You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to user@cassandra.apache.org by Stephen Pope <St...@quest.com> on 2011/06/21 16:31:16 UTC

Keys-only query

We just recently switched to 0.8 (from 0.7.4), and it looks like key-only queries are broken (number of columns = 0). The same query works if we switch the number of columns to 1. Is there a new mechanism for getting key-only? We can't use CQL yet since we're using .NET for our development.

Cheers,
Steve

Re: Keys-only query

Posted by Jeremy Hanna <je...@gmail.com>.

Also - there is an open ticket to create a .NET CQL driver - may be worth watching or if you'd like to help out with it somehow:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2634

On Jun 21, 2011, at 9:31 AM, Stephen Pope wrote:

> We just recently switched to 0.8 (from 0.7.4), and it looks like key-only queries are broken (number of columns = 0). The same query works if we switch the number of columns to 1. Is there a new mechanism for getting key-only? We can’t use CQL yet since we’re using .NET for our development.
>  
> Cheers,
> Steve

Re: Keys-only query

Posted by Nate McCall <na...@datastax.com>.

This is a known issue and is being tracked on the following:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2653

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Stephen Pope <St...@quest.com> wrote:
> We just recently switched to 0.8 (from 0.7.4), and it looks like key-only
> queries are broken (number of columns = 0). The same query works if we
> switch the number of columns to 1. Is there a new mechanism for getting
> key-only? We can’t use CQL yet since we’re using .NET for our development.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Steve