You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@servicemix.apache.org by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> on 2006/08/22 10:18:17 UTC
ServiceMix 3.0
I think we should release 3.0 asap.
The remaining todos are:
* xbean 2.6 release
* jencks 1.3 release (dependant on xbean)
* check samples and ensure they work
I will handled these. Note that the docs still need lots
of improvements, but I'm not sure it should really delay the
release... Thoughts ? Did i miss something ?
On another related point, it would be nice at the same time
to create a 3.0 branch for this release so that development
can continue on trunk.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Re: ServiceMix 3.0
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
On 8/22/06, Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/22/06, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think we should release 3.0 asap.
> > The remaining todos are:
> > * xbean 2.6 release
> > * jencks 1.3 release (dependant on xbean)
>
> How far off are these two?
Jencks should be release as soon as xbean is.
For xbean, see the xbean dev list (I just posted a mail there).
There is one outstanding JIRA in RTC and a question to solve
about including qdox 1.6.
>
> > * check samples and ensure they work
>
> Are there tests for the samples? Maybe we should consider creating
> some so it's easier and faster to determine if they're working or not?
> But, then again, maybe this is going too far.
Well, there aren't.
Now that the use maven to be built, we should be able to add some
tests to them, but i'm not sure how easy it would be (especially when
using the std jbi packaging)
>
> > I will handled these. Note that the docs still need lots
> > of improvements, but I'm not sure it should really delay the
> > release... Thoughts ? Did i miss something ?
> >
> > On another related point, it would be nice at the same time
> > to create a 3.0 branch for this release so that development
> > can continue on trunk.
>
> Agreed, a branch is a necessity.
>
> Bruce
> --
> perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> );'
>
> Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
> Apache ActiveMQ - http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/
> Apache ServiceMix - http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/
> Castor - http://castor.org/
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Re: ServiceMix 3.0
Posted by Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>.
On 8/22/06, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think we should release 3.0 asap.
> The remaining todos are:
> * xbean 2.6 release
> * jencks 1.3 release (dependant on xbean)
How far off are these two?
> * check samples and ensure they work
Are there tests for the samples? Maybe we should consider creating
some so it's easier and faster to determine if they're working or not?
But, then again, maybe this is going too far.
> I will handled these. Note that the docs still need lots
> of improvements, but I'm not sure it should really delay the
> release... Thoughts ? Did i miss something ?
>
> On another related point, it would be nice at the same time
> to create a 3.0 branch for this release so that development
> can continue on trunk.
Agreed, a branch is a necessity.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
Apache ActiveMQ - http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/
Apache ServiceMix - http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/
Castor - http://castor.org/
Re: ServiceMix 3.0
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 8/22/06, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/22/06, James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 8/22/06, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I think we should release 3.0 asap.
> >
> > +1
> >
> >
> > > The remaining todos are:
> > > * xbean 2.6 release
> > > * jencks 1.3 release (dependant on xbean)
> > > * check samples and ensure they work
> > >
> > > I will handled these. Note that the docs still need lots
> > > of improvements, but I'm not sure it should really delay the
> > > release...
> >
> > I'll try help out on the docs as much as I can (though am on vacation next week)
> >
> >
> > > Thoughts ? Did i miss something ?
> > >
> > > On another related point, it would be nice at the same time
> > > to create a 3.0 branch for this release so that development
> > > can continue on trunk.
> >
> > Agreed. Though it'd be nice ot hold off doing too much development
> > until 3.0 is out the door to minimise the backporting of fixes etc
>
> New development and fixes are two different problems imho.
Agreed - though backporting of fixes from trunk to a branch can be
time consuming; so it might be worth us all holding off for a couple
of weeks doing lots of new development until we've got the 3.0 release
cooked. No biggie
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: ServiceMix 3.0
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
On 8/22/06, James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/22/06, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think we should release 3.0 asap.
>
> +1
>
>
> > The remaining todos are:
> > * xbean 2.6 release
> > * jencks 1.3 release (dependant on xbean)
> > * check samples and ensure they work
> >
> > I will handled these. Note that the docs still need lots
> > of improvements, but I'm not sure it should really delay the
> > release...
>
> I'll try help out on the docs as much as I can (though am on vacation next week)
>
>
> > Thoughts ? Did i miss something ?
> >
> > On another related point, it would be nice at the same time
> > to create a 3.0 branch for this release so that development
> > can continue on trunk.
>
> Agreed. Though it'd be nice ot hold off doing too much development
> until 3.0 is out the door to minimise the backporting of fixes etc
New development and fixes are two different problems imho.
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Re: ServiceMix 3.0
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 8/22/06, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think we should release 3.0 asap.
+1
> The remaining todos are:
> * xbean 2.6 release
> * jencks 1.3 release (dependant on xbean)
> * check samples and ensure they work
>
> I will handled these. Note that the docs still need lots
> of improvements, but I'm not sure it should really delay the
> release...
I'll try help out on the docs as much as I can (though am on vacation next week)
> Thoughts ? Did i miss something ?
>
> On another related point, it would be nice at the same time
> to create a 3.0 branch for this release so that development
> can continue on trunk.
Agreed. Though it'd be nice ot hold off doing too much development
until 3.0 is out the door to minimise the backporting of fixes etc
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/