You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "Leonard Flournoy (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/01/18 18:29:30 UTC
[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-2753) the "namingProviderUrl" element
does *not* appear to control which IP addresses the RMI service binds to
the "namingProviderUrl" element does *not* appear to control which IP addresses the RMI service binds to
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: GERONIMO-2753
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2753
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: management
Affects Versions: 1.1.1
Environment: All
Reporter: Leonard Flournoy
Fix For: 1.1.1
Unfortunately, the "namingProviderUrl" element
does *not* appear to control which IP addresses the RMI service binds to
at the network level. In fact, from a quick look at the Geronimo source
code, it appears that "0.0.0.0" is hard-coded as the IP address to which
the RMI service binds:
In
modules/geronimo-system/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/system/rmi/RMI
RegistryService.java:
----8<---
public String getHost() {
return "0.0.0.0";
}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2753) the "namingProviderUrl" element
does *not* appear to control which IP addresses the RMI service binds to
Posted by "Jeff Genender (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Jeff Genender updated GERONIMO-2753:
------------------------------------
Affects Version/s: 1.2
> the "namingProviderUrl" element does *not* appear to control which IP addresses the RMI service binds to
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-2753
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2753
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: management
> Affects Versions: 1.1.1, 1.1.x, 1.2, 2.0
> Environment: All
> Reporter: Leonard Flournoy
> Assigned To: Jeff Genender
> Fix For: 1.1.1
>
>
> Unfortunately, the "namingProviderUrl" element
> does *not* appear to control which IP addresses the RMI service binds to
> at the network level. In fact, from a quick look at the Geronimo source
> code, it appears that "0.0.0.0" is hard-coded as the IP address to which
> the RMI service binds:
> In
> modules/geronimo-system/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/system/rmi/RMI
> RegistryService.java:
> ----8<---
> public String getHost() {
> return "0.0.0.0";
> }
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-2753) the "namingProviderUrl" element
does *not* appear to control which IP addresses the RMI service binds to
Posted by "Jeff Genender (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Jeff Genender reassigned GERONIMO-2753:
---------------------------------------
Assignee: Jeff Genender
> the "namingProviderUrl" element does *not* appear to control which IP addresses the RMI service binds to
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-2753
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2753
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: management
> Affects Versions: 1.1.1
> Environment: All
> Reporter: Leonard Flournoy
> Assigned To: Jeff Genender
> Fix For: 1.1.1
>
>
> Unfortunately, the "namingProviderUrl" element
> does *not* appear to control which IP addresses the RMI service binds to
> at the network level. In fact, from a quick look at the Geronimo source
> code, it appears that "0.0.0.0" is hard-coded as the IP address to which
> the RMI service binds:
> In
> modules/geronimo-system/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/system/rmi/RMI
> RegistryService.java:
> ----8<---
> public String getHost() {
> return "0.0.0.0";
> }
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-2753) the "namingProviderUrl" element does
*not* appear to control which IP addresses the RMI service binds to
Posted by "Jeff Genender (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Jeff Genender closed GERONIMO-2753.
-----------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.1.1)
2.0-M2
1.2
1.1.x
Fixed. The "host" attribute can now be set. Fixed in 1.1-BRANCH, 1.2-BRANCH, and TRUNK.
> the "namingProviderUrl" element does *not* appear to control which IP addresses the RMI service binds to
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-2753
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2753
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: management
> Affects Versions: 1.1.1, 1.1.x, 1.2, 2.0
> Environment: All
> Reporter: Leonard Flournoy
> Assigned To: Jeff Genender
> Fix For: 1.1.x, 1.2, 2.0-M2
>
>
> Unfortunately, the "namingProviderUrl" element
> does *not* appear to control which IP addresses the RMI service binds to
> at the network level. In fact, from a quick look at the Geronimo source
> code, it appears that "0.0.0.0" is hard-coded as the IP address to which
> the RMI service binds:
> In
> modules/geronimo-system/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/system/rmi/RMI
> RegistryService.java:
> ----8<---
> public String getHost() {
> return "0.0.0.0";
> }
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2753) the "namingProviderUrl" element
does *not* appear to control which IP addresses the RMI service binds to
Posted by "Jeff Genender (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Jeff Genender updated GERONIMO-2753:
------------------------------------
Affects Version/s: 2.0
1.1.x
> the "namingProviderUrl" element does *not* appear to control which IP addresses the RMI service binds to
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-2753
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2753
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: management
> Affects Versions: 1.1.1, 1.1.x, 2.0
> Environment: All
> Reporter: Leonard Flournoy
> Assigned To: Jeff Genender
> Fix For: 1.1.1
>
>
> Unfortunately, the "namingProviderUrl" element
> does *not* appear to control which IP addresses the RMI service binds to
> at the network level. In fact, from a quick look at the Geronimo source
> code, it appears that "0.0.0.0" is hard-coded as the IP address to which
> the RMI service binds:
> In
> modules/geronimo-system/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/system/rmi/RMI
> RegistryService.java:
> ----8<---
> public String getHost() {
> return "0.0.0.0";
> }
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2753) the "namingProviderUrl" element
does *not* appear to control which IP addresses the RMI service binds to
Posted by "Jeff Genender (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12465820 ]
Jeff Genender commented on GERONIMO-2753:
-----------------------------------------
I fixed the hard code for the host attribute in 1.2...I will get 1.1 and 2.x fixed next.
> the "namingProviderUrl" element does *not* appear to control which IP addresses the RMI service binds to
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-2753
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2753
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: management
> Affects Versions: 1.1.1
> Environment: All
> Reporter: Leonard Flournoy
> Assigned To: Jeff Genender
> Fix For: 1.1.1
>
>
> Unfortunately, the "namingProviderUrl" element
> does *not* appear to control which IP addresses the RMI service binds to
> at the network level. In fact, from a quick look at the Geronimo source
> code, it appears that "0.0.0.0" is hard-coded as the IP address to which
> the RMI service binds:
> In
> modules/geronimo-system/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/system/rmi/RMI
> RegistryService.java:
> ----8<---
> public String getHost() {
> return "0.0.0.0";
> }
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira