You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Benedikt Ritter <be...@systemoutprintln.de> on 2012/02/27 10:16:07 UTC

Re: [jira] [Commented] (SANDBOX-397) [BeanUtils2] Replace NullPointerExceptions been thrown in DefaultBeanAccessor with NoSuchMethodEceptions

Hi Simo,

please have a look at my comments inline.

Am 27.02.2012 08:28, schrieb Simone Tripodi (Commented) (JIRA):
>
>      [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13217086#comment-13217086 ]
>
> Simone Tripodi commented on SANDBOX-397:
> ----------------------------------------
>
> I still haven't had the time to take a look at your patches, we didn't even agree on the proposed design that you already tracked all the roadmap? What if I don't agree on one of the the proposed modifications?

Not not sure what you trying to say. Do you feel uncomfortable, because 
I wrote those patches without discussing it first? Or are you afraid, 
that I get the feeling that I wasted my time, if you disagree with my 
proposed changes?

As you said, it is just a proposal. Even if I had write access to the 
svn I wouldn't have commited such a big change without discussing it. I 
had some spare time this weekend so I just wanted to try my ideas out. I 
guess a patch is a better basis for discussion than just outlining what 
I had in mind (you can see it the other way around: I had an idea I 
wanted to discuss, so I wrote a patch). If you disagree with (parts) of 
the modifications, I'll just adjust the patch and submit it again.

If you are worried about my spare time, let me just say it was just fun 
working with the source. Even if you don't like the patch, that is no 
problem for me. I'm not offended or something. :)

>
> _I think it is the right thing to do_ doesn't mean that *it is*.

That is why I wrote "I think" ;)

>
> I'll let you know as soon as I get the chance to have a look at your patches, and provide you feedbacks.

TIA!
Benedikt

>
>> [BeanUtils2] Replace NullPointerExceptions been thrown in DefaultBeanAccessor with NoSuchMethodEceptions
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>                  Key: SANDBOX-397
>>                  URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-397
>>              Project: Commons Sandbox
>>           Issue Type: Task
>>           Components: BeanUtils2
>>     Affects Versions: Nightly Builds
>>             Reporter: Benedikt Ritter
>>          Attachments: SANDBOX-397.txt, SANDBOX-397_SRP.txt, SANDBOX-397_SRPv2.txt
>>
>>
>> At the moment, methods in {{DefaultBeanAccessor}} throw a {{NullPointerException}}, if no {{PropertyDescriptor}} for a given property name can be retrieved. As discussed on the ML (see http://markmail.org/thread/zlehclmybp5xgn5n) this behavior should be changed to throwing {{NoSuchMethodException}}.
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Re: [jira] [Commented] (SANDBOX-397) [BeanUtils2] Replace NullPointerExceptions been thrown in DefaultBeanAccessor with NoSuchMethodEceptions

Posted by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>.
hello,

> Or are you afraid, that I
> get the feeling that I wasted my time, if you disagree with my proposed
> changes?
>

exactly. Already experienced that "frustration", so better holding-on sometimes.

>
> If you are worried about my spare time, let me just say it was just fun
> working with the source. Even if you don't like the patch, that is no
> problem for me. I'm not offended or something. :)
>

nice to know, that makes the difference between passionates and mercenaries :)

keep in touch, alles gute,
-Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/



> Or are you afraid, that I
> get the feeling that I wasted my time, if you disagree with my proposed
> changes?
>
> As you said, it is just a proposal. Even if I had write access to the svn I
> wouldn't have commited such a big change without discussing it. I had some
> spare time this weekend so I just wanted to try my ideas out. I guess a
> patch is a better basis for discussion than just outlining what I had in
> mind (you can see it the other way around: I had an idea I wanted to
> discuss, so I wrote a patch). If you disagree with (parts) of the
> modifications, I'll just adjust the patch and submit it again.

>>
>> _I think it is the right thing to do_ doesn't mean that *it is*.
>
>
> That is why I wrote "I think" ;)
>
>>
>> I'll let you know as soon as I get the chance to have a look at your
>> patches, and provide you feedbacks.
>
>
> TIA!
> Benedikt
>
>>
>>> [BeanUtils2] Replace NullPointerExceptions been thrown in
>>> DefaultBeanAccessor with NoSuchMethodEceptions
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>                 Key: SANDBOX-397
>>>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-397
>>>             Project: Commons Sandbox
>>>          Issue Type: Task
>>>          Components: BeanUtils2
>>>    Affects Versions: Nightly Builds
>>>            Reporter: Benedikt Ritter
>>>         Attachments: SANDBOX-397.txt, SANDBOX-397_SRP.txt,
>>> SANDBOX-397_SRPv2.txt
>>>
>>>
>>> At the moment, methods in {{DefaultBeanAccessor}} throw a
>>> {{NullPointerException}}, if no {{PropertyDescriptor}} for a given property
>>> name can be retrieved. As discussed on the ML (see
>>> http://markmail.org/thread/zlehclmybp5xgn5n) this behavior should be changed
>>> to throwing {{NoSuchMethodException}}.
>>
>>
>> --
>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
>> administrators:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
>> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org