You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by Carl Marcum <cm...@apache.org> on 2022/04/21 12:57:24 UTC
Bugzilla list_id parameter in URL question
Hi All,
Does anyone know what the list_id parameter is for in the URL after a
search?
For example:
If I do an advanced search for issues fixed in 4.1.12 milestone I get
this for a URL:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?list_id=249822&query_format=advanced&resolution=FIXED&resolution=FIXED_WITHOUT_CODE&target_milestone=4.1.12
If I do it again I get a different list_id.
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?list_id=249823&query_format=advanced&resolution=FIXED&resolution=FIXED_WITHOUT_CODE&target_milestone=4.1.12
If I remove it like this and use it:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&resolution=FIXED&resolution=FIXED_WITHOUT_CODE&target_milestone=4.1.12
I get a new list_id again.
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?list_id=249824&query_format=advanced&resolution=FIXED&resolution=FIXED_WITHOUT_CODE&target_milestone=4.1.12
If I reuse a previous one with the list_id it stays the same.
Are these result lists stored in the database or something?
Best regards,
Carl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Bugzilla list_id parameter in URL question
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi Marcus,
Am 21.04.22 um 23:58 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 21.04.22 um 23:43 schrieb Carl Marcum:
>> On 4/21/22 4:15 PM, Marcus wrote:
>>> Am 21.04.22 um 14:57 schrieb Carl Marcum:
>>>> Does anyone know what the list_id parameter is for in the URL after
>>>> a search?
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>
>>> I did a quick search with Google (bugzilla url list_id) and found
>>> this as first hit:
>>>
>>> https://support-bugzilla.mozilla.narkive.com/jXnwYmle/purpose-of-list-id-url-parameter
>>
>>
>> So it seems the list_id may be a saved result, meaning if something
>> happens to an issue that would change the search result list it would
>> not be updated when using the list_id in a URL.
>> You have to do a new search or not include the list_id in the URL to
>> get the current results.
>> At least that is the way I'm understanding it.
>>
>> Now my questions is:
>> When we provide a URL like this in a release blog post or
>> announcement should we do a new search and use the list_id in the URL
>> so we have a snapshot in time or
>> not include it so each user gets an up-to-date result?
>>
>> For example, if an issue is changed from fixed to reopened, do we
>> want that issue to appear in the list after that or not?
>>
>> It might be easier on the database if we use the list_id at release
>> time so everyone that follows the link isn't creating a new entry as
>> long as we're okay with the snapshot in time list.
>
> as we present a software release which is fix when published, so it
> cannot be changed afterwards, I would prefer to deliver a list of its
> issues which is also fixed. So, let's include (and just keep) the URL
> paramter.
While browsing through Bugzilla I sometimes find issues that were fixed
in a certain release without knowing that an issue existed. Then I
change them to FIXED and set the milestone accordingly,
They do show up in the list now. This does not happen very often, but I
am OK with that.
Regards,
Matthias
>
> My 2ct.
>
> Marcus
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
Re: Bugzilla list_id parameter in URL question
Posted by Marcus <ma...@wtnet.de>.
Am 21.04.22 um 23:43 schrieb Carl Marcum:
> On 4/21/22 4:15 PM, Marcus wrote:
>> Am 21.04.22 um 14:57 schrieb Carl Marcum:
>>> Does anyone know what the list_id parameter is for in the URL after a
>>> search?
>>>
>>> [...]
>>
>> I did a quick search with Google (bugzilla url list_id) and found this
>> as first hit:
>>
>> https://support-bugzilla.mozilla.narkive.com/jXnwYmle/purpose-of-list-id-url-parameter
>
> So it seems the list_id may be a saved result, meaning if something
> happens to an issue that would change the search result list it would
> not be updated when using the list_id in a URL.
> You have to do a new search or not include the list_id in the URL to get
> the current results.
> At least that is the way I'm understanding it.
>
> Now my questions is:
> When we provide a URL like this in a release blog post or announcement
> should we do a new search and use the list_id in the URL so we have a
> snapshot in time or
> not include it so each user gets an up-to-date result?
>
> For example, if an issue is changed from fixed to reopened, do we want
> that issue to appear in the list after that or not?
>
> It might be easier on the database if we use the list_id at release time
> so everyone that follows the link isn't creating a new entry as long as
> we're okay with the snapshot in time list.
as we present a software release which is fix when published, so it
cannot be changed afterwards, I would prefer to deliver a list of its
issues which is also fixed. So, let's include (and just keep) the URL
paramter.
My 2ct.
Marcus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Bugzilla list_id parameter in URL question
Posted by Carl Marcum <cm...@apache.org>.
Hi Marcus and All,
On 4/21/22 4:15 PM, Marcus wrote:
> Am 21.04.22 um 14:57 schrieb Carl Marcum:
>> Does anyone know what the list_id parameter is for in the URL after a
>> search?
>>
>> [...]
>
> I did a quick search with Google (bugzilla url list_id) and found this
> as first hit:
>
> https://support-bugzilla.mozilla.narkive.com/jXnwYmle/purpose-of-list-id-url-parameter
>
>
> HTH
>
> Marcus
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
So it seems the list_id may be a saved result, meaning if something
happens to an issue that would change the search result list it would
not be updated when using the list_id in a URL.
You have to do a new search or not include the list_id in the URL to get
the current results.
At least that is the way I'm understanding it.
Now my questions is:
When we provide a URL like this in a release blog post or announcement
should we do a new search and use the list_id in the URL so we have a
snapshot in time or
not include it so each user gets an up-to-date result?
For example, if an issue is changed from fixed to reopened, do we want
that issue to appear in the list after that or not?
It might be easier on the database if we use the list_id at release time
so everyone that follows the link isn't creating a new entry as long as
we're okay with the snapshot in time list.
Thanks,
Carl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Bugzilla list_id parameter in URL question
Posted by Marcus <ma...@wtnet.de>.
Am 21.04.22 um 14:57 schrieb Carl Marcum:
> Does anyone know what the list_id parameter is for in the URL after a
> search?
>
> [...]
I did a quick search with Google (bugzilla url list_id) and found this
as first hit:
https://support-bugzilla.mozilla.narkive.com/jXnwYmle/purpose-of-list-id-url-parameter
HTH
Marcus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org