You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@trafficcontrol.apache.org by ocket 8888 <oc...@gmail.com> on 2022/01/11 16:43:00 UTC
2022-01-18 TC Working Group Agenda and Meeting Notes
If you have anything you want to discuss at next week's meeting,
respond to this email and it's on the agenda.
Re: 2022-01-18 TC Working Group Agenda and Meeting Notes
Posted by ocket 8888 <oc...@gmail.com>.
1. Attendance
- Zach Hoffman
- Srijeet Chatterjee
- Justin Howard
- Juliet Ngwe
- Jeremy Mitchell
- Taylor Frey
- Stephen Hamrick
2. Status of 6.1
- 6.1.0 RC0 set to be open for voting today
- Should we add everything that will be in 6.1 to the 6.1.0 milestone?
- No that's what the CHANGELOG is for
- Should we group CHANGELOG entries by component and/or
alphabetized?
- That might not be helpful unless we have more rules
around a CHANGELOG entry's format
- Components affected should be included in CHANGELOG
entries that affect more than one
- Traditionally the release notes are grouped by
component, but the CHANGELOG isn't
- We can add a sample entry to the PR template to
encourage people to do it without making it a real rule
3. Adding impact and effort level labels to technical debt issues
- #6512 Asked @rawlinp what he thinks are good effort level/impact labels
- #6504 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6502 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6501 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6500 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6499 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6498 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6497 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6496 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6495 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6494 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6493 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6492 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6491 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6490 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6489 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6488 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6487 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6486 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6485 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6484 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6483 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6482 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6481 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6480 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6479 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6478 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6477 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6476 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6475 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6474 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6473 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6472 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6471 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6470 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6469 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6468 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6467 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6466 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6465 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6464 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6463 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #6462 Add "low effort" and "low impact" labels
- #4047 Add "high effort" and "low impact" labels
- #3924 Add "low effort" and "high impact" labels
- #3868 Add "medium effort" and "high impact" labels
- #3710 Asked @rob05c if t3c does any clean-up on DS deletion, and
what he thinks would be appropriate impact/effort level labels
- #3515 Asked @rob05c if he can rename the issue and clean up the
description since its meaning has changed drastically since being
written
- #3352 Asked @rob05c whether the issue refers to Traffic Router
or Traffic Monitor, as the description conflicts - Add "medium impact"
label
- #3351 Add "medium impact" label
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 9:20 AM Zach Hoffman <zr...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> - 6.1.0 RC0 to be open for voting today
>
> active mailing list threads:
> - Layered Profiles Blueprint
> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/5lwbxhnfppdg3x5crrz61mp0k4v73klv>
>
> -Zach
>
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 9:15 AM Jeremy Mitchell <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Maybe we can put some impact and effort labels on the following tech debt
> > items:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22tech+debt%22++-label%3A%22high+impact%22+-label%3A%22medium+impact%22+-label%3A%22low+impact%22
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 9:14 AM Jeremy Mitchell <mi...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Status of 6.1
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 9:43 AM ocket 8888 <oc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> If you have anything you want to discuss at next week's meeting,
> > >> respond to this email and it's on the agenda.
> > >>
> > >
Re: 2022-01-18 TC Working Group Agenda and Meeting Notes
Posted by Zach Hoffman <zr...@apache.org>.
- 6.1.0 RC0 to be open for voting today
active mailing list threads:
- Layered Profiles Blueprint
<https://lists.apache.org/thread/5lwbxhnfppdg3x5crrz61mp0k4v73klv>
-Zach
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 9:15 AM Jeremy Mitchell <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Maybe we can put some impact and effort labels on the following tech debt
> items:
>
> https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22tech+debt%22++-label%3A%22high+impact%22+-label%3A%22medium+impact%22+-label%3A%22low+impact%22
>
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 9:14 AM Jeremy Mitchell <mi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Status of 6.1
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 9:43 AM ocket 8888 <oc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> If you have anything you want to discuss at next week's meeting,
> >> respond to this email and it's on the agenda.
> >>
> >
Re: 2022-01-18 TC Working Group Agenda and Meeting Notes
Posted by Jeremy Mitchell <mi...@gmail.com>.
Maybe we can put some impact and effort labels on the following tech debt
items:
https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22tech+debt%22++-label%3A%22high+impact%22+-label%3A%22medium+impact%22+-label%3A%22low+impact%22
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 9:14 AM Jeremy Mitchell <mi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Status of 6.1
>
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 9:43 AM ocket 8888 <oc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If you have anything you want to discuss at next week's meeting,
>> respond to this email and it's on the agenda.
>>
>
Re: 2022-01-18 TC Working Group Agenda and Meeting Notes
Posted by Jeremy Mitchell <mi...@gmail.com>.
Status of 6.1
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 9:43 AM ocket 8888 <oc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If you have anything you want to discuss at next week's meeting,
> respond to this email and it's on the agenda.
>