You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by Andrei Dulceanu <ad...@apache.org> on 2021/01/21 13:52:22 UTC
Jackrabbit Oak 1.38.0 release plan
Hi all,
I'm planning to cut Jackrabbit Oak 1.38.0 tomorrow.
I transitioned all open issues scheduled for 1.38.0 to 1.40.0:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OAK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.38.0%20%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved
The candidate release notes are here:
https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/blob/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
Let me know if there are any objections.
Regards,
Andrei
Re: Jackrabbit Oak 1.38.0 release plan
Posted by Angela Schreiber <an...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
hi
afaik the test class you refer to in the ticket summary was added in the light of OAK-9275.
kind regards
angela
________________________________
From: Julian Reschke <ju...@gmx.de>
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 3:54 PM
To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org <oa...@jackrabbit.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Jackrabbit Oak 1.38.0 release plan
Am 21.01.2021 um 15:47 schrieb Angela Schreiber:
> hi julian
>
> so far i didn't manage to reproduce the test failure you describe in OAK-9324<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9324> and nor did i see it failing in the integration. so, not sure this should block the release given that it might be limited to windows.
> also note: the ticket you link as likely root cause for the failing test (OAK-9275<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9275>) was about restoring test-coverage (caused by OAK-8769<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8769>).
> ...
Well yes, it most certainly has to do with the Windows platform.
I can only state that tests did pass up to this change, and now they
fail. As such, if there was a release vote, I would have to vote "-1".
If this is not a regression of the code per se, but just tests that did
not run before, then the right thing would be to disable these tests on
Windows, and link that change to the ticket.
Best regards, Julian
Re: Jackrabbit Oak 1.38.0 release plan
Posted by Julian Reschke <ju...@gmx.de>.
Am 21.01.2021 um 15:47 schrieb Angela Schreiber:
> hi julian
>
> so far i didn't manage to reproduce the test failure you describe in OAK-9324<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9324> and nor did i see it failing in the integration. so, not sure this should block the release given that it might be limited to windows.
> also note: the ticket you link as likely root cause for the failing test (OAK-9275<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9275>) was about restoring test-coverage (caused by OAK-8769<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8769>).
> ...
Well yes, it most certainly has to do with the Windows platform.
I can only state that tests did pass up to this change, and now they
fail. As such, if there was a release vote, I would have to vote "-1".
If this is not a regression of the code per se, but just tests that did
not run before, then the right thing would be to disable these tests on
Windows, and link that change to the ticket.
Best regards, Julian
Re: Jackrabbit Oak 1.38.0 release plan
Posted by Angela Schreiber <an...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
hi julian
so far i didn't manage to reproduce the test failure you describe in OAK-9324<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9324> and nor did i see it failing in the integration. so, not sure this should block the release given that it might be limited to windows.
also note: the ticket you link as likely root cause for the failing test (OAK-9275<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9275>) was about restoring test-coverage (caused by OAK-8769<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8769>).
kind regards
angela
________________________________
From: Julian Reschke <ju...@gmx.de>
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 2:55 PM
To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org <oa...@jackrabbit.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Jackrabbit Oak 1.38.0 release plan
Am 21.01.2021 um 14:52 schrieb Andrei Dulceanu:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm planning to cut Jackrabbit Oak 1.38.0 tomorrow.
>
> I transitioned all open issues scheduled for 1.38.0 to 1.40.0:
> ...
See <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9324>: tests fail on
Windows. I don't think we should release with this issue.
Best regards, Julian
Re: Jackrabbit Oak 1.38.0 release plan
Posted by Julian Reschke <ju...@gmx.de>.
Am 21.01.2021 um 14:52 schrieb Andrei Dulceanu:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm planning to cut Jackrabbit Oak 1.38.0 tomorrow.
>
> I transitioned all open issues scheduled for 1.38.0 to 1.40.0:
> ...
See <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9324>: tests fail on
Windows. I don't think we should release with this issue.
Best regards, Julian