You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@karaf.apache.org by Charles Moulliard <cm...@gmail.com> on 2010/12/23 12:02:38 UTC
Pax-Web 0.8.1
Hi,
I would like to know if it is planned to include pax-web 0.8.1 in karaf
2.2.0 ? I'm interested by this version as it allows to provide
additional parameters for jetty in jetty.xml and configure the location
of this file using config admin or system property
(http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXWEB-193)
Regards,
Charles
Re: Pax-Web 0.8.1
Posted by Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>.
That was my hope too :)
I'm longing for a nightly build for the ops4j stuff :)
> Oha, I've read the mail bottom up and not top down :) Nevermind, I think we'll have pax
> snapshots available the moment the new build server is available @ops4j.org; and
> I hope the server is available soon :)
>
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 02:39:04PM +0100, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
>> Am 27.12.2010 14:35, schrieb Andreas Pieber:
>>> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 02:24:22PM +0100, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> first hope you guys had some good holidays :)
>>>>
>>>> concerning the latest version of pax-web I really would love to use
>>>> the latest snapshot version on trunk of karaf.
>>>> But we currently have not snapshot versions available on any maven repo :(
>>> small correction here: hudson pushes all builds to apache snapshot repo; karafs
>>> latest version (trunk/snapshot) can be found here [1]
>>>
>>> [1] http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/karaf/
>> I know for karaf, but for pax-web we don't have any snapshot repo,
>> which is the main issue for other
>> people testing all the stuff i did on pax web :)
>>
>>>> second, yes the pax configuration overrides the configuration of the
>>>> jetty xml.
>>>> But just the ones that are passed to jetty by pax. All specialized
>>>> configurations
>>>> jaas as example are only configurable through the jetty xml.
>>>>
>>>> hope that helped a bit :)
>>>>
>>>> Am 23.12.2010 14:13, schrieb Charles Moulliard:
>>>>> I found my mistake. I should use the same port number as defined in
>>>>> jetty.xml config file
>>>>>
>>>>> In fact, no new instance is created but pax-web use jetty.xml config
>>>>> if define and override the parameters provided to karaf (port 8181 by
>>>>> example)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Guillaume Nodet<gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Achim has much more experience on using jetty in Karaf than me, so
>>>>>> hopefully he can share some infos.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 13:42, Charles Moulliard<cm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> pax-web 0.8.2 will be required because pax-web-jetty must import
>>>>>>> classes org.eclipse.jetty.jaas packages for the bundle and those
>>>>>>> classes are not included in pax-web 0.8.1 MANIFEST.mf file
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> According to the first test that I made, I can register a new jetty
>>>>>>> server using /etc/jetty.xml file but the kareaf webconsole defined
>>>>>>> with port 8181 does not respond...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Guillaume Nodet<gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Sure. Just make sure you associate the commit with a JIRA issue.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:28, Charles Moulliard<cm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Can I update the pom + feature file ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 23/12/10 12:15, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Definitely, we should upgrade to the latest version.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, December 23, 2010, Charles Moulliard<cm...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to know if it is planned to include pax-web 0.8.1 in karaf
>>>>>>>>>>> 2.2.0 ? I'm interested by this version as it allows to provide additional
>>>>>>>>>>> parameters for jetty in jetty.xml and configure the location of this file
>>>>>>>>>>> using config admin or system property
>>>>>>>>>>> (http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXWEB-193)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Charles
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>>>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>>>>
Re: Pax-Web 0.8.1
Posted by Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com>.
Oha, I've read the mail bottom up and not top down :) Nevermind, I think we'll have pax
snapshots available the moment the new build server is available @ops4j.org; and
I hope the server is available soon :)
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 02:39:04PM +0100, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
> Am 27.12.2010 14:35, schrieb Andreas Pieber:
> >On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 02:24:22PM +0100, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>first hope you guys had some good holidays :)
> >>
> >>concerning the latest version of pax-web I really would love to use
> >>the latest snapshot version on trunk of karaf.
> >>But we currently have not snapshot versions available on any maven repo :(
> >small correction here: hudson pushes all builds to apache snapshot repo; karafs
> >latest version (trunk/snapshot) can be found here [1]
> >
> >[1] http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/karaf/
>
> I know for karaf, but for pax-web we don't have any snapshot repo,
> which is the main issue for other
> people testing all the stuff i did on pax web :)
>
> >>second, yes the pax configuration overrides the configuration of the
> >>jetty xml.
> >>But just the ones that are passed to jetty by pax. All specialized
> >>configurations
> >>jaas as example are only configurable through the jetty xml.
> >>
> >>hope that helped a bit :)
> >>
> >>Am 23.12.2010 14:13, schrieb Charles Moulliard:
> >>>I found my mistake. I should use the same port number as defined in
> >>>jetty.xml config file
> >>>
> >>>In fact, no new instance is created but pax-web use jetty.xml config
> >>>if define and override the parameters provided to karaf (port 8181 by
> >>>example)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Guillaume Nodet<gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>Achim has much more experience on using jetty in Karaf than me, so
> >>>>hopefully he can share some infos.
> >>>>
> >>>>On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 13:42, Charles Moulliard<cm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>pax-web 0.8.2 will be required because pax-web-jetty must import
> >>>>>classes org.eclipse.jetty.jaas packages for the bundle and those
> >>>>>classes are not included in pax-web 0.8.1 MANIFEST.mf file
> >>>>>
> >>>>>According to the first test that I made, I can register a new jetty
> >>>>>server using /etc/jetty.xml file but the kareaf webconsole defined
> >>>>>with port 8181 does not respond...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Guillaume Nodet<gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>Sure. Just make sure you associate the commit with a JIRA issue.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:28, Charles Moulliard<cm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>Can I update the pom + feature file ?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>On 23/12/10 12:15, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> >>>>>>>>Definitely, we should upgrade to the latest version.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>On Thursday, December 23, 2010, Charles Moulliard<cm...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>I would like to know if it is planned to include pax-web 0.8.1 in karaf
> >>>>>>>>>2.2.0 ? I'm interested by this version as it allows to provide additional
> >>>>>>>>>parameters for jetty in jetty.xml and configure the location of this file
> >>>>>>>>>using config admin or system property
> >>>>>>>>>(http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXWEB-193)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>Charles
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>--
> >>>>>>Cheers,
> >>>>>>Guillaume Nodet
> >>>>>>------------------------
> >>>>>>Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >>>>>>------------------------
> >>>>>>Open Source SOA
> >>>>>>http://fusesource.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>--
> >>>>Cheers,
> >>>>Guillaume Nodet
> >>>>------------------------
> >>>>Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >>>>------------------------
> >>>>Open Source SOA
> >>>>http://fusesource.com
> >>>>
>
Re: Pax-Web 0.8.1
Posted by Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>.
Am 27.12.2010 14:35, schrieb Andreas Pieber:
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 02:24:22PM +0100, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> first hope you guys had some good holidays :)
>>
>> concerning the latest version of pax-web I really would love to use
>> the latest snapshot version on trunk of karaf.
>> But we currently have not snapshot versions available on any maven repo :(
> small correction here: hudson pushes all builds to apache snapshot repo; karafs
> latest version (trunk/snapshot) can be found here [1]
>
> [1] http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/karaf/
I know for karaf, but for pax-web we don't have any snapshot repo, which
is the main issue for other
people testing all the stuff i did on pax web :)
>> second, yes the pax configuration overrides the configuration of the
>> jetty xml.
>> But just the ones that are passed to jetty by pax. All specialized
>> configurations
>> jaas as example are only configurable through the jetty xml.
>>
>> hope that helped a bit :)
>>
>> Am 23.12.2010 14:13, schrieb Charles Moulliard:
>>> I found my mistake. I should use the same port number as defined in
>>> jetty.xml config file
>>>
>>> In fact, no new instance is created but pax-web use jetty.xml config
>>> if define and override the parameters provided to karaf (port 8181 by
>>> example)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Guillaume Nodet<gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Achim has much more experience on using jetty in Karaf than me, so
>>>> hopefully he can share some infos.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 13:42, Charles Moulliard<cm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> pax-web 0.8.2 will be required because pax-web-jetty must import
>>>>> classes org.eclipse.jetty.jaas packages for the bundle and those
>>>>> classes are not included in pax-web 0.8.1 MANIFEST.mf file
>>>>>
>>>>> According to the first test that I made, I can register a new jetty
>>>>> server using /etc/jetty.xml file but the kareaf webconsole defined
>>>>> with port 8181 does not respond...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Guillaume Nodet<gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Sure. Just make sure you associate the commit with a JIRA issue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:28, Charles Moulliard<cm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Can I update the pom + feature file ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 23/12/10 12:15, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>>>>> Definitely, we should upgrade to the latest version.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thursday, December 23, 2010, Charles Moulliard<cm...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would like to know if it is planned to include pax-web 0.8.1 in karaf
>>>>>>>>> 2.2.0 ? I'm interested by this version as it allows to provide additional
>>>>>>>>> parameters for jetty in jetty.xml and configure the location of this file
>>>>>>>>> using config admin or system property
>>>>>>>>> (http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXWEB-193)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Charles
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>> ------------------------
>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>> ------------------------
>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>>
Re: Pax-Web 0.8.1
Posted by Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 02:24:22PM +0100, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> first hope you guys had some good holidays :)
>
> concerning the latest version of pax-web I really would love to use
> the latest snapshot version on trunk of karaf.
> But we currently have not snapshot versions available on any maven repo :(
small correction here: hudson pushes all builds to apache snapshot repo; karafs
latest version (trunk/snapshot) can be found here [1]
[1] http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/karaf/
>
> second, yes the pax configuration overrides the configuration of the
> jetty xml.
> But just the ones that are passed to jetty by pax. All specialized
> configurations
> jaas as example are only configurable through the jetty xml.
>
> hope that helped a bit :)
>
> Am 23.12.2010 14:13, schrieb Charles Moulliard:
> >I found my mistake. I should use the same port number as defined in
> >jetty.xml config file
> >
> >In fact, no new instance is created but pax-web use jetty.xml config
> >if define and override the parameters provided to karaf (port 8181 by
> >example)
> >
> >
> >On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Guillaume Nodet<gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>Achim has much more experience on using jetty in Karaf than me, so
> >>hopefully he can share some infos.
> >>
> >>On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 13:42, Charles Moulliard<cm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>pax-web 0.8.2 will be required because pax-web-jetty must import
> >>>classes org.eclipse.jetty.jaas packages for the bundle and those
> >>>classes are not included in pax-web 0.8.1 MANIFEST.mf file
> >>>
> >>>According to the first test that I made, I can register a new jetty
> >>>server using /etc/jetty.xml file but the kareaf webconsole defined
> >>>with port 8181 does not respond...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Guillaume Nodet<gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>Sure. Just make sure you associate the commit with a JIRA issue.
> >>>>
> >>>>On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:28, Charles Moulliard<cm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>Can I update the pom + feature file ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>On 23/12/10 12:15, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> >>>>>>Definitely, we should upgrade to the latest version.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>On Thursday, December 23, 2010, Charles Moulliard<cm...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>Hi,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>I would like to know if it is planned to include pax-web 0.8.1 in karaf
> >>>>>>>2.2.0 ? I'm interested by this version as it allows to provide additional
> >>>>>>>parameters for jetty in jetty.xml and configure the location of this file
> >>>>>>>using config admin or system property
> >>>>>>>(http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXWEB-193)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Regards,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Charles
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>--
> >>>>Cheers,
> >>>>Guillaume Nodet
> >>>>------------------------
> >>>>Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >>>>------------------------
> >>>>Open Source SOA
> >>>>http://fusesource.com
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>Cheers,
> >>Guillaume Nodet
> >>------------------------
> >>Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >>------------------------
> >>Open Source SOA
> >>http://fusesource.com
> >>
>
Re: Pax-Web 0.8.1
Posted by Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>.
Hi,
first hope you guys had some good holidays :)
concerning the latest version of pax-web I really would love to use the
latest snapshot version on trunk of karaf.
But we currently have not snapshot versions available on any maven repo :(
second, yes the pax configuration overrides the configuration of the
jetty xml.
But just the ones that are passed to jetty by pax. All specialized
configurations
jaas as example are only configurable through the jetty xml.
hope that helped a bit :)
Am 23.12.2010 14:13, schrieb Charles Moulliard:
> I found my mistake. I should use the same port number as defined in
> jetty.xml config file
>
> In fact, no new instance is created but pax-web use jetty.xml config
> if define and override the parameters provided to karaf (port 8181 by
> example)
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Guillaume Nodet<gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Achim has much more experience on using jetty in Karaf than me, so
>> hopefully he can share some infos.
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 13:42, Charles Moulliard<cm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> pax-web 0.8.2 will be required because pax-web-jetty must import
>>> classes org.eclipse.jetty.jaas packages for the bundle and those
>>> classes are not included in pax-web 0.8.1 MANIFEST.mf file
>>>
>>> According to the first test that I made, I can register a new jetty
>>> server using /etc/jetty.xml file but the kareaf webconsole defined
>>> with port 8181 does not respond...
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Guillaume Nodet<gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Sure. Just make sure you associate the commit with a JIRA issue.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:28, Charles Moulliard<cm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Can I update the pom + feature file ?
>>>>>
>>>>> On 23/12/10 12:15, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>>> Definitely, we should upgrade to the latest version.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thursday, December 23, 2010, Charles Moulliard<cm...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would like to know if it is planned to include pax-web 0.8.1 in karaf
>>>>>>> 2.2.0 ? I'm interested by this version as it allows to provide additional
>>>>>>> parameters for jetty in jetty.xml and configure the location of this file
>>>>>>> using config admin or system property
>>>>>>> (http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXWEB-193)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Charles
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>> ------------------------
>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>> ------------------------
>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>>
Re: Pax-Web 0.8.1
Posted by Charles Moulliard <cm...@gmail.com>.
I found my mistake. I should use the same port number as defined in
jetty.xml config file
In fact, no new instance is created but pax-web use jetty.xml config
if define and override the parameters provided to karaf (port 8181 by
example)
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Achim has much more experience on using jetty in Karaf than me, so
> hopefully he can share some infos.
>
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 13:42, Charles Moulliard <cm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> pax-web 0.8.2 will be required because pax-web-jetty must import
>> classes org.eclipse.jetty.jaas packages for the bundle and those
>> classes are not included in pax-web 0.8.1 MANIFEST.mf file
>>
>> According to the first test that I made, I can register a new jetty
>> server using /etc/jetty.xml file but the kareaf webconsole defined
>> with port 8181 does not respond...
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Sure. Just make sure you associate the commit with a JIRA issue.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:28, Charles Moulliard <cm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Can I update the pom + feature file ?
>>>>
>>>> On 23/12/10 12:15, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Definitely, we should upgrade to the latest version.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thursday, December 23, 2010, Charles Moulliard<cm...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to know if it is planned to include pax-web 0.8.1 in karaf
>>>>>> 2.2.0 ? I'm interested by this version as it allows to provide additional
>>>>>> parameters for jetty in jetty.xml and configure the location of this file
>>>>>> using config admin or system property
>>>>>> (http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXWEB-193)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Charles
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>> ------------------------
>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>> ------------------------
>>> Open Source SOA
>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
>
Re: Pax-Web 0.8.1
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Achim has much more experience on using jetty in Karaf than me, so
hopefully he can share some infos.
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 13:42, Charles Moulliard <cm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> pax-web 0.8.2 will be required because pax-web-jetty must import
> classes org.eclipse.jetty.jaas packages for the bundle and those
> classes are not included in pax-web 0.8.1 MANIFEST.mf file
>
> According to the first test that I made, I can register a new jetty
> server using /etc/jetty.xml file but the kareaf webconsole defined
> with port 8181 does not respond...
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sure. Just make sure you associate the commit with a JIRA issue.
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:28, Charles Moulliard <cm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Can I update the pom + feature file ?
>>>
>>> On 23/12/10 12:15, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Definitely, we should upgrade to the latest version.
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, December 23, 2010, Charles Moulliard<cm...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to know if it is planned to include pax-web 0.8.1 in karaf
>>>>> 2.2.0 ? I'm interested by this version as it allows to provide additional
>>>>> parameters for jetty in jetty.xml and configure the location of this file
>>>>> using config admin or system property
>>>>> (http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXWEB-193)
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Charles
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
Re: Pax-Web 0.8.1
Posted by Charles Moulliard <cm...@gmail.com>.
pax-web 0.8.2 will be required because pax-web-jetty must import
classes org.eclipse.jetty.jaas packages for the bundle and those
classes are not included in pax-web 0.8.1 MANIFEST.mf file
According to the first test that I made, I can register a new jetty
server using /etc/jetty.xml file but the kareaf webconsole defined
with port 8181 does not respond...
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sure. Just make sure you associate the commit with a JIRA issue.
>
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:28, Charles Moulliard <cm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Can I update the pom + feature file ?
>>
>> On 23/12/10 12:15, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>
>>> Definitely, we should upgrade to the latest version.
>>>
>>> On Thursday, December 23, 2010, Charles Moulliard<cm...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to know if it is planned to include pax-web 0.8.1 in karaf
>>>> 2.2.0 ? I'm interested by this version as it allows to provide additional
>>>> parameters for jetty in jetty.xml and configure the location of this file
>>>> using config admin or system property
>>>> (http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXWEB-193)
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Charles
>>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
>
Re: Pax-Web 0.8.1
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Sure. Just make sure you associate the commit with a JIRA issue.
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:28, Charles Moulliard <cm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can I update the pom + feature file ?
>
> On 23/12/10 12:15, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>
>> Definitely, we should upgrade to the latest version.
>>
>> On Thursday, December 23, 2010, Charles Moulliard<cm...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I would like to know if it is planned to include pax-web 0.8.1 in karaf
>>> 2.2.0 ? I'm interested by this version as it allows to provide additional
>>> parameters for jetty in jetty.xml and configure the location of this file
>>> using config admin or system property
>>> (http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXWEB-193)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Charles
>>>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
Re: Pax-Web 0.8.1
Posted by Charles Moulliard <cm...@gmail.com>.
Can I update the pom + feature file ?
On 23/12/10 12:15, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Definitely, we should upgrade to the latest version.
>
> On Thursday, December 23, 2010, Charles Moulliard<cm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to know if it is planned to include pax-web 0.8.1 in karaf 2.2.0 ? I'm interested by this version as it allows to provide additional parameters for jetty in jetty.xml and configure the location of this file using config admin or system property (http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXWEB-193)
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Charles
>>
Re: Pax-Web 0.8.1
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Definitely, we should upgrade to the latest version.
On Thursday, December 23, 2010, Charles Moulliard <cm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know if it is planned to include pax-web 0.8.1 in karaf 2.2.0 ? I'm interested by this version as it allows to provide additional parameters for jetty in jetty.xml and configure the location of this file using config admin or system property (http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXWEB-193)
>
> Regards,
>
> Charles
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com