[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-8632) Poor Python UDF performance because of RDD caching

["Michael Armbrust (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-8632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Michael Armbrust updated SPARK-8632:
------------------------------------
    Shepherd: Davies Liu

> Poor Python UDF performance because of RDD caching
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-8632
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-8632
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: PySpark, SQL
>    Affects Versions: 1.4.0
>            Reporter: Justin Uang
>
> {quote}
> We have been running into performance problems using Python UDFs with DataFrames at large scale.
> From the implementation of BatchPythonEvaluation, it looks like the goal was to reuse the PythonRDD code. It caches the entire child RDD so that it can do two passes over the data. One to give to the PythonRDD, then one to join the python lambda results with the original row (which may have java objects that should be passed through).
> In addition, it caches all the columns, even the ones that don't need to be processed by the Python UDF. In the cases I was working with, I had a 500 column table, and i wanted to use a python UDF for one column, and it ended up caching all 500 columns. 
> {quote}
> http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/Python-UDF-performance-at-large-scale-td12843.html



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org