You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@calcite.apache.org by Rui Wang <am...@apache.org> on 2021/12/14 18:37:38 UTC
[Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release
Hi community,
To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check the JIRA list
[1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now remains open/in
progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be merged.
Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some fixes to be
released.
My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of Calcite by the end
of this week.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
[1]:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
-Rui
Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release
Posted by Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>.
After I switched from Mac to Ubuntu, the dependency check starts to work
:)
-Rui
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 11:47 AM Rui Wang <am...@apache.org> wrote:
> I am Generate a report of vulnerabilities that occur among dependencies
> when running `./gradlew :dependencyCheckUpdate`, I consistently hit
>
> Unable to download meta file:
> https://nvd.nist.gov/feeds/json/cve/1.1/xxx.meta and seems the root cause
> is "unable to connect".
>
>
>
> Has anyone seen it in the past?
>
>
> -Rui
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 6:26 PM Rui Wang <am...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi community,
>>
>> Now the main branch is locked at [1]. I will work toward RC0.
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/7a7b37fc1f4bd2121643539b0fd8e9c4f0f8ed09
>>
>>
>> -Rui
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 1:19 AM Alessandro Solimando <
>> alessandro.solimando@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>> I have merged https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2628 (
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4917) into master.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Alessandro
>>>
>>> On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 21:21, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Thanks for more information Julian. Then there should not have known
>>> > blockers at this moment.
>>> >
>>> > Hi Alessandro,
>>> >
>>> > I will wait for another 24 hours before blocking the main branch. It
>>> should
>>> > be enough time so please feel free to merge PR once there is no
>>> objection.
>>> >
>>> > -Rui
>>> >
>>> > On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 11:45 AM Alessandro Solimando <
>>> > alessandro.solimando@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi everyone,
>>> > > I'd like to merge https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2628 (
>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4917) which is ready
>>> if
>>> > > there
>>> > > are no objections.
>>> > >
>>> > > Since it's just adding an extra test it's not urgent at all, so if it
>>> > > causes any troubles it can be postponed after the release.
>>> > >
>>> > > Best regards,
>>> > > Alessandro
>>> > >
>>> > > On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 19:19, Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Ah, I see Stamatis has Log4j covered:
>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950 <
>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950>.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > On Dec 18, 2021, at 10:17 AM, Julian Hyde <
>>> jhyde.apache@gmail.com>
>>> > > > wrote:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > I think we should skip CALCITE-4907. There’s still discussion in
>>> its
>>> > > PR,
>>> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620 <
>>> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620>. I promise we’ll get
>>> it
>>> > in
>>> > > > soon after the release.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > In other news, there’s a new Log4j version, 2.17, addressing a
>>> new
>>> > > > CVE[1]. Let’s get that in.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Julian
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > [1]
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html
>>> > > > <
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >> On Dec 18, 2021, at 6:58 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <
>>> ppozerov@gmail.com
>>> > > > <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> Hi Xiong,
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> Thank you very much.
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> Vladimir.
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 14:32, xiong duan <nobigogle@gmail.com
>>> > <mailto:
>>> > > > nobigogle@gmail.com>>:
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >>> Hi Vladimir,
>>> > > > >>>
>>> > > > >>> I have merged.
>>> > > > >>>
>>> > > > >>> Vladimir Ozerov <ppozerov@gmail.com <mailto:ppozerov@gmail.com
>>> >>
>>> > > > 于2021年12月18日周六 16:58写道：
>>> > > > >>>
>>> > > > >>>> Hi Xiong,
>>> > > > >>>>
>>> > > > >>>> I've just resolved the conflicts.
>>> > > > >>>>
>>> > > > >>>> Regards,
>>> > > > >>>> Vladimir.
>>> > > > >>>>
>>> > > > >>>> сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 10:48, xiong duan <nobigogle@gmail.com
>>> > > <mailto:
>>> > > > nobigogle@gmail.com>>:
>>> > > > >>>>
>>> > > > >>>>> Hi, Vladimir.
>>> > > > >>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>> The PR[https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 <
>>> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464>] looks good. If you
>>> > > > >>>>> have
>>> > > > >>>>> free time Please resolve the conflicts. Then we can merge it.
>>> > > > >>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>> Vladimir Ozerov <ppozerov@gmail.com <mailto:
>>> ppozerov@gmail.com>>
>>> > > > 于2021年12月18日周六 15:20写道：
>>> > > > >>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>> Hi,
>>> > > > >>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>> Could you please also merge
>>> > > > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 <
>>> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464> ? I guess it got
>>> stuck
>>> > > > >>>>>> somehow,
>>> > > > >>>>>> as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to
>>> > create
>>> > > a
>>> > > > >>>> copy
>>> > > > >>>>> of
>>> > > > >>>>>> the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project.
>>> > > > >>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>> Regards,
>>> > > > >>>>>> Vladimir
>>> > > > >>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang <amaliujia@apache.org
>>> > > > <ma...@apache.org>>:
>>> > > > >>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>> Thanks Julian!
>>> > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>> Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or
>>> not,
>>> > > then
>>> > > > >>> I
>>> > > > >>>>> will
>>> > > > >>>>>>> lock the main branch and start the release process.
>>> > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>> -Rui
>>> > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde <
>>> > > > >>> jhyde.apache@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>
>>> > > > >>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>> wrote:
>>> > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946.
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang <
>>> amaliujia@apache.org
>>> > >
>>> > > > >>>>> wrote:
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks Zhe.
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Hi Francesco,
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> -Rui
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu <iluffzhe@163.com
>>> >
>>> > > > >>> wrote:
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi, Rui.
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can
>>> pass it
>>> > > > >>>>>> currently.
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your work!
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> ZheHu
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini<
>>> francesco.gini@gmail.com
>>> > >
>>> > > > >>>>> wrote：
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is
>>> in
>>> > > > >>>> review.
>>> > > > >>>>> I
>>> > > > >>>>>>>> believe
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I
>>> missed
>>> > > > >>>>> anything.
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau <
>>> > > > >>>> jacques@apache.org>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around
>>> > > > >>>>>> CALCITE-4898
>>> > > > >>>>>>>> and
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> maven repositories and category x licenses.
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang <
>>> > > > >>> amaliujia@apache.org>
>>> > > > >>>>>>> wrote:
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been
>>> marked
>>> > > > >>> as
>>> > > > >>>>>>> resolved
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but
>>> probably
>>> > > > >>> not
>>> > > > >>>>> all
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> those
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> will make the 1.29.0 release.
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> -Rui
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L <
>>> > rubenql@gmail.com
>>> > > > >>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>> wrote:
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737
>>> has
>>> > > > >>> been
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> merged.
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Ruben
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <
>>> > > > >>>>> jhyde.apache@gmail.com
>>> > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Rui,
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Even though
>>> > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898
>>> > > > >>>> <
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is
>>> > marked
>>> > > > >>>>>> fixed,
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and
>>> > category
>>> > > > >>>> X.
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> That
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> I’m working on getting
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946>
>>> done
>>> > > > >>>> today.
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Please
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> wait for that.
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is
>>> a
>>> > big
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> refactoring
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it
>>> > isn’t
>>> > > > >>>>> going
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> to
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> happen. Don’t wait for it.
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> I also see the following as open or in progress and
>>> > > > >>> fix-in-1.29:
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872>
>>> (Will
>>> > > > >>>> Noble)
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908>
>>> > (Woonsan
>>> > > > >>>> Koo)
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704>
>>> > > > >>> (Stamatis)
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737>
>>> (Thomas
>>> > > > >>>>> Rebele)
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860>
>>> (Zhe
>>> > Hu /
>>> > > > >>>>> Duan
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Xiong)
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907>
>>> > > > >>> (Francesco
>>> > > > >>>>>> Gini)
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> What’s the status on those?
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Julian
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in
>>> time-honored
>>> > > > >>>>> tradition
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> the
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite
>>> x.y.z’.
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang <
>>> > amaliujia@apache.org>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi community,
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to
>>> check
>>> > > > >>> the
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> JIRA
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> list
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of
>>> now
>>> > > > >>>>> remains
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> open/in
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> progress) and also the pending PRs which looks
>>> promising to
>>> > be
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> merged.
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want
>>> some
>>> > > > >>> fixes
>>> > > > >>>>> to
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> be
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> released.
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of
>>> > > > >>> Calcite
>>> > > > >>>> by
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> the
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> end
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> of this week.
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> [1]:
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>
>>> > > > >>>
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> -Rui
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> --
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Francesco Gini
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>>
>>> > > > >>>>
>>> > > > >>>
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>
Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release
Posted by Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>.
I am Generate a report of vulnerabilities that occur among dependencies
when running `./gradlew :dependencyCheckUpdate`, I consistently hit
Unable to download meta file:
https://nvd.nist.gov/feeds/json/cve/1.1/xxx.meta and seems the root cause
is "unable to connect".
Has anyone seen it in the past?
-Rui
On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 6:26 PM Rui Wang <am...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi community,
>
> Now the main branch is locked at [1]. I will work toward RC0.
>
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/7a7b37fc1f4bd2121643539b0fd8e9c4f0f8ed09
>
>
> -Rui
>
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 1:19 AM Alessandro Solimando <
> alessandro.solimando@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>> I have merged https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2628 (
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4917) into master.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Alessandro
>>
>> On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 21:21, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks for more information Julian. Then there should not have known
>> > blockers at this moment.
>> >
>> > Hi Alessandro,
>> >
>> > I will wait for another 24 hours before blocking the main branch. It
>> should
>> > be enough time so please feel free to merge PR once there is no
>> objection.
>> >
>> > -Rui
>> >
>> > On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 11:45 AM Alessandro Solimando <
>> > alessandro.solimando@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi everyone,
>> > > I'd like to merge https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2628 (
>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4917) which is ready if
>> > > there
>> > > are no objections.
>> > >
>> > > Since it's just adding an extra test it's not urgent at all, so if it
>> > > causes any troubles it can be postponed after the release.
>> > >
>> > > Best regards,
>> > > Alessandro
>> > >
>> > > On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 19:19, Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Ah, I see Stamatis has Log4j covered:
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950 <
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950>.
>> > > >
>> > > > > On Dec 18, 2021, at 10:17 AM, Julian Hyde <jhyde.apache@gmail.com
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I think we should skip CALCITE-4907. There’s still discussion in
>> its
>> > > PR,
>> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620 <
>> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620>. I promise we’ll get
>> it
>> > in
>> > > > soon after the release.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > In other news, there’s a new Log4j version, 2.17, addressing a new
>> > > > CVE[1]. Let’s get that in.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Julian
>> > > > >
>> > > > > [1]
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html
>> > > > <
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> On Dec 18, 2021, at 6:58 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <ppozerov@gmail.com
>> > > > <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Hi Xiong,
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Thank you very much.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Vladimir.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 14:32, xiong duan <nobigogle@gmail.com
>> > <mailto:
>> > > > nobigogle@gmail.com>>:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>> Hi Vladimir,
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> I have merged.
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Vladimir Ozerov <ppozerov@gmail.com <mailto:ppozerov@gmail.com
>> >>
>> > > > 于2021年12月18日周六 16:58写道：
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>> Hi Xiong,
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> I've just resolved the conflicts.
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> Regards,
>> > > > >>>> Vladimir.
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 10:48, xiong duan <nobigogle@gmail.com
>> > > <mailto:
>> > > > nobigogle@gmail.com>>:
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>>> Hi, Vladimir.
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> The PR[https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 <
>> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464>] looks good. If you
>> > > > >>>>> have
>> > > > >>>>> free time Please resolve the conflicts. Then we can merge it.
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> Vladimir Ozerov <ppozerov@gmail.com <mailto:
>> ppozerov@gmail.com>>
>> > > > 于2021年12月18日周六 15:20写道：
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> Hi,
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> Could you please also merge
>> > > > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 <
>> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464> ? I guess it got stuck
>> > > > >>>>>> somehow,
>> > > > >>>>>> as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to
>> > create
>> > > a
>> > > > >>>> copy
>> > > > >>>>> of
>> > > > >>>>>> the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project.
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> Regards,
>> > > > >>>>>> Vladimir
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang <amaliujia@apache.org
>> > > > <ma...@apache.org>>:
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> Thanks Julian!
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or
>> not,
>> > > then
>> > > > >>> I
>> > > > >>>>> will
>> > > > >>>>>>> lock the main branch and start the release process.
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> -Rui
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde <
>> > > > >>> jhyde.apache@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang <
>> amaliujia@apache.org
>> > >
>> > > > >>>>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks Zhe.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Hi Francesco,
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> -Rui
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu <il...@163.com>
>> > > > >>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi, Rui.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass
>> it
>> > > > >>>>>> currently.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your work!
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Best,
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> ZheHu
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini<
>> francesco.gini@gmail.com
>> > >
>> > > > >>>>> wrote：
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in
>> > > > >>>> review.
>> > > > >>>>> I
>> > > > >>>>>>>> believe
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I
>> missed
>> > > > >>>>> anything.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau <
>> > > > >>>> jacques@apache.org>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around
>> > > > >>>>>> CALCITE-4898
>> > > > >>>>>>>> and
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> maven repositories and category x licenses.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang <
>> > > > >>> amaliujia@apache.org>
>> > > > >>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been
>> marked
>> > > > >>> as
>> > > > >>>>>>> resolved
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but
>> probably
>> > > > >>> not
>> > > > >>>>> all
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> those
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> will make the 1.29.0 release.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> -Rui
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L <
>> > rubenql@gmail.com
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737
>> has
>> > > > >>> been
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> merged.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Ruben
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <
>> > > > >>>>> jhyde.apache@gmail.com
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Rui,
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Even though
>> > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898
>> > > > >>>> <
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is
>> > marked
>> > > > >>>>>> fixed,
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and
>> > category
>> > > > >>>> X.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> That
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> I’m working on getting
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946>
>> done
>> > > > >>>> today.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Please
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> wait for that.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a
>> > big
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> refactoring
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it
>> > isn’t
>> > > > >>>>> going
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> to
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> happen. Don’t wait for it.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> I also see the following as open or in progress and
>> > > > >>> fix-in-1.29:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872>
>> (Will
>> > > > >>>> Noble)
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908>
>> > (Woonsan
>> > > > >>>> Koo)
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704>
>> > > > >>> (Stamatis)
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737>
>> (Thomas
>> > > > >>>>> Rebele)
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe
>> > Hu /
>> > > > >>>>> Duan
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Xiong)
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907>
>> > > > >>> (Francesco
>> > > > >>>>>> Gini)
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> What’s the status on those?
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Julian
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in
>> time-honored
>> > > > >>>>> tradition
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> the
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang <
>> > amaliujia@apache.org>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi community,
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to
>> check
>> > > > >>> the
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> JIRA
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> list
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of
>> now
>> > > > >>>>> remains
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> open/in
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising
>> to
>> > be
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> merged.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want
>> some
>> > > > >>> fixes
>> > > > >>>>> to
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> be
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> released.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of
>> > > > >>> Calcite
>> > > > >>>> by
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> the
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> end
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> of this week.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> [1]:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> -Rui
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> --
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Francesco Gini
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release
Posted by Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>.
Hi community,
Now the main branch is locked at [1]. I will work toward RC0.
[1]
https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/7a7b37fc1f4bd2121643539b0fd8e9c4f0f8ed09
-Rui
On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 1:19 AM Alessandro Solimando <
alessandro.solimando@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I have merged https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2628 (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4917) into master.
>
> Best regards,
> Alessandro
>
> On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 21:21, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for more information Julian. Then there should not have known
> > blockers at this moment.
> >
> > Hi Alessandro,
> >
> > I will wait for another 24 hours before blocking the main branch. It
> should
> > be enough time so please feel free to merge PR once there is no
> objection.
> >
> > -Rui
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 11:45 AM Alessandro Solimando <
> > alessandro.solimando@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > > I'd like to merge https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2628 (
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4917) which is ready if
> > > there
> > > are no objections.
> > >
> > > Since it's just adding an extra test it's not urgent at all, so if it
> > > causes any troubles it can be postponed after the release.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Alessandro
> > >
> > > On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 19:19, Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ah, I see Stamatis has Log4j covered:
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950 <
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950>.
> > > >
> > > > > On Dec 18, 2021, at 10:17 AM, Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I think we should skip CALCITE-4907. There’s still discussion in
> its
> > > PR,
> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620 <
> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620>. I promise we’ll get it
> > in
> > > > soon after the release.
> > > > >
> > > > > In other news, there’s a new Log4j version, 2.17, addressing a new
> > > > CVE[1]. Let’s get that in.
> > > > >
> > > > > Julian
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html
> > > > <
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >> On Dec 18, 2021, at 6:58 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <ppozerov@gmail.com
> > > > <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Hi Xiong,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thank you very much.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Vladimir.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 14:32, xiong duan <nobigogle@gmail.com
> > <mailto:
> > > > nobigogle@gmail.com>>:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Hi Vladimir,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I have merged.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Vladimir Ozerov <ppozerov@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
> > > > 于2021年12月18日周六 16:58写道：
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> Hi Xiong,
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> I've just resolved the conflicts.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Regards,
> > > > >>>> Vladimir.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 10:48, xiong duan <nobigogle@gmail.com
> > > <mailto:
> > > > nobigogle@gmail.com>>:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>> Hi, Vladimir.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> The PR[https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 <
> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464>] looks good. If you
> > > > >>>>> have
> > > > >>>>> free time Please resolve the conflicts. Then we can merge it.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Vladimir Ozerov <ppozerov@gmail.com <mailto:ppozerov@gmail.com
> >>
> > > > 于2021年12月18日周六 15:20写道：
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Hi,
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Could you please also merge
> > > > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 <
> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464> ? I guess it got stuck
> > > > >>>>>> somehow,
> > > > >>>>>> as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to
> > create
> > > a
> > > > >>>> copy
> > > > >>>>> of
> > > > >>>>>> the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Regards,
> > > > >>>>>> Vladimir
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang <amaliujia@apache.org
> > > > <ma...@apache.org>>:
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Thanks Julian!
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or not,
> > > then
> > > > >>> I
> > > > >>>>> will
> > > > >>>>>>> lock the main branch and start the release process.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> -Rui
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde <
> > > > >>> jhyde.apache@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946.
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang <
> amaliujia@apache.org
> > >
> > > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks Zhe.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Hi Francesco,
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> -Rui
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu <il...@163.com>
> > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi, Rui.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass
> it
> > > > >>>>>> currently.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your work!
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> ZheHu
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini<
> francesco.gini@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > >>>>> wrote：
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in
> > > > >>>> review.
> > > > >>>>> I
> > > > >>>>>>>> believe
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed
> > > > >>>>> anything.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau <
> > > > >>>> jacques@apache.org>
> > > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around
> > > > >>>>>> CALCITE-4898
> > > > >>>>>>>> and
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> maven repositories and category x licenses.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang <
> > > > >>> amaliujia@apache.org>
> > > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been
> marked
> > > > >>> as
> > > > >>>>>>> resolved
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but
> probably
> > > > >>> not
> > > > >>>>> all
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> those
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> will make the 1.29.0 release.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> -Rui
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L <
> > rubenql@gmail.com
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hello,
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737
> has
> > > > >>> been
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> merged.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Ruben
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <
> > > > >>>>> jhyde.apache@gmail.com
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Rui,
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Even though
> > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898
> > > > >>>> <
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is
> > marked
> > > > >>>>>> fixed,
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and
> > category
> > > > >>>> X.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> That
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> I’m working on getting
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946> done
> > > > >>>> today.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Please
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> wait for that.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a
> > big
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> refactoring
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it
> > isn’t
> > > > >>>>> going
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> to
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> happen. Don’t wait for it.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> I also see the following as open or in progress and
> > > > >>> fix-in-1.29:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will
> > > > >>>> Noble)
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908>
> > (Woonsan
> > > > >>>> Koo)
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704>
> > > > >>> (Stamatis)
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737>
> (Thomas
> > > > >>>>> Rebele)
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe
> > Hu /
> > > > >>>>> Duan
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Xiong)
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907>
> > > > >>> (Francesco
> > > > >>>>>> Gini)
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> What’s the status on those?
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Julian
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored
> > > > >>>>> tradition
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> the
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang <
> > amaliujia@apache.org>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi community,
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to
> check
> > > > >>> the
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> JIRA
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> list
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of
> now
> > > > >>>>> remains
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> open/in
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising
> to
> > be
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> merged.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some
> > > > >>> fixes
> > > > >>>>> to
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> be
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> released.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of
> > > > >>> Calcite
> > > > >>>> by
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> the
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> end
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> of this week.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have any questions.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> [1]:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> -Rui
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> --
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Francesco Gini
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release
Posted by Alessandro Solimando <al...@gmail.com>.
Hello everyone,
I have merged https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2628 (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4917) into master.
Best regards,
Alessandro
On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 21:21, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org> wrote:
> Thanks for more information Julian. Then there should not have known
> blockers at this moment.
>
> Hi Alessandro,
>
> I will wait for another 24 hours before blocking the main branch. It should
> be enough time so please feel free to merge PR once there is no objection.
>
> -Rui
>
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 11:45 AM Alessandro Solimando <
> alessandro.solimando@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> > I'd like to merge https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2628 (
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4917) which is ready if
> > there
> > are no objections.
> >
> > Since it's just adding an extra test it's not urgent at all, so if it
> > causes any troubles it can be postponed after the release.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Alessandro
> >
> > On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 19:19, Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Ah, I see Stamatis has Log4j covered:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950 <
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950>.
> > >
> > > > On Dec 18, 2021, at 10:17 AM, Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I think we should skip CALCITE-4907. There’s still discussion in its
> > PR,
> > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620 <
> > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620>. I promise we’ll get it
> in
> > > soon after the release.
> > > >
> > > > In other news, there’s a new Log4j version, 2.17, addressing a new
> > > CVE[1]. Let’s get that in.
> > > >
> > > > Julian
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > >
> >
> https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html
> > > <
> > >
> >
> https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> On Dec 18, 2021, at 6:58 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <ppozerov@gmail.com
> > > <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi Xiong,
> > > >>
> > > >> Thank you very much.
> > > >>
> > > >> Vladimir.
> > > >>
> > > >> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 14:32, xiong duan <nobigogle@gmail.com
> <mailto:
> > > nobigogle@gmail.com>>:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi Vladimir,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I have merged.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Vladimir Ozerov <ppozerov@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
> > > 于2021年12月18日周六 16:58写道：
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Hi Xiong,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I've just resolved the conflicts.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Regards,
> > > >>>> Vladimir.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 10:48, xiong duan <nobigogle@gmail.com
> > <mailto:
> > > nobigogle@gmail.com>>:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Hi, Vladimir.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> The PR[https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 <
> > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464>] looks good. If you
> > > >>>>> have
> > > >>>>> free time Please resolve the conflicts. Then we can merge it.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Vladimir Ozerov <ppozerov@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
> > > 于2021年12月18日周六 15:20写道：
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Hi,
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Could you please also merge
> > > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 <
> > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464> ? I guess it got stuck
> > > >>>>>> somehow,
> > > >>>>>> as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to
> create
> > a
> > > >>>> copy
> > > >>>>> of
> > > >>>>>> the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Regards,
> > > >>>>>> Vladimir
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang <amaliujia@apache.org
> > > <ma...@apache.org>>:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Thanks Julian!
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or not,
> > then
> > > >>> I
> > > >>>>> will
> > > >>>>>>> lock the main branch and start the release process.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> -Rui
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde <
> > > >>> jhyde.apache@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang <amaliujia@apache.org
> >
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks Zhe.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Hi Francesco,
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> -Rui
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu <il...@163.com>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi, Rui.
> > > >>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it
> > > >>>>>> currently.
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your work!
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > > >>>>>>>>>> ZheHu
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini<francesco.gini@gmail.com
> >
> > > >>>>> wrote：
> > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in
> > > >>>> review.
> > > >>>>> I
> > > >>>>>>>> believe
> > > >>>>>>>>>> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed
> > > >>>>> anything.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau <
> > > >>>> jacques@apache.org>
> > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around
> > > >>>>>> CALCITE-4898
> > > >>>>>>>> and
> > > >>>>>>>>>> maven repositories and category x licenses.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang <
> > > >>> amaliujia@apache.org>
> > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked
> > > >>> as
> > > >>>>>>> resolved
> > > >>>>>>>>>> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably
> > > >>> not
> > > >>>>> all
> > > >>>>>>>>>> those
> > > >>>>>>>>>> will make the 1.29.0 release.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> -Rui
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L <
> rubenql@gmail.com
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Hello,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has
> > > >>> been
> > > >>>>>>>>>> merged.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Ruben
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <
> > > >>>>> jhyde.apache@gmail.com
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Rui,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Even though
> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898
> > > >>>> <
> > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is
> marked
> > > >>>>>> fixed,
> > > >>>>>>>>>> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and
> category
> > > >>>> X.
> > > >>>>>>>>>> That
> > > >>>>>>>>>> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> I’m working on getting
> > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
> > > >>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946> done
> > > >>>> today.
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Please
> > > >>>>>>>>>> wait for that.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
> > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a
> big
> > > >>>>>>>>>> refactoring
> > > >>>>>>>>>> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it
> isn’t
> > > >>>>> going
> > > >>>>>>>>>> to
> > > >>>>>>>>>> happen. Don’t wait for it.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> I also see the following as open or in progress and
> > > >>> fix-in-1.29:
> > > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
> > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will
> > > >>>> Noble)
> > > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
> > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908>
> (Woonsan
> > > >>>> Koo)
> > > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
> > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704>
> > > >>> (Stamatis)
> > > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
> > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas
> > > >>>>> Rebele)
> > > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
> > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe
> Hu /
> > > >>>>> Duan
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Xiong)
> > > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
> > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907>
> > > >>> (Francesco
> > > >>>>>> Gini)
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> What’s the status on those?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Julian
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
> > > >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored
> > > >>>>> tradition
> > > >>>>>>>>>> the
> > > >>>>>>>>>> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang <
> amaliujia@apache.org>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi community,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check
> > > >>> the
> > > >>>>>>>>>> JIRA
> > > >>>>>>>>>> list
> > > >>>>>>>>>> [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now
> > > >>>>> remains
> > > >>>>>>>>>> open/in
> > > >>>>>>>>>> progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to
> be
> > > >>>>>>>>>> merged.
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some
> > > >>> fixes
> > > >>>>> to
> > > >>>>>>>>>> be
> > > >>>>>>>>>> released.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of
> > > >>> Calcite
> > > >>>> by
> > > >>>>>>>>>> the
> > > >>>>>>>>>> end
> > > >>>>>>>>>> of this week.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have any questions.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> [1]:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> -Rui
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Francesco Gini
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release
Posted by Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>.
Thanks for more information Julian. Then there should not have known
blockers at this moment.
Hi Alessandro,
I will wait for another 24 hours before blocking the main branch. It should
be enough time so please feel free to merge PR once there is no objection.
-Rui
On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 11:45 AM Alessandro Solimando <
alessandro.solimando@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I'd like to merge https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2628 (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4917) which is ready if
> there
> are no objections.
>
> Since it's just adding an extra test it's not urgent at all, so if it
> causes any troubles it can be postponed after the release.
>
> Best regards,
> Alessandro
>
> On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 19:19, Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Ah, I see Stamatis has Log4j covered:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950>.
> >
> > > On Dec 18, 2021, at 10:17 AM, Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I think we should skip CALCITE-4907. There’s still discussion in its
> PR,
> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620 <
> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620>. I promise we’ll get it in
> > soon after the release.
> > >
> > > In other news, there’s a new Log4j version, 2.17, addressing a new
> > CVE[1]. Let’s get that in.
> > >
> > > Julian
> > >
> > > [1]
> >
> https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html
> > <
> >
> https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html
> > >
> > >
> > >> On Dec 18, 2021, at 6:58 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <ppozerov@gmail.com
> > <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi Xiong,
> > >>
> > >> Thank you very much.
> > >>
> > >> Vladimir.
> > >>
> > >> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 14:32, xiong duan <nobigogle@gmail.com <mailto:
> > nobigogle@gmail.com>>:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi Vladimir,
> > >>>
> > >>> I have merged.
> > >>>
> > >>> Vladimir Ozerov <ppozerov@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
> > 于2021年12月18日周六 16:58写道：
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi Xiong,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I've just resolved the conflicts.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Regards,
> > >>>> Vladimir.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 10:48, xiong duan <nobigogle@gmail.com
> <mailto:
> > nobigogle@gmail.com>>:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Hi, Vladimir.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The PR[https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 <
> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464>] looks good. If you
> > >>>>> have
> > >>>>> free time Please resolve the conflicts. Then we can merge it.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Vladimir Ozerov <ppozerov@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
> > 于2021年12月18日周六 15:20写道：
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Could you please also merge
> > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 <
> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464> ? I guess it got stuck
> > >>>>>> somehow,
> > >>>>>> as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to create
> a
> > >>>> copy
> > >>>>> of
> > >>>>>> the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>> Vladimir
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang <amaliujia@apache.org
> > <ma...@apache.org>>:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thanks Julian!
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or not,
> then
> > >>> I
> > >>>>> will
> > >>>>>>> lock the main branch and start the release process.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> -Rui
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde <
> > >>> jhyde.apache@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks Zhe.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Hi Francesco,
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> -Rui
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu <il...@163.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi, Rui.
> > >>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it
> > >>>>>> currently.
> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your work!
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>> ZheHu
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini<fr...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>> wrote：
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in
> > >>>> review.
> > >>>>> I
> > >>>>>>>> believe
> > >>>>>>>>>> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed
> > >>>>> anything.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau <
> > >>>> jacques@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around
> > >>>>>> CALCITE-4898
> > >>>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>> maven repositories and category x licenses.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang <
> > >>> amaliujia@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked
> > >>> as
> > >>>>>>> resolved
> > >>>>>>>>>> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably
> > >>> not
> > >>>>> all
> > >>>>>>>>>> those
> > >>>>>>>>>> will make the 1.29.0 release.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> -Rui
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L <rubenql@gmail.com
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Hello,
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has
> > >>> been
> > >>>>>>>>>> merged.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>> Ruben
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <
> > >>>>> jhyde.apache@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Rui,
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Even though
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898
> > >>>> <
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked
> > >>>>>> fixed,
> > >>>>>>>>>> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category
> > >>>> X.
> > >>>>>>>>>> That
> > >>>>>>>>>> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> I’m working on getting
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
> > >>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946> done
> > >>>> today.
> > >>>>>>>>>> Please
> > >>>>>>>>>> wait for that.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big
> > >>>>>>>>>> refactoring
> > >>>>>>>>>> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t
> > >>>>> going
> > >>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>> happen. Don’t wait for it.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> I also see the following as open or in progress and
> > >>> fix-in-1.29:
> > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will
> > >>>> Noble)
> > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan
> > >>>> Koo)
> > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704>
> > >>> (Stamatis)
> > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas
> > >>>>> Rebele)
> > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu /
> > >>>>> Duan
> > >>>>>>>>>> Xiong)
> > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907>
> > >>> (Francesco
> > >>>>>> Gini)
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> What’s the status on those?
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Julian
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored
> > >>>>> tradition
> > >>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi community,
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check
> > >>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>> JIRA
> > >>>>>>>>>> list
> > >>>>>>>>>> [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now
> > >>>>> remains
> > >>>>>>>>>> open/in
> > >>>>>>>>>> progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be
> > >>>>>>>>>> merged.
> > >>>>>>>>>> Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some
> > >>> fixes
> > >>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>> be
> > >>>>>>>>>> released.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of
> > >>> Calcite
> > >>>> by
> > >>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>> end
> > >>>>>>>>>> of this week.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have any questions.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> [1]:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> -Rui
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>> Francesco Gini
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >
> >
> >
>
Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release
Posted by Alessandro Solimando <al...@gmail.com>.
Hi everyone,
I'd like to merge https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2628 (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4917) which is ready if there
are no objections.
Since it's just adding an extra test it's not urgent at all, so if it
causes any troubles it can be postponed after the release.
Best regards,
Alessandro
On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 19:19, Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah, I see Stamatis has Log4j covered:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950>.
>
> > On Dec 18, 2021, at 10:17 AM, Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I think we should skip CALCITE-4907. There’s still discussion in its PR,
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620 <
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620>. I promise we’ll get it in
> soon after the release.
> >
> > In other news, there’s a new Log4j version, 2.17, addressing a new
> CVE[1]. Let’s get that in.
> >
> > Julian
> >
> > [1]
> https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html
> <
> https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html
> >
> >
> >> On Dec 18, 2021, at 6:58 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <ppozerov@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Xiong,
> >>
> >> Thank you very much.
> >>
> >> Vladimir.
> >>
> >> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 14:32, xiong duan <nobigogle@gmail.com <mailto:
> nobigogle@gmail.com>>:
> >>
> >>> Hi Vladimir,
> >>>
> >>> I have merged.
> >>>
> >>> Vladimir Ozerov <ppozerov@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
> 于2021年12月18日周六 16:58写道：
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Xiong,
> >>>>
> >>>> I've just resolved the conflicts.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Vladimir.
> >>>>
> >>>> сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 10:48, xiong duan <nobigogle@gmail.com <mailto:
> nobigogle@gmail.com>>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi, Vladimir.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The PR[https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 <
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464>] looks good. If you
> >>>>> have
> >>>>> free time Please resolve the conflicts. Then we can merge it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Vladimir Ozerov <ppozerov@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
> 于2021年12月18日周六 15:20写道：
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Could you please also merge
> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 <
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464> ? I guess it got stuck
> >>>>>> somehow,
> >>>>>> as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to create a
> >>>> copy
> >>>>> of
> >>>>>> the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>> Vladimir
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang <amaliujia@apache.org
> <ma...@apache.org>>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks Julian!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or not, then
> >>> I
> >>>>> will
> >>>>>>> lock the main branch and start the release process.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -Rui
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde <
> >>> jhyde.apache@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks Zhe.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi Francesco,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> -Rui
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu <il...@163.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, Rui.
> >>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it
> >>>>>> currently.
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your work!
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>> ZheHu
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini<fr...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote：
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in
> >>>> review.
> >>>>> I
> >>>>>>>> believe
> >>>>>>>>>> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed
> >>>>> anything.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau <
> >>>> jacques@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around
> >>>>>> CALCITE-4898
> >>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>> maven repositories and category x licenses.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang <
> >>> amaliujia@apache.org>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked
> >>> as
> >>>>>>> resolved
> >>>>>>>>>> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably
> >>> not
> >>>>> all
> >>>>>>>>>> those
> >>>>>>>>>> will make the 1.29.0 release.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> -Rui
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L <rubenql@gmail.com
> >>>>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has
> >>> been
> >>>>>>>>>> merged.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>> Ruben
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <
> >>>>> jhyde.apache@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Rui,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Even though
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898
> >>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked
> >>>>>> fixed,
> >>>>>>>>>> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category
> >>>> X.
> >>>>>>>>>> That
> >>>>>>>>>> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I’m working on getting
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
> >>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946> done
> >>>> today.
> >>>>>>>>>> Please
> >>>>>>>>>> wait for that.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big
> >>>>>>>>>> refactoring
> >>>>>>>>>> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t
> >>>>> going
> >>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>> happen. Don’t wait for it.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I also see the following as open or in progress and
> >>> fix-in-1.29:
> >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will
> >>>> Noble)
> >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan
> >>>> Koo)
> >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704>
> >>> (Stamatis)
> >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas
> >>>>> Rebele)
> >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu /
> >>>>> Duan
> >>>>>>>>>> Xiong)
> >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907>
> >>> (Francesco
> >>>>>> Gini)
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> What’s the status on those?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Julian
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
> >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored
> >>>>> tradition
> >>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi community,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check
> >>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> JIRA
> >>>>>>>>>> list
> >>>>>>>>>> [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now
> >>>>> remains
> >>>>>>>>>> open/in
> >>>>>>>>>> progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be
> >>>>>>>>>> merged.
> >>>>>>>>>> Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some
> >>> fixes
> >>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>> released.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of
> >>> Calcite
> >>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> end
> >>>>>>>>>> of this week.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have any questions.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> [1]:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> -Rui
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>> Francesco Gini
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >
>
>
Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com>.
Ah, I see Stamatis has Log4j covered: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950>.
> On Dec 18, 2021, at 10:17 AM, Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think we should skip CALCITE-4907. There’s still discussion in its PR, https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620 <https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620>. I promise we’ll get it in soon after the release.
>
> In other news, there’s a new Log4j version, 2.17, addressing a new CVE[1]. Let’s get that in.
>
> Julian
>
> [1] https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html <https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html>
>
>> On Dec 18, 2021, at 6:58 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <ppozerov@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Xiong,
>>
>> Thank you very much.
>>
>> Vladimir.
>>
>> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 14:32, xiong duan <nobigogle@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>:
>>
>>> Hi Vladimir,
>>>
>>> I have merged.
>>>
>>> Vladimir Ozerov <ppozerov@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> 于2021年12月18日周六 16:58写道：
>>>
>>>> Hi Xiong,
>>>>
>>>> I've just resolved the conflicts.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>
>>>> сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 10:48, xiong duan <nobigogle@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi, Vladimir.
>>>>>
>>>>> The PR[https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 <https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464>] looks good. If you
>>>>> have
>>>>> free time Please resolve the conflicts. Then we can merge it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Vladimir Ozerov <ppozerov@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> 于2021年12月18日周六 15:20写道：
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could you please also merge
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 <https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464> ? I guess it got stuck
>>>>>> somehow,
>>>>>> as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to create a
>>>> copy
>>>>> of
>>>>>> the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Vladimir
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang <amaliujia@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks Julian!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or not, then
>>> I
>>>>> will
>>>>>>> lock the main branch and start the release process.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Rui
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde <
>>> jhyde.apache@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks Zhe.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Francesco,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Rui
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu <il...@163.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Rui.
>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it
>>>>>> currently.
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your work!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>> ZheHu
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini<fr...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote：
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in
>>>> review.
>>>>> I
>>>>>>>> believe
>>>>>>>>>> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed
>>>>> anything.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau <
>>>> jacques@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around
>>>>>> CALCITE-4898
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> maven repositories and category x licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang <
>>> amaliujia@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked
>>> as
>>>>>>> resolved
>>>>>>>>>> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably
>>> not
>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>> will make the 1.29.0 release.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -Rui
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L <rubenql@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has
>>> been
>>>>>>>>>> merged.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Ruben
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <
>>>>> jhyde.apache@gmail.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Rui,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Even though
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898
>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked
>>>>>> fixed,
>>>>>>>>>> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category
>>>> X.
>>>>>>>>>> That
>>>>>>>>>> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I’m working on getting
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946> done
>>>> today.
>>>>>>>>>> Please
>>>>>>>>>> wait for that.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big
>>>>>>>>>> refactoring
>>>>>>>>>> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t
>>>>> going
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> happen. Don’t wait for it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I also see the following as open or in progress and
>>> fix-in-1.29:
>>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will
>>>> Noble)
>>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan
>>>> Koo)
>>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704>
>>> (Stamatis)
>>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas
>>>>> Rebele)
>>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu /
>>>>> Duan
>>>>>>>>>> Xiong)
>>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907>
>>> (Francesco
>>>>>> Gini)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What’s the status on those?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored
>>>>> tradition
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi community,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check
>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> JIRA
>>>>>>>>>> list
>>>>>>>>>> [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now
>>>>> remains
>>>>>>>>>> open/in
>>>>>>>>>> progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be
>>>>>>>>>> merged.
>>>>>>>>>> Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some
>>> fixes
>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>> released.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of
>>> Calcite
>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> end
>>>>>>>>>> of this week.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1]:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -Rui
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Francesco Gini
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com>.
I think we should skip CALCITE-4907. There’s still discussion in its PR, https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620 <https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620>. I promise we’ll get it in soon after the release.
In other news, there’s a new Log4j version, 2.17, addressing a new CVE[1]. Let’s get that in.
Julian
[1] https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html
> On Dec 18, 2021, at 6:58 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <pp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Xiong,
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> Vladimir.
>
> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 14:32, xiong duan <no...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi Vladimir,
>>
>> I have merged.
>>
>> Vladimir Ozerov <pp...@gmail.com> 于2021年12月18日周六 16:58写道：
>>
>>> Hi Xiong,
>>>
>>> I've just resolved the conflicts.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Vladimir.
>>>
>>> сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 10:48, xiong duan <no...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Hi, Vladimir.
>>>>
>>>> The PR[https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464] looks good. If you
>>>> have
>>>> free time Please resolve the conflicts. Then we can merge it.
>>>>
>>>> Vladimir Ozerov <pp...@gmail.com> 于2021年12月18日周六 15:20写道：
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you please also merge
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 ? I guess it got stuck
>>>>> somehow,
>>>>> as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to create a
>>> copy
>>>> of
>>>>> the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Vladimir
>>>>>
>>>>> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks Julian!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or not, then
>> I
>>>> will
>>>>>> lock the main branch and start the release process.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Rui
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde <
>> jhyde.apache@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks Zhe.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Francesco,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Rui
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu <il...@163.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi, Rui.
>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it
>>>>> currently.
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your work!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>> ZheHu
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini<fr...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote：
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in
>>> review.
>>>> I
>>>>>>> believe
>>>>>>>>> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed
>>>> anything.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau <
>>> jacques@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around
>>>>> CALCITE-4898
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> maven repositories and category x licenses.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang <
>> amaliujia@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked
>> as
>>>>>> resolved
>>>>>>>>> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably
>> not
>>>> all
>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>> will make the 1.29.0 release.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Rui
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L <rubenql@gmail.com
>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has
>> been
>>>>>>>>> merged.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Ruben
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <
>>>> jhyde.apache@gmail.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rui,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Even though
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898
>>> <
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked
>>>>> fixed,
>>>>>>>>> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category
>>> X.
>>>>>>>>> That
>>>>>>>>> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I’m working on getting
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946> done
>>> today.
>>>>>>>>> Please
>>>>>>>>> wait for that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big
>>>>>>>>> refactoring
>>>>>>>>> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t
>>>> going
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> happen. Don’t wait for it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I also see the following as open or in progress and
>> fix-in-1.29:
>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will
>>> Noble)
>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan
>>> Koo)
>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704>
>> (Stamatis)
>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas
>>>> Rebele)
>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu /
>>>> Duan
>>>>>>>>> Xiong)
>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907>
>> (Francesco
>>>>> Gini)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What’s the status on those?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored
>>>> tradition
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi community,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check
>> the
>>>>>>>>> JIRA
>>>>>>>>> list
>>>>>>>>> [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now
>>>> remains
>>>>>>>>> open/in
>>>>>>>>> progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be
>>>>>>>>> merged.
>>>>>>>>> Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some
>> fixes
>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>> released.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of
>> Calcite
>>> by
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> end
>>>>>>>>> of this week.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1]:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Rui
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Francesco Gini
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release
Posted by Vladimir Ozerov <pp...@gmail.com>.
Hi Xiong,
Thank you very much.
Vladimir.
Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 14:32, xiong duan <no...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> I have merged.
>
> Vladimir Ozerov <pp...@gmail.com> 于2021年12月18日周六 16:58写道：
>
> > Hi Xiong,
> >
> > I've just resolved the conflicts.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Vladimir.
> >
> > сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 10:48, xiong duan <no...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Hi, Vladimir.
> > >
> > > The PR[https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464] looks good. If you
> > > have
> > > free time Please resolve the conflicts. Then we can merge it.
> > >
> > > Vladimir Ozerov <pp...@gmail.com> 于2021年12月18日周六 15:20写道：
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Could you please also merge
> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 ? I guess it got stuck
> > > > somehow,
> > > > as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to create a
> > copy
> > > of
> > > > the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Vladimir
> > > >
> > > > Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks Julian!
> > > > >
> > > > > Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or not, then
> I
> > > will
> > > > > lock the main branch and start the release process.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -Rui
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde <
> jhyde.apache@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks Zhe.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Francesco,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Rui
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu <il...@163.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Hi, Rui.
> > > > > > >> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it
> > > > currently.
> > > > > > >> Thanks for your work!
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Best,
> > > > > > >> ZheHu
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini<fr...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote：
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in
> > review.
> > > I
> > > > > > believe
> > > > > > >> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed
> > > anything.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau <
> > jacques@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around
> > > > CALCITE-4898
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > >> maven repositories and category x licenses.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang <
> amaliujia@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked
> as
> > > > > resolved
> > > > > > >> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably
> not
> > > all
> > > > > > >> those
> > > > > > >> will make the 1.29.0 release.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> -Rui
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L <rubenql@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Hello,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has
> been
> > > > > > >> merged.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > > >> Ruben
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <
> > > jhyde.apache@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Rui,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Even though
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898
> > <
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked
> > > > fixed,
> > > > > > >> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category
> > X.
> > > > > > >> That
> > > > > > >> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I’m working on getting
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
> > > > > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946> done
> > today.
> > > > > > >> Please
> > > > > > >> wait for that.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big
> > > > > > >> refactoring
> > > > > > >> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t
> > > going
> > > > > > >> to
> > > > > > >> happen. Don’t wait for it.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I also see the following as open or in progress and
> fix-in-1.29:
> > > > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will
> > Noble)
> > > > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan
> > Koo)
> > > > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704>
> (Stamatis)
> > > > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas
> > > Rebele)
> > > > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu /
> > > Duan
> > > > > > >> Xiong)
> > > > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907>
> (Francesco
> > > > Gini)
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> What’s the status on those?
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Julian
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
> > > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored
> > > tradition
> > > > > > >> the
> > > > > > >> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Hi community,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check
> the
> > > > > > >> JIRA
> > > > > > >> list
> > > > > > >> [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now
> > > remains
> > > > > > >> open/in
> > > > > > >> progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be
> > > > > > >> merged.
> > > > > > >> Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some
> fixes
> > > to
> > > > > > >> be
> > > > > > >> released.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of
> Calcite
> > by
> > > > > > >> the
> > > > > > >> end
> > > > > > >> of this week.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Please let me know if you have any questions.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> [1]:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> -Rui
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > >> Francesco Gini
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release
Posted by xiong duan <no...@gmail.com>.
Hi Vladimir,
I have merged.
Vladimir Ozerov <pp...@gmail.com> 于2021年12月18日周六 16:58写道：
> Hi Xiong,
>
> I've just resolved the conflicts.
>
> Regards,
> Vladimir.
>
> сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 10:48, xiong duan <no...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi, Vladimir.
> >
> > The PR[https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464] looks good. If you
> > have
> > free time Please resolve the conflicts. Then we can merge it.
> >
> > Vladimir Ozerov <pp...@gmail.com> 于2021年12月18日周六 15:20写道：
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Could you please also merge
> > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 ? I guess it got stuck
> > > somehow,
> > > as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to create a
> copy
> > of
> > > the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Vladimir
> > >
> > > Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Julian!
> > > >
> > > > Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or not, then I
> > will
> > > > lock the main branch and start the release process.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -Rui
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde <jhyde.apache@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946.
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks Zhe.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Francesco,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Rui
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu <il...@163.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Hi, Rui.
> > > > > >> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it
> > > currently.
> > > > > >> Thanks for your work!
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Best,
> > > > > >> ZheHu
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini<fr...@gmail.com>
> > wrote：
> > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in
> review.
> > I
> > > > > believe
> > > > > >> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed
> > anything.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau <
> jacques@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around
> > > CALCITE-4898
> > > > > and
> > > > > >> maven repositories and category x licenses.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked as
> > > > resolved
> > > > > >> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably not
> > all
> > > > > >> those
> > > > > >> will make the 1.29.0 release.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> -Rui
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L <ru...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Hello,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has been
> > > > > >> merged.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > >> Ruben
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <
> > jhyde.apache@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Rui,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898
> <
> > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked
> > > fixed,
> > > > > >> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category
> X.
> > > > > >> That
> > > > > >> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I’m working on getting
> > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
> > > > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946> done
> today.
> > > > > >> Please
> > > > > >> wait for that.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
> > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big
> > > > > >> refactoring
> > > > > >> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t
> > going
> > > > > >> to
> > > > > >> happen. Don’t wait for it.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I also see the following as open or in progress and fix-in-1.29:
> > > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
> > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will
> Noble)
> > > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
> > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan
> Koo)
> > > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
> > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> (Stamatis)
> > > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
> > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas
> > Rebele)
> > > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
> > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu /
> > Duan
> > > > > >> Xiong)
> > > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
> > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> (Francesco
> > > Gini)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> What’s the status on those?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Julian
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
> > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored
> > tradition
> > > > > >> the
> > > > > >> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Hi community,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check the
> > > > > >> JIRA
> > > > > >> list
> > > > > >> [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now
> > remains
> > > > > >> open/in
> > > > > >> progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be
> > > > > >> merged.
> > > > > >> Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some fixes
> > to
> > > > > >> be
> > > > > >> released.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of Calcite
> by
> > > > > >> the
> > > > > >> end
> > > > > >> of this week.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Please let me know if you have any questions.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> [1]:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> -Rui
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> --
> > > > > >> Francesco Gini
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release
Posted by Vladimir Ozerov <pp...@gmail.com>.
Hi Xiong,
I've just resolved the conflicts.
Regards,
Vladimir.
сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 10:48, xiong duan <no...@gmail.com>:
> Hi, Vladimir.
>
> The PR[https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464] looks good. If you
> have
> free time Please resolve the conflicts. Then we can merge it.
>
> Vladimir Ozerov <pp...@gmail.com> 于2021年12月18日周六 15:20写道：
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could you please also merge
> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 ? I guess it got stuck
> > somehow,
> > as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to create a copy
> of
> > the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Vladimir
> >
> > Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > Thanks Julian!
> > >
> > > Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or not, then I
> will
> > > lock the main branch and start the release process.
> > >
> > >
> > > -Rui
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946.
> > > >
> > > > > On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks Zhe.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Francesco,
> > > > >
> > > > > I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?
> > > > >
> > > > > -Rui
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu <il...@163.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi, Rui.
> > > > >> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it
> > currently.
> > > > >> Thanks for your work!
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Best,
> > > > >> ZheHu
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini<fr...@gmail.com>
> wrote：
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in review.
> I
> > > > believe
> > > > >> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed
> anything.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around
> > CALCITE-4898
> > > > and
> > > > >> maven repositories and category x licenses.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked as
> > > resolved
> > > > >> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably not
> all
> > > > >> those
> > > > >> will make the 1.29.0 release.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> -Rui
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L <ru...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Hello,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has been
> > > > >> merged.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Regards,
> > > > >> Ruben
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <
> jhyde.apache@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Rui,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 <
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked
> > fixed,
> > > > >> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category X.
> > > > >> That
> > > > >> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I’m working on getting
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
> > > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946> done today.
> > > > >> Please
> > > > >> wait for that.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big
> > > > >> refactoring
> > > > >> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t
> going
> > > > >> to
> > > > >> happen. Don’t wait for it.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I also see the following as open or in progress and fix-in-1.29:
> > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will Noble)
> > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan Koo)
> > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> (Stamatis)
> > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas
> Rebele)
> > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu /
> Duan
> > > > >> Xiong)
> > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> (Francesco
> > Gini)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> What’s the status on those?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Julian
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
> > > > >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored
> tradition
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Hi community,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check the
> > > > >> JIRA
> > > > >> list
> > > > >> [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now
> remains
> > > > >> open/in
> > > > >> progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be
> > > > >> merged.
> > > > >> Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some fixes
> to
> > > > >> be
> > > > >> released.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of Calcite by
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> end
> > > > >> of this week.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Please let me know if you have any questions.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [1]:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> -Rui
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> Francesco Gini
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release
Posted by xiong duan <no...@gmail.com>.
Hi, Vladimir.
The PR[https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464] looks good. If you have
free time Please resolve the conflicts. Then we can merge it.
Vladimir Ozerov <pp...@gmail.com> 于2021年12月18日周六 15:20写道：
> Hi,
>
> Could you please also merge
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 ? I guess it got stuck
> somehow,
> as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to create a copy of
> the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project.
>
> Regards,
> Vladimir
>
> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>:
>
> > Thanks Julian!
> >
> > Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or not, then I will
> > lock the main branch and start the release process.
> >
> >
> > -Rui
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946.
> > >
> > > > On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Zhe.
> > > >
> > > > Hi Francesco,
> > > >
> > > > I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?
> > > >
> > > > -Rui
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu <il...@163.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi, Rui.
> > > >> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it
> currently.
> > > >> Thanks for your work!
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Best,
> > > >> ZheHu
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini<fr...@gmail.com> wrote：
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in review. I
> > > believe
> > > >> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed anything.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around
> CALCITE-4898
> > > and
> > > >> maven repositories and category x licenses.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked as
> > resolved
> > > >> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably not all
> > > >> those
> > > >> will make the 1.29.0 release.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> -Rui
> > > >>
> > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L <ru...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hello,
> > > >>
> > > >> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has been
> > > >> merged.
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >> Ruben
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <jhyde.apache@gmail.com
> >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Rui,
> > > >>
> > > >> Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 <
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked
> fixed,
> > > >> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category X.
> > > >> That
> > > >> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
> > > >>
> > > >> I’m working on getting
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
> > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946> done today.
> > > >> Please
> > > >> wait for that.
> > > >>
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big
> > > >> refactoring
> > > >> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t going
> > > >> to
> > > >> happen. Don’t wait for it.
> > > >>
> > > >> I also see the following as open or in progress and fix-in-1.29:
> > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will Noble)
> > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan Koo)
> > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> (Stamatis)
> > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas Rebele)
> > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu / Duan
> > > >> Xiong)
> > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> (Francesco
> Gini)
> > > >>
> > > >> What’s the status on those?
> > > >>
> > > >> Julian
> > > >>
> > > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
> > > >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
> > > >>
> > > >> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored tradition
> > > >> the
> > > >> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi community,
> > > >>
> > > >> To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check the
> > > >> JIRA
> > > >> list
> > > >> [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now remains
> > > >> open/in
> > > >> progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be
> > > >> merged.
> > > >> Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some fixes to
> > > >> be
> > > >> released.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of Calcite by
> > > >> the
> > > >> end
> > > >> of this week.
> > > >>
> > > >> Please let me know if you have any questions.
> > > >>
> > > >> [1]:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> -Rui
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Francesco Gini
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release
Posted by Vladimir Ozerov <pp...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Could you please also merge
https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 ? I guess it got stuck somehow,
as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to create a copy of
the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project.
Regards,
Vladimir
Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>:
> Thanks Julian!
>
> Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or not, then I will
> lock the main branch and start the release process.
>
>
> -Rui
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946.
> >
> > > On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks Zhe.
> > >
> > > Hi Francesco,
> > >
> > > I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?
> > >
> > > -Rui
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu <il...@163.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi, Rui.
> > >> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it currently.
> > >> Thanks for your work!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> ZheHu
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini<fr...@gmail.com> wrote：
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in review. I
> > believe
> > >> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed anything.
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around CALCITE-4898
> > and
> > >> maven repositories and category x licenses.
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked as
> resolved
> > >> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably not all
> > >> those
> > >> will make the 1.29.0 release.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -Rui
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has been
> > >> merged.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Ruben
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Rui,
> > >>
> > >> Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 <
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked fixed,
> > >> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category X.
> > >> That
> > >> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
> > >>
> > >> I’m working on getting
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
> > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946> done today.
> > >> Please
> > >> wait for that.
> > >>
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big
> > >> refactoring
> > >> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t going
> > >> to
> > >> happen. Don’t wait for it.
> > >>
> > >> I also see the following as open or in progress and fix-in-1.29:
> > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will Noble)
> > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan Koo)
> > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> (Stamatis)
> > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas Rebele)
> > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu / Duan
> > >> Xiong)
> > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> (Francesco Gini)
> > >>
> > >> What’s the status on those?
> > >>
> > >> Julian
> > >>
> > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
> > >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
> > >>
> > >> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored tradition
> > >> the
> > >> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi community,
> > >>
> > >> To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check the
> > >> JIRA
> > >> list
> > >> [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now remains
> > >> open/in
> > >> progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be
> > >> merged.
> > >> Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some fixes to
> > >> be
> > >> released.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of Calcite by
> > >> the
> > >> end
> > >> of this week.
> > >>
> > >> Please let me know if you have any questions.
> > >>
> > >> [1]:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -Rui
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Francesco Gini
> > >>
> >
> >
>
Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release
Posted by Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>.
Thanks Julian!
Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or not, then I will
lock the main branch and start the release process.
-Rui
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946.
>
> > On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Zhe.
> >
> > Hi Francesco,
> >
> > I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?
> >
> > -Rui
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu <il...@163.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, Rui.
> >> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it currently.
> >> Thanks for your work!
> >>
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> ZheHu
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini<fr...@gmail.com> wrote：
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in review. I
> believe
> >> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed anything.
> >>
> >> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around CALCITE-4898
> and
> >> maven repositories and category x licenses.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang <am...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked as resolved
> >> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably not all
> >> those
> >> will make the 1.29.0 release.
> >>
> >>
> >> -Rui
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has been
> >> merged.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Ruben
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Rui,
> >>
> >> Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 <
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked fixed,
> >> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category X.
> >> That
> >> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
> >>
> >> I’m working on getting
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946> done today.
> >> Please
> >> wait for that.
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big
> >> refactoring
> >> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t going
> >> to
> >> happen. Don’t wait for it.
> >>
> >> I also see the following as open or in progress and fix-in-1.29:
> >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will Noble)
> >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan Koo)
> >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> (Stamatis)
> >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas Rebele)
> >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu / Duan
> >> Xiong)
> >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> (Francesco Gini)
> >>
> >> What’s the status on those?
> >>
> >> Julian
> >>
> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
> >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
> >>
> >> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored tradition
> >> the
> >> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi community,
> >>
> >> To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check the
> >> JIRA
> >> list
> >> [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now remains
> >> open/in
> >> progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be
> >> merged.
> >> Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some fixes to
> >> be
> >> released.
> >>
> >>
> >> My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of Calcite by
> >> the
> >> end
> >> of this week.
> >>
> >> Please let me know if you have any questions.
> >>
> >> [1]:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
> >>
> >>
> >> -Rui
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Francesco Gini
> >>
>
>
Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com>.
Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946.
> On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Thanks Zhe.
>
> Hi Francesco,
>
> I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?
>
> -Rui
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu <il...@163.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Rui.
>> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it currently.
>> Thanks for your work!
>>
>>
>> Best,
>> ZheHu
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini<fr...@gmail.com> wrote：
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in review. I believe
>> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed anything.
>>
>> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around CALCITE-4898 and
>> maven repositories and category x licenses.
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang <am...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked as resolved
>> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably not all
>> those
>> will make the 1.29.0 release.
>>
>>
>> -Rui
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has been
>> merged.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ruben
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Rui,
>>
>> Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked fixed,
>> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category X.
>> That
>> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
>>
>> I’m working on getting
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946> done today.
>> Please
>> wait for that.
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big
>> refactoring
>> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t going
>> to
>> happen. Don’t wait for it.
>>
>> I also see the following as open or in progress and fix-in-1.29:
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will Noble)
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan Koo)
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> (Stamatis)
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas Rebele)
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu / Duan
>> Xiong)
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> (Francesco Gini)
>>
>> What’s the status on those?
>>
>> Julian
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
>>
>> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored tradition
>> the
>> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
>>
>>
>> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi community,
>>
>> To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check the
>> JIRA
>> list
>> [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now remains
>> open/in
>> progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be
>> merged.
>> Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some fixes to
>> be
>> released.
>>
>>
>> My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of Calcite by
>> the
>> end
>> of this week.
>>
>> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>>
>> [1]:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
>>
>>
>> -Rui
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Francesco Gini
>>
Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release
Posted by Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>.
Thanks Zhe.
Hi Francesco,
I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?
-Rui
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu <il...@163.com> wrote:
> Hi, Rui.
> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it currently.
> Thanks for your work!
>
>
> Best,
> ZheHu
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini<fr...@gmail.com> wrote：
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in review. I believe
> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed anything.
>
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around CALCITE-4898 and
> maven repositories and category x licenses.
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang <am...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked as resolved
> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably not all
> those
> will make the 1.29.0 release.
>
>
> -Rui
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has been
> merged.
>
> Regards,
> Ruben
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Rui,
>
> Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked fixed,
> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category X.
> That
> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
>
> I’m working on getting
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946> done today.
> Please
> wait for that.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big
> refactoring
> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t going
> to
> happen. Don’t wait for it.
>
> I also see the following as open or in progress and fix-in-1.29:
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will Noble)
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan Koo)
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> (Stamatis)
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas Rebele)
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu / Duan
> Xiong)
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> (Francesco Gini)
>
> What’s the status on those?
>
> Julian
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
>
> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored tradition
> the
> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
>
>
> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> Hi community,
>
> To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check the
> JIRA
> list
> [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now remains
> open/in
> progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be
> merged.
> Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some fixes to
> be
> released.
>
>
> My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of Calcite by
> the
> end
> of this week.
>
> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>
> [1]:
>
>
>
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
>
>
> -Rui
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Francesco Gini
>
Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release
Posted by Zhe Hu <il...@163.com>.
Hi, Rui.
CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it currently.
Thanks for your work!
Best,
ZheHu
On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini<fr...@gmail.com> wrote：
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in review. I believe
I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed anything.
On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around CALCITE-4898 and
maven repositories and category x licenses.
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang <am...@apache.org> wrote:
For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked as resolved
since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably not all
those
will make the 1.29.0 release.
-Rui
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has been
merged.
Regards,
Ruben
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Rui,
Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked fixed,
there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category X.
That
needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
I’m working on getting
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946> done today.
Please
wait for that.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big
refactoring
and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t going
to
happen. Don’t wait for it.
I also see the following as open or in progress and fix-in-1.29:
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will Noble)
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan Koo)
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> (Stamatis)
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas Rebele)
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu / Duan
Xiong)
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> (Francesco Gini)
What’s the status on those?
Julian
[1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored tradition
the
email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>
wrote:
Hi community,
To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check the
JIRA
list
[1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now remains
open/in
progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be
merged.
Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some fixes to
be
released.
My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of Calcite by
the
end
of this week.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
[1]:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
-Rui
--
Francesco Gini
Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release
Posted by Francesco Gini <fr...@gmail.com>.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in review. I believe
I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed anything.
On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around CALCITE-4898 and
> maven repositories and category x licenses.
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang <am...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked as resolved
> > since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably not all
> those
> > will make the 1.29.0 release.
> >
> >
> > -Rui
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has been
> merged.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Ruben
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Rui,
> > > >
> > > > Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 <
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked fixed,
> > > > there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category X.
> That
> > > > needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
> > > >
> > > > I’m working on getting
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946> done today.
> > Please
> > > > wait for that.
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big
> > refactoring
> > > > and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t going
> to
> > > > happen. Don’t wait for it.
> > > >
> > > > I also see the following as open or in progress and fix-in-1.29:
> > > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will Noble)
> > > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan Koo)
> > > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> (Stamatis)
> > > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas Rebele)
> > > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu / Duan
> > > Xiong)
> > > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> (Francesco Gini)
> > > >
> > > > What’s the status on those?
> > > >
> > > > Julian
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
> > > >
> > > > PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored tradition
> > the
> > > > email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi community,
> > > > >
> > > > > To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check the
> JIRA
> > > > list
> > > > > [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now remains
> > > > open/in
> > > > > progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be
> > merged.
> > > > > Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some fixes to
> > be
> > > > > released.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of Calcite by
> > the
> > > > end
> > > > > of this week.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please let me know if you have any questions.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -Rui
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Francesco Gini
Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release
Posted by Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>.
I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around CALCITE-4898 and
maven repositories and category x licenses.
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang <am...@apache.org> wrote:
> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked as resolved
> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably not all those
> will make the 1.29.0 release.
>
>
> -Rui
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has been merged.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ruben
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Rui,
> > >
> > > Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 <
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked fixed,
> > > there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category X. That
> > > needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
> > >
> > > I’m working on getting
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946> done today.
> Please
> > > wait for that.
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big
> refactoring
> > > and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t going to
> > > happen. Don’t wait for it.
> > >
> > > I also see the following as open or in progress and fix-in-1.29:
> > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will Noble)
> > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan Koo)
> > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> (Stamatis)
> > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas Rebele)
> > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu / Duan
> > Xiong)
> > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> (Francesco Gini)
> > >
> > > What’s the status on those?
> > >
> > > Julian
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
> > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
> > >
> > > PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored tradition
> the
> > > email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi community,
> > > >
> > > > To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check the JIRA
> > > list
> > > > [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now remains
> > > open/in
> > > > progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be
> merged.
> > > > Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some fixes to
> be
> > > > released.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of Calcite by
> the
> > > end
> > > > of this week.
> > > >
> > > > Please let me know if you have any questions.
> > > >
> > > > [1]:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -Rui
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release
Posted by Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>.
For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked as resolved
since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably not all those
will make the 1.29.0 release.
-Rui
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has been merged.
>
> Regards,
> Ruben
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Rui,
> >
> > Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked fixed,
> > there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category X. That
> > needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
> >
> > I’m working on getting
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946> done today. Please
> > wait for that.
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big refactoring
> > and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t going to
> > happen. Don’t wait for it.
> >
> > I also see the following as open or in progress and fix-in-1.29:
> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will Noble)
> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan Koo)
> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> (Stamatis)
> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas Rebele)
> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu / Duan
> Xiong)
> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> (Francesco Gini)
> >
> > What’s the status on those?
> >
> > Julian
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
> >
> > PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored tradition the
> > email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
> >
> >
> > > On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi community,
> > >
> > > To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check the JIRA
> > list
> > > [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now remains
> > open/in
> > > progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be merged.
> > > Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some fixes to be
> > > released.
> > >
> > >
> > > My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of Calcite by the
> > end
> > > of this week.
> > >
> > > Please let me know if you have any questions.
> > >
> > > [1]:
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
> > >
> > >
> > > -Rui
> >
> >
>
Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release
Posted by Ruben Q L <ru...@gmail.com>.
Hello,
FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has been merged.
Regards,
Ruben
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Rui,
>
> Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked fixed,
> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category X. That
> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
>
> I’m working on getting https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946> done today. Please
> wait for that.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big refactoring
> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t going to
> happen. Don’t wait for it.
>
> I also see the following as open or in progress and fix-in-1.29:
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will Noble)
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan Koo)
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> (Stamatis)
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas Rebele)
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu / Duan Xiong)
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> (Francesco Gini)
>
> What’s the status on those?
>
> Julian
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
>
> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored tradition the
> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
>
>
> > On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi community,
> >
> > To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check the JIRA
> list
> > [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now remains
> open/in
> > progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be merged.
> > Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some fixes to be
> > released.
> >
> >
> > My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of Calcite by the
> end
> > of this week.
> >
> > Please let me know if you have any questions.
> >
> > [1]:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
> >
> >
> > -Rui
>
>
Re: [Calcite Release] Preparing for 1.29.0 Release
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com>.
Rui,
Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked fixed, there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category X. That needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
I’m working on getting https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946> done today. Please wait for that.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big refactoring and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t going to happen. Don’t wait for it.
I also see the following as open or in progress and fix-in-1.29:
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will Noble)
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan Koo)
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> (Stamatis)
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas Rebele)
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu / Duan Xiong)
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> (Francesco Gini)
What’s the status on those?
Julian
[1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored tradition the email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi community,
>
> To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check the JIRA list
> [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now remains open/in
> progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be merged.
> Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some fixes to be
> released.
>
>
> My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of Calcite by the end
> of this week.
>
> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>
> [1]:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
>
>
> -Rui