You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@vcl.apache.org by Andy Kurth <an...@ncsu.edu> on 2015/08/07 21:39:18 UTC
[DISCUSS] Windows 10 support for VCL 2.4.3?
We intended 2.4.3 to be a minor bugfix-only release, but with the recent
release of Windows 10 I think it would be worthwhile to add support for it
in this release. The subsequent 2.4.4/2.5 VCL release may not happen for a
while and people are going to want to start using it within VCL.
I have taken a quick look at Windows 10 and created a base image. The
current Windows 8.x code should work well enough but I did notice some
minor problems. I created a Jira issue yesterday where the problems
encountered are being detailed:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VCL-893
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Andy
Re: [DISCUSS] Windows 10 support for VCL 2.4.3?
Posted by Aaron Peeler <fa...@ncsu.edu>.
After reviewing the code, this is a very small bug with low impact.
The timing has to be exactly right for it to cause an issue. Removing
from 2.5 release
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Aaron Peeler <fa...@ncsu.edu> wrote:
> Need to test VCL-866 (Bug). If it is still an issue, it should be an
> easy fix before the release. If testing shows it is no longer an
> issue, I'll untag and remove it.
>
> The couple of issues I added previously are now untagged.
>
> ....and on the original topic of this thread I also think going to 2.5
> with windows 10 support would be beneficial or the community.
>
> Aaron
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Josh Thompson <jo...@ncsu.edu> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Since we have bugs fixed and would like to get those out, but with the
>> addition of a few features, I'd prefer to minimize what new features we work
>> to include in 2.5 to prevent feature creap.
>>
>> I untagged the following items related to the frontend because I haven't begun
>> work on them yet. If I get them implemented before we try to get 2.5 out,
>> I'll tag them again.
>>
>> VCL-801 (Improvement) rework how frontend determines to prompt user for
>> image revision
>> VCL-728 (Improvement) Add description column to variable table
>>
>> I haven't done any work toward VCL-869. I'd say to untag it as well, but
>> didn't do that yet since it affects thte backend too.
>>
>> I commented on VCL-870 and VCL-873 to remain tagged with 2.5.
>>
>> Josh
>>
>> On Monday, August 10, 2015 2:58:40 PM Andy Kurth wrote:
>>> I was about to change the "fix version" from 2.4.3 to 2.5 in Jira and
>>> noticed a bunch of issues already tagged for 2.5. These need to be sorted
>>> out.
>>>
>>> We discussed how a roadmap would be decided and how issues would be tagged
>>> last September (http://vcl.markmail.org/thread/xulfqvyg3sgqbong). My
>>> understanding is that there was agreement that issues other than bug fixes
>>> would not be tagged with a specific version without discussion. It seems
>>> as though we need to revisit this discussion. Another thread would be best
>>> as to not hijack this one.
>>>
>>> The issues tagged 2.4.2 have not been altered so the 2.5 issues can be
>>> sorted out with less confusion. The following issues were tagged 2.5 and I
>>> am reasonably certain they have not been implemented. I untagged them from
>>> 2.5:
>>>
>>> VCL-790 (Improvement) create section of web site for managing connect
>>> methods
>>> VCL-526 (Sub-task) add section to site to manage connect methods
>>> VCL-571 (New Feature) EC2 API provisioning module
>>> VCL-572 (New Feature) Automatically install updates when an image is loaded
>>> VCL-579 (New Feature) provision ESXi as an end-user environment
>>> VCL-718 (Improvement) Add optional automatic execution of sdelete.exe to
>>> reduce vmdk size
>>> VCL-680 (New Feature) Support for Apache CloudStack
>>> VCL-336 (New Feature) Add support for IPv6
>>> VCL-388 (New Feature) Windows lab machine provisioning
>>> VCL-416 (Improvement) Fix the default user profile when capturing an image
>>> VCL-465 (Improvement) Add support for computers with a single NIC
>>>
>>> The following issues tagged 2.5 need to be checked. Leave a comment in the
>>> issue if you determine that it indeed should be tagged 2.5. Otherwise,
>>> untag it and reply to this message indicated you did so.
>>>
>>> VCL-873 (Bug) web UI only accepts 1 ssh identity key under User Preferences
>>> VCL-870 (Bug) the foreign keys are not in sync between the vcl.sql and
>>> update-vcl.sql files
>>> VCL-869 (Improvement) remove computer.vmtypeid and add something to
>>> vmprofile
>>> VCL-866 (Bug) Makeproduction doesn't work correctly
>>> VCL-846 (Bug) Improve flow of handling nodes for deleted reservations
>>> assigned to new reservations
>>> VCL-801 (Improvement) rework how frontend determines to prompt user for
>>> image revision
>>> VCL-796 (Improvement) tomainteance reservations should not be allowed to be
>>> created at end of indefinite server reservations
>>> VCL-728 (Improvement) Add description column to variable table
>>> VCL-670 (Improvement) user provided data loaded at request time
>>> VCL-614 (Improvement) static IP adresses - confirming IP is available
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Andy
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Aaron Coburn <ac...@amherst.edu> wrote:
>>> > +1 for calling it 2.5
>>> >
>>> > Aaron Coburn
>>> >
>>> > > On Aug 10, 2015, at 1:40 PM, Andy Kurth <an...@ncsu.edu> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > +1 for calling it 2.5. Good point.
>>> > >
>>> > > I can probably get all of the Windows 10 changes done by tomorrow.
>>> > >
>>> > > -Andy
>>> > >
>>> > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Josh Thompson <jo...@ncsu.edu>
>>> > >
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> > >> Hash: SHA1
>>> > >>
>>> > >> I think including Windows 10 support is a good idea. However, I'd
>>> >
>>> > prefer
>>> >
>>> > >> not
>>> > >> to include things other than bug fixes or very minor changes in a 3rd
>>> >
>>> > level
>>> >
>>> > >> dot release. I'd suggest just moving forward to 2.5. I have a few
>>> >
>>> > small
>>> >
>>> > >> improvements to the Computer Profiles page I'd like to include as well.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Any estimate on when support for Windows 10 could be ready?
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Josh
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Friday, August 07, 2015 3:39:18 PM Andy Kurth wrote:
>>> > >>> We intended 2.4.3 to be a minor bugfix-only release, but with the
>>> >
>>> > recent
>>> >
>>> > >>> release of Windows 10 I think it would be worthwhile to add support
>>> > >>> for
>>> > >>
>>> > >> it
>>> > >>
>>> > >>> in this release. The subsequent 2.4.4/2.5 VCL release may not happen
>>> > >>
>>> > >> for a
>>> > >>
>>> > >>> while and people are going to want to start using it within VCL.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> I have taken a quick look at Windows 10 and created a base image. The
>>> > >>> current Windows 8.x code should work well enough but I did notice some
>>> > >>> minor problems. I created a Jira issue yesterday where the problems
>>> > >>> encountered are being detailed:
>>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VCL-893
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Thoughts?
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Thanks,
>>> > >>> Andy
>>> > >>
>>> > >> - --
>>> > >> - -------------------------------
>>> > >> Josh Thompson
>>> > >> VCL Developer
>>> > >> North Carolina State University
>>> > >>
>>> > >> my GPG/PGP key can be found at pgp.mit.edu
>>> > >>
>>> > >> All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which
>>> > >> are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public
>>> > >> Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
>>> > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> > >> Version: GnuPG v2
>>> > >>
>>> > >> iEYEARECAAYFAlXIt/wACgkQV/LQcNdtPQM+KgCferyObGGPFgYBKM+fOiKU3EEe
>>> > >> ++EAn2qQvS8+0wiyc9qn/AbSvLuZTAYU
>>> > >> =2Crw
>>> > >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> - --
>> - -------------------------------
>> Josh Thompson
>> VCL Developer
>> North Carolina State University
>>
>> my GPG/PGP key can be found at pgp.mit.edu
>>
>> All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which
>> are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public
>> Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v2
>>
>> iEYEARECAAYFAlXI/psACgkQV/LQcNdtPQOCxACeJdkmJAocvY6V3xjBzjnDP19B
>> aRwAn3g9gZouc8MSzy7F5eYc0MQCcX8C
>> =CcXH
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Aaron Peeler
> Program Manager
> Virtual Computing Lab
> NC State University
>
> All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which
> are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public
> Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
--
Aaron Peeler
Program Manager
Virtual Computing Lab
NC State University
All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which
are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Re: [DISCUSS] Windows 10 support for VCL 2.4.3?
Posted by Aaron Peeler <fa...@ncsu.edu>.
Need to test VCL-866 (Bug). If it is still an issue, it should be an
easy fix before the release. If testing shows it is no longer an
issue, I'll untag and remove it.
The couple of issues I added previously are now untagged.
....and on the original topic of this thread I also think going to 2.5
with windows 10 support would be beneficial or the community.
Aaron
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Josh Thompson <jo...@ncsu.edu> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Since we have bugs fixed and would like to get those out, but with the
> addition of a few features, I'd prefer to minimize what new features we work
> to include in 2.5 to prevent feature creap.
>
> I untagged the following items related to the frontend because I haven't begun
> work on them yet. If I get them implemented before we try to get 2.5 out,
> I'll tag them again.
>
> VCL-801 (Improvement) rework how frontend determines to prompt user for
> image revision
> VCL-728 (Improvement) Add description column to variable table
>
> I haven't done any work toward VCL-869. I'd say to untag it as well, but
> didn't do that yet since it affects thte backend too.
>
> I commented on VCL-870 and VCL-873 to remain tagged with 2.5.
>
> Josh
>
> On Monday, August 10, 2015 2:58:40 PM Andy Kurth wrote:
>> I was about to change the "fix version" from 2.4.3 to 2.5 in Jira and
>> noticed a bunch of issues already tagged for 2.5. These need to be sorted
>> out.
>>
>> We discussed how a roadmap would be decided and how issues would be tagged
>> last September (http://vcl.markmail.org/thread/xulfqvyg3sgqbong). My
>> understanding is that there was agreement that issues other than bug fixes
>> would not be tagged with a specific version without discussion. It seems
>> as though we need to revisit this discussion. Another thread would be best
>> as to not hijack this one.
>>
>> The issues tagged 2.4.2 have not been altered so the 2.5 issues can be
>> sorted out with less confusion. The following issues were tagged 2.5 and I
>> am reasonably certain they have not been implemented. I untagged them from
>> 2.5:
>>
>> VCL-790 (Improvement) create section of web site for managing connect
>> methods
>> VCL-526 (Sub-task) add section to site to manage connect methods
>> VCL-571 (New Feature) EC2 API provisioning module
>> VCL-572 (New Feature) Automatically install updates when an image is loaded
>> VCL-579 (New Feature) provision ESXi as an end-user environment
>> VCL-718 (Improvement) Add optional automatic execution of sdelete.exe to
>> reduce vmdk size
>> VCL-680 (New Feature) Support for Apache CloudStack
>> VCL-336 (New Feature) Add support for IPv6
>> VCL-388 (New Feature) Windows lab machine provisioning
>> VCL-416 (Improvement) Fix the default user profile when capturing an image
>> VCL-465 (Improvement) Add support for computers with a single NIC
>>
>> The following issues tagged 2.5 need to be checked. Leave a comment in the
>> issue if you determine that it indeed should be tagged 2.5. Otherwise,
>> untag it and reply to this message indicated you did so.
>>
>> VCL-873 (Bug) web UI only accepts 1 ssh identity key under User Preferences
>> VCL-870 (Bug) the foreign keys are not in sync between the vcl.sql and
>> update-vcl.sql files
>> VCL-869 (Improvement) remove computer.vmtypeid and add something to
>> vmprofile
>> VCL-866 (Bug) Makeproduction doesn't work correctly
>> VCL-846 (Bug) Improve flow of handling nodes for deleted reservations
>> assigned to new reservations
>> VCL-801 (Improvement) rework how frontend determines to prompt user for
>> image revision
>> VCL-796 (Improvement) tomainteance reservations should not be allowed to be
>> created at end of indefinite server reservations
>> VCL-728 (Improvement) Add description column to variable table
>> VCL-670 (Improvement) user provided data loaded at request time
>> VCL-614 (Improvement) static IP adresses - confirming IP is available
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andy
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Aaron Coburn <ac...@amherst.edu> wrote:
>> > +1 for calling it 2.5
>> >
>> > Aaron Coburn
>> >
>> > > On Aug 10, 2015, at 1:40 PM, Andy Kurth <an...@ncsu.edu> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > +1 for calling it 2.5. Good point.
>> > >
>> > > I can probably get all of the Windows 10 changes done by tomorrow.
>> > >
>> > > -Andy
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Josh Thompson <jo...@ncsu.edu>
>> > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> > >> Hash: SHA1
>> > >>
>> > >> I think including Windows 10 support is a good idea. However, I'd
>> >
>> > prefer
>> >
>> > >> not
>> > >> to include things other than bug fixes or very minor changes in a 3rd
>> >
>> > level
>> >
>> > >> dot release. I'd suggest just moving forward to 2.5. I have a few
>> >
>> > small
>> >
>> > >> improvements to the Computer Profiles page I'd like to include as well.
>> > >>
>> > >> Any estimate on when support for Windows 10 could be ready?
>> > >>
>> > >> Josh
>> > >>
>> > >> On Friday, August 07, 2015 3:39:18 PM Andy Kurth wrote:
>> > >>> We intended 2.4.3 to be a minor bugfix-only release, but with the
>> >
>> > recent
>> >
>> > >>> release of Windows 10 I think it would be worthwhile to add support
>> > >>> for
>> > >>
>> > >> it
>> > >>
>> > >>> in this release. The subsequent 2.4.4/2.5 VCL release may not happen
>> > >>
>> > >> for a
>> > >>
>> > >>> while and people are going to want to start using it within VCL.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I have taken a quick look at Windows 10 and created a base image. The
>> > >>> current Windows 8.x code should work well enough but I did notice some
>> > >>> minor problems. I created a Jira issue yesterday where the problems
>> > >>> encountered are being detailed:
>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VCL-893
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Thoughts?
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Thanks,
>> > >>> Andy
>> > >>
>> > >> - --
>> > >> - -------------------------------
>> > >> Josh Thompson
>> > >> VCL Developer
>> > >> North Carolina State University
>> > >>
>> > >> my GPG/PGP key can be found at pgp.mit.edu
>> > >>
>> > >> All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which
>> > >> are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public
>> > >> Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
>> > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> > >> Version: GnuPG v2
>> > >>
>> > >> iEYEARECAAYFAlXIt/wACgkQV/LQcNdtPQM+KgCferyObGGPFgYBKM+fOiKU3EEe
>> > >> ++EAn2qQvS8+0wiyc9qn/AbSvLuZTAYU
>> > >> =2Crw
>> > >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> - --
> - -------------------------------
> Josh Thompson
> VCL Developer
> North Carolina State University
>
> my GPG/PGP key can be found at pgp.mit.edu
>
> All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which
> are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public
> Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlXI/psACgkQV/LQcNdtPQOCxACeJdkmJAocvY6V3xjBzjnDP19B
> aRwAn3g9gZouc8MSzy7F5eYc0MQCcX8C
> =CcXH
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
--
Aaron Peeler
Program Manager
Virtual Computing Lab
NC State University
All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which
are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Re: [DISCUSS] Windows 10 support for VCL 2.4.3?
Posted by Andy Kurth <an...@ncsu.edu>.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Josh Thompson <jo...@ncsu.edu>
wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> I haven't done any work toward VCL-869. I'd say to untag it as well, but
> didn't do that yet since it affects thte backend too.
>
I cleaned up the last reference to vmtype from the backend code. However,
this was only part of this issue. I added a comment to this issue and
untagged it from 2.5.
-Andy
Re: [DISCUSS] Windows 10 support for VCL 2.4.3?
Posted by Josh Thompson <jo...@ncsu.edu>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Since we have bugs fixed and would like to get those out, but with the
addition of a few features, I'd prefer to minimize what new features we work
to include in 2.5 to prevent feature creap.
I untagged the following items related to the frontend because I haven't begun
work on them yet. If I get them implemented before we try to get 2.5 out,
I'll tag them again.
VCL-801 (Improvement) rework how frontend determines to prompt user for
image revision
VCL-728 (Improvement) Add description column to variable table
I haven't done any work toward VCL-869. I'd say to untag it as well, but
didn't do that yet since it affects thte backend too.
I commented on VCL-870 and VCL-873 to remain tagged with 2.5.
Josh
On Monday, August 10, 2015 2:58:40 PM Andy Kurth wrote:
> I was about to change the "fix version" from 2.4.3 to 2.5 in Jira and
> noticed a bunch of issues already tagged for 2.5. These need to be sorted
> out.
>
> We discussed how a roadmap would be decided and how issues would be tagged
> last September (http://vcl.markmail.org/thread/xulfqvyg3sgqbong). My
> understanding is that there was agreement that issues other than bug fixes
> would not be tagged with a specific version without discussion. It seems
> as though we need to revisit this discussion. Another thread would be best
> as to not hijack this one.
>
> The issues tagged 2.4.2 have not been altered so the 2.5 issues can be
> sorted out with less confusion. The following issues were tagged 2.5 and I
> am reasonably certain they have not been implemented. I untagged them from
> 2.5:
>
> VCL-790 (Improvement) create section of web site for managing connect
> methods
> VCL-526 (Sub-task) add section to site to manage connect methods
> VCL-571 (New Feature) EC2 API provisioning module
> VCL-572 (New Feature) Automatically install updates when an image is loaded
> VCL-579 (New Feature) provision ESXi as an end-user environment
> VCL-718 (Improvement) Add optional automatic execution of sdelete.exe to
> reduce vmdk size
> VCL-680 (New Feature) Support for Apache CloudStack
> VCL-336 (New Feature) Add support for IPv6
> VCL-388 (New Feature) Windows lab machine provisioning
> VCL-416 (Improvement) Fix the default user profile when capturing an image
> VCL-465 (Improvement) Add support for computers with a single NIC
>
> The following issues tagged 2.5 need to be checked. Leave a comment in the
> issue if you determine that it indeed should be tagged 2.5. Otherwise,
> untag it and reply to this message indicated you did so.
>
> VCL-873 (Bug) web UI only accepts 1 ssh identity key under User Preferences
> VCL-870 (Bug) the foreign keys are not in sync between the vcl.sql and
> update-vcl.sql files
> VCL-869 (Improvement) remove computer.vmtypeid and add something to
> vmprofile
> VCL-866 (Bug) Makeproduction doesn't work correctly
> VCL-846 (Bug) Improve flow of handling nodes for deleted reservations
> assigned to new reservations
> VCL-801 (Improvement) rework how frontend determines to prompt user for
> image revision
> VCL-796 (Improvement) tomainteance reservations should not be allowed to be
> created at end of indefinite server reservations
> VCL-728 (Improvement) Add description column to variable table
> VCL-670 (Improvement) user provided data loaded at request time
> VCL-614 (Improvement) static IP adresses - confirming IP is available
>
> Thanks,
> Andy
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Aaron Coburn <ac...@amherst.edu> wrote:
> > +1 for calling it 2.5
> >
> > Aaron Coburn
> >
> > > On Aug 10, 2015, at 1:40 PM, Andy Kurth <an...@ncsu.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 for calling it 2.5. Good point.
> > >
> > > I can probably get all of the Windows 10 changes done by tomorrow.
> > >
> > > -Andy
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Josh Thompson <jo...@ncsu.edu>
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > >> Hash: SHA1
> > >>
> > >> I think including Windows 10 support is a good idea. However, I'd
> >
> > prefer
> >
> > >> not
> > >> to include things other than bug fixes or very minor changes in a 3rd
> >
> > level
> >
> > >> dot release. I'd suggest just moving forward to 2.5. I have a few
> >
> > small
> >
> > >> improvements to the Computer Profiles page I'd like to include as well.
> > >>
> > >> Any estimate on when support for Windows 10 could be ready?
> > >>
> > >> Josh
> > >>
> > >> On Friday, August 07, 2015 3:39:18 PM Andy Kurth wrote:
> > >>> We intended 2.4.3 to be a minor bugfix-only release, but with the
> >
> > recent
> >
> > >>> release of Windows 10 I think it would be worthwhile to add support
> > >>> for
> > >>
> > >> it
> > >>
> > >>> in this release. The subsequent 2.4.4/2.5 VCL release may not happen
> > >>
> > >> for a
> > >>
> > >>> while and people are going to want to start using it within VCL.
> > >>>
> > >>> I have taken a quick look at Windows 10 and created a base image. The
> > >>> current Windows 8.x code should work well enough but I did notice some
> > >>> minor problems. I created a Jira issue yesterday where the problems
> > >>> encountered are being detailed:
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VCL-893
> > >>>
> > >>> Thoughts?
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Andy
> > >>
> > >> - --
> > >> - -------------------------------
> > >> Josh Thompson
> > >> VCL Developer
> > >> North Carolina State University
> > >>
> > >> my GPG/PGP key can be found at pgp.mit.edu
> > >>
> > >> All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which
> > >> are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public
> > >> Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
> > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > >> Version: GnuPG v2
> > >>
> > >> iEYEARECAAYFAlXIt/wACgkQV/LQcNdtPQM+KgCferyObGGPFgYBKM+fOiKU3EEe
> > >> ++EAn2qQvS8+0wiyc9qn/AbSvLuZTAYU
> > >> =2Crw
> > >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- --
- -------------------------------
Josh Thompson
VCL Developer
North Carolina State University
my GPG/PGP key can be found at pgp.mit.edu
All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which
are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iEYEARECAAYFAlXI/psACgkQV/LQcNdtPQOCxACeJdkmJAocvY6V3xjBzjnDP19B
aRwAn3g9gZouc8MSzy7F5eYc0MQCcX8C
=CcXH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [DISCUSS] Windows 10 support for VCL 2.4.3?
Posted by Andy Kurth <an...@ncsu.edu>.
I was about to change the "fix version" from 2.4.3 to 2.5 in Jira and
noticed a bunch of issues already tagged for 2.5. These need to be sorted
out.
We discussed how a roadmap would be decided and how issues would be tagged
last September (http://vcl.markmail.org/thread/xulfqvyg3sgqbong). My
understanding is that there was agreement that issues other than bug fixes
would not be tagged with a specific version without discussion. It seems
as though we need to revisit this discussion. Another thread would be best
as to not hijack this one.
The issues tagged 2.4.2 have not been altered so the 2.5 issues can be
sorted out with less confusion. The following issues were tagged 2.5 and I
am reasonably certain they have not been implemented. I untagged them from
2.5:
VCL-790 (Improvement) create section of web site for managing connect
methods
VCL-526 (Sub-task) add section to site to manage connect methods
VCL-571 (New Feature) EC2 API provisioning module
VCL-572 (New Feature) Automatically install updates when an image is loaded
VCL-579 (New Feature) provision ESXi as an end-user environment
VCL-718 (Improvement) Add optional automatic execution of sdelete.exe to
reduce vmdk size
VCL-680 (New Feature) Support for Apache CloudStack
VCL-336 (New Feature) Add support for IPv6
VCL-388 (New Feature) Windows lab machine provisioning
VCL-416 (Improvement) Fix the default user profile when capturing an image
VCL-465 (Improvement) Add support for computers with a single NIC
The following issues tagged 2.5 need to be checked. Leave a comment in the
issue if you determine that it indeed should be tagged 2.5. Otherwise,
untag it and reply to this message indicated you did so.
VCL-873 (Bug) web UI only accepts 1 ssh identity key under User Preferences
VCL-870 (Bug) the foreign keys are not in sync between the vcl.sql and
update-vcl.sql files
VCL-869 (Improvement) remove computer.vmtypeid and add something to
vmprofile
VCL-866 (Bug) Makeproduction doesn't work correctly
VCL-846 (Bug) Improve flow of handling nodes for deleted reservations
assigned to new reservations
VCL-801 (Improvement) rework how frontend determines to prompt user for
image revision
VCL-796 (Improvement) tomainteance reservations should not be allowed to be
created at end of indefinite server reservations
VCL-728 (Improvement) Add description column to variable table
VCL-670 (Improvement) user provided data loaded at request time
VCL-614 (Improvement) static IP adresses - confirming IP is available
Thanks,
Andy
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Aaron Coburn <ac...@amherst.edu> wrote:
> +1 for calling it 2.5
>
> Aaron Coburn
>
>
> > On Aug 10, 2015, at 1:40 PM, Andy Kurth <an...@ncsu.edu> wrote:
> >
> > +1 for calling it 2.5. Good point.
> >
> > I can probably get all of the Windows 10 changes done by tomorrow.
> >
> > -Andy
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Josh Thompson <jo...@ncsu.edu>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> I think including Windows 10 support is a good idea. However, I'd
> prefer
> >> not
> >> to include things other than bug fixes or very minor changes in a 3rd
> level
> >> dot release. I'd suggest just moving forward to 2.5. I have a few
> small
> >> improvements to the Computer Profiles page I'd like to include as well.
> >>
> >> Any estimate on when support for Windows 10 could be ready?
> >>
> >> Josh
> >>
> >> On Friday, August 07, 2015 3:39:18 PM Andy Kurth wrote:
> >>> We intended 2.4.3 to be a minor bugfix-only release, but with the
> recent
> >>> release of Windows 10 I think it would be worthwhile to add support for
> >> it
> >>> in this release. The subsequent 2.4.4/2.5 VCL release may not happen
> >> for a
> >>> while and people are going to want to start using it within VCL.
> >>>
> >>> I have taken a quick look at Windows 10 and created a base image. The
> >>> current Windows 8.x code should work well enough but I did notice some
> >>> minor problems. I created a Jira issue yesterday where the problems
> >>> encountered are being detailed:
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VCL-893
> >>>
> >>> Thoughts?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Andy
> >> - --
> >> - -------------------------------
> >> Josh Thompson
> >> VCL Developer
> >> North Carolina State University
> >>
> >> my GPG/PGP key can be found at pgp.mit.edu
> >>
> >> All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which
> >> are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public
> >> Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >> Version: GnuPG v2
> >>
> >> iEYEARECAAYFAlXIt/wACgkQV/LQcNdtPQM+KgCferyObGGPFgYBKM+fOiKU3EEe
> >> ++EAn2qQvS8+0wiyc9qn/AbSvLuZTAYU
> >> =2Crw
> >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Windows 10 support for VCL 2.4.3?
Posted by Aaron Coburn <ac...@amherst.edu>.
+1 for calling it 2.5
Aaron Coburn
> On Aug 10, 2015, at 1:40 PM, Andy Kurth <an...@ncsu.edu> wrote:
>
> +1 for calling it 2.5. Good point.
>
> I can probably get all of the Windows 10 changes done by tomorrow.
>
> -Andy
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Josh Thompson <jo...@ncsu.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> I think including Windows 10 support is a good idea. However, I'd prefer
>> not
>> to include things other than bug fixes or very minor changes in a 3rd level
>> dot release. I'd suggest just moving forward to 2.5. I have a few small
>> improvements to the Computer Profiles page I'd like to include as well.
>>
>> Any estimate on when support for Windows 10 could be ready?
>>
>> Josh
>>
>> On Friday, August 07, 2015 3:39:18 PM Andy Kurth wrote:
>>> We intended 2.4.3 to be a minor bugfix-only release, but with the recent
>>> release of Windows 10 I think it would be worthwhile to add support for
>> it
>>> in this release. The subsequent 2.4.4/2.5 VCL release may not happen
>> for a
>>> while and people are going to want to start using it within VCL.
>>>
>>> I have taken a quick look at Windows 10 and created a base image. The
>>> current Windows 8.x code should work well enough but I did notice some
>>> minor problems. I created a Jira issue yesterday where the problems
>>> encountered are being detailed:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VCL-893
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Andy
>> - --
>> - -------------------------------
>> Josh Thompson
>> VCL Developer
>> North Carolina State University
>>
>> my GPG/PGP key can be found at pgp.mit.edu
>>
>> All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which
>> are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public
>> Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v2
>>
>> iEYEARECAAYFAlXIt/wACgkQV/LQcNdtPQM+KgCferyObGGPFgYBKM+fOiKU3EEe
>> ++EAn2qQvS8+0wiyc9qn/AbSvLuZTAYU
>> =2Crw
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [DISCUSS] Windows 10 support for VCL 2.4.3?
Posted by Andy Kurth <an...@ncsu.edu>.
+1 for calling it 2.5. Good point.
I can probably get all of the Windows 10 changes done by tomorrow.
-Andy
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Josh Thompson <jo...@ncsu.edu>
wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I think including Windows 10 support is a good idea. However, I'd prefer
> not
> to include things other than bug fixes or very minor changes in a 3rd level
> dot release. I'd suggest just moving forward to 2.5. I have a few small
> improvements to the Computer Profiles page I'd like to include as well.
>
> Any estimate on when support for Windows 10 could be ready?
>
> Josh
>
> On Friday, August 07, 2015 3:39:18 PM Andy Kurth wrote:
> > We intended 2.4.3 to be a minor bugfix-only release, but with the recent
> > release of Windows 10 I think it would be worthwhile to add support for
> it
> > in this release. The subsequent 2.4.4/2.5 VCL release may not happen
> for a
> > while and people are going to want to start using it within VCL.
> >
> > I have taken a quick look at Windows 10 and created a base image. The
> > current Windows 8.x code should work well enough but I did notice some
> > minor problems. I created a Jira issue yesterday where the problems
> > encountered are being detailed:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VCL-893
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Andy
> - --
> - -------------------------------
> Josh Thompson
> VCL Developer
> North Carolina State University
>
> my GPG/PGP key can be found at pgp.mit.edu
>
> All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which
> are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public
> Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlXIt/wACgkQV/LQcNdtPQM+KgCferyObGGPFgYBKM+fOiKU3EEe
> ++EAn2qQvS8+0wiyc9qn/AbSvLuZTAYU
> =2Crw
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Windows 10 support for VCL 2.4.3?
Posted by Josh Thompson <jo...@ncsu.edu>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I think including Windows 10 support is a good idea. However, I'd prefer not
to include things other than bug fixes or very minor changes in a 3rd level
dot release. I'd suggest just moving forward to 2.5. I have a few small
improvements to the Computer Profiles page I'd like to include as well.
Any estimate on when support for Windows 10 could be ready?
Josh
On Friday, August 07, 2015 3:39:18 PM Andy Kurth wrote:
> We intended 2.4.3 to be a minor bugfix-only release, but with the recent
> release of Windows 10 I think it would be worthwhile to add support for it
> in this release. The subsequent 2.4.4/2.5 VCL release may not happen for a
> while and people are going to want to start using it within VCL.
>
> I have taken a quick look at Windows 10 and created a base image. The
> current Windows 8.x code should work well enough but I did notice some
> minor problems. I created a Jira issue yesterday where the problems
> encountered are being detailed:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VCL-893
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> Andy
- --
- -------------------------------
Josh Thompson
VCL Developer
North Carolina State University
my GPG/PGP key can be found at pgp.mit.edu
All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which
are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iEYEARECAAYFAlXIt/wACgkQV/LQcNdtPQM+KgCferyObGGPFgYBKM+fOiKU3EEe
++EAn2qQvS8+0wiyc9qn/AbSvLuZTAYU
=2Crw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----