Marketing

[Thomas Jungblut <th...@googlemail.com>]

Hey guys, as you may read on the user-list:

I think，maybe, It is important to find some algorithm or some problem which
> is more suitable for using HAMA. Then, people can observe the contrast to
> the results between HAMA and MapReduce. Because more people want to know why
> they should choose HAMA, when they should choose HAMA.....
>

What do you think on that?
What can we improve?

Re: Marketing

["Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org>]

I mean, the first is ready to use. In/output system is a high priority.

And then, we'll need some Hama use cases in real-world and evangelists.

Since I have a large cluster, I'll more focus on evaluations and use cases.

Anyone interested in implementing In/Output system?

On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Thomas Jungblut
<th...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Okay. What is the result of the design issue?
>
> 2011/9/25 Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
>
>> Good idea.
>>
>> BTW, I think we have to implement in/output system as soon as
>> possible. then, I'll start to use Hama in my real applications.
>>
>> 2011/9/25 Thomas Jungblut <th...@googlemail.com>:
>> > What do you think about a Benchmark between MapReduce Pagerank and BSP
>> > Pagerank?
>> >
>> > 2011/9/24 Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
>> >
>> >> Real world applications..
>> >>
>> >> Sent from my iPad
>> >>
>> >> On Sep 24, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Thomas Jungblut <
>> >> thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Hey guys, as you may read on the user-list:
>> >> >
>> >> > I think，maybe, It is important to find some algorithm or some problem
>> >> which
>> >> >> is more suitable for using HAMA. Then, people can observe the
>> contrast
>> >> to
>> >> >> the results between HAMA and MapReduce. Because more people want to
>> know
>> >> why
>> >> >> they should choose HAMA, when they should choose HAMA.....
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > What do you think on that?
>> >> > What can we improve?
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Thomas Jungblut
>> > Berlin
>> >
>> > mobile: 0170-3081070
>> >
>> > business: thomas.jungblut@testberichte.de
>> > private: thomas.jungblut@gmail.com
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>> @eddieyoon
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Jungblut
> Berlin
>
> mobile: 0170-3081070
>
> business: thomas.jungblut@testberichte.de
> private: thomas.jungblut@gmail.com
>



-- 
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon

Re: Marketing

[Thomas Jungblut <th...@googlemail.com>]

Okay. What is the result of the design issue?

2011/9/25 Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>

> Good idea.
>
> BTW, I think we have to implement in/output system as soon as
> possible. then, I'll start to use Hama in my real applications.
>
> 2011/9/25 Thomas Jungblut <th...@googlemail.com>:
> > What do you think about a Benchmark between MapReduce Pagerank and BSP
> > Pagerank?
> >
> > 2011/9/24 Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
> >
> >> Real world applications..
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPad
> >>
> >> On Sep 24, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Thomas Jungblut <
> >> thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hey guys, as you may read on the user-list:
> >> >
> >> > I think，maybe, It is important to find some algorithm or some problem
> >> which
> >> >> is more suitable for using HAMA. Then, people can observe the
> contrast
> >> to
> >> >> the results between HAMA and MapReduce. Because more people want to
> know
> >> why
> >> >> they should choose HAMA, when they should choose HAMA.....
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > What do you think on that?
> >> > What can we improve?
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thomas Jungblut
> > Berlin
> >
> > mobile: 0170-3081070
> >
> > business: thomas.jungblut@testberichte.de
> > private: thomas.jungblut@gmail.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> @eddieyoon
>



-- 
Thomas Jungblut
Berlin

mobile: 0170-3081070

business: thomas.jungblut@testberichte.de
private: thomas.jungblut@gmail.com

Re: Marketing

["Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org>]

Good idea.

BTW, I think we have to implement in/output system as soon as
possible. then, I'll start to use Hama in my real applications.

2011/9/25 Thomas Jungblut <th...@googlemail.com>:
> What do you think about a Benchmark between MapReduce Pagerank and BSP
> Pagerank?
>
> 2011/9/24 Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
>
>> Real world applications..
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Sep 24, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Thomas Jungblut <
>> thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hey guys, as you may read on the user-list:
>> >
>> > I think，maybe, It is important to find some algorithm or some problem
>> which
>> >> is more suitable for using HAMA. Then, people can observe the contrast
>> to
>> >> the results between HAMA and MapReduce. Because more people want to know
>> why
>> >> they should choose HAMA, when they should choose HAMA.....
>> >>
>> >
>> > What do you think on that?
>> > What can we improve?
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Jungblut
> Berlin
>
> mobile: 0170-3081070
>
> business: thomas.jungblut@testberichte.de
> private: thomas.jungblut@gmail.com
>



-- 
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon

Re: Marketing

[Thomas Jungblut <th...@googlemail.com>]

What do you think about a Benchmark between MapReduce Pagerank and BSP
Pagerank?

2011/9/24 Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>

> Real world applications..
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Sep 24, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Thomas Jungblut <
> thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey guys, as you may read on the user-list:
> >
> > I think，maybe, It is important to find some algorithm or some problem
> which
> >> is more suitable for using HAMA. Then, people can observe the contrast
> to
> >> the results between HAMA and MapReduce. Because more people want to know
> why
> >> they should choose HAMA, when they should choose HAMA.....
> >>
> >
> > What do you think on that?
> > What can we improve?
>



-- 
Thomas Jungblut
Berlin

mobile: 0170-3081070

business: thomas.jungblut@testberichte.de
private: thomas.jungblut@gmail.com

Re: Marketing

["Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org>]

Real world applications..

Sent from my iPad

On Sep 24, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Thomas Jungblut <th...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Hey guys, as you may read on the user-list:
> 
> I think，maybe, It is important to find some algorithm or some problem which
>> is more suitable for using HAMA. Then, people can observe the contrast to
>> the results between HAMA and MapReduce. Because more people want to know why
>> they should choose HAMA, when they should choose HAMA.....
>> 
> 
> What do you think on that?
> What can we improve?