with all Java version. So far at least 1.6.0_14 and 1.6.0_17 fail. It's ok with 1.6.0_23 and 1.6.0_24
>>
>> HTH
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
>
Re: Compiler issue with
Posted by David E Jones <de...@me.com>.
On a side note, is that class even used anywhere by default? Or, is anyone using it?
-David
On Mar 15, 2011, at 9:39 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> FYI, we crossed an issue with
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/sql/src/org/ofbiz/sql/Planner.java?view=diff&r1=1076852&r2=1076853&pathrev=1076853
> It does not compile with all Java version. So far at least 1.6.0_14 and 1.6.0_17 fail. It's ok with 1.6.0_23 and 1.6.0_24
>
> HTH
>
> Jacques
>
>
Re: Compiler issue with
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Thanks Ashish,
Unfortunately this is on a 64 bits Debian server without access to Internet.
And last but not least jdk1.6.0_22(b04) was installed. I'm sure you are aware of
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do;jsessionid=eda2515610ea5ffffffffb524779629b4d53?bug_id=6916062 :/
So, caught from both side, we simply revert the change below, and downgrade the jdk (in this case to _14, was used in dev)
Jacques
From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <vi...@gmail.com>
> My recent email on user mailing list:- "FYI - trunk code was failing on
> 1.6.0_11 version - updated to latest version of jdk(jdk1.6.0_24) and now it
> is compiling fine" :-)
>
> --
> Ashish
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
> jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com> wrote:
>
>> FYI, we crossed an issue with
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/sql/src/org/ofbiz/sql/Planner.java?view=diff&r1=1076852&r2=1076853&pathrev=1076853
>> It does not compile with all Java version. So far at least 1.6.0_14 and
>> 1.6.0_17 fail. It's ok with 1.6.0_23 and 1.6.0_24
>>
>> HTH
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Compiler issue with
Posted by Ashish Vijaywargiya <vi...@gmail.com>.
My recent email on user mailing list:- "FYI - trunk code was failing on
1.6.0_11 version - updated to latest version of jdk(jdk1.6.0_24) and now it
is compiling fine" :-)
--
Ashish
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com> wrote:
> FYI, we crossed an issue with
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/sql/src/org/ofbiz/sql/Planner.java?view=diff&r1=1076852&r2=1076853&pathrev=1076853
> It does not compile with all Java version. So far at least 1.6.0_14 and
> 1.6.0_17 fail. It's ok with 1.6.0_23 and 1.6.0_24
>
> HTH
>
> Jacques
>
>
>
Re: Compiler issue with
Posted by Ashish Vijaywargiya <vi...@gmail.com>.
My recent email on user mailing list:- "FYI - trunk code was failing on
1.6.0_11 version - updated to latest version of jdk(jdk1.6.0_24) and now it
is compiling fine" :-)
--
Ashish
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com> wrote:
> FYI, we crossed an issue with
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/sql/src/org/ofbiz/sql/Planner.java?view=diff&r1=1076852&r2=1076853&pathrev=1076853
> It does not compile with all Java version. So far at least 1.6.0_14 and
> 1.6.0_17 fail. It's ok with 1.6.0_23 and 1.6.0_24
>
> HTH
>
> Jacques
>
>
>