Re: [VOTE] Release of phoenixdb 1.2.0 RC0

[Istvan Toth <st...@apache.org>]

Voting for my release:

+1 (binding)

- Downloaded files from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/phoenix/python-phoenixdb-1.2.0.rc0/src/
and verified signature successfully
- Successfully ran full test suite on docker with Python 2.7 and 3.5-3.10
versions.
- Successfully ran dev-support/run-source-ratcheck.sh
- Checked that NEWS.rst lists the relevant changes
- Checked that the version in setup.py is indeed 1.2.0



On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 10:52 AM Istvan Toth <st...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hello Everyone,
>
> This is a call for a vote on phoenixdb 1.2.0 RC0.
>
> PhoenixDB is native Python driver for accessing Phoenix via Phoenix Query
> Server.
>
> This version contains the following improvements compared to the previous
> 1.1.0 release
>
> - Updated test environment to support Python 3.9 and 3.10 (PHOENIX-6737)
> - Fixed get_view_names() in SqlAlchemy driver (PHOENIX-6727)
> - Added supports_statement_cache attribute for SqlAlchemy dialect to avoid
> warnings (PHOENIX-6735)
> - Re-generated the protobuf Python files with protoc 3.19 from the Avatica
> 1.21 descriptors (PHOENIX-6731)
> - Dropped support for Python 3.4 (PHOENIX-6731)
>
> The source release consists of the contents of the python-phoenixdb
> directory of the phoenix-queryserver repository.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc can be found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/phoenix/python-phoenixdb-1.2.0.rc0/
>
> Artifacts are signed with my "CODE SIGNING KEY":
> 825203A70405BC83AECF5F7D97351C1B794433C7
>
> KEYS file available here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/phoenix/KEYS
>
>
> The hash and tag to be voted upon:
>
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=phoenix-queryserver.git;a=commit;h=bd1b36987912f20f1074e93caf257397111b8e9f
>
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=phoenix-queryserver.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/python-phoenixdb-1.2.0.rc0
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Thanks,
> Istvan
>