You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com> on 2008/04/10 23:45:15 UTC

OpenEJB Eclipse Plugin

Hi,

I've attached openejb-674-18.diff and openejb-674-18-newfiles.zip to 
Jira issue OPENEJB-674.

This latest patch allows the server plugin to work with OpenEJB plugins 
with any version string (as opposed to being hard coded to look for 
openejb-3.0.0-SNAPSHOT in jar filenames), and essentially converts the 
XML based configuration to a set of Java classes. I found that the 
server never started properly (it always said it was 'Starting') on my 
machines - this appears to be fixed by these changes too.

I've also fixed a bug with the annotations plugin where annotations 
relating to method permission were added to the source multiple times.

Hope that's all ok.

Regards

Jon

Re: OpenEJB Eclipse Plugin

Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Jonathan Gallimore
<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That reminds me - I have now sent in a CLA (as discussed here:
> http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--Fwd%3A-Re%3A-Confluence-Based-Website-Access-Control--p16260523.html)
> - do I need to do anything else, or can I now get write access to the Wiki?
> I'm quite keen to get some information about the plugin on there.

I think it's enough, but will have to check with Dave B. to assert all
legal stuff are met. You have to be assigned the openejb-contributors
role (or alike) and you'll be ready to go.

Jacek

-- 
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl

Re: OpenEJB Eclipse Plugin

Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
That reminds me - I have now sent in a CLA (as discussed here: 
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--Fwd%3A-Re%3A-Confluence-Based-Website-Access-Control--p16260523.html) 
- do I need to do anything else, or can I now get write access to the 
Wiki? I'm quite keen to get some information about the plugin on there.

Cheers

Jon


Jeremy Whitlock wrote:
> Hi All,
>     Is there any way to update the Eclipse presence on the wiki to
> include the information in the Maven site for the plugin?  I think
> using the wiki to discuss the plugin's development, usage, sample docs
> and such might make it easier to get involved with.
>
> Take care,
>
> Jeremy
>

Re: OpenEJB Eclipse Plugin

Posted by Jeremy Whitlock <jc...@gmail.com>.
Hi All,
    Is there any way to update the Eclipse presence on the wiki to
include the information in the Maven site for the plugin?  I think
using the wiki to discuss the plugin's development, usage, sample docs
and such might make it easier to get involved with.

Take care,

Jeremy

Re: OpenEJB Eclipse Plugin

Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
Awesome, Many thanks!

Jon


Daniel S. Haischt wrote:
> Completed at revision: 646994
>
>
> Cheers
> Daniel
>
> Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've attached openejb-674-18.diff and openejb-674-18-newfiles.zip to 
>> Jira issue OPENEJB-674.
>>
>> This latest patch allows the server plugin to work with OpenEJB 
>> plugins with any version string (as opposed to being hard coded to 
>> look for openejb-3.0.0-SNAPSHOT in jar filenames), and essentially 
>> converts the XML based configuration to a set of Java classes. I 
>> found that the server never started properly (it always said it was 
>> 'Starting') on my machines - this appears to be fixed by these 
>> changes too.
>>
>> I've also fixed a bug with the annotations plugin where annotations 
>> relating to method permission were added to the source multiple times.
>>
>> Hope that's all ok.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Jon
>>
>

Re: OpenEJB Eclipse Plugin

Posted by "Daniel S. Haischt" <da...@googlemail.com>.
Completed at revision: 646994


Cheers
Daniel

Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've attached openejb-674-18.diff and openejb-674-18-newfiles.zip to 
> Jira issue OPENEJB-674.
> 
> This latest patch allows the server plugin to work with OpenEJB plugins 
> with any version string (as opposed to being hard coded to look for 
> openejb-3.0.0-SNAPSHOT in jar filenames), and essentially converts the 
> XML based configuration to a set of Java classes. I found that the 
> server never started properly (it always said it was 'Starting') on my 
> machines - this appears to be fixed by these changes too.
> 
> I've also fixed a bug with the annotations plugin where annotations 
> relating to method permission were added to the source multiple times.
> 
> Hope that's all ok.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Jon
>