You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jira@kafka.apache.org by "Konstantine Karantasis (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/04/10 21:32:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-9642) "BigDecimal(double)" should not be used

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9642?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Konstantine Karantasis updated KAFKA-9642:
------------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 2.6.0

> "BigDecimal(double)" should not be used
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-9642
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9642
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: KafkaConnect
>            Reporter: Soontaek Lim
>            Assignee: Soontaek Lim
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.6.0
>
>
> I recommend not to use the BigDecimal(double) constructor. Because of floating point imprecision, we're unlikely to get the value we expect from that constructor.
> Instead, we should use BigDecimal.valueOf, which uses a string under the covers to eliminate floating-point rounding errors, or the constructor that takes a String argument.
>  
> From JavaDocs
> The results of this constructor can be somewhat unpredictable. One might assume that writing new BigDecimal(0.1) in Java creates a BigDecimal which is exactly equal to 0.1 (an unscaled value of 1, with a scale of 1), but it is actually equal to 0.1000000000000000055511151231257827021181583404541015625. This is because 0.1 cannot be represented exactly as a double (or, for that matter, as a binary fraction of any finite length). Thus, the value that is being passed in to the constructor is not exactly equal to 0.1, appearances notwithstanding.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)